Home Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit

  • Luisa Agnello , Anna Maria Ciaccio , Fabio Del Ben ORCID logo , Bruna Lo Sasso , Giuseppe Biundo , Aurora Giglia , Rosaria Vincenza Giglio , Andrea Cortegiani , Caterina Maria Gambino and Marcello Ciaccio EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 22, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a measure of monocyte anisocytosis. In this study, we assessed the role of MDW, in comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and lactate, as a screening and prognostic biomarker of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) by longitudinally measuring it in the first 5 days of hospital stay.

Methods

We considered all consecutive patients admitted to the ICU. At admission, patients were classified as septic or not according to Sepsis-3 criteria. MDW, CRP, PCT, and lactate were measured daily in the first 5 days of hospitalization. ICU mortality was also recorded.

Results

We included 193 patients, 62 with sepsis and 131 without sepsis (controls). 58% and 26 % of the patients, with and without sepsis respectively, died during ICU stay. MDW showed the highest accuracy for sepsis detection, superior to CRP, PCT, and lactate (AUC of 0.840, 0.755, 0.708, 0.622, respectively). At admission, no biomarker predicts ICU mortality in patients with sepsis. The kinetic of all biomarkers during the first 5 days of hospitalization was associated with ICU mortality. Noteworthy, above all, the kinetic of MDW showed the best accuracy. Specifically, an increase or decrease in MDW from day 1–4 and 5 was significantly associated with mortality or survival, respectively.

Conclusions

MDW is a reliable diagnostic and prognostic sepsis biomarker, better than traditional biomarkers.


Corresponding author: Professor Marcello Ciaccio, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo 90127, Italy; and Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital “P. Giaccone”, Palermo 90127, Italy, E-mail:
Luisa Agnello and Anna Maria Ciaccio contributed equally to this work.
  1. Research ethics: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by Authors’ Institutional Review Board (nr 07/2019).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was not required because we did not perform additional biochemical analysis. Confidentiality was guaranteed and no interventions were performed beyond ordinary good and standard clinical practices.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Rudd, KE, Johnson, SC, Agesa, KM, Shackelford, KA, Tsoi, D, Kievlan, DR, et al.. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32989-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Grande, E, Grippo, F, Frova, L, Pantosti, A, Pezzotti, P, Fedeli, U. The increase of sepsis-related mortality in Italy: a nationwide study, 2003-2015. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;38:1701–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03601-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Mellhammar, L, Wollter, E, Dahlberg, J, Donovan, B, Olséen, CJ, Wiking, PO, et al.. Estimating sepsis incidence using administrative data and clinical medical record review. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2331168. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31168.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Fleischmann-Struzek, C, Mellhammar, L, Rose, N, Cassini, A, Rudd, KE, Schlattmann, P, et al.. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:1552–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Vincent, JL, Jones, G, David, S, Olariu, E, Cadwell, KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2019;23:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Gyawali, B, Ramakrishna, K, Dhamoon, AS. Sepsis: the evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management. SAGE Open Med 2019;7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119835043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Liu, R, Greenstein, JL, Fackler, JC, Bembea, MM, Winslow, RL. Spectral clustering of risk score trajectories stratifies sepsis patients by clinical outcome and interventions received. Elife 2020;9:e58142. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.58142.Search in Google Scholar

8. Parker, RI. Monocyte distribution width: another (better?) marker to predict sepsis? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022;23:752–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000003039.Search in Google Scholar

9. Agnello, L, Ciaccio, AM, Vidali, M, Cortegiani, A, Biundo, G, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) in sepsis. Clin Chim Acta 2023;548:117511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117511.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ciaccio, AM, Agnello, L, Sasso, BL, Giglio, RV, Iacona, A, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as a biomarker of sepsis: an evidenced-based laboratory medicine approach. Clin Chim Acta 2023;540:117214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.117214.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Wu, J, Li, L, Luo, J. Diagnostic and prognostic value of monocyte distribution width in sepsis. J Inflamm Res 2022;15:4107–17. https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s372666.Search in Google Scholar

12. Laínez Martínez, S, González Del Castillo, J. Usefulness of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a sepsis biomarker. Rev Española Quimioter 2022;35(1 Suppl):S2–5. https://doi.org/10.37201/req/s01.01.2022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Martinez-Iribarren, A, Tejedor, X, Sala Sanjaume, À, Leis, A, Doladé Botias, M, Morales-Indiano, C. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer UniCel DxH 900. Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:623–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13448.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Radzyukevich, YV, Kosyakova, NI, Prokhorenko, IR. Participation of monocyte subpopulations in progression of experimental endotoxemia (EE) and systemic inflammation. J Immunol Res 2021;2021:1762584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1762584.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Agnello, L, Iacona, A, Lo Sasso, B, Scazzone, C, Pantuso, M, Giglio, RV, et al.. A new tool for sepsis screening in the Emergency Department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1600–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Agnello, L, Vidali, M, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Gambino, CM, Scazzone, C, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for early detecting sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:786–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1331.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Agnello, L, Sasso, BL, Giglio, RV, Bivona, G, Gambino, CM, Cortegiani, A, et al.. Monocyte distribution width as a biomarker of sepsis in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. Ann Clin Biochem 2021;58:70–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563220970447.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Agnello, L, Bivona, G, Vidali, M, Scazzone, C, Giglio, RV, Iacolino, G, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for sepsis in the Emergency Department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1951–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0417.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Piva, E, Zuin, J, Pelloso, M, Tosato, F, Fogar, P, Plebani, M. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) parameter as a sepsis indicator in intensive care units. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1307–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Marcos-Morales, A, Barea-Mendoza, JA, García-Fuentes, C, Cueto-Felgueroso, C, López-Jiménez, A, Martin-Loeches, I, et al.. Elevated monocyte distribution width in trauma: an early cellular biomarker of organ dysfunction. Injury 2022;53:959–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Polilli, E, Frattari, A, Esposito, JE, Stanziale, A, Giurdanella, G, Di Iorio, G, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a new tool for the prediction of sepsis in critically ill patients: a preliminary investigation in an intensive care unit. BMC Emerg Med 2021;21:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00521-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Agnello, L, Lo Sasso, B, Bivona, G, Gambino, CM, Giglio, RV, Iacolino, G, et al.. Reference interval of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in healthy blood donors. Clin Chim Acta 2020;510:272–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Agnello, L, Lo Sasso, B, Vidali, M, Scazzone, C, Gambino, CM, Giglio, RV, et al.. Validation of monocyte distribution width decisional cutoff for sepsis detection in the acute setting. Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:O183–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13496.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Crouser, ED, Parrillo, JE, Martin, GS, Huang, DT, Hausfater, P, Grigorov, I, et al.. Monocyte distribution width enhances early sepsis detection in the emergency department beyond SIRS and qSOFA. J Intensive Care 2020;8:33. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a2600.Search in Google Scholar

25. Woo, A, Oh, DK, Park, CJ, Hong, SB. Monocyte distribution width compared with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for early sepsis detection in the emergency department. PLoS One 2021;16:e0250101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Agnello, L, Giglio, RV, Bivona, G, Scazzone, C, Gambino, CM, Iacona, A, et al.. The value of a complete blood count (CBC) for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. Diagnostics 2021;11:1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101881.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Hou, SK, Lin, HA, Chen, SC, Lin, CF, Lin, SF. Monocyte distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio improves early prediction for sepsis at the emergency. J Personalized Med 2021;11:732. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080732.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Agnello, L, Vidali, M, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Baiamonte, D, Altomare, S, et al.. Monocyte distribution width kinetic after surgery. Int J Lab Hematol 2022;44:e195–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13845.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW, Shankar-Hari, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Celik, IH, Demirel, G, Aksoy, HT, Erdeve, O, Tuncer, E, Biyikli, Z, et al.. Automated determination of neutrophil VCS parameters in diagnosis and treatment efficacy of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res 2012;71:121–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2011.16.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Liu, Y, Wang, R, Zhong, S, Qian, L, Wang, D. Monocyte distribution width as an early predictor of short-term outcome in adult patients with sepsis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;562–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0577.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Riva, G, Castellano, S, Nasillo, V, Ottomano, AM, Bergonzini, G, Paolini, A, et al.. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as novel inflammatory marker with prognostic significance in COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep 2021;11:12716. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92236-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Lorubbio, M, Tacconi, D, Iannelli, G, Feri, M, Scala, R, Montemerani, S, et al.. The role of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in the prognosis and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. Clin Biochem 2022;103:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.02.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Bajić, D, Matijašević, J, Andrijević, L, Zarić, B, Lalić-Popović, M, Andrijević, I, et al.. Prognostic role of monocyte distribution width, CRP, procalcitonin and lactate as sepsis biomarkers in critically ill COVID-19 patients. J Clin Med 2023;12:1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031197.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0019).


Received: 2024-01-23
Accepted: 2024-04-08
Published Online: 2024-04-22
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Should APTT become part of thrombophilia screening?
  4. Review
  5. n-3 fatty acids and the risk of atrial fibrillation, review
  6. Guidelines and Recommendations
  7. Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. What is diagnostic safety? A review of safety science paradigms and rethinking paths to improving diagnosis
  10. Interprofessional clinical reasoning education
  11. Original Articles
  12. Quality of heart failure registration in primary care: observations from 1 million electronic health records in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area
  13. Typology of solutions addressing diagnostic disparities: gaps and opportunities
  14. Diagnostic errors and characteristics of patients seen at a general internal medicine outpatient clinic with a referral for diagnosis
  15. Cost-benefit considerations of the biased diagnostician
  16. Delayed diagnosis of new onset pediatric diabetes leading to diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective cohort study
  17. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit
  18. Are shortened aPTT values always to be attributed only to preanalytical problems?
  19. External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme for serological diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Sicily Region (Italy), in the period 2020–2022
  20. Recent mortality rates due to complications of medical and surgical care in the US
  21. Short Communication
  22. The potential, limitations, and future of diagnostics enhanced by generative artificial intelligence
  23. Case Report – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  24. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of persistent dysphagia and patient partnership
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. The ‘curse of knowledge’: when medical expertise can sometimes be a liability
  27. A new approach for identifying innate immune defects
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2024-0019/html
Scroll to top button