The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
-
María de Lourdes Pastelín-Martínez
, Moisés Manuel Gallardo-Pérez , Andrés Gómez-de-León , Juan Carlos Olivares-Gazca , Edgar Jared Hernández-Flores , Daniela Sánchez-Bonilla , Merittzel Montes-Robles , Max Robles-Nasta , Guillermo Ocaña-Ramm , Silvia Soto-Olvera , David Gómez-Almaguer , Guillermo J. Ruiz-Delgado und Guillermo J. Ruiz-Argüelles
Abstract
Objectives
We have analyzed the association of delayed both diagnosis and treatment of persons with MS with the long-term results of patients given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT).
Methods
Patients with MS referred to the HSCT-Mexico program were included in the study; in 103, detailed pre- and post-transplant evolution could be recorded. Two groups of patients were analyzed according to the time of evolution between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis of MS: more than 8 months (delayed diagnosis, DD), or less than 8 months (non-delayed diagnosis, NDD). The progression of MS was assessed by changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS).
Results
The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis was lower for the NDD group (1.55 vs. 35.87 months, p<0.05). Both groups of patients showed a similar EDSS score at diagnosis (1.5 vs. 1.5); however, the EDSS at the time of the transplant was higher in the DD group (4.5 vs. 3.0, p=0.3) and the response of the EDSS score to the transplant was significantly better for the NDD group, the last EDSS scores being 2.5 vs. 4.25 (p=0.03). Both groups of patients responded to aHSCT by diminishing the EDSS, but the response was significantly better in the NDD group.
Conclusions
These data indicate that both the pre-transplant progression of the disease and the response to aHSCT were significantly worse in the DD group. An early diagnosis and an early aHSCT intervention are critical for a good prognosis, in terms of lowering and stabilizing the motor disability in MS patients given autografts.
-
Research ethics: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinica RUIZ (Conbioetica 21CEI00120130605, Registry No. 13 CEI 21 114 126).
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Walton, C, King, R, Rechtman, L, Kaye, W, Leray, E, Marrie, RA, et al.. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler 2020;26:1816–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520970841.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Cárdenas-Robledo, S, Lopez-Reyes, L, Arenas-Vargas, LE, Carvajal-Parra, MS, Guío-Sánchez, C. Delayed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in a low prevalence country. Neurol Res 2021;43:521–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2020.1866374.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Thompson, AJ, Banwell, BL, Barkhof, F, Carroll, WM, Coetzee, T, Comi, G, et al.. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17::162–73.10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Moghaddam, VK, Dickerson, AS, Bazrafshan, E, Seyedhasani, SN, Najafi, F, Hadei, M, et al.. Socioeconomic determinants of global distribution of multiple sclerosis: an ecological investigation based on global burden of disease data. BMC Neurol 2021;21:145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02170-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Patti, F, Chisari, CG, Arena, S, Toscano, S, Finocchiaro, C, FermoLo, S, et al.. Factors driving delayed time to multiple sclerosis diagnosis: results from a population-based study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022;57:103361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.103361.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Libbey, JE, McCoy, LL, Fujinami, RS. Molecular mimicry in multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Neurobiol 2007;79:127–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7742(07)79006-2.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Siller, N, Kuhle, J, Muthuraman, M, Barro, C, Uphaus, T, Groppa, S, et al.. Serum neurofilament light chain is a biomarker of acute and chronic neuronal damage in early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019;25:678–9.10.1177/1352458518765666Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Pietrasik, S, Dziedzic, A, Miller, E, Starosta, M, Saluk-Bijak, J. Circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers distinguishing relapsing-remitting from secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. A review. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:11887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111887.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Aires, A, Barros, A, Machado, C, Fitas, D, Cação, G, Pedrosa, R, et al.. Diagnostic delay of multiple sclerosis in a Portuguese population. Acta Med Port 2019;32:289–94. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11187.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Schag, CC, Heinrich, RL, Ganz, PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1984;2:187–93. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1984.2.3.187.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Adamec, I, Barun, B, Gabelić, T, Zadro, I, Habek, M. Delay in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in Croatia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:S70–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Sánchez-Bonilla, D, Robles-Nasta, M, Gallardo-Pérez, MM, Hernández-Flores, EJ, Montes-Robles, M, Pastelín-Martínez, ML, et al.. Long-term results of autografting persons with multiple sclerosis are better in those not exposed to prior disease-modifying therapies. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023;75:104744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.104744.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Burt, RK, Balabanov, R, Burman, J, Sharrack, B, Snowden, JA, Oliveira, MC, et al.. Effect of nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs continued disease-modifying therapy on disease progression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 2019;321:165–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18743.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Murrieta-Álvarez, I, Cantero-Fortiz, Y, León-Peña, AA, Olivares-Gazca, JC, Priesca-Marín, JM, Ruiz-Delgado, GJ, et al.. The 1,000th transplant for multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders at the HSCT-México program: a myriad of experiences and knowledge. Front Neurol 2021;12:647425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.647425.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Bose, G, Freedman, MS. Recent advances and remaining questions of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2021;421:117324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117324.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Ruiz-Argüelles, GJ, León-Peña, AA, León-González, M, Nuñez-Cortes, AK, Olivares-Gazca, JC, Murrieta-Alvarez, I, et al.. A feasibility study of the full outpatient conduction of hematopoietic transplants in persons with multiple sclerosis employing autologous non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells. Acta Haematol 2017;137:214–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000469655.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Gale, RP, Gómez-Cruz, GB, Olivares-Gazca, JC, León-Peña, AA, Gómez-Almaguer, D, Gómez-De-León, A, et al.. Determine safety of outpatient chemotherapy and autotransplants using refrigerated, non-frozen grafts in persons with multiple sclerosis. Clin Transplant 2019;33:33–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13567.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Olivares-Gazca, JC, Sánchez-Bonilla, D, Fernández-Gutiérrez, JA, Reyes-Cisneros, OA, Gallardo-Pérez, MM, Ruiz-Delgado, GJ, et al.. Patient-reported-outcomes and safety of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a single center experience with the “Mexican method” in 1300 persons. Blood. 2022;140:1178–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-163740.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Ruiz-Argüelles, GJ, Olivares-Gazca, JC, Olivares-Gazca, M, Leon-Peña, AA, Murrieta-Alvarez, I, Cantero-Fortiz, Y, et al.. Self-reported changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score in patients with multiple sclerosis after autologous stem cell transplants: real-world data from a single center. Clin Exp Immunol 2019;198:351–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13358.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Multiple sclerosis in adults: management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, NICE Clinical Guidelines, NG220); 2022. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng220.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Ghiasian, M, Faryadras, M, Mansour, M, Khanlarzadeh, E, Mazaheri, S. Assessment of delayed diagnosis and treatment in multiple sclerosis patients during 1990–2016. Acta Neurol Belg 2021;121:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01528-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Khedr, EM, El Malky, I, Hussein, HB, Mahmoud, DM, Gamea, A. Multiple sclerosis diagnostic delay and its associated factors in Upper Egyptian patients. Sci Rep 2023;13:2249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28864-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Rzepiński, L, Zawadka-Kunikowska, M, Maciejek, Z, Newton, JL, Zalewski, P. Early clinical features, time to secondary progression, and disability milestones in polish multiple sclerosis patients. Medicina 2019;55:232. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060232.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. Van Wijmeersch, B, Hartung, HP, Vermersch, P, Pugliatti, M, Pozzilli, C, Grigoriadis, N, et al.. Using personalized prognosis in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis: a practical guide. Front Immunol 2022;13:991291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.991291.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Willison, AG, Ruck, T, Lenz, G, Hartung, HP, Meuth, SG. The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2022;269:3937–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. McGinley, MP, Goldschmidt, CH, Rae-Grant, AD. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. J Am Med Assoc 2021;325:765–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26858.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Muraro, PA, Martin, R, Mancardi, GL, Nicholas, R, Sormani, MP, Saccardi, R. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2017;13:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.81.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Miller, AE, Chitnis, T, Cohen, BA, Costello, K, Sicotte, NL, Stacom, R. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in multiple sclerosis: recommendations of the national multiple sclerosis society. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:241–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Brownlee, WJ, Hardy, TA, Fazekas, F, Miller, DH. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. Lancet 2017;389:1336–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30959-X.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
30. Woelfle, T, Pless, S, Reyes, O, Wiencierz, A, Feinstein, A, Calabrese, P, et al.. Reliability and acceptance of dreaMS, a software application for people with multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study. J Neurol 2023;270:262–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11306-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
31. Foong, YC, Bridge, F, Merlo, D, Gresle, M, Zhu, C, Buzzard, K, et al.. Smartphone monitoring of cognition in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023;73:104674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.104674.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Opinion Paper
- Exploring synthesis as a vital cognitive skill in complex clinical diagnosis
- Original Articles
- Physiologic measurements of cognitive load in clinical reasoning
- Impact of diagnostic management team on patient time to diagnosis and percent of accurate and clinically actionable diagnoses
- Game-based learning to improve diagnostic accuracy: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
- A patient follow-up intervention to improve medical decision making at an internal medicine residency program
- Application of a diagnosis flow draft based on appearance impression for detection of vulvar disease
- The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Troponin testing in routine primary care: observations from a dynamic cohort study in the Amsterdam metropolitan area
- Use of saliva-based qPCR diagnostics for the accurate, rapid, and inexpensive detection of strep throat
- Short Communications
- Improving communication of diagnostic uncertainty to families of hospitalized children
- Association of diagnostic error education and recognition frequency among Japanese medical students: a nationwide cross-sectional study
- Updated statistics on Influenza mortality
- Letters to the Editor
- How case reports can be used to improve diagnosis
- Clinical assessment of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen chemiluminescence immunoassay
- Convicting a wrong molecule?
- Case Reports - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a woman brought to a halt
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: shoulder pain as the first and only manifestation of lung cancer
- Congress Abstracts
- The Future of Diagnosis: Achieving Excellence and Equity
- The Future of Diagnosis: Navigating Uncertainty
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Opinion Paper
- Exploring synthesis as a vital cognitive skill in complex clinical diagnosis
- Original Articles
- Physiologic measurements of cognitive load in clinical reasoning
- Impact of diagnostic management team on patient time to diagnosis and percent of accurate and clinically actionable diagnoses
- Game-based learning to improve diagnostic accuracy: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
- A patient follow-up intervention to improve medical decision making at an internal medicine residency program
- Application of a diagnosis flow draft based on appearance impression for detection of vulvar disease
- The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Troponin testing in routine primary care: observations from a dynamic cohort study in the Amsterdam metropolitan area
- Use of saliva-based qPCR diagnostics for the accurate, rapid, and inexpensive detection of strep throat
- Short Communications
- Improving communication of diagnostic uncertainty to families of hospitalized children
- Association of diagnostic error education and recognition frequency among Japanese medical students: a nationwide cross-sectional study
- Updated statistics on Influenza mortality
- Letters to the Editor
- How case reports can be used to improve diagnosis
- Clinical assessment of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen chemiluminescence immunoassay
- Convicting a wrong molecule?
- Case Reports - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a woman brought to a halt
- Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: shoulder pain as the first and only manifestation of lung cancer
- Congress Abstracts
- The Future of Diagnosis: Achieving Excellence and Equity
- The Future of Diagnosis: Navigating Uncertainty