Keeping up with the Times: The Transformation of the Publicity Regime with New Movable Property Security Rights and Developments in Blockchain Technology

Yaman Gürsel

doi:10.1515/eplj-2020-0004

Artikel

Keeping up with the Times: The Transformation of the Publicity Regime with New Movable Property Security Rights and Developments in Blockchain Technology

Yaman Gürsel

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Dezember 2020

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift European Property Law Journal Band 9 Heft 2-3

Abstract

For a long time, the publicity regime over movable property has been associated with possession. Many modern legal systems still operate on Roman law principles concerning the validity of transactions: Whoever is in possession of a movable asset generates the legal presumption that he or she rightfully owns that asset. Immovable assets on the other hand are tied to a different concept due to the value and meaning ascribed to them. Whereas possession signals who has which rights to claim against whom, inscriptions made in a public registry (such as a land registry) determine the fate of immovable property. Over time, reforms in the law on secured transactions have resulted in a less strict approach adopted in executing transaction relating to movable property to enable the establishment of limited rights in rem and their implementation. Regardless, most civil law jurisdictions still deem the transfer of possession as compulsory for a valid right of pledge over movable property. This article elaborates on the most significant changes to the field of property law and why certain countries may reconsider their traditional approach, especially since yet another wave of change is coming in the form of Blockchain registries. Although certain countries’ legal systems are bound to the old-fashioned principle dating back to Germanic and Roman laws, many others like the Belgian, French and Turkish systems have modernized their publicity regime applied on movable assets and have a special registry, whether regional or nationwide, for transactions related to movables. While providing a few examples from common law countries, this article is an in-depth, comparative analysis into the current condition of Swiss law on this matter and the modifications implemented under French and Turkish law. In the last section, the article reviews the imminent interaction between the publicity regime of immovables and blockchain technology.

Note

This article is inspired by the author’s ongoing Ph.D. project, which is based on a comparative analysis between common and civil law systems concerning the implementation of the floating charge and non-possessory pledges over movable property. The doctoral dissertation of the author elaborates, among many other aspects in relation to the creation of such security instruments, the third-party effectiveness/perfection of a limited right in rem, which is revealed by the application of one of the security devices mentioned earlier. As their most intriguing characteristic relies upon the fact that they do not seek transfer of possession for validity nor for third-party effectiveness, instead they merely obligate parties to carry out an inscription at the relevant registry. Conducting in-depth research in this field led the author to this investigation of the modification in the field of customary property law.

Bibliography

ACAR, F. “Rehin Hukuku Dersleri” 2. Baskı (Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 2017) p 221Suche in Google Scholar

ANSAULT, J. “Regard sur l’avant-projet de réforme du droit de sûretés” in: Revue de droit d’Assas No 19 December 2019 (Lextenso éditions, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

ANSAY, T./SCHNEIDER, E. “General Introduction to Turkish Business Law” in: Introduction to Turkish Business Law (Wolters Kluwer International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2014) p 3Suche in Google Scholar

ARKAN, S. “Ticari İşletme Hukuku” 12nd Edition-Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü (Sözkesen Matbaacılık, Ankara, 2008) p 47Suche in Google Scholar

ARVAS, M. “6750 Sayılı Kanun’a Göre Rehne Konu Olabilecek Taşınırlar” (Lotus Life Ajans, Ankara, 2017) p 11Suche in Google Scholar

AYHAN, R./ÇAĞLAR, H. “Ticari İşletme Hukuku-Genel Esaslar” 10th Edition (Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2017) p 165Suche in Google Scholar

AYNÈS, L./CROCQ, P. “Droit des Sûretés” 12th Edition (eds.) Philippe Malaurie and Laurent Aynès (LGDJ-Lextenso editions, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2018)Suche in Google Scholar

BAILEY III, H./HAGEDORN, R. “Secured Transactions in a nutshell” 4th Edition (WESTGROUP, St. Paul, 2000)Suche in Google Scholar

BÄR, R./OFTINGER, K. “Zürcher Kommentar-Das Fahrnispfand” (Schulthess Verlag, Zurich, 1981) No 31Suche in Google Scholar

BAUR, F./BAUR, J F./STÜRNER, R. “Sachenrecht” (Beck Verlag, Großes Lehrbuch, 2009) Sektion 57 No 8Suche in Google Scholar

BAYDAK, E. “Ticari İşlemlerde Taşınır Rehni” (OnIkiLevha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2018) p 12Suche in Google Scholar

BAYERN, S. “Artificial Intelligence and private law” in Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence (eds.) Woodrow Barfield and Ugo Pagallo (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham [UK] & Northampton [USA], 2018) p 146Suche in Google Scholar

BEALE, H./BRIDGE, M./GULLIFER, L./LOMNICKA, E. “The Law of Personal Property Security” (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007)Suche in Google Scholar

BLAISE, J./DESGORCES, R. “Droit Des Affaires” (Commerçants, Concurrence, Distribution), 9^e édition (LGDJ, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2017) pp 291-292Suche in Google Scholar

BOEGLI, T. “Leasing – Untersuchung spezieller Aspekte einer neuen Finanzierungsform” (Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern and Stuttgart, 1984) p 9Suche in Google Scholar

BOURRASSIN, M./BRÉMOND, V. “Droit des sûretés” 6^e édition (DALLOZ, Paris, 2018) p 16.Suche in Google Scholar

BRIDGE, M./GULLIFER, L./McMEEL, G./ WORTHINGTON, S. “The Law of Personal Property” 1st Edition (Sweet&Maxwell, London, 2013)Suche in Google Scholar

BÜLOW, P. “NomosKommentar BGB Sachenrecht Band 3: Sektion 854-1296” 4. Auflage (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016) No 4 Vorbemerkung zu 1204 ff (Sektion 1204)Suche in Google Scholar

CABRILLAC, M./MOULY, C./CABRILLAC, S./PÉTEL, P. “Manuel- Droit des sûretés” 10^e édition (LexisNexis, Paris, 2015) p 435Suche in Google Scholar

CARRON, B./BOTTERON, V. “How smart can a contract be?” in Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law (eds.) Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist and Olivier Hari (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham [UK] & Northampton [USA], 2019) p 101.10.4337/9781788115131.00011Suche in Google Scholar

CASTELLANO, G. “Reforming Non-Possessory Secured Transactions Laws: A New Strategy?” The Modern Law Review (2015) 78(4) MLR pp 611–640.10.1111/1468-2230.12131Suche in Google Scholar

DUMONT-LEFRAND, M. “Le gage de meubles corporels” in: Evolution des sûretés réelles: regards croises Université-Notariat (sous la direction de) Severine Cabrillac, Christophe Albiges and Cecile Lisanti (LexisNexis, Paris, 2007)Suche in Google Scholar

EIGENMANN, A. “L’effectivité des sûretés mobilières – Etude critique en droit suisse au regard du droit américain et propositions législatives” (AISUF, Fribourg, 2001) p 9Suche in Google Scholar

FAURÉ, C. “La pratique notariale en matière de sûretés mobilières” in: Evolution des sûretés réelles: regards croises Université-Notariat (sous la direction de) Severine Cabrillac, Christophe Albiges and Cecile Lisanti (LexisNexis, Paris, 2007) p 66Suche in Google Scholar

FILIPPI, P./WRIGHT, A. “Blockchain and the Law—The Rule of the Code” (Harvard University Press, London, 2018) p 2010.2307/j.ctv2867spSuche in Google Scholar

GEISER, T./WOLF, S. “Basler Kommentar Zivilgesetzbuch II” (eds.) Thomas GEISER & Stephan WOLF (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel, 2019) Art 933 No 28Suche in Google Scholar

GIRSBERGER, D. “Grenzüberschreitendes Finanzierungsleasing (International Vertrags-, Sachen- und Insolvenzrecht” (Schulthess Polygraphicher Verlag, Zurich, 1997) p 11Suche in Google Scholar

GLAS, V./AICHINGER, C. “Bank Finance and Regulation, Multi-Jurisdictional Survey: Austria—Enforcement of Security Interests in Banking Transactions”.Suche in Google Scholar

GMUER & PATRY, Pestalozzi, “Business Law Guide to Switzerland” 2nd Edition (CCH Editions Limited, Oxford, 1997)Suche in Google Scholar

GOODE, R. “Legal Problems of Credit and Security” 3rd Edition (Sweet&Maxwell, London 2003)Suche in Google Scholar

GULLIFER, L. “Conclusions and Recommendations” in: Secured Transactions Law Reform (eds.) Louise Gullifer & Orkun Akseli (Hart publishing, London, 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

GULLIFER, L./RACZYNSKA, M. “The English Law of Personal Property Security: Under-reformed?” in: Secured Transactions Law Reform (eds.) Louise Gullifer and Orkun Akseli (pp 271–296) (Harts Publishing, London, 2016) p 277.Suche in Google Scholar

HAMWIJK, D.J.Y. “The puzzling concepts of publicity and possession: to the heart of property law” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012) pp 299–31610.1515/eplj-2012-0012Suche in Google Scholar

HANSELER, P./HOCHSTRASSER, D. “Real-Estate in Switzerland” (ed.) Nedim Peter Vogt in: Swiss Commercial Law Series Vol 5 (Helbing & Lichtenhahn Verlag AG, Basle, 1996)Suche in Google Scholar

HELVACI, I. “Türk Medeni Kanunu—Eşya hukuku Volume IV (Gerekçeli-Karşılaştırmalı- İçtihatla- Notlu)” (OnIkiLevha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2013)Suche in Google Scholar

HOEREN, T. “NomosKommentar BGB Sachenrecht Band 3: Sektion 854-1296” 4. Auflage (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016) Nos 1–3 (Sektion 854)Suche in Google Scholar

IDELBERGER, F. “Connected Contracts Reloaded –Smart Contracts as Contractual Networks” in: European Contract Law in the Digital Age (ed.) Stefan Grundmann (Intersentia, Cambridge, 2018) p 207.Suche in Google Scholar

JHERING, R. “Scherz und Ernst in der Jurisprudenz” 5th Edition (Breitkopf and Härtel, Leipzig, 1892) pp 58–63.Suche in Google Scholar

KARAKUŞ ERBAŞ, B. “Ticari İşlemlerde Taşınır Rehni ve Rehin Alacaklısının Korunması” (Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2018) p 26Suche in Google Scholar

KURTOĞLU, S. “Fransız Hukukunda Ticaret Fonu Üzerinde İpotek Tesisi” Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi Vol 1 No 3 (Bankacılık Enstitüsü Yayınları, Ankara, 1962) p 337Suche in Google Scholar

LEMIEUX, V. “Evaluating the Use of Blockchain in Land Transactions: An Archival Science Perspective” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 6 Issue 3 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2017) p 393.10.1515/eplj-2017-0019Suche in Google Scholar

LEMMEN, C./VOS, J./BEENTJES, B. “Ongoing Development of Land Administration Standards” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 6 Issue 3 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2017) p 483.10.1515/eplj-2017-0016Suche in Google Scholar

LÉVY, J./CASTALDO, A. “Histoire du droit civil” 2ième édition (Dalloz, Paris, 2010) p 1104.Suche in Google Scholar

LIMMER, P. “Property Transactions and Certainty of Title Transfer” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 2 Issue 3 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2013) p 325.10.1515/eplj-2013-0022Suche in Google Scholar

LISANTI, C. “Quelques remarques à propos des sûretés sur meubles incorporels, dans l’ordonnance n° 2006–346 du 23 mars 2006”, Recueil Dalloz (DALLOZ, Paris, 2006) p 58Suche in Google Scholar

McCORMACK, G. “Secured Credit under English and American Law” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)10.1017/CBO9780511494789Suche in Google Scholar

MELLER-HANNICH, C. “NomosKommentar BGB Sachenrecht Band 3: Sektion 854-1296” 4. Auflage (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2016) Nos 1 and 2 (Sektion 929)Suche in Google Scholar

MIGNON, V. “Blockchain—perspectives and challenges” in: Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law (eds.) Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist, Olivier Hari (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham [UK] & Northampton [USA], 2019) p 1.10.4337/9781788115131.00007Suche in Google Scholar

OĞUZMAN, K./SELIÇI, Ö./OKTAY-ÖZDEMIR, S. “Eşya Hukuku—Zilyetlik-Tapu Sicili, Taşınmaz Ve Taşınır Mülkiyeti, Kat Mülkiyeti, Sınırlı Ayni Haklar” 14th Edition (Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2011) pp 19, 713Suche in Google Scholar

ORAL, B. “Ticari İşlemelerde Taşınır Rehni” (Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019) pp 21–22Suche in Google Scholar

PEIRO, N./GARCIA, E. “Blockchain and Land Registration Systems” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 6 Issue 3 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2017) p 29610.1515/eplj-2017-0017Suche in Google Scholar

PICHONNAZ, P. “Le Centenaire du Code des Obligations—Un code toujours plus hors du code” in : Revue de Droit Suisse Vol 130 No 2 (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Bâle, 2011) pp 121–122.Suche in Google Scholar

PICHONNAZ, P. “Les fondements romains du droit privé” (Schulthess, Genève-Zurich-Bâle, 2008)Suche in Google Scholar

PICHONNAZ, P./FOËX, B./ PIOTET, D. “Commentaire Romand Code Civil II” (eds.) Pascal Pichonnaz/Bénédict Foëx/Denis Piotet (HelbingLichtenhahn Verlag, Basel, 2016)Suche in Google Scholar

PICOD, Y. “Droit des sûretés” 3 e édition (Thémis droit puf- Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2016)Suche in Google Scholar

POROY, R./YASAMAN, H. “Ticari İşletme Hukuku” 14th Edition (Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 2012) p 53Suche in Google Scholar

RIFFARD, J. “The Still Uncompleted Evolution of the French Law on Secured Transactions Towards Modernity” in: Secured Transactions Law Reform (eds.) Louise Gullifer and Orkun Akseli (pp 369–389) (Harts Publishing, London, 2016) p 370Suche in Google Scholar

SCHMID, J./HÜRLIMANN-KAUP, B. “Sachenrecht” 5^th Edition (Schulthess Verlag, Zurich, 2017) No 1868Suche in Google Scholar

ŞENOCAK, K./KAHRAMAN, Z./TUNCER-KAZANCI, I./ÖCAL-APAYDIN, B. “Ticari İşlemlerde Taşınır Rehni” (Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2019) pp 14–15Suche in Google Scholar

SEUBE, J. “Droit des sûretés” 9th Edition (Dalloz, Paris, 2018) p 141Suche in Google Scholar

SEVEN, V. “Ticari İşlemlerde Taşınır Rehni Kanunu’na Göre Taşınır (Varlık) Rehni” 2nd Edition (Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2019)Suche in Google Scholar

SIMLER, P./DELEBECQUE, P. “Droit Civil: Les Sûretés—La Publicité Foncière” 7^ième édition (Dalloz, Paris, 2016)Suche in Google Scholar

SIRMEN, L. “Eşya Hukuku” (Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2013) pp 38–39.Suche in Google Scholar

SIRMEN, L. “Secured Transactions (Securities and Suretyship)” in: Introduction to Turkish Business Law” eds. Tuğrul Ansay&Eric C. Schneider (Wolters Kluwer International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2014) p 68Suche in Google Scholar

ŞIT-IMAMOĞLU, B. “Ticari İşlemlerde Taşınır Rehni Kanunu Üzerine Bir İnceleme” (Sözkesen Matbaacılık, Ankara, 2017) p 8Suche in Google Scholar

STEINAUER, P. “Les droits éeels (Tome I) – Introduction à l’étude des droits réels/Possession et registre foncier/Dispositions générales sur la propriété/Propriété par étages” 6^e édition (Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern, 2019) pp 82–83.Suche in Google Scholar

STEINAUER, P. “Les Droits Réels: Tome III Servitudes personnelles, Charges foncières, Droits de gage immobiliers, Droits de gage mobiliers” 4ième Édition (Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern, 2012)Suche in Google Scholar

SUTTER-SOMM, T. “Schweizerisches Zivilprozessrecht” 3^iemeEdition (Schulthess Verlag, Zurich, 2017) No 1172.Suche in Google Scholar

TAJTI, T. “Comparative Secured Transactions Law” (Akademiai Kiado 2002)Suche in Google Scholar

TEKIL, F. “Ticari İşletme Hukuku” 3rd Edition (Tekil Müşavirlik ve Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 1997)Suche in Google Scholar

TERCIER, P./PICHONNAZ, P./DEVELIOĞLU, M. “Borçlar Hukuku—Genel Hükümler” (OnIkiLevha Yayınları, İstanbul, 2016) p 13Suche in Google Scholar

ULPIAN “D. 43,17.1.2” in: Digesta Iustiniani Augusti (ed. Bonfante/Fadda et al.), Milano 1955, p. 1231Suche in Google Scholar

van ERP, S. “Cross-Border Electronic Conveyancing: overcoming problems with negative and positive integration in European property law” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 1 Issue (1) pp. 3–9 retrieved 11 Mar. 2020, from doi:10.1515/eplj-2012-000210.1515/eplj-2012-0002Suche in Google Scholar

van ERP, S. “The Twilight Zone of Transparency and Privacy” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 3 Issue 1 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2014) p 1.10.1515/eplj-2014-0001Suche in Google Scholar

VOS, J. “Blockchain and Land Administration: a happy marriage?” in: European Property Law Journal Vol 6 Issue 3 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2017) p 29310.1515/eplj-2017-0018Suche in Google Scholar

WESTERMANN, H./GURSKY, K./EICKMANN, D. “Sachenrecht” (C. F. Muller, 2011) Sektion 44 ISuche in Google Scholar

WHITE, J./SUMMERS, R. “UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE” 6th Edition (West Publishing Co, St. Paul, 2010)Suche in Google Scholar

WIEGAND, W. “Kommentar zum Bürgelischen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen Buch 3 Sachenrecht” (ed.) Carsten Herresthal (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2019) (Vorbemerkungen zu 1204) Nos 6-9Suche in Google Scholar

WITZIG, P./SALOMON, V. “Cutting out the middle man: a case study of blockchain technology induced reconfigurations in the Swiss financial services industry” in: Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law (eds.) Daniel Kraus, Thierry Obrist, and Olivier Hari (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham [UK] & Northampton [USA], 2019) p 18.10.4337/9781788115131.00008Suche in Google Scholar

ZOBL, D./THURNHERR, C. “Berner Kommentar Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch: Art. 884–887 ZGB und Die beschränkten dinglichen Rechte: Das Fahrnispfand, Systematischer Teil” (Stämpfli Verlag, Bern, 2010) Art 884 No 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Web Materials

BOUCHER, P. “How blockchain technology could change our lives” European Parliamentary Research Service (Scientific Foresight Unit) see available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/581948/EPRS_IDA(2017)581948_EN.pdf p 18 accessed 16 April 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

CALEFF, J./JEANRENAUD, Y. “The Register Mortgage Certificate” (Schellenberg Wittmer Newsletter, March 2015) see available at: https://www.swlegal.ch/files/media/filer_public/69/9d/699dff46-c7c8-4760-837d-6ddc77b40001/newsletter_march_2015_english_final.pdf pp 1–2 accessed 18 September 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

COASE, R. “The Problem of Social Cost” in: Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 3 (1960) https://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/coase-problem.pdf accessed 17 April 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

COLE, D./GROSSMAN, P. “The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics?” in: Land Economics Vol 78 No 3 (2002) JSTOR p 326 www.jstor.org/stable/3146892 accessed 17 April 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

HAMEL, J. “Le gage commercial” Études de droit commercial sous la direction de J. Hamel. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol 6 N°2 Avril-juin 1954 (Dalloz, 1953) pp 393–395, see available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ridc_0035-3337_1954_num_6_2_9045 accessed 10 September 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

NAKAMOTO, S. “White Paper- Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” see available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf accessed 18 September 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

PASQUIER, S./HÜNERWADEL, P./MENOUD, V. “Law&Practice – Switzerland” CHAMBERS Global Practice Guides (Banking & Finance) Contributed by Lenz & Staehelin 2018 see available:https://www.lenzstaehelin.com/uploads/tx_netvlsldb/Chambers_Banking_and_Finance__Switzerland_Chapter_2018.PDF p 9 accessed 18 September 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

RAHMATIAN, A. “A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law” (June 23, 2010), Journal of Comparative Law Vol 3 No 1 pp 197–248, see available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1629268 pp 3–4.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas Reuters Practical Law, see available at: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/3-517-2985?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true accessed 16 September 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

THOMAS, R. “Blockchain’s Unsuitability for Real Property Transactions” (January 13, 2019). Rod Thomas “Blockchain’s unsuitability for real property transactions” in S Murphy and P Kenna and (eds.) eConveyancing and Title Registration in Ireland (Clarus Press, Dublin, 2018), see available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3315000 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3315000 accessed 18 September 2020.10.2139/ssrn.3315000Suche in Google Scholar

List of Case Law

UK CASE LAW

Davey & Co v Williamson and Sons Ltd. [1898] 2 QB 194, 200-1
Re Woodroffes (Musical Instruments) Ltd. [1986] CH 366
Re Sperrin Textiles Ltd. [1992] NI 323, 329
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v BRS Kumar Brothers Ltd. [1994] 1 BCLC 211, 221
William Gaskell Group Ltd. v Highley [1994] 1 BCLC 197
Re The Real Meat Co. Ltd. [1996] BCC 254, 261
Re Colonial Trusts Corporation ex p Bradshaw (1879) 15 CH D 465
Holroyd v Marshall [1862] 10 HLC 191, 11 ER 999
Re Panama, New Zealand and Australia Royal Mail Co [1870] L.R. 5 CH APP 318
Re Jackson and Bassford Ltd [1906] 2 CH 467.
Smith (Administrator of Cosslett [2001] UKHL 58 (Contractors) Ltd) v Bridgend County BC [2002] 1 AC 336

SWISS CASE LAW

ATF 118/1992 II 150 = JdT 1994 II 98
ATF 112 II 406/410 = JdT 1987 I 347/348
ATF 111 II 134/139 = JdT 1986 I 267
ATF 85 II 580/591 = JdT 1960 I 485/492

FRENCH CASE LAW

;Cour de Cassation Chambre Commerciale No 11–21763 dated 19 February 2013
Cour de cassation Plenary Assembly No 14–18435 dated on 7 December 2015
;Cour de Cassation Chambre Commerciale No 11–21763 dated 19 February 2013 (Bull. 2013 IV no 29)
Cour de Cassation Chambre Commerciale No 14–14401 dated 1 March 2016 (Bull. 2016 no 846 IV no 1081)

TURKISH CASE LAW

Turkish Supreme Court 19th Chamber Decision No E 2970/2007 K 3133/2009 dated 15 April 2009.
Turkish Supreme Court 19th Chamber Decision No E 1006/2009 K 1282/2009 dated 19 February 2009.
Turkish Supreme Court 12^th Chamber Decision No E 2923/1988 K 14847/1988 dated 5 December 1988.
Turkish Supreme Court 19^th Chamber Decision No E 4132/2001 K 6811/2001 dated 25 October 2001.
Turkish Supreme Court 15th Chamber Decision No E 4309/1989 K 658/1989 dated 20 February 1989.
Turkish Supreme Court 8th Chamber Decision No E 7967/2006 K 692/2007 dated 13 February 2007.

Published Online: 2020-12-04

Published in Print: 2020-12-01

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2020-0004