Non-finite constructions in Khanty: their unity and diversity

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordăchioaia & Elena Soare. 2010. Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A Distributed Morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics 46. 537–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226710000058.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 2009. Formal generative typology. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 285–312. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0012Search in Google Scholar

Bikina, Daria & Aleksey Starchenko. 2019. Otnositel’naja klauza ili nominalizovannaya klauza: dannye xantyjskogo jazyka [Relative clause or nominalized clause: The evidence from Kazym Khanty]. Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters 2(1). 49–69.Search in Google Scholar

Bondarenko, Tatiana. 2020. Factivity from pre-existence: Evidence from Barguzin Buryat. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 109. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1196.Search in Google Scholar

Borsley, Robert D. & Jaklin Kornfilt. 2000. Mixed extended projection. In Robert D. Borsley (ed.), The nature and function of syntactic categories (Syntax and Semantics 32), 101–131. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/S0092-4563(00)80021-5Search in Google Scholar

Cagri, Ilhan M. 2005. Minimality and Turkish relative clauses. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 506–569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guiglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Colley, Justin & Dmitry Privoznov. 2020. On the topic of subjects: Composite probes in Khanty. In Mariam Asatryan, Yixiao Song & Ayana Whitmal (eds.), NELS 50: Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 111–124. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dékány, Éva & Ekaterina Georgieva. 2021. Three ways of unifying participles and nominalizations: The case of Udmurt. In Artemis Alexiadou & Hagit Borer (eds.), Nominalization: 50 years on from Chomsky’s Remarks, 169–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198865544.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Doron, Edit & Chris H. Reintges. 2005. On the syntax of participial modifiers. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://pluto.huji.ac.il/∼edit/papers/DORON&REINTGES2.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4(3). 333–377. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3). New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley, Papers on phonology and morphology (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21), 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaksin, Andrey D. 2010. Kazymskiy dialekt xantyjskogo yazyka [The Kazym dialect of Khanty]. Khanty-Mansijsk: IIC YuGU.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2001. Some syntactic and morphological properties of relative clauses in Turkish. In Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses, 121–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.32.04korSearch in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2008. Subject case and Agr in two types of Turkic RCs. In Cedric Boeckx & Suleyman Ulutas (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL4) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 56), 145–168. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2015. Turkish relative clauses: How exceptional are they from a Central Asian Turkic perspective? In Öner Özçelik & Amber Kennedy Kent (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL-1), 3–24. Bloomington: Center for Languages of the Central Asian Region.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin & Omer Preminger. 2015. Nominative as no case at all: An argument from raising-to-ACC in Sakha. In Andrew Joseph & Esra Predolac (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 9) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 76), 109–120. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Search in Google Scholar

Koshkareva, Natalia B. 1988. Modal’noe skazuemoe v xantyjskom jazyke (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta) [The modal predicate in Khanty (on the data of the Kazym dialect)]. In Maria I. Cheremisina & Elena K. Skribnik (eds.), Komponenty predloženija (na materiale jazykov raznyx sistem), 33–38. Novosibirsk: AN SSSR.Search in Google Scholar

Koshkareva, Natalia B. 1996. Poslelogi xantyjskogo jazyka (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta) [Khanty postpositions (on the data of the Kazym dialect)]. In Nina A. Lukyanova (ed.), Jazykovye edinicy v semantičeskom i leksikografičeskom aspektax, 45–61. Novosibirsk: NGU.Search in Google Scholar

Koshkareva, Natalia B. 2005. Sposoby vyrazhenija modus-diktumnyx otnoshenij v ural’skix jazykax Sibiri (na materiale xantyjskogo i nenetskogo jazykov) [Means of expressing modus-dictum relations in Uralic languages of Siberia: The evidence from Khanty and Nenets]. In Natalia N. Shirobokova (ed.), Puti formirovaniya lingvističeskogo landšafta Sibiri, 169–195. Novosibirsk: Nika.Search in Google Scholar

Koshkareva, Natalia B. 2006. Puti formirovaniya fonda analitičeskix skrep v polipredikativnyx konstrukciyax xantyjskogo yazyka (kazymskij dialekt) [Ways of forming analytic compounds in Khanty polypredicative constructions (the Kazym dialect)]. In Natalia N. Shirobokova & Alla A. Maltseva (eds.), Analitičeskie struktury v prostom i složnom predloženii (Yazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri 18), 50–67. Novosibirsk: OIIFF SO RAN.Search in Google Scholar

Koshkareva, Natalia B. 2007. Sposoby vyraženiya sočinitel’nyx otnošenij v kazymskom dialekte xantyjskogo yazyka [Expressing coordination in Kazym Khanty]. In Natalia B. Koshkareva (ed.), Razvitie analitičeskix struktur v uslovijax jazykovyx kontaktov (Yazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri 19), 118–126. Novosibirsk: OIIFF SO RAN.Search in Google Scholar

Kovgan, Elena V. 2007. Semantičeskie tipy pričastnyx opredelitel’nyx konstrukcij (na materiale zapadnyx dialektov xantyjskogo yazyka) [Semantic types of participial definitional constructions (evidence from Western Khanty dialects)]. In Razvitie analitičeskix struktur v uslovijax jazykovyx kontaktov (Yazyki korennyx narodov Sibiri 19), 127–147. Novosibirsk: OIIFF SO RAN.Search in Google Scholar

Krause, Cornelia. 2001. On reduced relatives with genitive subjects. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try a morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Mikhailov, Stepan. 2020. Three -en in Northern Khanty: 2sg possessive, salient, and anaphoric articles. Higher School of Economics WP BRP 101. https://www.hse.ru/data/2020/12/09/1355877601/101LNG2020.pdf?ysclid=l7vs4al5ne567827374 (accessed 10 September 2022).10.2139/ssrn.3745556Search in Google Scholar

Moulton, Keir. 2009. Natural selection and the syntax of clausal complementation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 1999a. Object agreement, grammatical relations and information structure. Studies in Language 23(2). 331–376. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.2.05nik.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 1999b. Ostyak. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Özyıldız, Deniz. 2017. Attitude reports with and without true belief. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 27. 397–417. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4189.Search in Google Scholar

Potseluev, Vsevolod. 2020. Javlenija sojuza klauz na materiale kazymskogo dialekta xantyjskogo jazyka [Clause union phenomena on the material of Khazym Khanty]. Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters 3(1). 114–130.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Roussou, Anna. 1991. Nominalized clauses in the syntax of Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 77–100.Search in Google Scholar

Satik, Deniz. 2021. The maximal size of infinitives: A truncation theory of finiteness. Unpublished manuscript. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005910 (accessed 10 September 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Peter W. 2020. Object agreement and grammatical functions: A re-evaluation. In Peter W. Smith, Johannes Mursell & Katharina Hartmann (eds.). Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist programme, 117–147. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spiryakova, Lyudmila T. 2009. Morfologičeskie osobennosti čislitel’nyx xantyjskogo jazyka (na materiale šuryškarskogo i kazymskogo dialektov) [Morphological pecularities of Khanty numerals (on the data of Shuryshkary and Kazym dialects)]. Saint Petersbourg: Herzen SPUR Kandidat Nauk dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Steinitz, Wolfgang. 1937. Xantyjskij (ostyackij) yazyk [The Khanty (Ostyak) language]. Jazyki i pis’mennost’ narodov Severa, 193–227. Leningrad: Učpediz.Search in Google Scholar

Tereshkin, Nikolaj I. 1961. Očerki dialektov xantyjskogo yazyka. Čast’ I. Vaxovskij dialect [Sketches of Khanty dialects. Part I. The Vakhovsky dialect]. Moscow: AN SSSR.Search in Google Scholar

Tereshkin, Nikolaj I. 1967. Vaxovskij dialekt xantyjskigo yazyka (fonetika i morfologija) [The Vakh dialect of Khanty (phonetics and morphology)]. Leningrad: Kandidat Nauk dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 1998. Infinitives. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. Restructuring across the world. In Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds.), Complex visibles out there. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language use and linguistic structure, 275–294. Olomouc: Palacký University.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2015. Restructuring cross-linguistically. In Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics, 227–240. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susanne & Magdalena Lohninger. In press. An implicational universal in complementation: Theoretical insights and empirical progress. In Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie/Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar