Home Mass rearing protocol and density trials of Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato
Article Open Access

Mass rearing protocol and density trials of Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato

  • Rosemary B. Murray , Philip G. Hahn and Octavio Menocal EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2025

Abstract

Lilioceris egena (Weise) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) is an approved classical biological control agent that feeds on the aerial reproductive structures (i.e., bulbils) of the invasive air potato vine in Florida. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, has mass-produced and released over 100,000 beetles since 2021. Mass rearing can be challenging for highly specialized herbivores like L. egena. Therefore, we present a detailed protocol to mass rear L. egena under laboratory settings. This protocol ensures consistent production of approximately 675 beetles per month/colony for research and field applications while maintaining efficiency and affordability. Additionally, we determined how the number of mating pairs and the condition of air potato bulbils (whole or bisected) used in the mass rearing system influenced the number of adults produced. Results showed that 17 mating pairs per bulbil (of approximately 150 g) was an optimal beetle density to maximize beetle production and maintain a healthy colony. The condition of bulbils utilized did not influence the number of adults produced. This protocol can be adopted by integrated pest management (IPM) and master gardener programs, universities, and regulatory agencies in other southeastern states currently facing air potato infestations.

Resumen

Lilioceris egena (Weise) (Coleóptera: Chrysomelidae) es un escarabajo que se alimenta de los “bulbillos” de la patata trepadora y es actualmente utilizado como un agente de control biológico de ésta en el estado de Florida. El Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, ha producido y liberado más de 100,000 escarabajos desde 2021. Este manuscrito presenta un protocolo detallado de crianza que asegura la producción consistente de aproximadamente 675 escarabajos mensuales/colonia los cuales pueden ser utilizados en investigaciones o liberados en campo mientras se asegura eficacia y asequibilidad. Adicionalmente, se determinó cómo la densidad de escarabajos y el estado de los “bulbillos” (enteros o cortados a la mitad) usados en el sistema de crianza masiva influyó en el número de adultos producidos. Los resultados muestran que 17 parejas reproductivas por “bulbillo” (∼150 g) es una densidad óptima para maximizar la producción de escarabajos y mantener colonias saludables. Utilizar “bulbillos” enteros o cortados por la mitad no afectó el número de escarabajos producidos. Este protocolo puede ser utilizado por programas de manejo integrado de plagas (MIP), universidades y agencias reguladoras en otros estados en el sureste de los Estados Unidos que actualmente tienen problemas con la papa trepadora.

Insect mass rearing protocols are essential in classical biological control programs. These protocols enable the production and release of thousands of biological control agents, increasing their impact and rate of establishment in the field, thus reducing the abundance of the targeted pest (Moran et al. 2023; Parra and Coelho 2022). However, in some cases, protocols may have to be adjusted based on the quantity of control agents required, number of staff available, and size of the rearing facility (Kraus et al. 2022).

In the last two decades, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI), has played a critical role in multiple biological control projects targeting invasive insect and plant pests. Its efforts include developing or improving mass rearing protocols of biological control agents. For instance, FDACS-DPI has successfully reared and released various agents such as Tamarixia radiata (Waterston) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) against the Asian citrus psyllid (Patt and Rohrig 2017), Apanteles opuntiarum Martínez and Berta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for the Argentine cactus moth (Varone et al. 2024), Gratiana boliviana Spaeth (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to control tropical soda apple (Overholt et al. 2009), and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) against Brazilian peppertree (Wheeler et al. 2022). However, one of the most successful projects has been the air potato biological control program (Kraus et al. 2022; Manrique et al. 2023; Overholt et al. 2016). Its success is due to the biological control agent’s high degree of specificity and conspicuous impact on the vine, the environmental and economic benefits, the long-term effectiveness, and finally, the strong community involvement. In this regard, the program actively involves community members in releases across infested areas.

Air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera L., Dioscoreales: Dioscoreaceae) is an invasive perennial vine originally from Asia, Africa, and northern Australia, which can climb tree canopies, displace native vegetation, and disrupt ecological functions (Croxton et al. 2011; Pemberton and Witkus 2010). Currently, air potato is present in several southeastern states, including Florida (Manrique et al. 2023). Air potato reproduces asexually, generating aerial potato-like structures (i.e., bulbils), which fall off as the vine senesces. Previous methods of control included herbicide applications and mechanical removal of bulbils; however, these approaches were proven to be costly, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and only provided a temporary solution (Kraus and Murray 2021; Overholt et al. 2014; Wheeler et al. 2007).

Biological control was considered the best, cost-effective management tactic against air potato. Between 2011 and 2021, the leaf-feeding beetle, Lilioceris cheni Gressitt and Kimoto (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was mass produced and over one million beetles were released as a biocontrol agent of air potato by multiple state and federal agencies (Kraus et al. 2022; Rayamajhi and Dray 2022). Although L. cheni successfully reduced vine coverage and propagule pressure of air potato (Rayamajhi et al. 2019), the production of bulbils, particularly in South Florida, remains relatively high compared to North and Central Florida (Kraus et al. 2022; Manrique et al. 2017, 2023]; Overholt et al. 2016; Rayamajhi and Dray 2022; Wheeler et al. 2020). To overcome this issue, an additional biological control agent of air potato was federally approved to be released across Florida in 2021. Lilioceris egena (Weise) is an air potato feeding specialist, where both larvae and adults feed primarily on bulbils (Dray and Goldstein 2019; Dray et al. 2023). The bulbil damage caused by L. egena paired with the defoliation by L. cheni is expected to further reduce the dominance of air potato in agricultural and natural ecosystems.

Here, we present an efficient protocol to mass rear L. egena in laboratory settings. Furthermore, we document how the number of mating pairs and the condition of bulbils (whole or bisected) used in the mass rearing system influence the number of adults produced. This study aimed to optimize L. egena adult production, particularly when the number of bulbils in the rearing system is limited.

The following protocol yielded approximately 675 beetles per month from each rearing colony cage. Mass rearing of L. egena was conducted in a walk-in rearing room under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5 % relative humidity (RH), and 14L:10D (Kraus et al. 2021). For one L. egena colony, an open 4.5 L translucent plastic container (24 × 18 × 15 cm) filled with approximately 100 g of dry sterilized grade A-1 vermiculite was placed into a 40 × 40 × 60 cm polyvinyl chloride cage (Bug Dorm, Catalog No. B09GRTB95S). Two whole large bulbils (250 ± 50 g) were placed in the container along with a 37 mL plastic cup filled with reverse osmosis water. The plastic cup lid had a 1.5 cm hole to insert a 5 cm long braided cotton wick. Subsequently, 17 L. egena active and vigorous mating pairs, all collected within 1–2 weeks post-emergence from laboratory stock colonies, were released into the cage, and allowed to oviposit freely. After four days, adults were gently separated from bulbils. The container was covered with a lid that had a 6-cm plastic screen vent, and then removed from the cage. Subsequently, dead beetles were replaced, and a new container with bulbils was placed into the cage to repeat the cycle. Every two months, cages, mating pairs, and containers were replaced entirely to maintain productivity and prevent frass build up and potential pests and pathogens.

Containers with infested bulbils were monitored daily to remove frass and deliquesced bulbils. Daily monitoring and sanitation prevent pest infestations like mites or diseases caused by fungi and bacterial growth. When bulbils build up too much frass or become overcrowded, second and third instar larvae tended to exit the bulbils and search for fresh food (Figure 1). Consequently, extra bulbils were added as needed. Neonate larvae could not penetrate the rough skin of new bulbils; thus, new bulbils were cut in half to facilitate their boring and feeding activities (Figure 1). Once mature, fourth instar larvae exited the bulbils and burrowed into the vermiculite to pupate. When larvae have pupated (approximately 86 %, Menocal et al. unpublished), the remaining bulbils were removed, and the containers were left undisturbed for approximately 12 days until adults began to emerge. A period of 12 days was used based on L. egena pupal developmental time at 24 °C (Dray et al. 2023). Emerging adults were collected daily and placed into vented 4.5 L containers of one hundred adults with bulbil slices and air potato leaves. These containers were replaced three times a week until the beetles were used for research or field releases.

Figure 1: 
Damage caused by Lilioceris egena larvae to air potato bulbils. Note larvae crawling around due to overcrowding and bulbils cut in half to facilitate boring activities.
Figure 1:

Damage caused by Lilioceris egena larvae to air potato bulbils. Note larvae crawling around due to overcrowding and bulbils cut in half to facilitate boring activities.

To determine the impact of adult beetle density (3F:3M, 5F:5M, 10F:10M, 20F:20M, and 30F:30M; where F = female and M = male) and the condition of bulbils (whole or bisected) on the number of beetles produced, we conducted a 5 × 2 full factorial experimental design. Each treatment was replicated 10 times, except the 10F:10M whole and 10F:10M bisected treatments, which were replicated 20 times. The experiment followed the aforementioned protocol with some minor modifications. Briefly, medium-sized bulbils (150 ± 50 g), whether whole or bisected, were individually placed in terraria (33 × 18.5 × 21 cm) set up with a trifold paper towel at the bottom. Recently emerged (>3 days old) mating pairs selected from stock colonies were released into each terrarium according to the desired adult beetle density to be tested. Beetles oviposited for 72 h. Then, infested bulbils (whole or bisected) were individually transferred to plastic containers with vermiculite. The containers were left undisturbed until adults emerged, at which point the adults were removed and counted.

Data were analyzed using JMP Pro. 16.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of adult beetle density, condition of bulbils (whole or bisected), and their interaction on the total number of adults produced. To determine the optimal beetle density, data were analyzed in R (version 4.1.3.) using the Ricker function (Pinheiro et al. 2024), which calculates density-dependent reproduction rate (Brännström and Sumpter 2005). Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) unless otherwise indicated; results were considered significant at a critical level of α = 0.05.

The interaction of adult beetle density and condition of bulbils was not statistically significant (F = 0.0570, p = 0.9939). The number of adults produced was significantly influenced by beetle density (F = 6.9298, p < 0.0001) but not by the condition of bulbils offered (F = 0.5364, p = 0.4655). A beetle density of 20F:20M produced more beetles (90.45 ± 8.60) than densities of 10F:10M (76.65 ± 5.56) and 30F:30M (74.25 ± 10.39). However, adult production among these three densities was not significantly different. Densities of 3F:3M and 5F:5M produced the least number of beetles, 35.90 ± 4.37 and 59.30 ± 6.99, respectively. The Ricker function revealed an optimal adult beetle density of 17F:17M beetles with an estimated adult production of 90.30 (Figure 2).

Figure 2: 
Total number of Lilioceris egena adults produced at five beetle densities. Each data point represents raw data for each treatment (beetle density and bulbil condition). The Ricker model shows the estimated optimal beetle density (X
opt; 95 % CI) and the estimated adult production (Y
max; 95 % CI) at the optimal beetle density.
Figure 2:

Total number of Lilioceris egena adults produced at five beetle densities. Each data point represents raw data for each treatment (beetle density and bulbil condition). The Ricker model shows the estimated optimal beetle density (X opt; 95 % CI) and the estimated adult production (Y max; 95 % CI) at the optimal beetle density.

In mass-rearing biological control programs, a factor that limits the production of biocontrol agents is host availability (Kraus et al. 2022). The air potato program at FDACS-DPI relies on bulbils collected from state and national parks in Florida. However, acquiring these bulbils involves a significant amount of travel, time, and labor. Therefore, it is critical to maximize the number of beetles produced per bulbil in each rearing cycle. Our results indicate that 17 mating pairs per bulbil is an optimal beetle density to maximize beetle production and the use of bulbils. Although higher beetle density did not significantly increase the number of beetles produced; it increased the amount of frass, which led to more frequent cleaning of the rearing units. Contamination and overcrowding are known to weaken insect colonies (Maciel-Vergara et al. 2021; Mahavidanage et al. 2023; Morales-Ramos and Rojas 2015). Thus, good sanitary practices are highly recommended to maintain healthy colonies. These practices include the disposal of dead insects, frass, used rearing substrate, and old adults at the end of rearing cycles (Eilenberg et al. 2015). Additionally, it is critical to maintain several colonies that are isolated to prevent disease or pest transmission among colonies thereby protecting against entire colony collapse.

Insect mass-rearing protocols require a thorough understanding of the biology and ecology of the intended biological control agent and host. Additionally, a well-designed protocol ensures consistent production of thousands of active and vigorous biological control agents for research and field applications while maintaining efficiency and affordability. The rearing method proposed here has consistently proven to be highly effective at producing large quantities of healthy beetles while utilizing low-cost rearing equipment. However, we note that slight deviations from our protocol would likely still result in conditions conducive to mass rearing. For instance, if controlled environmental conditions are unavailable, room temperature and ambient humidity should be sufficient for insect production. This protocol can easily be adopted by integrated pest management (IPM) and master gardener programs, universities, and regulatory agencies in other southeastern states currently facing air potato infestations. These protocols should be reviewed periodically to incorporate the most up-to-date information derived from additional empirical research.


Corresponding author: Octavio Menocal, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: AP23PPQFO000C062

Award Identifier / Grant number: 6.0559

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Simon Riley (UF/IFAS Statistical Consulting Unit) for his valuable help during the statistical analysis. We thank Kimberly Lastra and Anya Hames for their technical assistance during experimental setup and data collection. Special thanks to José Marcelino and Nicole Benda (both FDACS-DPI) for providing feedback on previous versions of the manuscript.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsability for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. All authors contributed to research, writing, and/or editing of this manuscript.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: This research was supported by USDA-APHIS through the Plant Protection Act Section - 7721 (Project# 6.0559) awarded to FDACS-DPI and AP23PPQFO000C062.

  7. Data availability: Data are contained within the article.

References

Brännström, A. and Sumpter, D.J.T. (2005). The role of competition and clustering in population dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272: 2065–2072, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3185.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Croxton, M.D., Andreu, M.A., Williams, D.A., Overholt, W.A., and Smith, J.A. (2011). Geographic origins and genetic diversity of air-potato (Dioscorea bulbifera) in Florida. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 4: 22–30, https://doi.org/10.1614/ipsm-d-10-00033.1.Search in Google Scholar

Dray, F.A.Jr. and Goldstein, S.L. (2019). A novel method for quantifying insect damage to plant storage organs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 168: 113–117, https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12862.Search in Google Scholar

Dray, F.A.Jr., Menocal, O., Murray, R., Rohrig, E., and Minteer, C. (2023). Lilioceris egena (Weise) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae) – biological control agent of air potato vine. UF/IFAS – EDIS EENY-804 2023, https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-IN1406-2023.Search in Google Scholar

Eilenberg, J., Vlak, J.M., Nielsen-LeRoux, C., Cappellozza, S., and Jensen, A.B. (2015). Diseases in insects produced for food and feed. J. Insects Food Feed 1: 87–102, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2014.0022.Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, E.C. and Murray, R. (2021). Air potato management guide: combining management strategies to achieve eradication of the noxious weed Dioscorea bulbifera (air potato vine). Circular No. 2. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services-Division of Plant Industry. FDACS-P-02163.Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, E., Kelm, C., Schuchman, E., Clark, M., Poffenberger, R., Kerr, C., and Rohrig, E. (2021). Mass-rearing Lilioceris cheni Gressitt and Kimoto, air potato beetle (APB): standard operating procedures. Methods Technical Manual No. 002. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services-Division of Plant Industry. FDACS-P-01943.Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, E.C., Murray, R., Kelm, C., Poffenberger, R., Rohrig, E., and Fairbanks, K. (2022). Advancements in mass rearing the air potato beetle Lilioceris cheni. Insects 13: 65, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010065.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Maciel-Vergara, G., Jensen, A.B., Lecocq, A., and Eilenberg, J. (2021). Diseases in edible insect rearing systems. J. Insects Food Feed 7: 621–638, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2021.0024.Search in Google Scholar

Mahavidanage, S., Fuciarelli, T.M., Li, X., and Rollo, C.D. (2023). The effects of rearing density on growth, survival, and starvation resistance of the house cricket Acheta domesticus. J. Orthoptera Res. 32: 25–31, https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.32.86496.Search in Google Scholar

Manrique, V., Lake, E.C., Smith, M.C., Diaz, R., Franko, C., Pratt, P.D., Rayamajhi, M.B., and Overholt, W.A. (2017). Comparative evaluation of development and reproductive capacity of two biotypes of Lilioceris cheni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), biological control agents of air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera) in Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 110: 310–316, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saw100.Search in Google Scholar

Manrique, V., Kraus, E., Schaffer, C., Diaz, R., Kelm, C., Poffenberger, R., Rohrig, E., Murray, R., David, A., Smith, M.C., et al.. (2023). Assessing the status of biological control of air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera) in the southeastern USA. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 12: 1173–1185, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2023.2294207.Search in Google Scholar

Morales-Ramos, J.A. and Rojas, M.G. (2015). Effect of larval density on food utilization efficiency of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 108: 2259–2267, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Moran, P.J., De Clerck-Floate, R., Hill, M.P., Raghu, S., Paynter, Q., and Goolsby, J.A. (2023). Mass-production of arthropods for biological control of weeds: a global perspective. In: Morales-Ramos, J.A., Guadalupe Rojas, M., and Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. (Eds.). Mass production of beneficial organisms, 2nd ed Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego, California, pp. 157–194.10.1016/B978-0-12-822106-8.00014-2Search in Google Scholar

Overholt, W.A., Diaz, R., Hibbard, K.L., Roda, A.L., Amalin, D., Fox, A.J., Hight, S.D., Medal, J.C., Stansly, P.A., Carlisle, B., et al.. (2009). Releases, distribution and abundance of Gratiana boliviana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum, Solanaceae) in Florida. Fla. Entomol. 92: 450–457, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0306.Search in Google Scholar

Overholt, W.A., Markle, L., Meisenberg, M., Raz, L., Wheeler, G., Pemberton, J., Taylor, J., King, M., Schmitz, D., Parks, G.R., et al.. (2014). Air potato management plan for Florida. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, Available at: www.fleppc.org.Search in Google Scholar

Overholt, W.A., Rayamajhi, M., Rohrig, E., Hight, S., Dray, F.A., Lake, E., Smith, M., Hibbard, K., Bhattarai, G.P., Bowers, K., et al.. (2016). Release and distribution of Lilioceris cheni (Coleloptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera: Dioscoreaceae), in Florida. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 8: 1087–1099.10.1080/09583157.2016.1185090Search in Google Scholar

Parra, J.R.P. and Coelho, A.Jr. (2022). Insect rearing techniques for biological control programs, a component of sustainable agriculture in Brazil. Insects 13: 105, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Patt, J.M. and Rohrig, E. (2017). Laboratory evaluations of the foraging success of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenopetera: Eulophidae) on flowers and extrafloral nectaries: potential use of nectar plants for conservation biological control of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla. Entomol. 100: 149–156, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0121.Search in Google Scholar

Pemberton, R.W. and Witkus, G.L. (2010). Laboratory host range testing of Lilioceris sp. near impressa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) – a potential biological control agent of air potato, Dioscorea bulbifera (Dioscoreaceae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 20: 567–587, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150903531332.Search in Google Scholar

Pinheiro, J. and Bates, D., and R Core Team (2024). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-166, Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.Search in Google Scholar

Rayamajhi, M.B. and Dray, F.A.Jr. (2022). Classical biological control of air potato vine, Dioscorea bulbifera, infestations in Florida. In: van Driesche, R.G., Winston, R.L., Perring, T.M., and Lopez, V.M. (Eds.). Contributions of classical biological control to the U.S. food security, forestry, and biodiversity. FHAAST-2019-05. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, pp. 390–401.Search in Google Scholar

Rayamajhi, M.B., Rohrig, E., Leidi, J., Kerr, C., Salcedo, E., Poffenberger, R., Smith, M., Lake, E., Dray, F.A.Jr., Pratt, P., et al.. (2019). Herbivory by the biocontrol agent Lilioceris cheni suppresses propagule production and smothering ability of the invasive vine Dioscorea bulbifera. Biol. Control 130: 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Varone, L., Benda, N., Guala, M.E., Martinez, J.J., and Bruzzone, O.A. (2024). Reproductive biology and rearing improvements of Apanteles opuntiarum, potential biocontrol agent of the Argentine cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum. Insects 15: 604, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080604.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wheeler, G.S., Pemberton, R.W., and Raz, L. (2007). A biological control feasibility study of the invasive weed – air potato, Dioscorea bulbifera L. (Dioscoreaceae): an effort to increase biological control transparency and safety. Nat. Area J. 27: 296–279, https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608(2007)27[269:abcfso]2.0.co;2.10.3375/0885-8608(2007)27[269:ABCFSO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, G.S., Lake, E.C., Rayamajhi, M.B., and Smith, M.C. (2020). Acute toxicity of mosquito pesticides on weed biological control agents in south Florida, USA. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 30: 855–861, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1768220.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, G.S., Minteer, C., Rohrig, E., Steininger, S., Nestle, R., Halbritter, D., Leidi, J., Rayamajhi, M., and LeFalchier, E. (2022). Release and persistence of the Brazilian peppertree biological control agent Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) in Florida. Fla. Entomol. 105: 225–230, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.105.0308.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-24
Accepted: 2024-11-19
Published Online: 2025-02-12

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of the Florida Entomological Society

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. First report of Phidotricha erigens (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Epipaschiinae) injuring mango inflorescences in Puerto Rico
  4. Seed predation of Sabal palmetto, Sabal mexicana and Sabal uresana (Arecaceae) by the bruchid Caryobruchus gleditsiae (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), with new host and distribution records
  5. Genetic variation of rice stink bugs, Oebalus spp. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from Southeastern United States and Cuba
  6. Selecting Coriandrum sativum (Apiaceae) varieties to promote conservation biological control of crop pests in south Florida
  7. First record of Mymarommatidae (Hymenoptera) from the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
  8. First field validation of Ontsira mellipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a potential biological control agent for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in South Carolina
  9. Field evaluation of α-copaene enriched natural oil lure for detection of male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in area-wide monitoring programs: results from Tunisia, Costa Rica and Hawaii
  10. Abundance of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and other thrips in commercial snap bean fields in the Homestead Agricultural Area (HAA)
  11. Performance of Salvinia molesta (Salviniae: Salviniaceae) and its biological control agent Cyrtobagous salviniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in freshwater and saline environments
  12. Natural arsenal of Magnolia sarcotesta: insecticidal activity against the leaf-cutting ant Atta mexicana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
  13. Ethanol concentration can influence the outcomes of insecticide evaluation of ambrosia beetle attacks using wood bolts
  14. Post-release support of host range predictions for two Lygodium microphyllum biological control agents
  15. Missing jewels: the decline of a wood-nesting forest bee, Augochlora pura (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), in northern Georgia
  16. Biological response of Rhopalosiphum padi and Sipha flava (Hemiptera: Aphididae) changes over generations
  17. Argopistes tsekooni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a new natural enemy of Chinese privet in North America: identification, establishment, and host range
  18. A non-overwintering urban population of the African fig fly (Diptera: Drosophilidae) impacts the reproductive output of locally adapted fruit flies
  19. Fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on four economically important host fruits from Fujian Province, China
  20. Carambola fruit fly in Brazil: new host and first record of associated parasitoids
  21. Establishment and range expansion of invasive Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae) in Texas
  22. A micro-anatomical investigation of dark and light-adapted eyes of Chilades pandava (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
  23. Scientific Notes
  24. Early stragglers of periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) found in Louisiana
  25. Attraction of released male Mediterranean fruit flies to trimedlure and an α-copaene-containing natural oil: effects of lure age and distance
  26. Co-infestation with Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae): a threat for berry crops in Morelos, Mexico
  27. Observation of brood size and altricial development in Centruroides hentzi (Arachnida: Buthidae) in Florida, USA
  28. New quarantine cold treatment for medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in pomegranates
  29. A new invasive pest in Mexico: the presence of Thrips parvispinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in chili pepper fields
  30. Acceptance of fire ant baits by nontarget ants in Florida and California
  31. Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
  32. Note on the nesting biology of Epimelissodes aegis LaBerge (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
  33. Mass rearing protocol and density trials of Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato
  34. Cardinal predation of the invasive Jorō spider Trichophila clavata (Araneae: Nephilidae) in Georgia
  35. Retraction
  36. Retraction of: Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flaent-2024-0074/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button