Implementation of the Provisions of Directive 2017/1132 on Openness and Reliability of Registers in Poland and Other Selected EU Countries
Abstract
887The paper presents the issue of openness and reliability of business registers maintained by the Member States of the European Union on the basis of acts that implement EU directives. The first part of the article presents the historical evolution of the provisions of EU law, while the second part focuses on the assessment of regulations currently in force. On this basis, in the third part of the article, the author carries out an analysis of how EU regulations are implemented in national laws in the context of openness and reliability of registers, with a particular focus on Polish law and references to the implementation methods adopted in other selected Member States. Based on this comparative analysis, the author ultimately comes to the conclusion that the general direction adopted in EU law is correct, but Polish domestic law is burdened with flaws, indicating low efficiency of implementation of EU law. Thus, the author makes suggestions as to the possible directions of development of domestic law, and to some extent also in relation to EU law.
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Liability of the Economic Unit – A General Principle of EU Law?
- The Management and the Advice of (Un)Explainable AI
- U. S. vs. EU Insider Trading Regulation: Risks and Challenges from a European Perspective
- The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems
- Implementation of the Provisions of Directive 2017/1132 on Openness and Reliability of Registers in Poland and Other Selected EU Countries
- Third Party Release in Group-Wide Restructuring Proceedings: Comparative Remarks to Support the Application of Such a Rule in the Italian Legal System
- Proportionality in the European Banking Law.Lessons from Silicon Valley Bank
- Does EU Regulation Adequately Address the Tension between CCPs Shareholders’ and Clearing Members’ Incentives?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Liability of the Economic Unit – A General Principle of EU Law?
- The Management and the Advice of (Un)Explainable AI
- U. S. vs. EU Insider Trading Regulation: Risks and Challenges from a European Perspective
- The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems
- Implementation of the Provisions of Directive 2017/1132 on Openness and Reliability of Registers in Poland and Other Selected EU Countries
- Third Party Release in Group-Wide Restructuring Proceedings: Comparative Remarks to Support the Application of Such a Rule in the Italian Legal System
- Proportionality in the European Banking Law.Lessons from Silicon Valley Bank
- Does EU Regulation Adequately Address the Tension between CCPs Shareholders’ and Clearing Members’ Incentives?
