Go to church or die in prison: PPs with bare institutional nouns in the history of English

References

Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A handbook of word and grammar patters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Allerton, David. J. 2002. Stretched verb constructions in English. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Lynn. 2021. Individuality in language change. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Joost Zwarts. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth semantics and linguistic theory conference, 179–196. Washington D.C.: Linguistic Society of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Amberber, Mengistu, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.). 2010. Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Baldwin, Timothy, John Beavers, Leonoor van der Beek, Francis Bond, Dan Flickinger & Ivan A. Sag. 2006. In search of a systematic treatment of determinerless PPs. In Patrick Sait-Dizier (ed.), Computational linguistics dimensions of the syntax and semantics of prepositions, 163–179. Amsterdam: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Johanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Berezowski, Leszek. 2009. The myth of the zero article. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1996. Oddments of English. Journal of English Linguistics 24. 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429602400102.Suche in Google Scholar

Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke. 2015. The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 2008. Where grammar and lexis meet: Composite predicates in English. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, 33–53. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 2011. The grammaticalization of complex predicates. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0045.Suche in Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia M. 2001. Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences 23. 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(00)00036-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37. 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.575.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263102002061.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, Greg N. 2006. The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and plurality, 35–50. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, Greg N., Sussman Rachel, Natalie Klein & Michael Tanenhaus. 2006. Weak definite noun phrases. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), 36th annual Meeting of North East linguistic society (NELS 36), 179–196. Massachusetts: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association).Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178. 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Dayal, Veneeta. 1999. Bare NP’s, reference to kinds, and incorporation. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9. 34–51. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2816.Suche in Google Scholar

Dayal, Veneeta. 2015. Incorporation: Morpho-syntactic vs. semantic considerations. In Olga Borik & Berit Gehrke (eds.), The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 47–87. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2007. Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 25(2). 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2023. The constructicon: Taxonomies and networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger & Martin Hilpert. 2016. Frequency effects in grammar. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.120.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263102002024.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka & Henriëtte de Swart. 2003. The semantics of incorporation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Filpulla, Markku. 2008. Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In Bernd Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), Varieties of English, vol. 1: The British isles, 328–359. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter .Suche in Google Scholar

Flach, Susanne. 2021. Collostructions: An R implementation for the family of collostructional methods. Package version v.0.2.0. https://sfla.ch/collostructions/ (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Garnier, Simon, Noam Ross, Robert Rudis, Pedro Camargo, Marco Sciaini & Cédric Scherer. 2021. Viridis – colorblind-friendly color maps for R. https://sjmgarnier.github.io/viridis/ (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Geenhoven, Veerle van. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2019. Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. 2019. 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistic measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3). 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9. 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri.Suche in Google Scholar

Grønn, Atle, Bert Le Bruyn, Henriëtte de Swart & Joost Zwarts. 2010. Bare PPs across languages. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bert-Le-Bruyn/publication/46717098_Bare_PPs_across_languages/links/546fb4c60cf2d67fc0311bab/Bare-PPs-across-languages.pdf (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Haimann, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Harm, Volker. 2021. Funktionsverbgefüge des Deutschen. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness. A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm/Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2021. Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1998. Regularity in irregularity: Article usage in appositional phrases. Linguistic Typology 2. 315–353.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hollmann, Willem & Anna Siewierska. 2007. A construction grammar account of possessive constructions in Lancashire dialect: Some advantages and challenges. English Language and Linguistics 11(2). 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674307002304.Suche in Google Scholar

Hollmann, Willem & Anna Siewierska. 2011. The status of frequency, schemas, and identity in cognitive sociolinguistics: A case study on definite article reduction. Cognitive Linguistics 22. 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006x133933.Suche in Google Scholar

Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis. 2015. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partitioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16. 3905–3909.Suche in Google Scholar

Hundt, Marianne. 2018. Variable article usage with institutional nouns. An “oddment” of English? In Alex Ho-Cheong Leung & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), The noun phrase in English. Past and present, 113–142. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. ‘Construction after construction’ and its theoretical challenges. Language: Journal of the Linguistics Society of America 84(1). 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2008.0058.Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Natalie M., Whitney M. Gegg-Hattison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2013. Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128. 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Jong-Bok & Peter Sells. 2015. English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51(1). 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222671400005x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor & Beatrice Santorini. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn., release 4. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCME2-RELEASE-4 (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English, 1st edn., release 3. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCEME-RELEASE-3 (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani. 2016. The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English, 2nd edn., release 1. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCMBE2-RELEASE-1 (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. An overview of Cognitive Grammar. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics, 3–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804764469.Suche in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 2004. South African English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Legacies of colonial English: Studies in transported dialects, 363–386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2021. Conditional inference trees and random forests. In Magali Paquot & Stefan Gries (eds.), Practical handbook of corpus linguistics, 611–643. New York, NY: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorenz, David & David Tizón-Couto. 2019. Chunking or predicting – frequency information and reduction in the perception of multi-word sequences. Cognitive Linguistics 30(4). 751–784. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0138.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Massam, Diane. 2009. Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3. 1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00140.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Gary. 1993. Complex verb formation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Jim. 2008. Scottish English: Morphology and syntax. In Bernd Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), Varieties of English, vol. 1: The British isles, 299–327. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Noël, Dirk & Timothy Colleman. 2021. Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Xu Wen & John Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 662–675. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Payne, John & Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 323–523. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pérez-Leroux, Ana & Thomas Roeper. 1999. Scope and the structure of bare nominal: Evidence from child language. Linguistics 37(5). 927–960. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.5.927.Suche in Google Scholar

Poesio, Massimo. 1994. Weak definites. In Mandy Harvey & Lynn Seantelmann (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on semantics and linguistic theory SALT 4, 282–299. Washington D.C.: Linguistic Society of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.r-project.org/ (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

RStudio Team. 2021. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC. www.rstudio.org (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Haj. 1995. Defective noun phrases. In Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need & Sheri Pargman (eds.), Papers from the 31st regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society, 398–440. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Soja, Nancy. 1994. Evidence for a distinct kind of noun. Cognition 51. 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90056-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Sommerer, Lotte. 2018. Article emergence in Old English: A constructionalist perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Sommerer, Lotte & Elena Smirnova (eds.). 2020. Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste.Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Susanne Flach. 2020. Too big to fail but big enough to pay for their mistakes: A collostructional analysis of the patterns [too ADJ to V] and [ADJ enough to V]. In Gloria Corpas & Jean-Pierre Colson (eds.), Computational phraseology, 248–272. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Stvan, Laurel S. 2007. The functional range of bare singular count nouns in English. In Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence, 171–187. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Stvan, Laurel S. 2009. Semantic incorporation as an account for some bare singular count noun uses in English. Lingua 119. 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.017.Suche in Google Scholar

Swart, Henriëtte de & Joost Zwarts. 2009. Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. Lingua 119(2). 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sally & Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394512000129.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Tobias. 2024. Vertical and horizontal links in constructional networks: Two sides of the same coin? Constructions and frames 16(1). 30–63. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.22011.ung.Suche in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann. 2023. Constructionist approaches: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.). 2018. Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry & Kirill Müller. 2018. Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.7.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (accessed 04 December 2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy D’Agostino McGowan, Romain François, Grolemund Garrett, Alex Hayes, Lionel Henry, Jim Hester, Max Kuhn, Thomas Lin Pedersen, Evan Miller, Stephan Milton Bache, Kirill Müller, Jeroen Ooms, David Robinson, Dana Paige Seidel, Vitalie Spinu, Kohske Takahashi, Davis Vaughan, Claus Wilke, Kara Woo & Hiroaki Yutani. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4(43). 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Adina. 2019. A morpho-semantic account of weak definites and bare institutional singulars in English. In Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Julia Pozas Loyo & Violeta Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado (eds.), Definiteness across languages, 319–345. Berlin: Language Science Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zehentner, Eva. 2019. Competition in language change: The rise of the English dative alternation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Zehentner, Eva. 2021. Cognitive reality of constructions as a theoretical and methodological challenge in historical linguistics. In Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), The wealth and breadth of construction-based research, 378–389. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Zehentner, Eva, Gerold Schneider, Marianne Hundt & Melanie Röthlisberger. 2023. Differences in syntactic annotation affect retrieval: Verb-attached PPs in the history of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28(2). 378–406. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21104.zeh.Suche in Google Scholar