1. 56Introduction
Like the other EU Member States,[77] France has enshrined in its national laws an objective to reach ‘carbon neutrality’ by 2050. With reference to the 1990 levels, the goal is to reduce the emission of greenhouse gasess by 40 % by 2030, and by over 85 % by 2050.[78]
Buildings, and particularly heating and cooling systems, are amongst the main emitters of greenhouse gases. This is particularly true of office buildings and other tertiary structures. The ageing real estate stock is ripe for all sorts of energy consumption improvements, both for the sake of the environment and because an increasing number of households live in energetically inadequate buildings, which expose them to poor sanitary conditions and to the cost-of-living crisis. In the French case, the main culprits are landlords who, in the past, have had very few incentives to renovate the flats or buildings in which their tenants live, as the limited housing availability in larger cities has meant that even slum flats can catch a high rent on the market.
It is legally difficult to force owners to renovate their buildings. French law has a strong constitutional culture of protecting the right of property (§ 2), which can only be restricted by law, and under limited circumstances. This right is jealously guarded by courts, which can strike down any law that disproportionately interferes with property. This generally means that the legislator cannot target owners 57directly when other means are available for compliance with such national energy and climate objectives as defined by law.
The legislator therefore chooses to act indirectly by setting conditions for new buildings and the renovation of old buildings, which are implemented upon granting (or refusing to grant) building permits (§ 3). Such administrative requirements, because they do not apply to existing built property outside the context of a renovation, are not seen as an infringement on the rights of owners. Additionally, the law creates a few positive obligations to climate-proof new buildings or existing buildings upon voluntary renovation, as well as weaker obligations to renovate certain existing buildings (§ 4). At the same time, the law encourages owners to perform renovations through incentives both positive, such as subsidies, and negative, such as rent freezes causing an overall decrease in the market value of the property (§ 5). Such renovations will have to follow planning requirements as well as obligations applicable upon renovation.
Owing to the nature of the mechanisms used in French law, there are no specific enforcement mechanisms (§ 6). Any rules or obligations relative to new or renovated buildings are implemented after a building permit has been issued. Incentives are, by definition, non-coercive tools and people are expected to follow them voluntarily, because it is in their best interest to do so. The only positive obligation to renovate existing buildings under French law is backed by a small monetary penalty. This leads us to the conclusion that these somewhat disappointing mechanisms seem to be the only ones that fall within the constraints of French constitutional law (§ 7).
2. Constitutional Protection of Property
The right of property is protected by French constitutional law, in a way that is probably stronger than in some other jurisdictions. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (Déclaration des droits de l’Homme et du citoyen) deems it a ‘natural and imprescriptible right’,[79] which is also considered ‘inviolable and sacred’, meaning that ‘no one may be deprived thereof, unless public necessity, legally ascertained, obviously requires it, and just and prior indemnity has been paid’.[80] This specific provision was introduced to limit and regulate an ancient prerogative, used by feudal superiors and then the monarchy, consisting in depriving vassals (and now owners) of their property for various purposes. This prerogative subsists in the law, 58but is now strictly limited to public utility, and requires prior compensation.[81] Interference with ownership is therefore explicitly restricted by these provisions, thereby giving ownership a rather ‘absolutist’ flavour, also reflected in the Civil Code (Code civil) and the commentaries thereon.[82] This effectively precludes the French legislator from issuing overly general restrictions on ownership, other than those required by public interest.
As a result of this constitutional heritage, any positive obligation imposed upon owners is at first seen as an infringement on this specific ‘natural’, ‘inviolable and sacred’ right to property. According to the case law of the French Constitutional Council (Conseil constitutionnel), restrictions to these right could be considered as 1) a ‘deprivation’ of ownership, which can only be justified by the finding, provided for by law, of ‘public necessity’ and the allocation to the owners of a fair and prior compensation;[83] or 2) or a mere ‘limitation’ on the exercise of the right to property,[84] in which case the Constitutional Council verifies that the infringement is justified by reasons of ‘general interest’.[85] These two hypotheses roughly correspond to the distinction that the European Court of Human Rights draws between deprivation of property justified by a public interest, and control of the use of possessions in the general interest.[86]
We must point out, furthermore, that restrictions to the right of property can only result from a special procedure or from provisions defined by the legislator. In other words, changes to the legal regime of property, or any in rem rights, cannot be delegated to administrative bodies.[87]
The Constitutional Council also requires any measures compelling owners in the general interest to be proportionate to the objective followed by the legislator. Specifically, as a matter of principle, this means that the French legislator cannot 59create general restrictions on owners that apply in a uniform manner to certain categories of buildings. A practical application of the proportionality criterion would be the possible requirement of monetary compensation meant to indemnify owners for any costs and for loss of value incurred, covering both the works imposed by law and, for example, the loss of enjoyment or the eviction of a tenant for the duration of the works. The assessment of what is proportionate or not, however, remains at the discretion of the constitutional judges. They usually examine the means employed by the legislator to reach an objective by restraining an individual right. Under the influence of European courts, French constitutional judges are developing their own reasoning in this field.[88]
For instance, Article 6 of the Law on an energy transition for green growth (2015) was found to be unconstitutional.[89] It created a duty to renovate private residential buildings to improve its energy performance ‘in the event of a change of ownership’ (‘à l’occasion d’une mutation’), applicable from 2030 onwards to 2050, under a timeframe to be determined by decree. On the one hand, the Constitutional Council admitted that ‘reducing energy consumption in residential buildings’ can be regarded as an objective of general interest, on the basis of which the French legislator could be allowed to limit the right of property. On the other hand, in the same decision, the judges stated that the French legislator had not sufficiently defined the legal framework under which the provision infringing on the right of property operated. In other words, it had failed to define the scope of the obligation and had not defined the financial conditions for its implementation. An obligation to climate-proof buildings could not take the form of a general duty: the legislator should always precisely define the scope of the duty (persons, buildings or projects targeted, compensation or grant criteria depending on the income of the owners or the amount of renovation expenses at stake, etc.).
Another issue is the compatibility of new procedures aiming to accelerate the production of renewable energies with constitutional environmental law, and especially with the French Environment Charter which states: ‘Everyone has the right to live in a healthy environment.’[90]
For instance, Article 19 of the Law on accelerating the production of renewable energies (2023) was challenged. This law provided for certain renewable energy production sources or energy storage facilities to be characterized, under certain 60circumstances, as motivated by an ‘imperative reason of major public interest’, which would justify a derogation from the prohibitions on damaging protected species.[91] One of the criticisms directed at these provisions was that they created an irrefutable presumption that certain projects were of major public interest, which would systematically favour their implementation. As a result, these installations could have harmful effects on the health of local residents and on protected species and their habitats. The Constitutional Council points out that, under the terms of Article 1 of the Environmental Charter, limitations imposed by the legislator on the exercise of the right to a healthy environment must be linked to constitutional requirements or justified on grounds of general interest and proportionate to the objective pursued. On the one hand, the Constitutional Council noted that these provisions are intended to encourage the production of renewable energy and the development of energy storage capacities. In doing so, the legislator pursued the constitutional objective of protecting the environment. On the other hand, the presumption established by the scrutinized provisions does not exempt such projects from compliance with the other conditions required for obtaining a derogation from the rules protecting the environment.[92] In this respect, the competent administrative authority ensures, under supervision by a judge, that an exemption from the laws protecting the environment is the only satisfactory solution and that it does not harm the maintenance, in a favourable conservation status, of the species concerned in their natural habitat.
What we have learnt from this section is that the development of equipment to promote renewable energy must be reconciled with many other public interest goals. The result is that French law is slowly progressing, given the precautions that need to be taken to ensure that the obligations imposed are not too strict or too general. They are adapted to the targets of general interest and proportionate, suitable and necessary.
3. Planning Law Obligations
In this section, we discuss the principles governing the drafting and implementation of the rules resulting from town planning. Specifically, we see how these rules, which traditionally apply to future constructions or renovations, are gradually 61starting to concern current owners. They are encouraged by the advantages of constructability to carry out work improving the production of renewable energy or energy savings.
3.1 Principles
To date, in France, no planning law, either general or specific, has made it possible to impose the installation or replacement of equipment for energy purposes on the owners of existing buildings. Such constraints are only valid for new buildings or renovations (i.e., they have no retroactive effect).[93]
This applies to town planning rules, which have to be set by the legislator, whether the legal rule is imposed directly on builders, created by regulatory power, or issued by certain administrations that are empowered by law to issue rules adapted to local circumstances. For instance, municipal authorities can issue urban plans that will generate administrative easements because the law empowers them to do so, for instance, through a ‘Plan Local d’Urbanisme’ (PLU),[94] which sets out the rules for communal urban planning. Therefore, as a matter of principle, urban planning documents can only restrict the right of property to the extent that the Planning Code (Code de l’urbanisme) allows. The public body would be acting ultra vires if there were no legal basis for the restrictions they wish to impose on ownership. For example, they cannot require systematic counselling by an architect, or demand that people contract with a specific real estate professional for a given project, nor can they require prior public consultations not provided for by law, or ask for additional studies or documents.[95] The PLU cannot directly regulate economic activity, 62either.[96] It cannot, for example, require a sunlight study without legal empowerment.[97]
As a result, town planning cannot compel owners to actively do something, nor can it create rules that immediately impact existing constructions. The purpose of town planning is to impose rules on future construction or development projects. It is concerned only with the aesthetic or architectural features of buildings, which may influence the installation of future equipment outside the building, in the event of renovations, but it cannot require that specific materials or brands of equipment be used, nor regulate the interior of buildings. In other words, urban planning can require the positioning of the roofs of future buildings facing the sun, but it cannot require the owner of an existing building to install solar panels.
3.2 Renovation of Buildings
When owners – out of their own free will – decide to install equipment intended to produce renewable energy, they must proceed with the installation or the necessary work in compliance with town planning rules, be they national or local. Thus, for example, the installation of a heat pump that would result in a change to the external appearance of the building must be notified to the local council beforehand. If the project requires the extension of the existing building, or the construction of a new building, depending on the importance of the work or the power produced, a building permit or a declaration prior to the work will be required.[98]
It should be noted that the French Planning Code favours the installation of renewable energy equipment[99] and provides for a lighter formalism than for other construction or installation projects.[100] The PLU can also grant bonuses to construc63tion works on buildings that demonstrate energy exemplarity.[101] Additionally, PLU regulations can define sectors in which they require any construction, work, installation or development to comply with reinforced energy and environmental performance standards that they define. In this respect, the PLU can impose a minimum production of renewable energy, where appropriate, depending on the characteristics of the project and the energy consumption of the sites concerned.[102]
3.3 Concluding Remarks on Planning Law
It can therefore be concluded that there is no way, under French Planning Law, to compel owners to renovate their building, for instance by replacing an old heating system burning fossil fuels. However, if the owner decides to perform such renovations because of the incentives created by law, he will have to comply with the technical specifications set out in the aid scheme, which are not planning law requirements but conditions for receiving said financial aid (for instance, to buy equipment that complies with high environmental or energy standards). Installing a new boiler may therefore be required by a specific incentive.
Renovation also requires compliance with the Planning Code. Depending on the extent of the work, a building permit or a prior declaration may be required, depending on whether the external appearance of the building is to be modified or the surface area extended. Internal alterations are normally not subject to authorization, except in the case of a building located in an outstanding heritage site.
The city planning administration will either approve or refuse the project only with reference to the administrative servitudes[103] provided for by the Planning Code. Nevertheless, if the PLU regulations have defined sectors in which they require projected constructions, works, installations and developments to comply with en64hanced energy and environmental performance standards (and impose a minimum production of renewable energy). In the event of non-compliance, the owner’s project may be refused, if it requires planning permission, before any work begins. However, in any case, the PLU only sets out general substantive rules. It will not impose the installation of, for instance, a boiler rather than a heat pump, nor will it impose a particular commercial brand.
We add that a law from March 2023 makes territorial planning of renewable energies a priority.[104] Local bodies (municipalities) can now create ‘acceleration zones’[105] where they would like to see renewable energy projects set up as a matter of priority. These zones can encompass all types of renewable energy, such as photovoltaic, solar, thermal, wind, biogas, and geothermal energy. ‘Acceleration zones’ are not exclusive zones for setting up renewable energy projects, but the Government will be introducing financial incentives for project developers setting up in these areas.
This Law supports the creation of ‘agrivoltaic installations’ as well. This is an electricity production installation that uses the sun’s radiative energy, the modules of which are located on an agricultural plot. It must make a lasting contribution to the installation, maintenance or development of agricultural production.[106]
4. Unilaterally Imposed Obligations to Climate-Proof Buildings
There are no general obligations, under French law, to climate-proof existing buildings. However, for instance, there are legal obligations to install renewable energy production facilities on certain buildings or car parks, and a legal ‘obligation to renovate’ (‘obligation légale de rénovation’) for certain types of buildings.
For many years, there were no provisions under French law to allow a public body to compel the owner of an existing building to climate-proof it. The goal was not considered to be of a sufficient degree of general interest – as if, generally speaking, protecting the environment were not an emergency. It was a question of political priority (or lack thereof), rather than a legal impossibility. For instance, French 65Law did not, then, compel the owner of an existing building to renovate it, to replace an old heating system burning fuel fossils, to install solar panels or a geothermal heat pump, or to connect to a district heating system.
Faced with the need to fight climate change urgently, however, the legislator is progressively setting up specific obligations to do so. The Climate and Resilience Law[107] and the Law on accelerating the production of renewable energies[108] made a step forward. The obligations created by those laws apply to owners for the future (when they build or renovate) or sometimes even in the present (obligation to renovate). To date, only buildings from specific economic sectors are affected by obligations to renovate or to build in a certain manner, with the requirement of doing so within a short period of time. The housing sector remains unaffected, despite some failed attempts to include it.[109] This situation is due to the aforementioned need for specific, fair and proportionate measures when it comes to imposing positive obligations on owners of existing buildings.
4.1 Obligations on Buildings or Car Parks for Renewable Energy Production Process
Regarding obligations that are imposed with respect to the construction of new buildings or the renovation of old ones, for instance, Article L. 171–4 of the Construction and Housing Code (Code de la construction et de l’habitation) states that, in compliance with the general objectives for the energy and environmental performance of buildings, some buildings or parts of buildings must incorporate either:
a renewable energy production process; or
a greening system based on a method of cultivation that uses drinking water only to supplement recovered water, guarantees a high degree of thermal efficiency and insulation, and promotes the preservation and recovery of biodiversity; or
any other system that achieves the same result.
66These obligations apply:
to extensions and major renovations to buildings or parts of buildings, where these extensions or renovations have a footprint of more than 500 square metres;
to any associated parking areas on which major renovations are carried out; or
when a new public service concession, service provision or commercial lease contract is concluded or renewed.[110]
Compliant structures are installed on the roofs of buildings or over-shaded areas (‘ombrières’) hanging over parking lots, on a minimum surface area at least equal to a proportion of the roof of the building that has been built or extensively renovated and of the shaded areas created, defined by order of the ministers responsible for construction and energy. This proportion is at least 30 % from 1 July 2023, then 40 % from 1 July 2026, and finally 50 % from 1 July 2027. In addition, other measures require the installation of shading systems on at least half the surface area of existing car parks of more than 1,500 square metres. This obligation will apply to existing car parks from July 2023 and to those for which planning permission applications have been submitted since the promulgation of this law. However, some derogations are also provided for.[111]
Finally, it should be noted that, since 2010, it is required that any planning action or operation (‘opération’ or ‘action d’aménagement’) subject to an environmental assessment must undergo a feasibility study of the area’s renewable energy development potential, specifically on the appropriateness of creating or connecting to a heating or cooling network using renewable and recovered energy.[112]
4.2 67District Heating Networks
As a result of the French interpretation of the constitutional protection of the right of property (see § 2), a public body can generally not compel any private individual or enterprise to connect their house or their shop’s building to a new district heating network using renewable energies. It cannot be expected from them to bear the connection costs either. Furthermore, even if a landlord wanted to revamp their house located in the development area of a (new) district heating system, a public body could not subject its renovation approval to a connection to a district heating network. That said, it can organize financial incentives to do so.
Under French law, however, the development and use of district heating systems are quite well promoted by a specific legal framework. After the second oil shock, the French legislative body adopted a first law promoting heating district system utilization.[113] The promotion of heating district systems was all the more important because using heat that is locally produced increases national energy independence. This first statute introduced a procedure of ‘classification’ (‘classement’) of heating district networks.[114] It authorizes a local public body to require private individuals and businesses to connect to the heating district system if they are located in the development area of a classified heating network.[115] Since 1980, classification decisions have been made by the executive. At first, it required a decree of the Prime Minister upon consultative advice by the Council of State (Conseil d’État).[116] Then, from 1996, it required a decision of the government’s representative in each administrative subdivision (préfet de département).[117] Under this system, however, only one district heating system was classified (Municipality of Fresnes, in 2006).
In the context of the energy transition, the classification procedure has been revised twice. The Grenelle II Law (2010) transferred the classification procedure to French local authorities (collectivités territoriales and établissements publics de coopération intercommunale). It then clearly promoted the use of heating district systems in order to achieve the national renewable energy development goal (23 % of 68national final energy consumption by 2020).[118] Article 85 subjected the classification of a heating district system to three conditions: 50 % of distributed heat has to come from renewable sources, the heating network has to include a counting system, and the project has to be financially balanced.[119] To accelerate the development and use of heating (and cooling) district networks, the Energy and Climate Law adopted in 2019[120] required all local authorities to classify the heating networks built before 2009 on their territory.[121] This obligation entered into force on 1 January 2022.
The Grenelle II Law (2010) also clarified the obligation to connect a building to a heating system, resulting from its classification by a local authority. According to Art. L. 712-3 of the French Energy Code (Code de l’énergie), all new or old buildings ‘subject to subsequent renovation works’ and located on the area of a classified heating network must be connected by their owner. A building is considered to be subject to ‘subsequent renovation works’ when it uses collective heating or cooling systems, the capacity of which is superior to 30 kilowatts.[122] Owners of such buildings can request a derogation from this obligation from the local authority, which can issue said derogation under four cumulative regulatory conditions: 1) the installation already uses a renewable energy technology for 50 % of its heating needs; 2) the heating or cooling needs cannot be technically fulfilled by the heating district system; 3) the building cannot be supplied within a timeframe corresponding to the needs of its owner or tenant; 4) the connection cannot be achieved under the economic and tariff conditions first announced by the operator. Compliance with this legal obligation is enforced by local authorities, administrative bodies, and the police, with a fixed fine of EUR 300,000.[123]
Very few district heating systems have been classified to date, partly because the legal obligation to do so is very recent, but also because the investment it represents is expensive as well. The legal obligation to connect to a classified heating network has not yet been clarified by specific case law. However, the generalization of the classification of French heating networks imposed by the legislator in 2019 will surely generate a new wave of litigation. Local authorities and heating network operators are currently preparing for their massive development. To prevent conflicts between inhabitants and local authorities, they strongly recommend promot69ing the attractiveness of this technology as well as maintaining citizens consultation procedures.[124]
4.3 Global Energy Performance Standards for instead of on Tertiary Sector Buildings
Under French law, a positive obligation to renovate only exists for buildings belonging to the ‘tertiary sector’. This legal obligation was first created in 2010 by the already mentioned, very important environmental statute Grenelle II Law.[125] It was reaffirmed in 2019[126] and finally rendered applicable by a widely anticipated decree adopted on 23July 2019[127] (hereafter referred to as the ‘Tertiary Decree’), which was subsequently codified.[128] This decree only applies to buildings belonging to the ‘tertiary sector’, i.e., buildings that are not used for habitation, industrial or agricultural activities, but for conducting any other private or public services. This category includes public buildings, meaning that this legal obligation also concerns public-law persons (the State and other public bodies). In addition, as detailed in the Tertiary Decree, the obligation to renovate only applies to tertiary buildings whose surface exceeds 1,000 square metres.[129]
The Tertiary Decree requires from the owner of the building and their tenants that they reduce their final energy consumption by 40 % before 2030, by 50 % before 2040, and by 60 % before 2050.[130] Since September 2022, owners of tertiary buildings are subjected to an obligation to report the annual energy consumption linked to their buildings.[131] This declaration is verified by agents of a dedicated public plat70form.[132] Owners of tertiary buildings are also required to submit an action plan detailing how they plan to meet the energy performance objectives. Possible actions include improving the energy performance of buildings, installing devices that allow for a better management of energy consumption, defining new modalities for energy usage and adapting the building in such a way as to reduce its energy needs.[133] The Tertiary Decree also anticipates the need to balance the obligations it creates with the nature of existing buildings (for instance, structural risks and listed buildings), pre-existing third-party rights or administrative easements, or the disproportionate costs of climate-proofing obligations in regard to the expected results.[134] This balancing is operated through a modification of climate-proofing obligations, i.e., whenever possible, the requirements will be reduced instead of being waived entirely.[135]
Failure to disclose the required information or inconsistencies with the action plan can lead to the publication of any summons that has not been complied with, the requirement to submit an action plan that will have to be approved by the departmental administrative authority, along with fairly minimal financial administrative sanctions (EUR 1,500 for a natural person, and EUR 7,500 for a legal person).[136]
Overall, this unilaterally imposed obligation to climate-proof buildings has a rather limited scope, as it only applies to large tertiary buildings, such as offices, and this obligation is backed by financial sanctions that seem relatively non-dissuasive.
5. Incentives to Climate-Proof Buildings
In French Law, several mechanisms have been created to motivate owners to carry out climate-proof-building works, without forcing them to do so. In addition to general incentives designed by the legislator, incentives targeted at insulation and heating systems also increasingly encourage owners to renovate their buildings. Some more specific incentives also come from urban planning regulations, tax credit systems or address the specific issue of buildings divided into flats.
5.1 71General Incentives
Instead of creating a general legal obligation to climate-proof buildings, the French legislator defined a national energy performance objective, which addresses all kinds of housing buildings. Article 22 of the Energy and Climate law established that ‘from 1 January 2028, the energy consumption of residential buildings cannot exceed a limit of 330 kwh/m2 a year’.[137] This objective seems particularly ambitious as it applies to all residential buildings, including old ones. But the legislator also decided to exempt many buildings from its application. This obligation does not apply, for instance, to buildings that cannot be renovated to achieve energy consumption below this threshold because of their technical, architectural or heritage constraints, nor to buildings for which the cost of the work required to meet this obligation is clearly disproportionate to the value of the property.
In order to reach this general objective in the private housing sector, the French State first implemented several fiscal incentives and financial aid schemes. Contrary to the legal obligation to renovate tertiary buildings, the financial aid schemes concerning private households are not aimed directly at reaching a certain level of energy performance, but at encouraging improvement. They are based on individual or family income criteria. It is intended that, by financially supporting the renovation projects of households, this will lead to better energy performance. In 2015, the French government first put in place a tax credit system,[138] before replacing it with direct financial aid in 2020, i.e., public funding provided ex-ante, before the works are performed.[139] Within the framework of the national recovery plan, the income categories of households that can benefit from this financial aid have also been significantly extended.[140] This aid is usually distributed by a specific national public body or by the regional administration.[141] The Climate and Resilience Law confirmed that financial aid given to households to support them in their renovation projects is the preferred method to reach a general national energy performance objective, which is updated by the legislator for the buildings sector every five years.[142]
5.2 72Insulation and Heating Systems incentives
There are no specific obligations to insulate buildings, install solar panels or heat pumps in France. However, the law indirectly encourages these measures by effectively putting at a disadvantage any building that does not meet the energy consumption objectives. In order to achieve this, the French State has therefore developed further tools to ensure that landlords renovate residential buildings in a more energy-efficient way.
The Climate and Resilience Law replaces the general energy performance threshold of 330 kWh/m2 a year for residential buildings by a target energy performance standard of between A and E classes (with class E corresponding to the same minimum threshold). As a result, landlords should undertake all necessary renovation works needed to move from class F or G by 2028 (respectively, ‘not very efficient’ and ‘extremely inefficient’) to class E (at least), and then to class D by 2034 (this corresponds to an energy level of 250 kwh/m2 a year).[143]
Complying with those thresholds, however, does not constitute a legal obligation. The French legislator laid down an obligation for landlords to establish an energy performance diagnosis of their building, according to a classification from A to G (as determined by a ministerial ruling).[144] Publicizing this information is mandatory for selling or renting the property. Failure to comply with these publicity obligations can be sanctioned with a EUR 3,000 fine for non-professional landlords, increased to EUR 15,000 for legal persons. The fine is imposed by the French national or departmental administration.[145]
In addition, from January 2022, any owner who wants to sell or rent a building that is considered ‘indecent’ (i.e., not meeting the energetic efficiency threshold of 330 kWh/m2 a year) will be required to expressly mention this lack of conformity with French energy performance requirements in all advertisements. From 2028, lack of conformity will also have to be mentioned explicitly in the sale or lease contract.[146] Furthermore, starting in 2022, in order to sell a building that is classified between D and G, a specific audit will have to be performed by an independent third 73party. It will mention all suggested renovation works and their price.[147] Last but not least, from 2023 onwards, it will be impossible to increase the rent of buildings that have an energy rating of F or G upon tacit renewal of the contract.[148]
Without turning renovation into a strict legal obligation, the French legislator created strong incentives pushing landlords to undertake energy renovation works. Essentially, immovables that are not energy efficient will lose most of their market value and their profitability, as they can no longer be leased.
5.3 Specific Incentives
There are other indirect constraint mechanisms, such as the plan for the protection of the atmosphere (‘Plan de protection de l’atmosphère’, or PPA). It aims to preserve air quality in a given territory.[149] This plan is adopted by the government’s representative in each administrative subdivision (préfet de département). Its implementation is accompanied by prescriptive and accompanying measures adopted by the préfet.[150] For example, for the PPA of the Vallée de l’Arve (Haute-Savoie),a prefectural order requires compliance of wood-burning appliances with environmental rules whenever a property is sold. In each real estate transaction, the seller must prove that the installation is compliant or, if not, carry out the necessary work to bring it up to standard.[151]
Other levels for action are financial aids such as loans, grants, and subsidies, and other forms of support[152] or tax incentives (VAT reduction or tax credit[153]) for the energy renovation of buildings, particularly housing for which there are State and 74local authority incentives. This financial aid is granted subject to the work being carried out in accordance with technical environmental standards. It comes in addition to all other renovation incentives, particularly the ones banning owners from letting inadequate housing premises (see § 5.2).
Last but not least, the French law on residential buildings divided in flats (copropriété des immeubles bâtis)[154] has, until recently, been a hindrance to the renovation of residential buildings. Specifically, the law used to focus on building up funds for ordinary repairs but failed to address the need for large-scale improvements to existing buildings. This was due, in part, to the lack of a legal obligation to plan for such repairs and, therefore, anticipate their cost. New provisions have been inserted in to the law to that effect, requiring owners to draft a multi-year renovation plan and the associated costings, all of which are to be renewed every ten years, with specific reference to the reduction of energy consumption.[155]
6. Enforcement
There is no specific way of compelling the owner of an existing building to climate-proof it. It is highly unlikely that the administrative power or organ capable of coercing owners into climate-proofing their building even exists under French law, or that any administration would have the means to enforce an obligation that is so blatantly contrary to the French constitutional culture. At the very best, the administration would have to rely on ordinary means of enforcement, such as imposing, in the case of positive obligations, a monetary penalty set by the court for each day of non-compliance (‘astreinte’), but we are not aware that this has been implemented by any law to date.
At present, the only positive obligation to climate-proof existing buildings, which is limited to certain large tertiary buildings (§ 4.3), is met with a fairly small monetary penalty and the publicity of non-compliance, which is probably intended to make building owners look bad in the eyes of the general public. Incentives to renovate (§ 5) are expected to be followed either because of financial aid, or owing to financial disadvantages such as a loss in profitability and market value of the land or building, instead of through coercion. As such, there are no specific enforcement measures for those incentives, aside from some monetary fines.
75The right of a landlord to renovate their building is subject to the protected rights of the tenant. Under the most frequent type of tenancy, for instance, the tenant is expected to facilitate any works that do not prevent them from living in the building – and they may seek some form of monetary compensation for works lasting over 21 days.[156] Some works, however, may require prior eviction of the tenant. In that event, the landlord cannot terminate the lease before it reaches its contractual term, which is at least three years for natural persons, and six years for legal persons.[157] The lease is automatically renewed after termination, unless the landlord notifies the tenant that they wish to terminate the lease.[158] There are, additionally, a limited number of reasons why the landlord may terminate the lease, chiefly to live in the flat or to sell it, as well as ‘a serious and legitimate motive’,[159] such as renovation works that will improve the overall quality of the premises.[160] The landlord will therefore be able to terminate the lease, but they will have this possibility once every three years at best. As such, it cannot be said that they are forcing their right to renovate upon the tenant, as they cannot terminate the contract early.
7. Concluding Remarks
Owing to its constitutional culture, French law has developed a set of mechanisms that purport to help reach the carbon neutrality objective by 2050 without openly infringing on the right of property. Chiefly, there are energy-compliance rules applicable to new and renovated buildings, which are controlled after issuing building permits. Recently, buildings from specific economic sectors have been affected by obligations to renovate or to build in a certain manner within a short period of time, and landlords have been invited to renovate residential buildings that do not meet the energy consumption objectives if they want to let them on the rental market. There are also positive and negative financial incentives for owners to renovate buildings. These mechanisms seem to be the only ones that fall within the constraints of French constitutional law. It is therefore doubtful, given the current state of constitutional law, whether there is enough legal room for satisfactory mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. The Constitutional Council undoubtedly has a key role to play here, as it is the only body that can, through its case law, balance the differ76ent constitutionally protected interests at stake, and notably accept that more ambitious legal obligations for owners to climate-proof buildings in France should further restrict the right of property in the general interest.
© 2024 the author(s), published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Editorial – Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in England
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in France
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Germany
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Iceland
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Spain
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Sweden
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in the Netherlands
- Map of Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Editorial – Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in England
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in France
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Germany
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Iceland
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Spain
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Sweden
- Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in the Netherlands
- Map of Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings