Startseite The loss of Jê nominal verbs in Panará
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The loss of Jê nominal verbs in Panará

  • Bernat Bardagil ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. November 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In Jê languages, verbs appear in a non-finite form that fulfills a double function: licensing marked TAME semantics in main clauses, and licensing embedded clauses. However, the Panará language lost its non-finite verbal form. This paper examines Panará verbs from both a synchronic and diachronic angle, and in a broader comparative approach with regards to the morphosyntactic behaviour of verbs in the other Jê languages. The main claim is that the non-finite forms prevalent in the Jê family underwent a reanalysis in Panará, resulting in fully finite clauses in all environments.


Corresponding author: Bernat Bardagil, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Unless otherwise indicated, the data presented in this article were collected by myself during fieldwork in Brazil. In that regard I would like to thank the Panará people, in particular those of the village of Nãnsêpotiti. My thanks go especially to Perankô, Kânko, Sokren, Kypakjã and Akââ, as well as Kunity and Bepêre. My gratitude extends also to the organizers of the SLE 2020 workshop on Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms, and the editors of the present volume. Finally, two anonymous reviewers raised good questions and provided valuable feedback on an earlier stage of this article, for which I am very grateful.

References

Alves, Flávia de Castro. 2021. Relações de objeto em canela. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 16(1). 1–18.10.1590/2178-2547-bgoeldi-2020-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Alves, Flávia de Castro & Spike Gildea. 2020. Reconstructing the source of nominative-absolutive alignment in two Amazonian language families. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Eugenio Luján & Spike Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing grammar: Cognates and directionality, 76–101. Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardagil, Bernat. 2018. Case and agreement in Panará. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardagil, Bernat. 2019. The decline of Jê ergative case? Presentation at the 3rd Symposium of Amazonian Languages. Berkeley: UC.10.56551/YPFW3713Suche in Google Scholar

Bardagil, Bernat. to appear. The rise and fall of Jê ergativity. Amerindia.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardagil, Bernat & Kim Groothuis. to appear. Finiteness across languages: a case study of the Jê family. Proceedings of the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas 25. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Suche in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Johanna, Spike Gildea & Eugenio Luján. 2020. Reconstructing syntax. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004392007Suche in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmowsky (eds.), Temps et point de vue/Tense and point of view, 213–246. Paris: Nanterre.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Irvine. 1966. Comparative Jê phonology. Estudos Lingüísticos: Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 1(2). 10–24.Suche in Google Scholar

Groothuis, Kim. 2020. Reflexes of finiteness in Romance. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Suche in Google Scholar

Nash, Lea & Alain Rouveret. 2002. Cliticization as unselective attract. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 157–199. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.58.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(4). 939–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9150-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Nikulin, André. 2020. Proto-Macro-Jê: Um estudo reconstrutivo. Brasilia: University of Brasília dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Nonato, Rafael. 2014. Clause-chaining, switch-reference and coordination. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Nonato, Rafael. 2016. Where does possession take place? In Emily Sadlier-Brown, Erin Guntly & Natalie Weber (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas 20, 71–81. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Suche in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Jeri J. Jaeger, Anthony C. Woodbury, Farrell Ackerman, Christine Chiarello, Orin D. Gensler, John Kingston, Eve E. Sweetser, Henry Thompson & Kenneth W. Whistler (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157–189. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198Suche in Google Scholar

Preminger, Omer. 2019. What the PCC tells us about “abstract” agreement, head movement, and locality. Glossa 4(1). 1–42. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.315.Suche in Google Scholar

Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko. 2014. The composition of INFL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4). 1331–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9248-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718Suche in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Aryon. 1999. Macro-Jê. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 165–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Roussou, Anna. 2001. Control and raising in and out of subjunctive complements. In Maria-Luisa Rivero & Angela Ralli (eds.), Comparative syntax of Balkan languages, 74–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195129519.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Salanova, Andrés. 2007. Nominalizations and aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Salanova, Andrés. 2011. Relative clauses in Mẽbengokre. In Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Subordination in native South-American languages, 45–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.97.03pabSuche in Google Scholar

Salanova, Andrés. 2017. Ergativity in Jê languages. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), Oxford handbook of ergativity, 1325–1352. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.43Suche in Google Scholar

Salanova, Andrés. in prep. Macro-Jê. In Patience Epps & Lev Michael (eds.), Amazonian languages: An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Santos, Ludoviko Carnasciali dos. 1997. Descrição de aspectos morfossintáticos da língua Suyá/Kĩsêdjê, família Jê [Description of morphosyntactic aspects of the Suyá/Kĩsêdjê language, Jê family]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Urban, Greg. 1985. Ergativity and accusativity in Shokleng (Gê). International Journal of American Linguistics 16. 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/465865.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-15
Accepted: 2021-12-14
Published Online: 2022-11-16
Published in Print: 2022-11-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2022-2044/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen