Startseite The effect of nonadherence on phenobarbital concentrations and recommendations on the replacement dose using Monte Carlo simulation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The effect of nonadherence on phenobarbital concentrations and recommendations on the replacement dose using Monte Carlo simulation

  • Janthima Methaneethorn ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juni 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the impacts of missed phenobarbital (PB) doses on its pharmacokinetics and to investigate the appropriate replacement dosing scheme for various PB missed dose scenarios.

Methods

Monte Carlo simulations were performed using parameters from the selected population pharmacokinetic study. The impacts of missed PB dose and the proper replacement dosing scheme were assessed based on the percent deviation of simulated concentrations outside the reference range from the full adherence scenario.

Results

The impact of missed PB dose on its concentrations depended on the daily dose. The replacement with a respective regular dose and one and a half regular dose was appropriate for the one and two missed doses scenarios for patients receiving PB monotherapy. For patients receiving PB with valproic acid or phenytoin, the same replacement scheme was still appropriate. The results also indicated that weight did not influence the proper replacement dosing scheme.

Conclusions

The impacts of missed PB doses on its pharmacokinetics were identified and the proper replacement dosing schemes for different missed dose scenarios were proposed. These schemes should be implemented based on the clinician’s justification of the patient’s seizure control.


Corresponding author: Janthima Methaneethorn, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, 65000, Phitsanulok, Thailand; and Center of Excellence for Environmental Health and Toxicology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: Single author contribution.

  3. Competing interests: Author states no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Methaneethorn, J, Leelakanok, N. Pharmacokinetic variability of phenobarbital: a systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020;77:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-03011-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Patsalos, PN, Berry, DJ, Bourgeois, BF, Cloyd, JC, Glauser, TA, Johannessen, SI, et al.. Antiepileptic drugs—best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2008;49:1239–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01561.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Hvidberg, EF, Dam, M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976;1:161–88. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-197601030-00001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Battino, D, Estienne, M, Avanzini, G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in paediatric patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995;29:257–86. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199529040-00005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Touw, D, Graafland, O, Cranendonk, A, Vermeulen, R, Van Weissenbruch, M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital in neonates. Eur J Pharmaceut Sci 2000;12:111–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-0987(00)00145-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Mamiya, K, Hadama, A, Yukawa, E, Ieiri, I, Otsubo, K, Ninomiya, H, et al.. CYP2C19 polymorphism effect on phenobarbitone. Pharmacokineties in Japanese patients with epilepsy: analysis by population pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000;55:821–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050703.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Goto, S, Seo, T, Murata, T, Nakada, N, Ueda, N, Ishitsu, T, et al.. Population estimation of the effects of cytochrome P450 2C9 and 2C19 polymorphisms on phenobarbital clearance in Japanese. Ther Drug Monit 2007;29:118–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0b013e318030def0.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Šíma, M, Michaličková, D, Slanař, O. What is the best predictor of phenobarbital pharmacokinetics to use for initial dosing in neonates? Pharmaceutics 2021;13:301. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030301.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Murphy, JE. Clinical pharmacokinetics, 5th ed. Bethesda: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc; 2011:263–72 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Das, AM, Ramamoorthy, L, Narayan, SK, Wadvekar, V, Harichandrakumar, K. Adherence to antiepileptic regime: a cross-sectional survey. Neurol India 2020;68:856. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.293468.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Davis, KL, Candrilli, SD, Edin, HM. Prevalence and cost of nonadherence with antiepileptic drugs in an adult managed care population. Epilepsia 2008;49:446–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01414.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Getnet, A, Woldeyohannes, SM, Bekana, L, Mekonen, T, Fekadu, W, Menberu, M, et al.. Antiepileptic drug nonadherence and its predictors among people with epilepsy. Behav Neurol 2016;2016:3189108. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3189108.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Ogboi Sonny, J, Babajide, F, Ademola, OA, Olabunmi, O, Agu, PU. Evaluation of factors influencing medication adherence in patients with epilepsy in rural communities of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Neurosci Med 2011;2:299–305. https://doi.org/10.4236/nm.2011.24039.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Samsonsen, C, Reimers, A, Bråthen, G, Helde, G, Brodtkorb, E. Nonadherence to treatment causing acute hospitalizations in people with epilepsy: an observational, prospective study. Epilepsia 2014;55:e125–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12801.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Phenobarbital. Prescribing information. Montréal: Pendopharm, Division of Pharmascience Inc. Phenobarbital tablets [prescribing information]; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Gu, J-Q, Guo, Y-P, Jiao, Z, Ding, J-J, Li, G-F. How to handle delayed or missed doses: a population pharmacokinetic perspective. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2020;45:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-019-00598-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Yu, E-Q, Jiao, Z, Wang, C-Y, Ding, J-J, Zhang, X-H. Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of lamotrigine in pediatric patients with epilepsy using Monte Carlo simulations. Epilepsy Behav 2019;96:132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Belayneh, Z, Mekuriaw, B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of anti-epileptic medication non-adherence among people with epilepsy in Ethiopia. Arch Publ Health 2020;78:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00405-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Ejeliogu, E, Courage, A. Prevalence and factors associated with non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs among children with epilepsy in Jos, Nigeria. Niger J Paediatr 2020;47:240–5. https://doi.org/10.4314/njp.v47i3.8.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Ding, J-J, Zhang, Y-J, Jiao, Z, Wang, Y. The effect of poor compliance on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine and its epoxide metabolite using Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2012;33:1431–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2012.135.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Wang, C-Y, Jiao, Z, Ding, J-J, Yu, E-Q, Zhu, G-X. Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of valproic acid in patients with epilepsy based on Monte Carlo simulations. Epilepsy Behav 2020;111:107265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107265.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Díaz, RAS, Sancho, J, Serratosa, J. Antiepileptic drug interactions. Neurol 2008;14:S55–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nrl.0000340792.61037.40.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Kuranari, M, Tatsukawa, H, Seike, M, Saikawa, T, Ashikari, Y, Kodama, Y, et al.. Effect of phenytoin on phenobarbital pharmacokinetics in a patient with epilepsy. Ann Pharmacother 1995;29:83–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809502900118.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Methaneethorn, J, Panomvana, D, Vachirayonstien, T. Preliminary study of the association between the elimination parameters of phenytoin and phenobarbital. Drug Metab Pers Ther 2017;32:151–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/dmpt-2017-0017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-01-14
Accepted: 2022-04-25
Published Online: 2022-06-17

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 9.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dmpt-2022-0104/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen