Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
When Yes Means No: GOP Congressional Strategy and the Reauthorization of the VRA in 2006
-
M. Adrienne Jones
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
30. August 2018
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between Congressional GOP roll call votes on the Voting Rights Act reauthorization (VRARA) in 2006 and the GOP response to Shelby v. Holder in 2013. Why did the GOP support the VRARA in 2006 and the Shelby decision in 2013 that effectively nullified the VRA? The analysis presented here will demonstrate that the ideological position of the GOP – opposition to the VRA – was the same in both situations. Because Congress was a politically dangerous place for the GOP to oppose the VRA in 2006, it widened the scope of the conflict and helped facilitate the evisceration of Section 5 by the Supreme Court, instead of attempting to achieve that goal in Congress.
Published Online: 2018-08-30
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Intro-summer
- Following Fenno: Learning from Senate Candidates in the Age of Social Media and Party Polarization
- Explaining Trump’s Support: What We Saw and Heard At His Campaign Rallies
- The Trump Effect: Filing Deadlines and the Decision to Run in the 2016 Congressional Elections
- What if Hillary Clinton Had Gone to Wisconsin? Presidential Campaign Visits and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election
- The Fight for American Restoration: Understanding the Paradoxical Foundations of the Trump Presidency
- Invisible Coattails: Presidential Approval and Gubernatorial Elections, 1994–2014
- When Yes Means No: GOP Congressional Strategy and the Reauthorization of the VRA in 2006
- Help or Hindrance? Outside Group Advertising Expenditures in House Races
- The Politics of Prioritization: Senators’ Attention in 140 Characters
- Book reviews
- Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology
- Insecure Majorities
- Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the US Congress
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Intro-summer
- Following Fenno: Learning from Senate Candidates in the Age of Social Media and Party Polarization
- Explaining Trump’s Support: What We Saw and Heard At His Campaign Rallies
- The Trump Effect: Filing Deadlines and the Decision to Run in the 2016 Congressional Elections
- What if Hillary Clinton Had Gone to Wisconsin? Presidential Campaign Visits and Vote Choice in the 2016 Election
- The Fight for American Restoration: Understanding the Paradoxical Foundations of the Trump Presidency
- Invisible Coattails: Presidential Approval and Gubernatorial Elections, 1994–2014
- When Yes Means No: GOP Congressional Strategy and the Reauthorization of the VRA in 2006
- Help or Hindrance? Outside Group Advertising Expenditures in House Races
- The Politics of Prioritization: Senators’ Attention in 140 Characters
- Book reviews
- Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology
- Insecure Majorities
- Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the US Congress
