Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?

References

Adamczyk, Elzbieta. 2018. Reshaping the nominal inflection in early Northern West Germanic. [NOWELE Supplement Series 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.31.Suche in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Leonid Kulikov. 2006. Case, valency and transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.77.Suche in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan P. Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2001. Case syncretism in and out of Indo-European. In Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston & Sylvain Neuvel (eds.), CLS 37: The Panels. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 15–28. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan P. Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486234.Suche in Google Scholar

Bazell, Charles. 1960. A question of syncretism and analogy. Transactions of the Philological Society 59(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1960.tb00305.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Berndt, Rolf. 1956. Form und funktion des verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen: Eine untersuchung der grammatischen formen und ihrer syntaktischen beziehungsbedeutungen in der großen sprachlichen umbruchsperiode. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164894.Suche in Google Scholar

Blakeley, Leslie. 1948/1949. Accusative-dative syncretism in the Lindisfarne gospels. English and Germanic Studies 1. 6–31.Suche in Google Scholar

Blakeley, Lesley. 1949/1950. The Lindisfarne s/ð problem. Studia Neophilologica 22. 15–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274908587038.Suche in Google Scholar

Bosworth, Joseph & Thomas Northcote Toller (eds.). 1882–1898. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon; Toller, Thomas Northcote (ed.). 1908–1921. Supplement to an anglo-saxon dictionary based on the manuscript collections of the late joseph bosworth. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyd, William John Peter. 1975. Aldred’s Marginalia: Explanatory comments in the Lindisfarne Gospels. [Exeter Medieval Texts and Studies 4]. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Michelle P. 2003. The Lindisfarne gospels: Society, spirituality and the scribe. London: British Library/Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530410531866.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Michelle P. 2016. ‘A good woman’s son’: Aspects of Aldred’s agenda in glossing the Lindisfarne gospels. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 13–36. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-006Suche in Google Scholar

Brunner, Alice. 1947/1948. A note on the distribution of the variant forms of the Lindisfarne gospels. English and Germanic Studies 1. 32–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Brunner, Karl. 1965. Altenglische grammatik. Nach der angelsächsischen grammatik von Eduard Sievers neu bearbeitet, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110930894Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Suzanne Kemmer & Michael Barlow (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 65–86. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096768.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702211974.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon; repr. with corrections 1962.Suche in Google Scholar

Carpenter, Henry C. A. 1910. Die Deklination in der nordhumbrischen Evangelienübersetzung der Lindisfarner Handschrift. [Bonner Studien zur englischen Philologie 2]. Bonn: Hanstein.Suche in Google Scholar

Clackson, James & Geoffrey Horrocks. 2007. The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Cole, Marcelle. 2014. Verbal morphosyntax in Old Northumbrian and the (Northern) subject rule. [NOWELE Supplement Series 25]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.25.Suche in Google Scholar

Crisma, Paola & Susan Pintzuk. 2019. The noun phrase and the ‘Viking Hypothesis’. Language Variation and Change 31. 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000127.Suche in Google Scholar

Dammel, Antje & Damaris Nübling 2006. The superstable marker as an indicator of categorial weakness? Folia Linguistica XL(1–2). 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.40.1-2.97.Suche in Google Scholar

DOE = Dictionary of Old English: A to I online, ed. Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Antonette diPaolo Healy et al. (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, 2018) <https://www.doe.utoronto.ca/>.Suche in Google Scholar

DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 2009). <https://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web-corpus.html>.Suche in Google Scholar

Douay-Rheims Bible = The Holy Bible, Douay-Rheims Version, with Revisions and Footnotes by Bishop Richard Challoner, 1749–52, 1899, BaltimoreJohn Murphy. <https://www.drbo.org>.Suche in Google Scholar

Elliott, Constance O. & Alan S. C. Ross. 1972. Aldrediana XXIV: The linguistic peculiarities of the gloss on St. John’s gospel. English Philological Studies 13. 49–72.Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández Cuesta, Julia. 2016. Revisiting the manuscript of the Lindisfarne gospels. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 255–286. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-016Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández Cuesta, Julia & Christopher Langmuir. 2019. Verbal morphology in the Old English gloss to the Durham Collectar. NOWELE 72(2). 135–166.10.1075/nowele.00025.ferSuche in Google Scholar

Fernández Cuesta, Julia & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.). 2016. The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context. [Buchreihe der Anglia / Anglian Book Series 51]. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105Suche in Google Scholar

Füchsel, Hans. 1901. Die sprache der northumbrischen interlinearversion zum Johannes-Evangelium. Anglia 24. 1–99.10.1515/angl.1901.1901.24.1Suche in Google Scholar

Gameson, Richard. 2017. The Lindisfarne gospels: New perspectives. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1111/emed.12336.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70.10.1017/S0022226705003683Suche in Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. 2004. North Northumbrian and South Northumbrian: Geographical statement? In Marina Dossena & Roger Lass (eds.), Methods and data in English historical dialectology, 241–255. Linguistic insights: studies in language and communication 16. Bern: Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. & Robert D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English. Volume 2: Morphology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327472.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1939. Signe zéro. In Roman Jakobson selected writings, 2011–2019. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.211Suche in Google Scholar

Jolly, Karen. 2016. The process of glossing and glossing as process: Scholarship and education in Durham, Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 361–376. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-020Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1987. Grammatical gender in English 950–1250. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Thomas D., Thomas J. Brown, Rupert L. S. Bruce-Mitford, Peter H. Roosen-Runge, Alan S. C. Ross, Eric G. Stanley & Anthony E. A. Werner (eds.). 1956. Evangeliorum quattuor codex Lindisfarnensis, musei britannici codex nero D.IV. volume I: Totius codicis similitudo folii, 1–259. Olten/Lausanne: Graf.Suche in Google Scholar

Kolasinska, Paulina. 2013. Early Old English nominal system: Synchronic declensions in the Vespasian Psalter. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 48(4). 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2013-0013.Suche in Google Scholar

Kruger, William W. 2019. Verbal prefixes in Old Northumbrian. NOWELE 72(2). 192–219.10.1075/nowele.00027.kruSuche in Google Scholar

Krygier, Marcin. 2002. A re-classification of Old English nouns. Studia Anglica Posnanensia 38. 311–319.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1981. Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57(2). 267–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/413692.Suche in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1991. Of data and ‘datives’: Ruthwell cross ‘rodi’ again. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 92. 395–404.Suche in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English. A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511621000Suche in Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928.Suche in Google Scholar

Lea, Elisabeth Mary. 1894. The language of the Northumbrian gloss to the gospel of St. Mark. Anglia 16. 62–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.1894.1894.16.62.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindelöf, Uno (ed.). 1927. Rituale Ecclesiae Dunelmensis. The Durham Collectar. A new and revised edition of the Latin text with the interlinear Anglo-Saxon version. [Surtees Society 140]. Durham/London: Andrews/Quaritch.Suche in Google Scholar

Los, Betelou. 2015. A historical syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.10.1515/9780748694563Suche in Google Scholar

Page, Raymond I. 1995. Runes and runic inscriptions. Woolbridge: Boydell and Brewer.Suche in Google Scholar

Phillips, Betty. 1984. Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60. 320–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/413643.Suche in Google Scholar

Phillips, Betty. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509090459.Suche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2000. Analysis of the Scandinavian loanwords in the Aldredian glosses to the Lindisfarne gospel. [Studies in English Language and Linguistics: Monographs 9]. Valencia: Department of English and German Philology, University of Valencia.Suche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2001. Aldredian glosses to proper Names in the Lindisfarne gospels. Anglia 119. 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1515/ANGL.2001.173.Suche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2004. A sociolinguistic approach to the Norse-derived words in the glosses to the Lindisfarne and Rushworth gospels. In Christian J. Kay, Carole A. Hough & Irené Wotherspoon (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics: selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002. Volume II: Lexis and transmission. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 252]. 177–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.252.14ponSuche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2013. The Lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on Old English. [Studies in the Early Middle Ages 1]. Turnhout: Brepols. http://www.brepolsonline.net/action/showBook?doi=10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106260.Suche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2016. A study of Aldred’s multiple glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 301–328. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-018Suche in Google Scholar

Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2018. Legal vocabulary in early English translations of the Bible. In Claudia di Sciacca, Concetta Giliberto, Carmela Rizzo & Loredana Teresi (eds.), Studies on late antique and medieval Germanic glossography and lexicography in honour of Patrizia Lendinara. II, 565–585. Pisa: ETS Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Jane. 2016. Aldred glossator and book historian. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 37–60. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-007Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez Ledesma, Nieves. 2016. Dauides sunu vs. filii david: The genitive in the gloss to the Lindisfarne gospels. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 213–238. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-014Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez Ledesma, Nieves. 2018. Zelotes and elnvnges: The extension of genitive singular -es in the Gloss to the Durham Collectar. Anglia 136(4). 611–642. https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2018-0061.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Alan S. C. 1934. The origins of the s-endings of the present-indicative in English. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 33. 68‒73.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Alan S. C. 1936. Sex and gender in the Lindisfarne gospels. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 35. 321–330.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Alan S. C. 1937. Studies in the accidence of the Lindisfarne Gospels. [Leeds School of English Language Texts and Monographs 2]. Leeds: Kendal.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Alan S. C. 1960. Standard paradigms. In Kendrick, Thomas D., Thomas J. Brown, Rupert L. S. Bruce-Mitford, Peter H. Roosen-Runge, Alan S. C. Ross, Eric G. Stanley & Anthony E. A. Werner (eds.), Evangeliorum quattuor codex Lindisfarnensis, musei britannici codex nero D.IV. Vol. II: Commentariorum libri duo, quorum unus de textu evangeliorum Latino et codicis ornatione, alter de glossa Anglo-Saxonica. Book II, Part II, 37–42. Lausanna: Urs Graf.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Alan S. C., Eric G. Stanley & Thomas J. Brown. 1960. The paleography. In Kendrick, Thomas D., Thomas J. Brown, Rupert L. S. Bruce-Mitford, Peter H. Roosen-Runge, Alan S. C. Ross, Eric G. Stanley & Anthony E. A. Werner (eds.), Evangeliorum quattuor codex Lindisfarnensis, musei britannici codex nero D.IV. Vol. II: Commentariorum libri duo, quorum unus de textu evangeliorum Latino et codicis ornatione, alter de glossa Anglo-Saxonica. Book II, Part I, Chapter II, 12–21. Lausanna: Urs Graf.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidwell, Keith. 1995. Reading medieval Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511814174Suche in Google Scholar

Skeat, Walter W. (ed.). 1871‒1887. The holy gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian versions, vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Mark (1871), Luke (1874), John (1878), Matthew (1887)].Suche in Google Scholar

Skeat, Walter W. (ed.). 1878. The gospel according to Saint John in Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian versions synoptically arranged. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stanley, Eric. 2017. The Lindisfarne gospels: Aldred’s gloss. For god and St Cuthbert and all the Saints together who are in the Island. In Richard Gameson (ed.). The Lindisfarne gospels: New perspectives, 206–217. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004337848_013Suche in Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter M. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–849. https://doi.org/10.2307/413959.Suche in Google Scholar

van Bergen, Linda. 2008. Negative contraction and Old English dialects: Evidence from glosses and prose. Part I. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 109. 275–312.Suche in Google Scholar

van Gelderen, Elly. 2019a. The Northumbrian Old English glosses. NOWELE 72(2). 119–133.10.1075/nowele.00024.gelSuche in Google Scholar

van Gelderen, Elly. 2019b. Reflexive pronouns in the Lindisfarne glosses. NOWELE 72(2). 220–244.10.1075/nowele.00028.gelSuche in Google Scholar

Walkden, George. 2016. Null subjects in the Lindisfarne Gospels as evidence of syntactic variation in Old English. In Julia Fernández Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne gospels: Language, author and context, 239–256. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110449105-015Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, Johanna. 2019. The subjunctive in the Lindisfarne gloss. NOWELE 72(2). 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00026.woo.Suche in Google Scholar