Wisdom in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen

Sergio Ariza

doi:10.1515/elen-2022-0014

Article

Wisdom in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen

Sergio Ariza

Published/Copyright: November 17, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Elenchos Volume 43 Issue 2

Abstract

This paper argues that the Encomium of Helen must be seen as a speech about the value and importance of wisdom in human life and not as much as one as about logos. Gorgias sustains his vision based on a certain intellectualism which reduces moral faults to intellectual errors. This intellectualist program comprises a rationalization of emotions and a commitment with a certain tradition that discriminates between a minority with knowledge and a majority with only opinion. The consequence for Helen is that she can be excused from her action at the expense of being reproached for her lack of wisdom and is thus relegated to the ignorant majority. Therefore, what is initially praise and an apology turns into severe blame. For this, I argue, the encomium can be qualified as an amusement (paignion). For the Encomium’s listeners the amusement becomes a challenge that demands they decipher the speech’s paradoxical character and appeal to their own wisdom to not be reproached like Helen. Thus the Encomium cannot be seen as a treaty nor as mere joke but rather as an intellectual agôn between the speech and the listener, which serves them “to arm the soul for contests of excellence”, as the epigram dedicated to Gorgias in Delfos says.

Keywords: Gorgias; Greek rhetoric; emotions; intellectualism; discourse theory

Corresponding author: Sergio Ariza, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia, E-mail: sariza@uniandes.edu.co

References

Buccheim, Th. 1989. Gorgias von Leontini. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 1957. “Gorgias and the Socratic Principle Nemo Sua Sponte Peccat.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 12–7, https://doi.org/10.2307/628627.Search in Google Scholar

Claus, D. 1981. Toward the Soul. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cole, T. 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801840555Search in Google Scholar

Consigny, S. 2001. Gorgias, Sophist and Artist. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Romilly, J. 1975. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674331457Search in Google Scholar

Echeñique, J. 2012. “El Encomio de Helena y la Responsabilidad Moral.” Methexis 25: 35–50, https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000595.Search in Google Scholar

Enos, R. L. 1976. “The Epistemology of Gorgias’ Rhetoric: A Re-examination.” Southern Speech Communication Journal 42: 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947609372331.Search in Google Scholar

Faraone, Ch. 1999. Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge & London: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/9780674036703Search in Google Scholar

Flashar, H. 1956. “Die Medizinischen Grundlagen der Lehre von der Wirkung der Dichtung in der Griechischen Poetik.” Hermes 84: 12–48.Search in Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 19: 275–91, https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2001.19.3.275.Search in Google Scholar

Ioli, R. 2013. Gorgia. Testimonianze e Frammenti. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1999. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258595Search in Google Scholar

MacDowell, D. M. 1982. Gorgias. Encomium of Helen. London: Bristol Classical Press.10.2307/4349533Search in Google Scholar

McComiskey, B. 2002. Gorgias and the New Sophistic Rhetoric. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1987. “Gorgias on the Function of Language.” Philosophical Topics 15: 135–70, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19871527.Search in Google Scholar

Poulakos, J. 1983. “Gorgias’ Encomium to Helen and the Defense of Rhetoric.” Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 1: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.2.1.Search in Google Scholar

Schiappa, E. 1995. “Gorgias’s Helen Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81: 310–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384118.Search in Google Scholar

Segal, Ch. P. 1962. “Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66: 99–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/310738.Search in Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sprague, R. K. 1972. The Older Sophists. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Verdenius, W. J. 1981. “Gorgias’ Doctrine of Deception.” In The Sophists and their Legacy, edited by G. B. Kerferd, 116–28. Wisbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Wardy, R. 1996. The Birth of Rhetoric. Gorgias, Plato and their Successors. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-11-17

Published in Print: 2022-12-16

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0014

Keywords for this article

Gorgias; Greek rhetoric; emotions; intellectualism; discourse theory