Startseite The Hardest Path to Reelection: Dueling Incumbent House Primaries in 2022
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Hardest Path to Reelection: Dueling Incumbent House Primaries in 2022

  • M.V. Hood EMAIL logo und Seth C. McKee
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. November 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, we examine the six dueling incumbent U.S. House primaries in the 2022 midterm elections. Our principal aim is to answer the question: Who wins these rare but consequential contests that ensure one incumbent does not return to Congress? Contrary to the intuition that retaining more of one’s previous constituents is a considerable electoral advantage, district- and precinct-level data suggest this was not pivotal. Instead, in these four Democrat versus Democrat and two Republican versus Republican dueling incumbent primaries, explanations for winning or losing appear to hinge on other factors. For the Republican races, former President Trump’s endorsement appears to have gone a long way in influencing the outcome. In the Democratic contests, descriptive representation, ideological fit, and intra-party meddling and a scandal, played a part in determining the victor.


Corresponding author: M.V. Hood, III, University of Georgia, Athens, USA, E-mail:

Appendix

Table A1:

Democratic primary model for Georgia CD 7 in 2022.

Variable Coefficient Standard error
McBath retained precincts 0.233* 0.015
Bourdeaux retained precincts −0.131* 0.008
% Black turnout 0.357* 0.027
% Asian turnout 0.009 0.109
% Hispanic turnout 0.202 0.163
% Other turnout −0.148 0.160
Constant 0.489* 0.027
R 2 0.89
n 141
  1. OLS coefficients weighted by Democratic primary turnout. DV: percent McBath vote out of all primary votes cast. For precinct type, redrawn precincts are the omitted comparison group. White turnout is the omitted comparison group for turnout percent by race/ethnicity. *p < 0.001.

References

Ansolabehere, S., J. M. SnyderJr., and C. StewartIII. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 17–34, https://doi.org/10.2307/2669290.Suche in Google Scholar

Ashton, H. B., M. H. Crespin, and S. C. McKee. 2022a. “Dueling Incumbent House Elections, 1843-2018.” American Politics Research 50 (6): 735–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x221116618.Suche in Google Scholar

Ashton, H. B., M. H. Crespin, and S. C. McKee. 2022b. “Dueling Incumbent Primaries in U.S. House Elections.” Unpublished manuscript.10.1111/ssqu.13253Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, L. C., D. E. Meyer, and R. K. Gaddie. 2016. Slingshot: The Defeat of Eric Cantor. Los Angeles: CQ Press.10.4135/9781506311982Suche in Google Scholar

Bredderman, W., and U. Perano. 2022. “Congresswoman’s Bribery Scandal Takes Shocking New Turn.” Daily Beast. https://www.thedailybeast.com/dem-rep-marie-newman-now-has-rival-she-allegedly-bribed-on-her-payroll (accessed February 1, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, R., and C. Cook. 2021. The Almanac of American Politics 2022. Bethesda: Columbia Books & Information Services.10.1093/acref/9780197770122.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cox, G. W., and J. N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606212Suche in Google Scholar

Desposato, S. W., and J. R. Petrocik. 2003. “The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 18–32, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00002.Suche in Google Scholar

Eder, S., D. D. Kirkpatrick, and M. McIntire. 2022. “They Legitimized the Myth of a Stolen Election—and Reaped the Rewards.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/politics/republican-election-objectors.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20221003&instance_id=73583&nl=the-morning&regi_id=139833608&segment_id=108807&te=1&user_id=78b9022f67e4e64ef0e042b52c1c944d (accessed October 3, 2009).Suche in Google Scholar

Engstrom, E. J. 2013. Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.2307/j.ctt1gk086kSuche in Google Scholar

Fandos, N. 2022a. “Maloney vs. Nadler? New York Must Pick a Side (East or West).” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/30/nyregion/jerry-nadler-carolyn-maloney.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20220531&instance_id=62786&nl=the-morning&regi_id=139833608&segment_id=93785&te=1&user_id=78b9022f67e4e64ef0e042b52c1c944d (accessed May 30, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Fandos, N. 2022b. “Could New York City Lose Its Last Remaining Jewish Congressman?” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/22/nyregion/jewish-congress-nadler-nyc.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20220623&instance_id=64789&nl=the-morning&regi_id=139833608&segment_id=96528&te=1&user_id=78b9022f67e4e64ef0e042b52c1c944d (accessed June 22, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, D., and S. C. McKee. 2009. “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 1006–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00413.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, D., and S. C. McKee. 2012. “The Intersection of Redistricting, Race, and Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 115–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00546.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, M. V.III, and S. C. McKee. 2022. “How Much is a Trump Endorsement Worth?” Unpublished manuscript.10.1017/spq.2023.12Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77 (3): 861–73, https://doi.org/10.1086/681670.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 2021. “The Presidential and Congressional Elections of 2020: A National Referendum on the Trump Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 136 (1): 11–45, https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13133.Suche in Google Scholar

Lengel, A. 2022. “Poll: Stevens Has Dominant Lead Over Levin in Michigan’s 11th Congressional District.” Deadline Detroit. https://www.deadlinedetroit.com/articles/30956/poll_stevens_has_dominant_lead_over_levin_in_michigan_s_11th_congressional_district (accessed July 21, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Masterson, M. 2022. “Sean Casten Declares Victory Over Marie Newman in Race of Incumbents in 6th Congressional District.” WTTW. https://news.wttw.com/2022/06/28/incumbents-sean-casten-marie-newman-face-race-illinois-6th-congressional-district (accessed June 28, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

McKee, S. C. 2008a. “The Effects of Redistricting on Voting Behavior in Incumbent U.S. House Elections, 1992–1994.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 122–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907306473.Suche in Google Scholar

McKee, S. C. 2008b. “Redistricting and Familiarity with U.S. House Candidates.” American Politics Research 36 (6): 962–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x08322881.Suche in Google Scholar

McKee, S. C. 2013. “Political Conditions and the Electoral Effects of Redistricting.” American Politics Research 41 (4): 623–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x12464545.Suche in Google Scholar

McKee, S. C. 2019. The Dynamics of Southern Politics: Causes and Consequences. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.10.4135/9781544328737Suche in Google Scholar

McKinley, J. 2022. “How a Mapmaker Became New York’s Most Unexpected Power Broker.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/28/nyregion/jonathan-cervas-redistricting-maps-ny.html (accessed May 28, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Petrocik, J. R., and S. W. Desposato. 1998. “The Partisan Consequences of Majority-Minority Redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994.” Journal of Politics 60 (3): 613–33, https://doi.org/10.2307/2647641.Suche in Google Scholar

Popkin, S. L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Rush, M. E. 1993. Does Redistricting Make a Difference? Partisan Representation and Electoral Behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rush, M. E. 2000. “Redistricting and Partisan Fluidity: Do We Really Know a Gerrymander when We See One?” Political Geography 19 (2): 249–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(99)00048-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Ward, M. 2022. “Rep. Haley Stevens Beats Levin in Battle of Democratic Incumbents.” Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/02/rep-haley-stevens-beats-levin-in-battle-of-democratic-incumbents-00049449 (accessed August 2, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Weigel, D. 2022. “In Michigan, a Pro-Israel Group Works to Beat a Jewish Democrat.” Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/29/michigan-pro-israel-group-works-beat-jewish-democrat/ (accessed July 29, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Yourish, K., L. Buchanan, and D. Lu. 2021. “The 147 Republicans Who Voted to Overturn Election Results.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html (accessed January 7, 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-11-29

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2022-2062/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen