Reciprocal constructions in Homeric Greek: A typological and corpus-based approach

References

AGLDT 2.0 = Ancient Greek and Latin Dependency Treebank 2.0. Available at: https://perseusdl.github.io/treebank_data/. Search in Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J. 2003. Middle voice in Ancient Greek. A study of polysemy. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004409064Search in Google Scholar

Alpatov, Vladimir A. & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 2007. Reciprocal, sociative and competitive constructions in Japanese. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 1021–1094. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.36alpSearch in Google Scholar

Asproudi, Evangelia. 2005. Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Modern Greek. The ITB Journal 6(2). https://arrow.dit.ie/itbj/vol6/iss2/2 (accessed 25 January 2019). Article 2.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. 2014. NP-strategies in semitic languages in a typological perspective. Diachronica 31(3). 337–378. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.3.02bar.Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Johanna. 2008. Productivity. Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.8Search in Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, Nicolas. 2014. On tmesis, word order and noun incorporation in Homeric Greek. In Annamaria Bartolotta (ed.), The Greek verb. Morphology, syntax, and semantics. Proceedings of the 8th international meeting on Greek linguistics (Agrigento, October 1–3, 2009), 11–30. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Bortone, Pietro. 2010. Greek prepositions: from antiquity to present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556854.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bozzone, Chiara. 2014. Constructions: A new approach to formularity, discourse, and syntax in Homer. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chantraine, Pierre. 1953. Grammaire homérique. Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Conti, Luz. 2006. Untersuchung der sogenannten inhärent reziproken Verben im Altgriechischen: Semantische und syntaktische Eigenschaften. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 119. 168–185.Search in Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès.Search in Google Scholar

Crespo, Emilio, Luz Conti & Maquiera Helena. 2003. Sintaxis del griego clásico. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2015. Reciprocals in Latin. A reappraisal. In Gerd V. M. Haverling (ed.), Latin linguistics in the early 21st century: Acts of the 16th international colloquium on Latin linguistics (Uppsala, June 6th–11th, 2011), 221–239. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu Ignazio & Paolo Ramat. 2006. The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186505.1.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Serena. 2009. Uso e significato della preverbazione in vedico: la testimonianza del R̥gveda. Pisa: University of Pisa dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Darlymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo & Stanley Peters. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21. 159–210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005330227480.Search in Google Scholar

De Angelis, Alessandro. 2004. Forme di “tmesi” nel greco omerico, la legge di Wackernagel e un caso di rianalisi sintattica. In Giovanna Rocca (ed.), Dialetti dialettalismi, generi letterari e funzioni sociali. Atti del V colloquio internazionale di linguistica greca (Milano, 12–13 settembre 2002), 179–214. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Search in Google Scholar

De Decker, Filip. 2015. A Morphosyntactic analysis of speech introductions and conclusions in Homer. München: Ludwig Maximiliansuniversität dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dedio, Stefan & Widmer Paul. 2017. S, A, and P argument demotion with preverbal imm-(a-n)- in Old and Middle Irish. Études Celtiques 43. 187–206. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecelt.2017.1100.Search in Google Scholar

Delbrück, Berthold. 1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen II. Straßburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111626796Search in Google Scholar

DELG =Chantraine, Pierre. 1968. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Dimitriadis, Alexis. 2008. Irreducible symmetry in reciprocal constructions. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 375–410. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147.375Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2008. Reciprocal constructions: Towards a structural typology. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 33–103. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147.33Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, Stephen C. Levinson, Alice Gaby & Asifa Majid. 2011. Introduction: Reciprocals and semantic typology. In Nicholas Evans, Stephen C. Levinson, Alice Gaby & Asifa Majid (eds.), Reciprocals and semantic typology, 1–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.98.01introSearch in Google Scholar

Fanelli, Valentina. 2009. Le costruzioni reciproche nella lingua latina. Roma: Universitaria editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Traci S. Curl (eds.). 2000. Reciprocals: Forms and functions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.41Search in Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis. 2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames 10(1). 61–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00011.geo.Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2016. Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European deponents. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4. 98–149. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-00401001.Search in Google Scholar

Haas, Florian. 2007. The development of English each other: Grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both? English Language and Linguistics 11(1). 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674306002103.Search in Google Scholar

Hajnal, Ivo. 2004. Die Tmesis bei Homer und auf den mykenischen Linear B Tafeln – ein chronologisches Paradox? In J.H.W. Penney (ed.), Indo-European perspectives: Studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, 146–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199258925.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type [Arbeitspapiere, N. F. 5]. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Further remarks on reciprocal constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 2087–2115. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Haug, Dag T.T. 2011. Tmesis in the epic tradition. In Øivind Andersen & Dag T.T. Haug (eds.), Relative chronology in early Greek epic poetry, 96–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921728.007Search in Google Scholar

Haug, Dag T.T. 2012. Syntactic conditions on null arguments in the Indo-European Bible translations. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44(2). 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2013.776239.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Hiroyuki Miyashita. 2008. The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 169–224. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147.169Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

HoDeL 2.0 = https://hodel.unipv.it/hodel-res/. Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hopSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017.Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 1981. Space and time in Homer: Prepositional and adverbial particles in the Greek epic. New York: Arno Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 2010. Greek. A history of the language and its speakers. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318913Search in Google Scholar

Inglese, Guglielmo. 2017. A synchronic and diachronic typology of Hittite reciprocal constructions. Studies in Language 41(4). 956–1006. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17019.ing.Search in Google Scholar

Inglese, Guglielmo. 2020. The Hittite middle voice. Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004432307Search in Google Scholar

Karantzola, Eleni & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2014. On the relation between labilizations and neuter gender: Evidence from the Greek diachrony. Linguistics 52. 1025–1059. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23Search in Google Scholar

Keydana, Götz & Silvia Luraghi. 2012. Definite referential null objects in Vedic Sanskrit and Ancient Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44(2). 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2013.776245.Search in Google Scholar

Knjazev, Jurij P. 2007. Lexical reciprocals as a means of expressing reciprocal situations. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 115–146. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.07knjSearch in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 41–74. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.40.03konSearch in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Shigehiro Kokutani. 2006. Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: Focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics 44(2). 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2006.010.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast. 2008. Reciprocity and reflexivity – description, typology and theory. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 1–32. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147.1Search in Google Scholar

Krisch, Thomas. 1999. Zur Reziprozität in altindogermanischen Sprachen. In Heiner Eichner & Hans-Christian Luschützky (eds.), Compositiones Indogermanicae in memoriam Jochem Schindler Gedenkschrift für Jochern Schindler, 275–297. Praha: Enigma corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2007. Reciprocal constructions in vedic. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 709–738. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.23kulSearch in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2012. Vedic preverbs as markers of valency-changing derivations. Studies in Language 34(4). 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.4.01kul.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2013. Middle and reflexive. In Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to syntax, 261–280. London, New Delhi, New York & Sydney: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472542090.ch-015Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2014a. Grammaticalization of reciprocal pronouns in Indo-Arian: Evidence from Sanskrit and Indo-European for a diachronic typology of reciprocal constructions. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 1(2). 117–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2014-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2014b. The decline of labile syntax in old indo-aryan: A diachronic typological perspective. Linguistics 52(4). 1139–1165. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0018.Search in Google Scholar

LIPP =Dunkel, George E. 2014. Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Band 2: Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

LIV2 =Rix, Helmut. 2001. Lexicon der Indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Logozzo, Felicia & Paolo Poccetti. 2017. Ancient Greek linguistics. New approaches, insights, perspectives. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551754Search in Google Scholar

Lord, Albert B. 1960. The singer of tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

LSJ = The Online Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Lexicon. Available at: https://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/#eid=1&context=lsj. Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2003a. Definite referential null objects in Ancient Greek. Indogermanische Forschungen 108. 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110243482.167.Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2003b. On the meaning of preposition and cases. The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.67Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. The rise (and possible downfall) of configurationality. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 212–229. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. Forthcoming. Basic valency orientation, the anticausative alternation, and voice in PIE. In Proceedings of the 15. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wien (Austria), 13–16 September 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan. Forthcoming. The passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb forms. Folia Linguistica Historica.10.1515/flin-2021-2033Search in Google Scholar

Mackridge, Peter. 1985. The modern Greek language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Magni, Elisabetta. 2010. L’evoluzione semantico-funzionale dell’elemento -th- nella morfologia verbale del greco. In Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, 266–285. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Maslova, Elena. 2008. Reflexive encoding of reciprocity: Cross-linguistic and language-internal variation. In Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and cross-linguistic explorations, 225–258. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147.225Search in Google Scholar

Maslova, Elena & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 2005. Reciprocal constructions. In Mattew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. https://wals.info/chapter/106 (accessed 25 January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007a. Overview of the research. Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 3–114. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.06nedSearch in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007b. Encoding of the reciprocal meaning. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 147–208. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.08nedSearch in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.). 2007. Reciprocal constructions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Neri, Sergio. 2013. Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand’. In Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds.), Multi nominis grammaticus. Studies in classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 185–205. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parry, Adam (ed). 1971. The making of Homeric verse: the collected papers of Milman Parry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Puddu, Nicoletta. 2005. Riflessivi e intensificatori: greco, latino e le altre lingue indoeuropee. Pisa: ETS Edizioni.Search in Google Scholar

Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio R. 2007. Morfolgía y sintaxis: Los compuestos verbales de συν- en griego antiguo. In M. Esperanza Torrego, José M. Baños, Concepción Cabrillana & Julian Méndez Dosuna (eds.), Praedicativa II: Esquemas de complementación verbal en griego antiguo y latín, 180–209. Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.Search in Google Scholar

Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio. 2010. El pronombre ἀλλήλλων: Entre la reciprocidad y la simetría. In José F. Gonzales Castro & Jesús de la Villa (eds.), Perfiles de Grecia y Roma. Actas del XII Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, 133–142. Madrid: SEEC.Search in Google Scholar

Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio R. 2015. The verbal compounds of com- in Latin and the morphology-syntax interface. In Gerd V. M. Haverling (ed.), Latin linguistics in the early 21st century: Acts of the 16th international colloquium on Latin linguistics (Uppsala, June 6th–11th, 2011), 158–169. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Search in Google Scholar

Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio R. 2017. Dis-compound and reciprocal inter se in Latin. Pallas 103. 115–127. https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.4078.Search in Google Scholar

Romagno, Domenica. 2004. Ancora su preverbazione e sistemi verbali. Il caso dei preverbi greci. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 89(2). 165–180.Search in Google Scholar

Romagno, Domenica. 2010. Anticausativi, passivi, riflessivi: Considerazioni sul medio oppositivo. In Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, 430–441. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Sausa, Eleonora. 2015. Argument structure constructions in Homeric Greek. A study on bivalent verbs. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sausa, Eleonora. 2016. Basic valency orientation in Homeric Greek. Folia Linguistica Historica 37. 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Sausa, Eleonora & Chiara Zanchi. 2015. Non-accusative null objects in the homeric dependency treebank. In Fancesco Mambrini, Marco Passarotti & Caroline Sporleder (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on corpus-based research in the humanities (CRH). Warsaw: Institute of Computer Science.Search in Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Band 2: Syntax. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

The Chicago Homer. Available at: https://homer.library.northwestern.edu/. Search in Google Scholar

Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in cognitive linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 225–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225.Search in Google Scholar

Vezzosi, Letizia. 2010. Micro-processes of grammaticalization. The case of Italian l’un l’altro. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization. Current views and issues, 343–372. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.119.18vezSearch in Google Scholar

Viti, Carlotta. 2008. From space words to transitive markers: The case of ancient Greek en ‘in’. Transactions of the Philological Society 106. 375–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.2008.00204.x.Search in Google Scholar

Viti, Carlotta. 2011. The use of the dual number in Homeric Greek. In Thomas Krisch & Thomas Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog, 595–604. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1963. Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6. 1–49.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1964. Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. In Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, 1035–1045. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1976. Toward Proto-Indo-European syntax: Problems and pseudo-problems. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Aleksej D. Shmelev. 2007. Sociativity, conjoining, reciprocity, and the Latin prefix com-. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušene & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 209–230. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.09zalSearch in Google Scholar

Zanchi, Chiara, Eleonora Sausa & Silvia Luraghi. 2018. Hodel, a dependency lexicon for Homeric Greek: Issues and perspectives. In Federico Giusfredi & Paola Cotticelli-Kurras (eds.), Formal representation and digital humanities, 230–256. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Zanchi, Chiara. 2019. Multiple preverbs in ancient Indo-European language. A comparative study on Vedic, Homeric Greek, Old Church Slavic, and Old Irish. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar