Startseite Unexpected interaction between CYP3A4 and BI 11634: is BI 11634 interacting with CYP3A4 similar to nifedipine?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Unexpected interaction between CYP3A4 and BI 11634: is BI 11634 interacting with CYP3A4 similar to nifedipine?

  • Arti Mathur , Donald J. Tweedie , Holly Hlaing-Hlaing Maw und Yongmei Li EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. Oktober 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: Interactions between cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and its substrates are complex with multiple binding sites within the active site. BI 11634 is a factor Xa inhibitor in drug development and its interaction with CYP3A4 was evaluated.

Methods: Reaction phenotyping studies were conducted to determine human isoform(s) of cytochrome P450 responsible for BI 11634 metabolism using recombinant CYPs and specific chemical inhibitors. Metabolite identification and quantitation were performed for incubations of [14C]BI 11634 with human liver microsomes (HLMs) or recombinant CYP3A4 (rCYP3A4) using a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-radiomatic detector. Inhibition of the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of BI 11634 by quinidine was further evaluated.

Results: From the reaction phenotyping studies, it was shown that the metabolism of BI 11634 in HLM was inhibited by ketoconazole and quinidine, well-accepted specific inhibitors of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6, respectively. In contrast, BI 11634 metabolism was exclusively mediated by rCYP3A4. Additional studies confirmed that BI 11634 was metabolized by CYP3A4 to form one major metabolite and this reaction was inhibited by quinidine with a Ki of 7 µM.

Conclusions: These data indicated that BI 11634 may interact with CYP3A4 similar to nifedipine. CYP3A4 substrates have been categorized into three subgroups, including a stand-alone subgroup for dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers such as nifedipine and felodipine. In addition, this study emphasizes the importance of using rCYP in conjunction with approaches relying on inhibition when conducting CYP450 reaction phenotyping studies, as one single method may generate misleading results. The specificity of quinidine as a CYP2D6 inhibitor is questionable as it can also significantly inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of some compounds.


Corresponding author: Yongmei Li, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Rd., Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA, Phone: +1-203-778-7606, Fax: +1-203-791-6003, E-mail:

We thank Dr. Timothy S. Tracy for providing scientific advice. We thank Maxim Chevliakov and Bachir Latli for synthesizing the monohydroxylated BI 11634 (oxidation on the methyl group).

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research funding played no role in thestudy design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretationof data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision tosubmit the report for publication.

Research funding: This research was funded in full by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Guengerich FP. Cytochrome P-450 3A4: regulation and role in drug metabolism. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1999;39: 1–17.10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wienkers LC, Heath TG. Predicting in vivo drug interactions from in vitro drug discovery data. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4: 825–33.10.1038/nrd1851Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Korzekwa KR, Trager WF, Gillette JR. Theory for the observed isotope effects from enzymatic systems that form multiple products via branched reaction pathways: Cytochrome P-450. Biochem 1989;28:9012–8.10.1021/bi00449a009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Shou M, Grogan J, Mancewicz JA, Krausz KW, Gonzalez FJ, Gelboin HV, et al. Activation of CYP3A4: Evidence for the simultaneous binding of two substrates in a cytochrome P450 active site. Biochem 1994;33:6450–5.10.1021/bi00187a009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Korzekwa KR, Krishnamachary N, Shou M, Ogai A, Parise RA, Rettie AE, et al. Evaluation of atypical cytochrome P450 kinetics with two-substrate models: Evidence that multiple substrates can simultaneously bind to cytochrome P450 active sites. Biochem 1998;37:4137–47.10.1021/bi9715627Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Wrighton SA, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE, Shen DD, Korzekwa KR, Watkins PB. The human CYP3A subfamily: Practical considerations. Drug Metab Rev 2000;32: 339–61.10.1081/DMR-100102338Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Yano JK, Wester MR, Schoch GA, Griffin KJ, Stout CD, Johnson EF. The structure of human microsomal cytochrome P450 3A4 determined by X-ray crystallography to 2.05-Ǻ resolution. J Biol Chem 2004;279:38091–4.10.1074/jbc.C400293200Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Scott EE, Halpert JR. Structures of cytochrome P450 3A4. Trends Biochem Sci 2005;30:5–7.10.1016/j.tibs.2004.11.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kenworthy KE, Bloomer JC, Clarke SE, Houston JB. CYP3A4 drug interactions: Correlation of 10 in vitro probe substrates. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;48:716–27.10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00073.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Wang RW, Newton DJ, Liu N, Atkins WM, Lu AYH. Human cytochrome P-450 3A4: in vitro drug-drug interaction patterns are substrate-dependent. Drug Metab Dispos 2000;28:360–6.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Stresser DM, Blanchard AP, Turner SD, Erve JC, Dandeneau AA, Miller VP, et al. Substrate-dependent modulation of CYP3A4 catalytic activity: analysis of 27 test compounds with four fluorometric substrates. Drug Metab Dispos 2000;28:1440–8.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Foti RS, Rock DA, Wienkers LC, Wahlstrom JL. Selection of alternative CYP3A4 probe substrates for clinical drug interaction studies using in vitro data and in vivo simulation. Drug Metab Dispos 2010;38:981–7.10.1124/dmd.110.032094Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Soons PA, Mulders TM, Uchida E, Schoemaker HC, Cohen AF, Breimer DD. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of oral felodipine and nitrendipine in healthy subjects: correlation with nifedipine pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993;44:163–9.10.1007/BF00315475Suche in Google Scholar

14. Galetin A, Clarke SE, Houston JB. Quinidine and haloperidol as modifiers of CYP3A4 activity: multisite kinetic model approach. Drug Metab Dispos 2002;30:1512–22.10.1124/dmd.30.12.1512Suche in Google Scholar

15. Yuan R, Madani S, Wei XX, Reynolds K, Huang SM. Evaluation of cytochrome P450 probe substrates commonly used by the pharmaceutical industry to study in vitro drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 2002;30:1311–9.10.1124/dmd.30.12.1311Suche in Google Scholar

16. Bowles SK, Reeves RA, Cardozo L, Edwards DJ. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between quinidine and nifedipine. J Clin Pharmacol 1993;33:727–31.10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb05614.xSuche in Google Scholar

17. Schellens JH, Ghabrial H, van der Wart HH, Bakker EN, Wilkinson GR, Breimer DD. Differential effects of quinidine on the disposition of nifedipine, sparteine, and mephenytoin in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50:520–8.10.1038/clpt.1991.177Suche in Google Scholar

18. Obach RS, Reed-Hagen AE. Measurement of Michaelis constants for cytochrome P450-mediated biotransformation reactions using a substrate depletion approach. Drug Metab Dispos 2002;30:831–7.10.1124/dmd.30.7.831Suche in Google Scholar

19. Pelkonen O, Maenpaa J, Taavitsainen P, Rautio A, Raunio H. Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Xenobiotica 1998;28:1203–53.10.1080/004982598238886Suche in Google Scholar

20. Rodrigues AD. Integrated cytochrome P450 reaction phenotyping: attempting to bridge the gap between cDNA-expressed cytochromes P450 and native human liver microsomes. Biochem Pharmacol 1999;57:465–80.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54:1271–94.10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00066-2Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-7-22
Accepted: 2013-10-1
Published Online: 2013-10-29
Published in Print: 2013-12-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dmdi-2013-0044/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen