Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit
-
Luisa Agnello
, Bruna Lo Sasso
Abstract
Objectives
Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a measure of monocyte anisocytosis. In this study, we assessed the role of MDW, in comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and lactate, as a screening and prognostic biomarker of sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) by longitudinally measuring it in the first 5 days of hospital stay.
Methods
We considered all consecutive patients admitted to the ICU. At admission, patients were classified as septic or not according to Sepsis-3 criteria. MDW, CRP, PCT, and lactate were measured daily in the first 5 days of hospitalization. ICU mortality was also recorded.
Results
We included 193 patients, 62 with sepsis and 131 without sepsis (controls). 58% and 26 % of the patients, with and without sepsis respectively, died during ICU stay. MDW showed the highest accuracy for sepsis detection, superior to CRP, PCT, and lactate (AUC of 0.840, 0.755, 0.708, 0.622, respectively). At admission, no biomarker predicts ICU mortality in patients with sepsis. The kinetic of all biomarkers during the first 5 days of hospitalization was associated with ICU mortality. Noteworthy, above all, the kinetic of MDW showed the best accuracy. Specifically, an increase or decrease in MDW from day 1–4 and 5 was significantly associated with mortality or survival, respectively.
Conclusions
MDW is a reliable diagnostic and prognostic sepsis biomarker, better than traditional biomarkers.
-
Research ethics: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by Authors’ Institutional Review Board (nr 07/2019).
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was not required because we did not perform additional biochemical analysis. Confidentiality was guaranteed and no interventions were performed beyond ordinary good and standard clinical practices.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Rudd, KE, Johnson, SC, Agesa, KM, Shackelford, KA, Tsoi, D, Kievlan, DR, et al.. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32989-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Grande, E, Grippo, F, Frova, L, Pantosti, A, Pezzotti, P, Fedeli, U. The increase of sepsis-related mortality in Italy: a nationwide study, 2003-2015. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;38:1701–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03601-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Mellhammar, L, Wollter, E, Dahlberg, J, Donovan, B, Olséen, CJ, Wiking, PO, et al.. Estimating sepsis incidence using administrative data and clinical medical record review. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2331168. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31168.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Fleischmann-Struzek, C, Mellhammar, L, Rose, N, Cassini, A, Rudd, KE, Schlattmann, P, et al.. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:1552–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Vincent, JL, Jones, G, David, S, Olariu, E, Cadwell, KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2019;23:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Gyawali, B, Ramakrishna, K, Dhamoon, AS. Sepsis: the evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management. SAGE Open Med 2019;7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119835043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Liu, R, Greenstein, JL, Fackler, JC, Bembea, MM, Winslow, RL. Spectral clustering of risk score trajectories stratifies sepsis patients by clinical outcome and interventions received. Elife 2020;9:e58142. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.58142.Search in Google Scholar
8. Parker, RI. Monocyte distribution width: another (better?) marker to predict sepsis? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022;23:752–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000003039.Search in Google Scholar
9. Agnello, L, Ciaccio, AM, Vidali, M, Cortegiani, A, Biundo, G, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) in sepsis. Clin Chim Acta 2023;548:117511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117511.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Ciaccio, AM, Agnello, L, Sasso, BL, Giglio, RV, Iacona, A, Gambino, CM, et al.. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as a biomarker of sepsis: an evidenced-based laboratory medicine approach. Clin Chim Acta 2023;540:117214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.117214.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Wu, J, Li, L, Luo, J. Diagnostic and prognostic value of monocyte distribution width in sepsis. J Inflamm Res 2022;15:4107–17. https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s372666.Search in Google Scholar
12. Laínez Martínez, S, González Del Castillo, J. Usefulness of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a sepsis biomarker. Rev Española Quimioter 2022;35(1 Suppl):S2–5. https://doi.org/10.37201/req/s01.01.2022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Martinez-Iribarren, A, Tejedor, X, Sala Sanjaume, À, Leis, A, Doladé Botias, M, Morales-Indiano, C. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer UniCel DxH 900. Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:623–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13448.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Radzyukevich, YV, Kosyakova, NI, Prokhorenko, IR. Participation of monocyte subpopulations in progression of experimental endotoxemia (EE) and systemic inflammation. J Immunol Res 2021;2021:1762584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1762584.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Agnello, L, Iacona, A, Lo Sasso, B, Scazzone, C, Pantuso, M, Giglio, RV, et al.. A new tool for sepsis screening in the Emergency Department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1600–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Agnello, L, Vidali, M, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Gambino, CM, Scazzone, C, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for early detecting sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:786–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1331.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Agnello, L, Sasso, BL, Giglio, RV, Bivona, G, Gambino, CM, Cortegiani, A, et al.. Monocyte distribution width as a biomarker of sepsis in the intensive care unit: a pilot study. Ann Clin Biochem 2021;58:70–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563220970447.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Agnello, L, Bivona, G, Vidali, M, Scazzone, C, Giglio, RV, Iacolino, G, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for sepsis in the Emergency Department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1951–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0417.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Piva, E, Zuin, J, Pelloso, M, Tosato, F, Fogar, P, Plebani, M. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) parameter as a sepsis indicator in intensive care units. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1307–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Marcos-Morales, A, Barea-Mendoza, JA, García-Fuentes, C, Cueto-Felgueroso, C, López-Jiménez, A, Martin-Loeches, I, et al.. Elevated monocyte distribution width in trauma: an early cellular biomarker of organ dysfunction. Injury 2022;53:959–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Polilli, E, Frattari, A, Esposito, JE, Stanziale, A, Giurdanella, G, Di Iorio, G, et al.. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a new tool for the prediction of sepsis in critically ill patients: a preliminary investigation in an intensive care unit. BMC Emerg Med 2021;21:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00521-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Agnello, L, Lo Sasso, B, Bivona, G, Gambino, CM, Giglio, RV, Iacolino, G, et al.. Reference interval of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in healthy blood donors. Clin Chim Acta 2020;510:272–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.07.036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Agnello, L, Lo Sasso, B, Vidali, M, Scazzone, C, Gambino, CM, Giglio, RV, et al.. Validation of monocyte distribution width decisional cutoff for sepsis detection in the acute setting. Int J Lab Hematol 2021;43:O183–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13496.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Crouser, ED, Parrillo, JE, Martin, GS, Huang, DT, Hausfater, P, Grigorov, I, et al.. Monocyte distribution width enhances early sepsis detection in the emergency department beyond SIRS and qSOFA. J Intensive Care 2020;8:33. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a2600.Search in Google Scholar
25. Woo, A, Oh, DK, Park, CJ, Hong, SB. Monocyte distribution width compared with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for early sepsis detection in the emergency department. PLoS One 2021;16:e0250101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Agnello, L, Giglio, RV, Bivona, G, Scazzone, C, Gambino, CM, Iacona, A, et al.. The value of a complete blood count (CBC) for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. Diagnostics 2021;11:1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101881.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
27. Hou, SK, Lin, HA, Chen, SC, Lin, CF, Lin, SF. Monocyte distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio improves early prediction for sepsis at the emergency. J Personalized Med 2021;11:732. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080732.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
28. Agnello, L, Vidali, M, Lo Sasso, B, Giglio, RV, Baiamonte, D, Altomare, S, et al.. Monocyte distribution width kinetic after surgery. Int J Lab Hematol 2022;44:e195–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13845.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW, Shankar-Hari, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Celik, IH, Demirel, G, Aksoy, HT, Erdeve, O, Tuncer, E, Biyikli, Z, et al.. Automated determination of neutrophil VCS parameters in diagnosis and treatment efficacy of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res 2012;71:121–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2011.16.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Liu, Y, Wang, R, Zhong, S, Qian, L, Wang, D. Monocyte distribution width as an early predictor of short-term outcome in adult patients with sepsis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;562–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0577.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Riva, G, Castellano, S, Nasillo, V, Ottomano, AM, Bergonzini, G, Paolini, A, et al.. Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) as novel inflammatory marker with prognostic significance in COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep 2021;11:12716. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92236-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. Lorubbio, M, Tacconi, D, Iannelli, G, Feri, M, Scala, R, Montemerani, S, et al.. The role of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in the prognosis and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. Clin Biochem 2022;103:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.02.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
34. Bajić, D, Matijašević, J, Andrijević, L, Zarić, B, Lalić-Popović, M, Andrijević, I, et al.. Prognostic role of monocyte distribution width, CRP, procalcitonin and lactate as sepsis biomarkers in critically ill COVID-19 patients. J Clin Med 2023;12:1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031197.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0019).
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Should APTT become part of thrombophilia screening?
- Review
- n-3 fatty acids and the risk of atrial fibrillation, review
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis
- Opinion Papers
- What is diagnostic safety? A review of safety science paradigms and rethinking paths to improving diagnosis
- Interprofessional clinical reasoning education
- Original Articles
- Quality of heart failure registration in primary care: observations from 1 million electronic health records in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area
- Typology of solutions addressing diagnostic disparities: gaps and opportunities
- Diagnostic errors and characteristics of patients seen at a general internal medicine outpatient clinic with a referral for diagnosis
- Cost-benefit considerations of the biased diagnostician
- Delayed diagnosis of new onset pediatric diabetes leading to diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective cohort study
- Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit
- Are shortened aPTT values always to be attributed only to preanalytical problems?
- External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme for serological diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Sicily Region (Italy), in the period 2020–2022
- Recent mortality rates due to complications of medical and surgical care in the US
- Short Communication
- The potential, limitations, and future of diagnostics enhanced by generative artificial intelligence
- Case Report – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of persistent dysphagia and patient partnership
- Letters to the Editor
- The ‘curse of knowledge’: when medical expertise can sometimes be a liability
- A new approach for identifying innate immune defects
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Should APTT become part of thrombophilia screening?
- Review
- n-3 fatty acids and the risk of atrial fibrillation, review
- Guidelines and Recommendations
- Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis
- Opinion Papers
- What is diagnostic safety? A review of safety science paradigms and rethinking paths to improving diagnosis
- Interprofessional clinical reasoning education
- Original Articles
- Quality of heart failure registration in primary care: observations from 1 million electronic health records in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area
- Typology of solutions addressing diagnostic disparities: gaps and opportunities
- Diagnostic errors and characteristics of patients seen at a general internal medicine outpatient clinic with a referral for diagnosis
- Cost-benefit considerations of the biased diagnostician
- Delayed diagnosis of new onset pediatric diabetes leading to diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective cohort study
- Monocyte distribution width (MDW) kinetic for monitoring sepsis in intensive care unit
- Are shortened aPTT values always to be attributed only to preanalytical problems?
- External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme for serological diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Sicily Region (Italy), in the period 2020–2022
- Recent mortality rates due to complications of medical and surgical care in the US
- Short Communication
- The potential, limitations, and future of diagnostics enhanced by generative artificial intelligence
- Case Report – Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of persistent dysphagia and patient partnership
- Letters to the Editor
- The ‘curse of knowledge’: when medical expertise can sometimes be a liability
- A new approach for identifying innate immune defects