Home Law Does Transparency Lead to Unfairness? The Court of Justice of the European Union on the Duty to Inform about Mandatory Rules
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Does Transparency Lead to Unfairness? The Court of Justice of the European Union on the Duty to Inform about Mandatory Rules

  • Nicholas Mouttotos EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 9, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Ottília Lovasné Tóth v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt can be seen as a missed opportunity, first, in elaborating on Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13, in particular whether the two criteria set by the article, of a term causing a ‘significant imbalance’ and it being contrary to ‘good faith’ should be assessed separately; and, second, in clarifying the status of the transparency requirement found in Article 5 of the directive. This case note focuses on the latter question, taking into account the repercussions of the judgment of the CJEU in Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Amazon EU Sàrl. In the latter case, the CJEU introduced an information duty about the existence of mandatory rules such as Article 6(2) of Rome I Regulation. In its decision in Ottília Lovasné Tóth, the CJEU decided to limit the scope of the judgment in Amazon to the particular circumstances of that case.

Published Online: 2020-06-09
Published in Print: 2020-06-05

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ercl-2020-0018/html
Scroll to top button