Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

From subcategories to the entire module categories

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 12, 2020

Abstract

In this paper we show that how the representation theory of subcategories (of the category of modules over an Artin algebra) can be connected to the representation theory of all modules over some algebra. The subcategories dealing with are some certain subcategories of the morphism categories (including submodule categories studied recently by Ringel and Schmidmeier) and of the Gorenstein projective modules over (relative) stable Auslander algebras. These two kinds of subcategories, as will be seen, are closely related to each other. To make such a connection, we will define a functor from each type of the subcategories to the category of modules over some Artin algebra. It is shown that to compute the almost split sequences in the subcategories it is enough to do the computation with help of the corresponding functors in the category of modules over some Artin algebra which is known and easier to work. Then as an application the most part of Auslander–Reiten quiver of the subcategories is obtained only by the Auslander–Reiten quiver of an appropriate algebra and next adding the remaining vertices and arrows in an obvious way. As a special case, when Λ is a Gorenstein Artin algebra of finite representation type, then the subcategories of Gorenstein projective modules over the 2×2 lower triangular matrix algebra over Λ and the stable Auslander algebra of Λ can be estimated by the category of modules over the stable Cohen–Macaulay Auslander algebra of Λ.

MSC 2010: 16G10; 16G60; 16G50

Communicated by Freydoon Shahidi


Funding statement: This research was supported in part by a grant from School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM).

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully thanks the referee for the constructive comments and recommendations which definitely helped to improve the readability and quality of the paper. He would like to thank Hideto Asashiba for some useful comments to improve the English of the manuscript.

References

[1] M. Auslander, Representation theory of Artin algebras. I, Comm. Algebra 1 (1974), 177–268. 10.1017/CBO9780511623608Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Auslander and M. Bridger, Stable module theory, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1969), 1–146. 10.1090/memo/0094Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Auslander and I. Reiten, Representation theory of Artin algebras. IV. Invariants given by almost split sequences, Comm. Algebra 5 (1977), 443–518. 10.1080/00927877708822180Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. Auslander and I. Reiten, Applications of contravariantly finite subcategories, Adv. Math. 86 (1991), no. 1, 111–152. 10.1016/0001-8708(91)90037-8Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Auslander and I. Reiten, Cohen–Macaulay and Gorenstein Artin algebras, Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Finite-Dimensional Algebras, Progr. Math. 95, Birkhäuser, Basel (1991), 221–245. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8658-1_8Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Auslander and S. O. Smalø, Almost split sequences in subcategories, J. Algebra 69 (1981), no. 2, 426–454. 10.1016/0021-8693(81)90214-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Beligiannis, On the Freyd categories of an additive category, Homology Homotopy Appl. 2 (2000), 147–185. 10.4310/HHA.2000.v2.n1.a11Search in Google Scholar

[8] X.-W. Chen, D. Shen and G. Zhou, The Gorenstein-projective modules over a monomial algebra, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 148 (2018), no. 6, 1115–1134. 10.1017/S0308210518000185Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. Dlab and C. M. Ringel, The module theoretical approach to quasi-hereditary algebras, Representations of Algebras and Related Topics, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 168, Cambridge University, Cambridge (1992), 200–224. 10.1017/CBO9780511661853.007Search in Google Scholar

[10] O. Eiríksson, From submodule categories to the stable Auslander algebra, J. Algebra 486 (2017), 98–118. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.05.012Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. E. Enochs and O. M. G. Jenda, Gorenstein injective and projective modules, Math. Z. 220 (1995), no. 4, 611–633. 10.1007/BF02572634Search in Google Scholar

[12] H. Eshraghi, R. Hafezi and S. Salarian, Total acyclicity for complexes of representations of quivers, Comm. Algebra 41 (2013), no. 12, 4425–4441. 10.1080/00927872.2012.701682Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Freyd, Representations in abelian categories, Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra. Springer, New York (1966), 95–120. 10.1007/978-3-642-99902-4_4Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Geiss, B. Leclerc and J. Schröer, Quivers with relations for symmetrizable Cartan matrices I: Foundations, Invent. Math. 209 (2017), no. 1, 61–158. 10.1007/s00222-016-0705-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. Hafezi, Auslander–Reiten duality for subcategories, preprint (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06684. Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Holm, Gorenstein homological dimensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 189 (2004), no. 1–3, 167–193. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2003.11.007Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Krause, Krull–Schmidt categories and projective covers, Expo. Math. 33 (2015), no. 4, 535–549. 10.1016/j.exmath.2015.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Krause and O. Y. Solberg, Applications of cotorsion pairs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 68 (2003), no. 3, 631–650. 10.1112/S0024610703004757Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. Kussin, H. Lenzing and H. Meltzer, Nilpotent operators and weighted projective lines, J. Reine Angew. Math. 685 (2013), 33–71. 10.1515/crelle-2012-0014Search in Google Scholar

[20] X.-H. Luo and P. Zhang, Monic representations and Gorenstein-projective modules, Pacific J. Math. 264 (2013), no. 1, 163–194. 10.2140/pjm.2013.264.163Search in Google Scholar

[21] X.-H. Luo and P. Zhang, Separated monic representations I: Gorenstein-projective modules, J. Algebra 479 (2017), 1–34. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.01.038Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. Matsui and R. Takahashi, Singularity categories and singular equivalences for resolving subcategories, Math. Z. 285 (2017), no. 1–2, 251–286. 10.1007/s00209-016-1706-xSearch in Google Scholar

[23] C. M. Ringel and M. Schmidmeier, Invariant subspaces of nilpotent linear operators. I, J. Reine Angew. Math. 614 (2008), 1–52. 10.1515/CRELLE.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

[24] C. M. Ringel and M. Schmidmeier, The Auslander–Reiten translation in submodule categories, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 2, 691–716. 10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04183-9Search in Google Scholar

[25] C. M. Ringel and P. Zhang, From submodule categories to preprojective algebras, Math. Z. 278 (2014), no. 1–2, 55–73. 10.1007/s00209-014-1305-7Search in Google Scholar

[26] C. M. Ringel and P. Zhang, Representations of quivers over the algebra of dual numbers, J. Algebra 475 (2017), 327–360. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[27] C. M. Ringel and P. Zhang, Gorenstein-projective and semi-Gorenstein-projective modules, Algebra Number Theory 14 (2020), no. 1, 1–36. 10.2140/ant.2020.14.1Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. M. Ringel and P. Zhang, Gorenstein-projective and semi-Gorenstein-projective modules. II, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 224 (2020), no. 6, Article ID 106248. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2019.106248Search in Google Scholar

[29] B.-L. Xiong, P. Zhang and Y.-H. Zhang, Auslander–Reiten translations in monomorphism categories, Forum Math. 26 (2014), no. 3, 863–912. 10.1515/forum-2011-0003Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Zhang and B.-L. Xiong, Separated monic representations II: Frobenius subcategories and RSS equivalences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), no. 2, 981–1021. 10.1090/tran/7622Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-10-07
Revised: 2020-10-26
Published Online: 2020-11-12
Published in Print: 2021-01-01

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/forum-2019-0276/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button