Startseite The Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics

A Story of Collaborative Research: A Journey hand in hand with Prof. George Lakoff
  • Eusebio V. Llácer Llorca ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Juli 2015

Abstract

In this paper we will take a journey back in time and up to our days through the historical development of Cognitive Linguistics, especially but not only in the United States. In this journey we will show the most essential steps taken by several researchers who have contributed from diverse disciplines, not only Linguistics but also Psychology, Neuroscience, Computer Science or Mathematics, to the fruitful evolution of Cognitive Linguistics in the last fifty years. From Chomsky’s and Propp’s theories to the Neural Theory of Metaphor we will travel by the hand of Prof. George Lakoff, probably one of the most important American scholars who has devoted his academic life to the intensive and extensive research of this vast and attractive knowledge area.

Resumen

En este artículo realizaremos un viaje en el tiempo y hasta nuestros días a través del desarrollo histórico de la lingüística cognitiva, especialmente, pero no solo en los Estados Unidos. En nuestro viaje mostraremos los pasos esenciales seguidos por varios investigadores que han contribuido desde distintas disciplinas, no únicamente la lingüística sino también la psicología, las neurociencias, la informática y las ciencias de la computación o las matemáticas, a la fructífera evolución de la lingüística cognitiva en los últimos cincuenta años. Desde las teorías de Chomsky y de Propp a la teoría neuronal de la metáfora, viajaremos de la mano del Prof. George Lakoff, uno de los más importantes estudiosos estadounidenses que ha dedicado su vida académica a la investigación intensiva y extensiva de esta amplia y atractiva área de conocimiento.

Zusammenfassung

Mit diesem Beitrag unternehmen wir eine Zeitreise durch die historische Entwicklung der kognitiven Linguistik bis zur Gegenwart, vor allem, aber nicht nur mit Blick auf die USA. Dabei konzentrieren wir uns auf die wichtigsten Schritte, mit denen die Forschung aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen, – nicht nur aus der Linguistik, sondern auch aus der Psychologie, aus den Neurowissenschaften, der Informatik und Mathematik, – in den letzten fünfzig Jahren die fruchtbare Entwicklung der kognitiven Linguistik vorangetrieben hat. Ausgehend von Chomsky’s und Propps Ansätzen zu einer neuronalen Theorie der Metapher reisen wir unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. George Lakoff, wahrscheinlich einer der wichtigsten amerikanischen Gelehrten, der sein akademisches Leben der intensiven und extensiven Forschung zu dem weiten und attraktiven Gebiet der kognitiven Linguistik, insbesondere der Erforschung von Metaphern gewidmet hat.

Acknowledgement

This interview has been possible thanks to the postdoctoral aid granted by the Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Política Científica of the Universitat de València within the subprogram ‘Attraction of Talent’, and in the framework agreement signed by the University of California, Berkeley, the Andalusia-Tech and the VLC-Campus (Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Universitat de València).

Bibliography

Asanovic, Krste; Beck, James; Feldman, Jerry; Morgan, Nelson & John Wawrzynek. 1993. Designing A Connectionist Network Supercomputer. International Journal of Neural Systems 4(4), 317–326.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, David; Chang, Nancy; Feldman, Jerome & Srini Narayanan. 1998. Extending embodied lexical development. Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 84–89.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K.; Lindsay, Shane, Matlock, Teeny & Srini Narayanan. 2007. Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 31(5), 733–764.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. London: Mouton, 1957.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Language and the study of mind. Tokyo: Sansyusya Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. Language and thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Suche in Google Scholar

Dennison, Heeyeon Y. & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2010. Language-driven motor simulation is sensitive to social context. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 901–906. Portland, OR.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 2003. Mappings in thought and language. The European legacy 8(6), 839–840.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Jerome. 2007. Her story of cognitive science. Artificial Intelligence 171(18): 1107–1109.10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.007Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Jerome & Srini Narayanan. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and language 89(2), 385–392.Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Jerome; Lakoff, George; Bailey, David; Narayanan, Srini; Regier, Terry & Andreas Stolcke. 1996. L0-the first five years of an automated language acquisition project. Artificial Intelligence Review 10(1–2), 103–129.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1968. Child language. Aphasia and phonological universals, The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783111353562Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1978. Six lectures on sound and meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1995. On language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Frederic; Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2008. Computational Models in the Debate over Language Learnability. Infant and Child Development 17, 55–80.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2003. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2006. Language, mind, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2008. Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual review of cognitive linguistics 6(1): 168–184.10.1075/arcl.6.08kovSuche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2005. Thinking points (with the Rockridge Institute). New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2006. Whose freedom? New York: Farrar Strauss Giroux.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2008. The political mind. New York: Viking/Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Zoltán Kövecses. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Dorothy Holland, and Naomi Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, 195–221.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Elisabeth Wehling. 2012. The Little Blue Book: The essential guide to thinking and talking democratic. New York: Simon and Schuster.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume II, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, Srini. 1997. Embodiment in language understanding: Sensory-motor representations for metaphoric reasoning about event descriptions. University of California, Berkeley: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayanan, Srini. 1999. Moving Right Along: A Computational Model of Metaphoric Reasoning about Events. AAAI/IAAI, 121–127.Suche in Google Scholar

Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30(3), 401–450.Suche in Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the Tale. Austin, TX: American Folklore Society and Indiana University.Suche in Google Scholar

Radden, Gunter & Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. Metonymy in language and thought 4, 17–60.Suche in Google Scholar

Regier, Terry. 1996. The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3608.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1978. The Relation of Grammar to Cognition. TINLAP ’78 Proceedings of the 1978 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing, 14–24.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The Representation of Spatial Structure in Spoken and Signed Languages: a Neural Model. Language and Linguistics 4(2): 207–250.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2004. Recombinance in the Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Panels, 1–28. Eds. Jonathon E. Cihlar, David Kaiser, Irene Kimbara & Amy Franklin. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 1996. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford University Press (USA).Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2001. Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford University Press (USA).Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2014. The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. Oxford University Press (USA).Suche in Google Scholar

Walker, Esther J.; Bergen, Benjamin K. & Rafael E. Núñez. 2014. Disentangling Spatial Metaphors for Time Using Non-spatial Responses and Auditory Stimuli. Metaphor and Symbol 29(4): 316–327.10.1080/10926488.2014.948801Suche in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Kathryn & Benjamin K. Bergen. 2010. Meaning in the palm of your hand. In Sally Rice and John Newman (eds.) Empirical and experimental methods in conceptual structure, discourse, and language, chapter 18. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar


Note

The author is a member of SILVA - Group of Support for Investigation in Language Variation Analysis. The SILVA Group is a multidisciplinary team of scholars based in the Universitat de València (UV), the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV), and the Universidad de Alicante (UA).


Published Online: 2015-7-11
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eujal-2015-0019/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen