The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems
-
Anna Moszyńska
,
Aleksandra Sikorska-Lewandowska
and
Mariusz T. Kłoda
Abstract
866The Polish regulation concerning a limited joint-stock partnership has been in force since the date of entry into force of the Commercial Companies Code (CCC). The CCC divides commercial companies into “partnerships” and “capital companies”. Each of those two types of commercial companies is governed by separate rules. The completion of twenty years of Polish CCC in force prompts us to analyse the juridical model adopted by the legislature, according to which limited joint-stock partnership is classified as a partnership. During this period, there have been significant events making the verification of the validity of this model possible, including Poland’s accession to the European Union (EU), which has resulted in the need to adapt national regulations to EU law – both in the field of private law (including commercial law) and public law (including tax law). The need to amend the domestic law in connection with the implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/2121 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 27, 2019 amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (as regards cross-border conversions, mergers, and divisions of companies) – is a direct motivation for undertaking research on a Polish limited joint-stock partnership.867
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Liability of the Economic Unit – A General Principle of EU Law?
- The Management and the Advice of (Un)Explainable AI
- U. S. vs. EU Insider Trading Regulation: Risks and Challenges from a European Perspective
- The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems
- Implementation of the Provisions of Directive 2017/1132 on Openness and Reliability of Registers in Poland and Other Selected EU Countries
- Third Party Release in Group-Wide Restructuring Proceedings: Comparative Remarks to Support the Application of Such a Rule in the Italian Legal System
- Proportionality in the European Banking Law.Lessons from Silicon Valley Bank
- Does EU Regulation Adequately Address the Tension between CCPs Shareholders’ and Clearing Members’ Incentives?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Liability of the Economic Unit – A General Principle of EU Law?
- The Management and the Advice of (Un)Explainable AI
- U. S. vs. EU Insider Trading Regulation: Risks and Challenges from a European Perspective
- The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems
- Implementation of the Provisions of Directive 2017/1132 on Openness and Reliability of Registers in Poland and Other Selected EU Countries
- Third Party Release in Group-Wide Restructuring Proceedings: Comparative Remarks to Support the Application of Such a Rule in the Italian Legal System
- Proportionality in the European Banking Law.Lessons from Silicon Valley Bank
- Does EU Regulation Adequately Address the Tension between CCPs Shareholders’ and Clearing Members’ Incentives?
