Startseite The Romanian alternating gender in diachrony and synchrony
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Romanian alternating gender in diachrony and synchrony

  • Martin Maiden EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. November 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Romanian has a large class of nouns characterized by masculine agreement in the singular and feminine agreement in the plural. This phenomenon of alternating gender is frequently argued by traditional grammarians of Romanian, Romance linguists, and linguist typologists to constitute a neuter or third gender, distinct from masculine and feminine. The present study argues, from close analysis of a wide range of diachronic and comparative dialectal data, that the neuter is in fact an epiphenomenon of agreement behaviour that depends crucially on the inflexional identity of the singular and plural forms of the nouns. Hypostatization of a third gender is dangerously liable to obfuscate the true mechanisms at work. Principled explanations of some apparent exceptions to my overall claim will be offered. I also investigate, however, some ways in which the emergence of a third gender of the type so widely assumed already to exist might be latent in Romanian, and speculate in general on how alternating gender might emerge diachronically.

Acknowledgement

The basis of the research for this study was laid as part of the Leverhulme Trust-funded project The Romance Noun. A Comparative-Historical Study in Plural Formation at the University of Oxford, 2011–2012.That support is gratefully acknowledged, as is the contribution of Chiara Cappellaro and J. C. Smith. I am also grateful to Oana Uță Bărbulescu for her advice, and to Michele Loporcaro for some extremely stimulating comments. The views expressed here are my own.

References

ALRMunt. Teaha, Teofil (ed.). 1996–2007. Atlasul lingvistic român pe regiuni - Muntenia şi Dobrogea. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

ALRRMarm.: Petru, Neiescu, Grigore Rusu & Ionel Stan (eds.). 1969–1997. Atlasul lingvistic român pe regiuni – Maramureş. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

Atanasov, Petar. 2002. Meglenoromâna astăzi. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.Suche in Google Scholar

Atanasov, Petar. 2009. Atlasul lingvistic al dialectului meglenoromân. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.Suche in Google Scholar

Bateman, Nicoleta & Maria Polinsky. 2010. Romanian as a two-gender language. In Donna Gerdts, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Festschrift for David Perlmutter, 41–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bejan, Dumitru. 1995. Gramatica limbii române. Compendiu. Cluj: Echinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren Schmitt & Webb Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldwin Meadows (eds.), Language in mind. Advances in the study of language and cognition, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bujor, I. I. 1955. Genul substantivelor în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 5. 51–63.Suche in Google Scholar

Byck, Jack & Alexandru Graur. 1967. Influenţa pluralului asupra singularului substantivelor şi adjectivelor în limba română. In Jacques Byck (ed.), Studii şi articole, 49–92. Bucharest: Editura Știinţifică.Suche in Google Scholar

Capidan, Theophil. 1906. Flexion des Substantivs und Verbums im ‘Codex Dimonie’. Jahresbericht des Instituts für rumänische Sprache (rumänisches Seminar) zu Leipzig 12. 179–232.Suche in Google Scholar

Capidan, Theophil. 1925. Meglenoromânii. Istoria și graiul lor. Bucharest: Cultura națională.Suche in Google Scholar

Capidan, Theophil. 1932. Aromânii. Dialectul aromân. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

Cappellaro, Chiara, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith. 2012. The masculine wives of southern Italy. Paper at 45th meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm.Suche in Google Scholar

Chivu, Gheorghe (ed.). 2001. Institutiones linguae valachicae. Prima gramatică a limbii române scrisă în limba română. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

Ciorănescu, Alexandru. 2002. Dicţionarul etimologic al limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Saeculum I. O.Suche in Google Scholar

Cipariu, Timotei. 1869. Gramateca limbii române. Bucharest: Tipariulu Seminariului A. Diecesanu dein Blasiu.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobeț, Doina. 1983–84. Observații privind categoria genului în gramatica românească până la anul 1870. Annuaire de linguistique et d’histoire littéraire 29. 1–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166119Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139206983Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2013. Gender typology. In Greville Corbett (ed.), The expression of cognitive categories 6: The expression of gender, 87–130. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110307337.87Suche in Google Scholar

Coteanu, Ion. 1966. Din nou despre existența genului neutru în românește. Limba română 15. 309–312.Suche in Google Scholar

Coteanu, Ion. 1969. Morfologia numelui în protoromână. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.Suche in Google Scholar

Croitor, Blanca & Ion Giurgea. 2009. On the so called Romanian ‘neuter’. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 11(2). 21–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Densusianu, Ovid. 1961. Istoria limbii române, II. Secolul al XVI-lea. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.Suche in Google Scholar

DEX. 2011. Dicționarul explicativ al limbii române. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic.Suche in Google Scholar

Diaconescu, Paula. 1964. Numărul și genul substantivului romînesc (analiză contextuală). Studii și cercetări lingvistice 15. 295–316.Suche in Google Scholar

Diaconescu, Paula. 1969. Sintagmatic și paradigmatic în structura genului din limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 20. 23–40.Suche in Google Scholar

Dimitriu, Corneliu. 1999. Tratat de gramatică a limbii române. Morfologia. Iași: Institutul European.Suche in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka. 1990. Two cases of underspecification in morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 539–550.Suche in Google Scholar

Formentin, Vittorio & Michele Loporcaro. 2012. Sul quarto genere grammaticale del romanesco antico. Lingua e stile 47. 221–264.Suche in Google Scholar

Graur, Alexandru. 1954. Genul ‘neutru’ în românește. Limba română 3. 30–45.Suche in Google Scholar

Graur, Alexandru. 1968. Tendințele actuale ale limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.Suche in Google Scholar

Graur, Alexandru. 1973. Gramatica azi. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.Suche in Google Scholar

Grossmann, Maria. 2012. Romanian compounds. Probus 24. 147–17410.1515/probus-2012-0007Suche in Google Scholar

Guillermou, Alain. 1953. Manuel de langue roumaine. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Robert. 1965. The ‘neuter’ in Romance: a pseudo-problem. Word 21. 421–427.10.1080/00437956.1965.11435438Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, József. 1997. Vulgar Latin. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb00870.xSuche in Google Scholar

Igartua, Iván. 2006. Genus alternans in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 111. 56–70.10.1515/9783110186505.56Suche in Google Scholar

Ionașcu, Alexandru. 1965. Les contextes diagnostiques et le problème du genre des noms, Revue roumaine de linguistique 10. 461–468.Suche in Google Scholar

Ionică, Ion, Maria Marin & Anca Marinescu. 2009. Dicționarul graiurilor dacoromâne sudice. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

Iordan, Iorgu. 1938. Pluralul substantivelor în limba română actuală. Buletinul Institutului de filologie română “Al. Philippide” 5. 1–54.Suche in Google Scholar

Iordan, Iorgu. 1956. Limba romînă contemporană. Bucharest: Editura Ministerului Învățămîntului.Suche in Google Scholar

Iordan, Iorgu, Valeria Guțu Romalo & Alexandru Niculescu. 1967. Structura morfologică a limbii române contemporane. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971. On the Rumanian neuter. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings. II. World and language, 187–189. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.187Suche in Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich. 1966. Lingüística románica. II. Morfología. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar

Lăzărescu, Paul. 1984. Subdialectul moldovean. In Valeriu Rusu (ed.), Tratat de dialectologie românească, 208–240. Craiova: Scrisul românesc.Suche in Google Scholar

Lombard, Alf & Constantin Gâdei. 1981. Dictionnaire morphologique de la langue roumaine. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele. 2016. Gender. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the romance languages, 924–935. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0057Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele & Tania Paciaroni. 2011. Four-gender systems in Indo-European. Folia linguistica 45. 389–334.10.1515/flin.2011.015Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 1997. A propos d’un changement analogique remarquable en roumain: le type carte-cărţi. Vox Romanica 56. 24–57Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2009. On the morphologization of some phonetic processes in the Oltenian verb. In Sanda Reinheimer Rîpeanu (ed.), Studia linguistica in honorem Mariae Manoliu, 175–185. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphological persistence. In Adam Ledgeway, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. Structures, 155–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.006Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2014a. The plural type ‘cărnuri’ and the morphological structure of the Romanian feminine noun in diachrony. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula, Alexandru Nicolae & Louise Esher (eds.), Diachronic variation in Romanian, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2014b. Morfologia flexionară a pluralului românesc și așa-zisul ‘neutru’ în limba română și în graiurile românești. In Marius Sala, Maria Stanciu Istrate & Nicoleta Petuhov (eds.). Lucrările celui de-al cincilea Simpozion Internațional de Lingvistică. București 27–28 septembrie 2013. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic Gold.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2016a. Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Aromanian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 91–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. 2016b. Le roumain: présentation grammaticale. Lalies 35. 9–88.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin. (forthcoming). Ambiguity in Romanian word-structure. The structure of plurals in… uri Revue roumaine de linguistique.Suche in Google Scholar

Mallinson, Graham. 1984. Problems, pseudo-problems and hard evidence – another look at the Rumanian neuter. Folia Linguistica 18. 439–451.10.1515/flin.1984.18.3-4.439Suche in Google Scholar

Marin, Maria. 2009. Importanţa formelor de plural în stabilirea filiaţiei unor cuvinte. In Oliviu Felecan (ed.) Lucrările celui de-al XIII-lea Simpozion Internaţional de Dialectologie, 219–225. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Mega.Suche in Google Scholar

Marin, Maria. 2010. Despre desinenţa -i la substantivele neutre în graiurile munteneşti. In Gheorghe Chivu & Oana Uţă Bărbulescu (eds.), Studii de limba română. Omagiu profesorului Gr. Brâncuş, 135–44. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Suche in Google Scholar

Marin, Maria. 2013. Pluralele ‘picere’, ‘piciori’. Notă ‘morfologică. Fonetică și dialectologie 32. 193–96.Suche in Google Scholar

Marin, Maria, IuliaMărgărit & VictorelaNeagoe. 1998. Graiurile româneşti din Ucraina şi Republica Moldova. Fonetică şi dialectologie 17. 69–155.Suche in Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor. 2013. The notion of inflection and the expression of nominal gender in Spanish. Studies in Language 37. 736–63.10.1075/sl.37.4.02melSuche in Google Scholar

Merlo, Clemente. 1917. L’articolo determinativo nel dialetto di Molfetta. Studj romanzi 14. 69–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Micu, Samuil & Gheorghe Șincai. 1980 [1980/1805]. Elementa linguae daco-romanae sive valachicae. Dacia: Cluj-Napoca.Suche in Google Scholar

NALROlt. Boris Cazacu, Teofil Teaha, Ion Ionica & Valeriu Rusu (eds.). 1967–84. Noul atlas lingvistic român pe regiuni - Oltenia. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

NALRCriș. Ionel Stan & Dorin Urițescu (eds.). 2000. Noul atlas lingvistic român – Crișana. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

NALRR-Mold.Buc. Vasile Arvinte (ed.). 1987–2007. Noul atlas lingvistic român pe regiuni - Moldova şi Bucovina. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Suche in Google Scholar

Perkowski, Jan & Emil Vrabie. 1986. Covert semantic and morphophonemic categories in the Romanian gender system. Slavic and East European Journal 30. 54–67.10.2307/307278Suche in Google Scholar

Petrovici, Emil. 1956. ALRII Atlasul Lingvistic Român. Serie nouă. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.Suche in Google Scholar

Philippide, Alexandru. 2011 [1893–1932]. Istoria limbii române. Ivănescu, Pamfil, Botoşineanu (eds). Iaşi: Polirom.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizescu, Ion. 1966. Substantivul. In Alexandru Graur, Mioara Avram & Laura Vasiliu (eds.), Gramatica limbii române I. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, 82–94.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosetti, Alexandru. 1957. Despre genul neutru și genul personal în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 8. 407–413.Suche in Google Scholar

Rothe, Wolfgang. 1957. Einführung in die historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Rumänischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Rovai, Francesco. 2012. Between feminine singular and neuter plural: Reanalysis patterns. Transactions of the Philological Society 110. 94–121.10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01286.xSuche in Google Scholar

Scafoglio, Giuseppe. 1928. Forme del sostantivo calabrese. Rimini: Garattoni.Suche in Google Scholar

Schön, Ilse. 1971. Neutrum und Kollektivum. Das Morphem -a im Lateinischen und Romanischen. Innsbruck: Institut für Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft.Suche in Google Scholar

Tiersma, Pieter. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–849.10.2307/413959Suche in Google Scholar

Udrescu, Dumitru. 1967. Glosar regional. Argeș: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.Suche in Google Scholar

Väänänen, Veikko. 1963. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliu, Emanuel. 1960. Observații asupra categoriei genului în limba română. Studii si cercetări lingvistice 11. 769–770.Suche in Google Scholar

Vrabie, Emil. 1989. On the distribution of the neuter plural endings in modern standard Romanian (MSR). The Slavic and East European Journal 33. 400–410.10.2307/308727Suche in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, H. 1985–91. The Latin neuter plurals in Romance (I-VII). Ronshu 26–32. http://www6.ocn.ne.jp/~wil/lnp.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Windisch, Rudolf. 1973. Genusprobleme im Romanischen. Das Neutrum im Rumänischen. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-11-08
Published in Print: 2016-11-01

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flih-2016-0004/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen