Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Latgalic: Dialect or Language ?

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 3, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information Explore this Subject
Dialectologia et Geolinguistica
From the journal Dialectologia et Geolinguistica Volume 33 Issue 1

Abstract

This article provides insight into a question which continues to be debated, namely, whether to call the means of communication used by the Latvians of eastern Latvia, or Latgale, a language or a dialect. Different views on this question are discussed as well as the various terms the Latgale’s Latvians use to describe their speech. A classification of Latgalic subdialects according to their phonetic and morphological characteristics is also provided.

The question of what constitutes a language as opposed to a dialect is discussed in many places around the world. Linguists tend to define language as a standardised code, which has a spoken and written form, while defining a dialect as a spoken language variety lacking a standardised written form. The concepts dialect and language often have a political shade to them. Dialects can also be defined as different varieties of the same language, which have undergone unique development in different geographic locations or have ended up in dissimilar extralinguistic situations (for more on this see Hoekstra 2003; Haugen 1966; Rudzīte 1964:13). In this sense, the linguistic situation in Latvia’s eastern region of Latgale is unique. It has largely been determined by extralinguistic factors. For Latgalian this question is complicated by the historical circumstances of Latgale where a separate written tradition has existed for nearly 300 years, which only began to be standardised at the beginning of the 20th century, while its spoken form has not been similarly standardised even now.

Keywords: Latvian dialects; Latgalic subdialects; Latgalic subdialect classification dialectology; historical phonology; language history

References

Andronovs, Aleksejs & Lidija Leikuma. 2008. Latgalīšu-latvīšu-krīvu sarunu vuordineica. Rīga: Latviešu valodas aģentūra.Search in Google Scholar

Andronovs, Aleksejs & Lidija Leikuma. 2010. Leikuma. Latgal1skij jazyk. Bol’shaya rossijskaya enciklopediya 30: 41–42. Moskva: Bol’shaya rossijskaya enciklopediya.Search in Google Scholar

Atlas Linguarum Europae. 1983. Vol. 1. Commentaries. Fasc. 1 (Carte 6–9). Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

Augstkalns, Alvis. 1938. Sīki novērojumi. Filologu biedrības raksti 43: 186–191. Rīga: Filologu biedrība.Search in Google Scholar

Balode, Sarmīte. 2016. Vidzemes latgaliskās izloksnes: Beļava. Litene, Stāmeriena. In Avoti vēl neizsīkst. Latviešu valodas dialekti 21. Gadsimtā. Anna Stafecka & Liene Markus-Narvila (eds): 267–369. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Search in Google Scholar

Breidaks, Antons. 2007 [1999]. Latviešu valodas dialektu un izlokšņu grupu cilme un teritoriālā izplatība. Darbu izlase 2: 440–447. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts, Daugavpils Universitāte.Search in Google Scholar

Bukšs, Mikelis & Juris Placinskis. 1973. Latgaļu volūdas gramatika un pareiz-raksteibas vōrdneica. Minchene: Latgaļu izdevnīceiba.Search in Google Scholar

Eisuļs, Aleksandrs & Juris Siliniks. 1928. Latgališu voluda (Etimologija). Novosibirska: Taisneiba.Search in Google Scholar

Endzelīns, Jānis. 1938. Latviešu valodas skaņas un formas. Rīga: Latvijas Univer-sitāte.Search in Google Scholar

Endzelīns, Jānis. 1980 [1954]. Latviešu valoda Vidzemē. Darbu izlase. Vol. 3, part 2: 478–491 Rīga: Zinātne.Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, Binar. 1966. Dialect, Language, Nation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/670407?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Eric. 2003. Frisian. Standardization in progress of a language in decay. The standardization of the Germanic Languages, 195–211, eds Wim Vandenbussche & Ana Deumert. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Kemps, Francis. 1910. Latgalieši [Latgalians]. Rīga: Ģenerālkomisija pie D. Zeltiņa.Search in Google Scholar

Lelis, Joseph. 1961. The Place of Latgalian among the Baltic Dialects. A thesis presented to the Department of Linguistics […] for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Linguistics, Harvard University. Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar

LVDA. 1999. Latviešu valodas dialektu atlants. Leksika. Eds Laumane Benita, Brigita Bušmane & Anna Stafecka. Rīga: Zinātne.Search in Google Scholar

LVDA. 2022. Latviešu valodas dialektu atlants.Morfoloģija I. Ed. Anna Stafecka. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte, Latviešu valodas institūts.Search in Google Scholar

Ozols, Arturs. 1961. Latviešu tautasdziesmu valoda. Rīga: Latvijas Valsts izdevniecībaSearch in Google Scholar

Rudzīte, Marta. 1968. oi gaidāmā uo vietā dažās Latgales izloksnēs. Baltistica IV: 231–245. Vilnius: Mintis.Search in Google Scholar

Rūķe, Velta. 2017 [1939]. Latgales izlokšņu grupējums. Rūķe-Draviņa: Darbu izlase, 350–404. Rīga: Latviešu valodas institūts.Search in Google Scholar

Stafecka, Anna. 2015. “Latvian dialects in the 21 st century: old and new borders”. Acta Baltico-Slavica 39. https://ispan.waw.pl/journals/index.php/abs/article/view/abs.2015.001/171210.11649/abs.2015.001Search in Google Scholar

Stafecka, Anna. 2016. “Latgales latgaliskā izloksne: Nautrēni“. Avoti vēl neizsīkst. Latviešu valodas dialekti 21. gadsimtā: 370–458, eds Anna Stafecka & Liene Markus-Narvila. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Search in Google Scholar

Strods, Pēteris. 1933. Pareizraksteibas vōrdneica [Spelling dictionary]. Rēzekne: Dorbs un zineiba.Search in Google Scholar

Strods, Pēteris. 1944. “Latgaļu dialekta ortografijas problemas”. Rokstu krōjums latgaļu drukas aizlīguma atceļšonas 40 godu atcerei, 365–372. Daugavpiļs: V. Lōča izdevnīceiba.Search in Google Scholar

Toporov, Vladimir. 2006. “Baltijskie jazyki“. Jazyki mira, 10–50. Moskva: Academia.Search in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2025-11-03
Published in Print: 2025-11-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Artikel – Articles – Articulos
  3. The Genesis of Colonial American English Phonology. Dialect Mixture or Koineization?
  4. Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Lithuanian Language: Application of GIS Tools and Geospatial Analysis Methods in Language Perception Studies
  5. The Evolution and Functions of Evidentials in dialects of Turkish
  6. Latgalic: Dialect or Language ?
  7. On the Name ‘Fleance’ in Shakespeare’s Macbeth
  8. A dialectometric approach to Modern Breton dialect data: an opportunity to shed light on its origins and historical evolution
  9. Besprechungen – Comptes rendus – Reseñas – Reviews
  10. Besprechungen – Comptes rendus – Reseñas – Reviews
  11. Astrid van Nahl – An Appreciation
  12. Astrid van Nahl – An Appreciation
https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2025-0004
Keywords for this article
Latvian dialects; Latgalic subdialects; Latgalic subdialect classification dialectology; historical phonology; language history

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Artikel – Articles – Articulos
  3. The Genesis of Colonial American English Phonology. Dialect Mixture or Koineization?
  4. Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Lithuanian Language: Application of GIS Tools and Geospatial Analysis Methods in Language Perception Studies
  5. The Evolution and Functions of Evidentials in dialects of Turkish
  6. Latgalic: Dialect or Language ?
  7. On the Name ‘Fleance’ in Shakespeare’s Macbeth
  8. A dialectometric approach to Modern Breton dialect data: an opportunity to shed light on its origins and historical evolution
  9. Besprechungen – Comptes rendus – Reseñas – Reviews
  10. Besprechungen – Comptes rendus – Reseñas – Reviews
  11. Astrid van Nahl – An Appreciation
  12. Astrid van Nahl – An Appreciation
Downloaded on 19.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dialect-2025-0004/html
Scroll to top button