Startseite Climate Change Policy Development: A Multiple Streams Analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Climate Change Policy Development: A Multiple Streams Analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

  • Morgan McGlynn und Aaron C. Sparks EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Juli 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet
The Forum
Aus der Zeitschrift The Forum Band 22 Heft 1

Abstract

Climate change has been on the national agenda since the late 1970s, yet until recently, little progress had been made at the federal level because of the dominance of the fossil fuel industry within the policy subsystem. In this article, we use multiple streams approach with process tracing methods to examine why significant climate policy was able to pass in 2022, despite growing polarization, when previous attempts had all failed. We examine two key case studies, the failure of Waxman-Markey in 2010 and the success of the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. In 2010 some climate organizations were hesitant about cap and trade as a policy mechanism to address climate change and failed to stimulate advocacy in their grassroots. Since then, climate groups rallied around an alternative policy approach, which involves investing in clean technology inspired by the Green New Deal. Activists built significant power within the Democratic Party, evident in climate policy remaining prominent on the policy agenda at the beginning of Biden’s presidency. Moreover, media outlets have improved their coverage of extreme weather events by tying them to climate change. In short, the political dynamics changed with growing grassroots climate advocacy, motivating citizens to elect Democratic leaders capable of passing climate legislation and keeping climate high on the policy agenda.

Keywords: climate policy; multiple streams approach; process tracing; lawmaking; policy change
Corresponding author: Aaron C. Sparks, Elon University, Elon, NC, USA, E-mail:

References

Barreto, M. A., B. L. Cooper, B. Gonzalez, C. S. Parker, and C. Towler. 2011. “The Tea Party in the Age of Obama: Mainstream Conservatism or Out-Group Anxiety?” Political Power and Social Theory 22: 105–37.10.1108/S0198-8719(2011)0000022011Suche in Google Scholar

Beattie, G., L. Sale, and L. Mcguire. 2011. “An Inconvenient Truth? Can Extracts of Film Really Affect Our Psychological Mood and Our Motivation to Act against Climate Change?” Semiotica 187: 105–26.10.1515/semi.2011.066Suche in Google Scholar

Bergquist, P., M. Mildenberger, and L. C. Stokes. 2020. “Combining Climate, Economic, and Social Policy Builds Public Support for Climate Action in the U.S.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (5): 054019.10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c1Suche in Google Scholar

Bolsen, T., and M. A. Shapiro. 2018. “The US News Media, Polarization on Climate Change, and Pathways to Effective Communication.” Environmental Communication 12 (2): 149–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1397039.Suche in Google Scholar

Boulianne, S., M. Lalancette, and D. Ilkiw. 2020. “‘School Strike 4 Climate’: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change.” Media and Communication 8 (2): 208–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2768.Suche in Google Scholar

Boykoff, M. T. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511978586Suche in Google Scholar

Broder, J. M. 2010. “‘Cap and Trade’ Loses its Standing as Energy Policy of Choice.” The New York Times, sec. Science. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/science/earth/26climate.html (accessed March 26, 2010).Suche in Google Scholar

Brulle, R. J. 2022. “Advocating Inaction: A Historical Analysis of the Global Climate Coalition.” Environmental Politics 0 (0): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2058815.Suche in Google Scholar

Cochrane, E. 2022. “Climate and Tax Bill Scales Crucial Senate Hurdle, Paving Path to Passage.” The New York Times, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/06/us/politics/climate-tax-bill-senate.html (accessed August 6, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Cody, E. M., J. C. Stephens, J. P. Bagrow, P. Sheridan Dodds, and C. M. Danforth. 2017. “Transitions in Climate and Energy Discourse between Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 7 (1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0391-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Collier, D. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (04): 823–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.Suche in Google Scholar

Denhart, H. 2010. “Deconstructing Disaster: Economic and Environmental Impacts of Deconstruction in Post-Katrina New Orleans.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54 (3): 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Drake, B. 2013. “Public Puts Priority on Developing Alternative Energy Sources.” Pew Research Center (blog). 2013. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2013/03/12/public-puts-priority-on-developing-alternative-energy-sources/.Suche in Google Scholar

Egan, P. J., and M. Mullin. 2017. “Climate Change: US Public Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science 20 (1): 209–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022857.Suche in Google Scholar

Farley, J., D. Baker, D. Batker, C. Koliba, R. Matteson, R. Mills, and J. Pittman. 2007. “Opening the Policy Window for Ecological Economics: Katrina as a Focusing Event.” Ecological Economics, Ecological Economics of Coastal Disasters 63 (2): 344–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.029.Suche in Google Scholar

Feinberg, M., and R. Willer. 2011. “Apocalypse Soon? Dire Messages Reduce Belief in Global Warming by Contradicting Just-World Beliefs.” Psychological Science 22 (1): 34–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610391911.Suche in Google Scholar

Galvin, R., and N. Healy. 2020. “The Green New Deal in the United States: What it Is and How to Pay for it.” Energy Research & Social Science 67: 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101529.Suche in Google Scholar

Guggenheim, D., dir. 2006. An Inconvenient Truth. Paramount  Vantage.Suche in Google Scholar

Gupta, J. 2010. “A History of International Climate Change Policy.” WIREs Climate Change 1 (5): 636–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.67.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, N. L., and T. Ros. 2010. “Environmental Nonprofit Campaigns and State Competition: Influences on Climate Policy in California.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 21 (1): 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9104-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Hersher, R. 2020. “U.S. Officially Leaving Paris Climate Agreement.” NPR, sec. Science. https://www.npr.org/2020/11/03/930312701/u-s-officially-leaving-paris-climate-agreement (accessed November 3, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Jardina, A. 2019. White Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108645157Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, M. D., H. L. Peterson, J. J. Pierce, N. Herweg, A. Bernal, H. L. Raney, and N. Zahariadis. 2016. “A River Runs through it: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review.” Policy Studies Journal 44 (1): 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12115.Suche in Google Scholar

Karol, D. 2019. Red, Green, and Blue: The Partisan Divide on Environmental Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108673266Suche in Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W., and E. S. Agendas. 1984. Alternatives, and Public Policies, Vol. 45. Boston: Little, Brown.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirk, M., J. Gilmore, and M. Wiser, and dirs. 2010. Obama’s Deal. PBS Frontline. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/obamasdeal/.Suche in Google Scholar

Kraemer, D. 2021. “Greta Thunberg: Who Is the Climate Campaigner and what Are Her Aims?” BBC News, sec. Science & Environment. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49918719 (accessed November 5, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Layzer, J. A. 2016. “A Policymaking Framework: Defining Problems and Portraying Solutions in U.S. Environmental Politics.” In The Environmental Case: Translating Values into Policy, 4th ed., 30. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Layzer, J. A., and S. R. Rinfret. 2020. “Market-Based Solutions: Acid Rain and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.” In The Environmental Case. 5th ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A. 2004. “Before and after the Day after Tomorrow: A U.S. Study of Climate Change Risk Perception.” Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (blog). https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/before-and-after-the-day-after-tomorrow/ (accessed November 15, 2004).10.1080/00139150409603663Suche in Google Scholar

Lerer, L. 2021. “Progressives Made a Splash. Can They Pass Bills, Too?” The New York Times, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/06/us/politics/sunrise-movement-progressives.html (accessed February 6, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Lucas, J. 2019. “Notes from Three Months with Young Climate Activists.” The New York Times, sec. Reader Center. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/reader-center/sunrise-movement-astead-herndon-ama.html (accessed August 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.Suche in Google Scholar

McPherson, L. 2022. “How ‘Build Back Better’ Started, and How It’s Going: A Timeline.” Roll Call. https://www.rollcall.com/2022/07/21/how-build-back-better-started-and-how-its-going-a-timeline/ (accessed July 21, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Mildenberger, M. 2020. Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/12393.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Moroney, D. 2022. “What’s in the Inflation Reduction Act for Climate?” Climate Now. https://climatenow.com/podcast/whats-in-the-inflation-reduction-act-for-climate/ (accessed September 6, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Mouawad, J. 2009. “E.P.A. Releases Analysis of Climate Bill.” Green Blog. https://archive.nytimes.com/green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/epa-releases-analysis-of-climate-bill/ (accessed April 21, 2009).Suche in Google Scholar

Osaka, S. 2020. “Obama’s Recovery Act Breathed Life into Renewables. Now They Need Rescuing.” Grist. https://grist.org/energy/obamas-recovery-act-breathed-life-into-renewables-now-they-need-rescuing/ (accessed June 1, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Past Actions Archive. n.d. Sunrise Movement. https://www.sunrisemovement.org/actions/ (accessed April 25, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Pettifor, A. 2020. The Case for the Green New Deal. New York: Verso Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Pooley, E. 2010. The Climate War. New York: Hyperion.Suche in Google Scholar

Ricks, J. I., and A. H. Liu. 2018. “Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 842–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000975.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, D. 2010. “Why Did the Climate Bill Fail?” Grist. https://grist.org/article/2010-07-26-why-did-the-climate-bill-fail/ (accessed July 27, 2010).Suche in Google Scholar

Romm, T. 2022. “Inflation Reduction Act: House Passes Climate, Health-Care and Tax Bill - the Washington Post.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/08/12/inflation-reduction-act-house-vote/ (accessed August 12, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Sabherwal, A., M. T. Ballew, S. van der Linden, G. Abel, M. H. Goldberg, E. W. Maibach, J. E. Kotcher, J. K. Swim, S. A. Rosenthal, and A. Leiserowitz. 2021. “The Greta Thunberg Effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg Predicts Intentions to Engage in Climate Activism in the United States.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 51 (4): 321–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12737.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmalensee, R., and R. N. Stavins. 2017. “The Design of Environmental Markets: What Have We Learned from Experience with Cap and Trade?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (4): 572–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx040.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwartz, H. E. 2023. The Sunrise Movement: The Climate Revolution Generation. Minneapolis: Lerner Publishing Group.Suche in Google Scholar

Shivaram, D. 2022. “Democrats Passed a Major Climate, Health and Tax Bill. Here’s What’s in it.” NPR, sec. Politics. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/07/1116190180/democrats-are-set-to-pass-a-major-climate-health-and-tax-bill-heres-whats-in-it (accessed August 12, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Skocpol, T. 2013. Naming the Problem: What it Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming, 145. Cambridge: Harvard University.Suche in Google Scholar

Smeros, P., C. Castillo, and K. Aberer. 2019. “SciLens: Evaluating the Quality of Scientific News Articles Using Social Media and Scientific Literature Indicators.” In The World Wide Web Conference on - WWW ’19, 1747–58. San Francisco: ACM Press.10.1145/3308558.3313657Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, A. B. 2023. “2022 U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters in Historical Context.” NOAA Climate.gov. http://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2022-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters-historical (accessed January 10, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Stokes, L. C., and H. L. Breetz. 2018. “Politics in the U.S. Energy Transition: Case Studies of Solar, Wind, Biofuels and Electric Vehicles Policy.” Energy Policy 113: 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.057.Suche in Google Scholar

Stokols, E. 2023. “How the Climate Movement Learned to Win in Washington.” POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/02/climate-politics-change-00088107 (accessed April 2, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

The American Presidency Project. 2007. “Press Release - Barack Obama Unveils Initiative to Combat Global Warming.” https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/press-release-barack-obama-unveils-initiative-combat-global-warming (accessed April 20, 2007).Suche in Google Scholar

The New York Times. 2021. “What’s in the $2.2 Trillion Social Policy and Climate Bill.” The New York Times, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/article/build-back-better-explained.html (accessed November 21, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

The White House. 2022. “Fact Sheet: Inflation Reduction Act Advances Environmental Justice.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/17/fact-sheet-inflation-reduction-act-advances-environmental-justice/ (accessed August 17, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Tyson, A., C. Funk, and B. Kennedy. 2023. “What the Data Says about Americans’ Views of Climate Change.” Pew Research Center (blog). https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/09/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-climate-change/ (accessed August 9, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

U.S. Climate Action Partnership. 2007. “A Call for Action.” https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/global_warming/pewclimatecalltoaction0107pdf.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Tyson, A., B. Kennedy, and C. Funk. 2021. "Gen Z, Millennials Stand Out for Climate Change Activism, Social Media Engagement with Issue." Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/05/26/gen-z-millennials-stand-out-for-climate-change-activism-social-media-engagement-with-issue/.Suche in Google Scholar

U. S. Mission Brazil. 2021. “U.S. Officially Rejoins the Paris Agreement.” U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Brazil. https://br.usembassy.gov/u-s-officially-rejoins-the-paris-agreement/ (accessed February 19, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Van Boven, L., P. J. Ehret, and D. K. Sherman. 2018. “Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (4): 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617748966.Suche in Google Scholar

Weisman, J., and J. Ulloa. 2022. “As the Planet Cooks, Climate Stalls as a Political Issue.” The New York Times, sec. U.S. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/17/us/politics/climate-change-manchin-biden.html (accessed July 17, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, V., T. Skocpol, and J. Coggin. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271000407X.Suche in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2024-07-22

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. The Forum: Spring 2024 Issue
  4. Articles
  5. Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems
  6. The Post-Brown Era in Judicial Policymaking
  7. Blame, Policy Feedback, and the Politics of Student Debt Relief Policy
  8. The Nationalized Politics of Police Reform
  9. Inside the “Administrative State”: The Enigmatic Office for Civil Rights
  10. How Ideological Diversity Moderates Republican Support for Voter Suppression Measures: The Cases of Georgia and Alabama
  11. Ten Years Later: How Water Crises in Flint and Detroit Transformed the Politics of U.S. Water Policy
  12. Climate Change Policy Development: A Multiple Streams Analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
  13. Book Review
  14. Steven Rogers: Accountability in State Legislatures
https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2024-2014
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
climate policy; multiple streams approach; process tracing; lawmaking; policy change

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. The Forum: Spring 2024 Issue
  4. Articles
  5. Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems
  6. The Post-Brown Era in Judicial Policymaking
  7. Blame, Policy Feedback, and the Politics of Student Debt Relief Policy
  8. The Nationalized Politics of Police Reform
  9. Inside the “Administrative State”: The Enigmatic Office for Civil Rights
  10. How Ideological Diversity Moderates Republican Support for Voter Suppression Measures: The Cases of Georgia and Alabama
  11. Ten Years Later: How Water Crises in Flint and Detroit Transformed the Politics of U.S. Water Policy
  12. Climate Change Policy Development: A Multiple Streams Analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
  13. Book Review
  14. Steven Rogers: Accountability in State Legislatures
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2024-2014/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen