On the unified representation of continuity and discontinuity and its neurocognitive grounding

References

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1935. Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica 1. 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon, Colin Brown & William Marslen-Wilson. 1986. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: A psycholinguistic study. Language & Cognitive Processes 1. 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968608404677.Search in Google Scholar

Baggio, Giosué. 2021. Compositionality in a parallel architecture for language processing. Cognitive Science 45. e12949. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12949.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1953. A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description. Language 29. 47–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/410452.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, Haim Gaifman & Eli Shamir. 1960. On categorial and phrase structure grammars. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel 9F. 1–16. Reproduced in Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Language and Information, Addison Wesley, 1964, 99–115.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, Guy & Martin J. Pickering. 1990. Dependency and constituency in categorial grammar. In Guy Barry & Glynn Morrill (eds.), Edinburgh working papers in cognitive science, vol. 5. Studies in categorial grammar, 23–45. Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, Guy & Martin J. Pickering. 1993. Dependency and categorial grammar and coordination. Linguistics 31(5). 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1993.31.5.855.Search in Google Scholar

Blevins, James. 1990. Syntactic complexity: Evidence for discontinuity and multidomination. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts at Amherst Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Ronald M. Kaplan, Stanley Peters & Annie Zaenen. 1982. Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch. In Walter J. Savitch, Emmon Bach, William Marsh & Gila Safran-Naveh (eds.), The formal complexity of natural language, 286–319. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 33. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_11Search in Google Scholar

Carnie, Andrew. 2010. Constituent structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Claire H. C., Stanislas Dehaene, Denise H. Wu, Wen - Jui Kuo & Christophe Pallier. 2020. Cortical encoding of linguistic constituent with and without morphosyntactic cues. Cortex 129. 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.024.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory IT-2. 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1956.1056813.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, Massachusetts: Ginn and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Bare phrase structure. In Hector Campos & Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos P. Otero, 51–109. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2016. Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10406.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move and labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794278Search in Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson. 2000. The magical number 4 in short term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 24. 87–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003922.Search in Google Scholar

Debusmann, Ralph. 2000. An introduction to dependency grammar. In Hausarbeitfur das Hauptseminar Dependenzgrammatik So Se99. Saarbrücken: Universitatdes Saarlandes.Search in Google Scholar

Dehaene, Stanislas, Florent Meyniel, Catherine Wacongne, Liping Wang & Christophe Pallier. 2015. The neural representation of sequences: From transition probabilities to algebraic patterns and linguistic trees. Neuron 88(1). 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.019.Search in Google Scholar

de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine & Joakim Nivre. 2019. Dependency grammar. Annual Review of Linguistics 5. 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011842.Search in Google Scholar

De Vries, Meinou, Karl M. Petersson, Sebastian Geukes, Pienie Zwitserlood & Morten H. Christiansen. 2012. Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: Evidence from sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367. 2065–2076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0414.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Cathryn & Ivan A. Sag. 1999. Domains in Warlpiri. In Paper presented at the sixth international conference on HPSG–Abstracts, 04–06 August. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1996. Towards a minimalist theory of syntactic structure. In Harry C. Bunt & Authur J. M. van Horck (eds.), Discontinuous constituency, 11–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873467.11Search in Google Scholar

Dras, Mark, David Chiang & William Schuler. 2004. On relations of constituency and dependency grammars. Research on Language & Computation 2. 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:rolc.0000016735.20481.3f.10.1023/B:ROLC.0000016735.20481.3fSearch in Google Scholar

Frank, Stefan L., Rens Bod & Morten H. Christiansen. 2012. How hierarchical is language use? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279. 4522–4531. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1741.Search in Google Scholar

Gaifman, Haim. 1965. Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems. Information & Control 8(3). 304–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90232-9.Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald. 1983. Phrase structure grammar. In Jack Kulas, James H. Fetzer & Terry L. Rankin (eds.), Philosophy, language and artificial intelligence, 163–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_8Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1982. Natural languages and context-free languages. Linguistics & Philosophy 4. 471–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00360802.Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1985. Computationally relevant properties of natural languages and their grammars. New Generation Computing 3. 273–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03037123.Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey K. Pullum & Ivan A. Sag. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken. 1982. Preliminary remarks on configurationality. In James Pustejovsky & Peter Sells (eds.), North East Linguistic Society, 12, 86–96. Amherst, Mass: University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1). 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00210374.Search in Google Scholar

Hays, David G. 1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40. 511–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/411934.Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 1984. Word grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Humphries, Colin, Jeffrey R. Binder, David A. Medler & Einat Liebenthal. 2007. Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 36(3). 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.059.Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, Aravind. 1985. How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions: Tree adjoining grammars. In David Dowty, Laurie Karttunen & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, 206–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597855.007Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, Aravind. 1990. Coordination in TAG in the manner of CCG (Combinatory Category Grammars): Fixed vs. flexible phrase structure. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on tree adjoining grammar and related frameworks (TAG+1), 21. Schloß Dagstuhl: Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI).10.3115/112405.112435Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ronald M. & Joan Bresnan. 1982. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 173–281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kubota, Yusuke & Robert D. Levine. 2020. Type-logical syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11866.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, Marco. 2013. Mildly non-projective dependency grammar. Computational Linguistics 39(2). 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00125.Search in Google Scholar

Lambek, Joachim. 1958. The mathematics of sentence structure. The American Mathematical Monthly 65. 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1958.11989160.Search in Google Scholar

Leffel, Katherine & Denis Bouchard. 1991. Views on phrase structure. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-3196-4Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, William J. M. 2008. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Richard L., Shravan Vasishth & Julie A. Van Dyke. 2006. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

Lopopolo, Alessandro, Antal Van den Bosch & Karl Magnus Petersson. 2020. Distinguishing syntactic operations in the brain: Dependency and phrase-structure parsing. Neurobiology of Language 2(1). 1–64.10.1162/nol_a_00029Search in Google Scholar

Manaster-Ramer, Alexis & Michael B. Kac. 1990. The concept of phrase structure. Linguistics & Philosophy 13(3). 325–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627711.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, Solomon. 1965. Sur la notion de projectivité. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 11(2). 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/malq.19650110212.Search in Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, William D. 1973. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244(5417). 522–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/244522a0.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter Hugoe. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1). 91–106.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1987. Some additional evidence for discontinuity. In Geoffrey J. Huck & Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.), Discontinuous constituency: Syntax and semantics, 185–200. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373204_008Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 2000. Strong generative capacity - the semantics of linguistic formalism. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Mondal, Prakash. 2020. Language, biology and cognition: A critical perspective. Berlin: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-23715-8Search in Google Scholar

Mondal, Prakash. 2022. A critical perspective on the (neuro)biological foundations of language and linguistic cognition. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09741-0.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2008. The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262134989.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morrill, Glyn. 1995. Discontinuity in categorial grammar. Linguistics & Philosophy 18(2). 175–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00985216.Search in Google Scholar

Morrill, Glyn & Teresa Solias. 1993. Tuples, discontinuity and gapping in categorial grammar. Paper presented at the 6th European chapter of the Association for computational linguistics (EACL 93), Utrecht, 21–23 April. Kerrville: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/976744.976778Search in Google Scholar

Morrill, Glyn, Oriol Valentín & Mario Fadda. 2011. The displacement calculus. Journal of Logic, Language & Information 20. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-010-9129-2.Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan & Giosué Baggio. 2023. Notational variants and cognition: The case of dependency grammar. Erkenntnis.10.1007/s10670-022-00657-0Search in Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana. 2007. Embedded clauses with nominal internal structure in Wan (Mande): Mixed syntax without class-changing morphology. In Nikolay N. Kazansky (ed.), Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Transactions of the institute for linguistic studies, vol. 3(3), 270–294. Saint-Pétersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.Search in Google Scholar

Nirupama, Ratna & Prakash Mondal. 2022. The representation of discontinuity and the Correspondence Principle. In Proceedings of the 36th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation, 20–29. Kerrville: Association for Computational Linguistics. Search in Google Scholar

Nirupama, Ratna & Prakash Mondal. 2023. On the implementation of the algorithm for representation of discontinuity in natural language. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on natural language processing (ICNLP), 288–292. New York: IEEE Xplore.10.1109/ICNLP58431.2023.00059Search in Google Scholar

Nordlinger, Rachel. 2014. Constituency and grammatical relations in Australian languages. In Harold Koch & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Australia, 215–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110279771.215Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1982. Free word order and phrase structure rules. North East Linguistics Society 12(1). 209–220.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1986. Footloose and context-free. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4(3). 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133376.Search in Google Scholar

Reape, Michael. 1996. Getting things in order. In Harry C. Bunt & Authur J. M. van Horck (eds.), Discontinuous constituency, 209–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873467.209Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jane J. 1970. Dependency structures and transformational rules. Language 46(2). 259–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/412278.Search in Google Scholar

Sarkar, Anoop & Aravind Joshi. 1996. Coordination in TAG: Formalization and implementation. In Presented at the 16th international conference on computational linguistics, Copenhagen, 5–9 August.Search in Google Scholar

Seki, Hiroyuki, Takashi Matsumura, Mamoru Fujii & Tadao Kasami. 1991. On multiple context-free grammars. Theoretical Computer Science 88(2). 191–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(91)90374-b.Search in Google Scholar

Shieber, Stuart M. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics & Philosophy 8. 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630917.Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 1985. Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language 61(3). 523–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/414385.Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 1992. Categorial grammar. Lingua 90. 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90024-q.Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 2014. Categorial grammar. In Andrew Carnie, Daniel Siddiqui & Yosuke Sato (eds.), Routledge handbook of syntax, 670–701. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tesniére, Lucien. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, RobertJr. 2001. An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164320Search in Google Scholar

Weir, David J. 1988. Characterizing mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. Philadelphia, USA: University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. thesis.Search in Google Scholar