Deconstructing Popular Mythologies about Millennials and Party Identification

John Cluverius; Joshua J. Dyck

doi:10.1515/for-2019-0017

Article

Deconstructing Popular Mythologies about Millennials and Party Identification

John Cluverius and Joshua J. Dyck

Published/Copyright: September 13, 2019

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal The Forum Volume 17 Issue 2

Abstract

Americans born before 1980, called Millennials, are repeatedly treated as a singular voting bloc, but much like the Baby Boomers, have been socialized across a series of very different elections. We develop a theory of millennial political socialization that argues that older Millennials are more tied to the Democratic party and more liberal than their younger counterparts. We use the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study and an original survey of 1274 Americans conducted before the 2016 elections to test this theory. We find some support for our theory; in addition, we find that younger Millennials are socialized by issues of identity politics and culture – specifically on issues of immigration and the role of race in society. This implies a generation that largely favors Democrats, but whose Republicans are more culturally conservative than middle aged Republican voters.

Corresponding authors: Assist. Prof. John Cluverius and Assoc. Prof. Joshua J. Dyck, Political Science Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Office of the Dean of Fine Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences and the Office of the Provost at the University of Massachusetts Lowell for their generous support in conducting this research.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1994. “Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 1–25.10.2307/2111333Search in Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60: 634–652.10.2307/2647642Search in Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400888740Search in Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ansolobahere, Stephen, and Brian F. Schaffner. 2017. “CCES Common Content 2016.” URL: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GDF6Z0.Search in Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J. 2017. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation.” British Journal of Political Science 47: 241–262.10.1017/S0007123415000186Search in Google Scholar

Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691218250Search in Google Scholar

Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–477.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00196.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dimock, Michael. 2019. “Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z begins.” URL: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.Search in Google Scholar

Dyck, Joshua J., and Francis Talty. 2017. “UMass Lowell Citizen Attitudes about Democratic Values and American Democracy.” URL: https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/GUYWW3.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, Charles H., and John E. Jackson. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77 (4): 957–973.10.2307/1957569Search in Google Scholar

Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keith, Bruce E., David Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912236Search in Google Scholar

Key Jr., V. O. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.10.2307/2126401Search in Google Scholar

Kinder, Donald R., and Nathan P. Kalmoe. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226452593.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C., and Thomas M. Carsey. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786–802.10.2307/3088434Search in Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2004. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American genre. Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, Andrew, Arnold Lau, and Courtney Kennedy. 2018. For Weighting Online Opt-In Samples, What Matters Most? URL: http://www.pewresearch.org/2018/01/26/for-weighting-online-opt-in-samples-what-matters-most/.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Christopher S., and Matt A. Barreto. 2014. Change they can’t Believe in: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691163611.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rouse, Stella M., and Ashley D. Ross. 2018. The Politics of Millennials: Political Beliefs and Policy Preferences of America’s Most Diverse Generation. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9526877Search in Google Scholar

Stoker, Laura. 2014. “Reflections on the Study of Generations in Politics.” The Forum 12 (3): 377–396.10.1515/for-2014-5012Search in Google Scholar

Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Revised ed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Search in Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818691Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-09-13

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0017