Startseite Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Multi-objective Bonobo optimisers of industrial low-density polyethylene reactor

  • Fakhrony Sholahudin Rohman , Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi EMAIL logo , Dinie Muhammad , Khairul Azly Zahan , Muhamad Nazri Murat und Ashraf Azmi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. Juli 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to produce a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is applied to address these two problems: increasing conversion and reducing operating cost (as the first optimization problem, P1) and increasing productivity and reducing operating cost (as the second optimization problem, P2). ASPEN Plus software was utilized for the model-based optimization by executing the MOO algorithm using the tubular reactor model. The multi-objective optimization of multi-objective Bonobo optimisers (MOBO-I, MOBO-II and MOBO-III) are utilised to solve the optimization problem. The performance matrices, including hypervolume, pure diversity, and distance, are used to decide on the best MOO method. An inequality constraint was introduced on the temperature of the reactor to prevent run-away. According to the findings of the study, the MOBO-II for Problems 1 and 2 was the most effective MOO strategy. The reason is that the solution set found represents the most accurate, diversified, and acceptable distribution points alongside the Pareto Front (PF) in terms of homogeneity. The minimum operating cost, the maximum conversion and productivity obtained by MOBO-II are Mil. RM/year 114.3, 31.45 %, Mil. RM/year 545.3, respectively.


Corresponding author: Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi, Process Systems Engineering Centre (UTM-PROSPECT), Research Institute of Sustainable Environment (RISE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Malaysia; and School of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: Professional Development Research University Grant

Acknowledgments

The financial support from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia through Professional Development Research University Grant (Vote Number: Q.J130000.21A2.07E17) is greatly acknowledged.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: Fakhrony S Rohman contributes on Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi contributes on Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Dinie Muhammad contributes on Software, Methodology, Formal analysis. Ashraf Azmi contributes on Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Khairul Azly Zahan contributes on Writing - Review & Editing. Siti Nor Azreen Ahmad Termizi contributes on Writing - Review & Editing.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

  4. Research funding: This study was funded by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Professional Development Research University Grant (UTM-PDRU) with Vote number: Q.J130000.21A2.07E17.

  5. Data availability: Datasets used and/or analysed during the study are available from the author on reasonable request.

References

1. Tang, Q, Liu, S, Liu, J, Wang, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, S, et al.. Novel cuboid-like crystalline complexes (CLCCs), photon emission, fluorescent fibers, and bright red fabrics of Eu3+ complexes adjusted by amphiphilic molecules. Polymers 2022;14:905. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050905.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Saldívar-Guerra, E, Ordaz-Quintero, A, Infante-Martínez, R, Herrera-Ordóñez, J, Villarreal-Cárdenas, L, Ramírez-Wong, D, et al.. Some factors affecting the molecular weight distribution (MWD) in low density polyethylene multizone autoclave polymerization reactors. Macromol React Eng 2016;10:123–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/mren.201500030.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Patel, RM. Types and basics of polyethylene. In: Spalding, MA, Chatterjee, AM, editors. Handbook of industrial polyethylene and technology. Beverly, Massachusetts: Scrivener Publishing; 2017:105–38 pp.10.1002/9781119159797.ch4Suche in Google Scholar

4. Burdett, ID, Eisinger, RS. Ethylene polymerization processes and manufacture of polyethylene. Beverly, Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2017:61–103 pp.10.1002/9781119159797.ch3Suche in Google Scholar

5. Rohman, FS, Wan Alwi, SR, Muhammad, D, Idris, I, Zahan, KA, Murat, MN, et al.. Artificial hummingbird-based optimisation with advanced crowding distance of energy reduction in the polyethylene reactors. Process Integr Optim Sustainability 2023;8:271–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-023-00369-0.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Azmi, A, Rohman, FS, Idris, I, Zainol, MM, Sudibyo. Sensitivity study of input parameters in the industrial low density polyethylene tubular reactor. Mater Today Proc 2022;63:S195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.404.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Azmi, A, Sata, SA, Rohman, FS, Aziz, N. Optimization studies of low-density polyethylene process: effect of different interval numbers. Chem Prod Process Model 2020:15:20190125. https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2019-0125.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Boopathy, MBM. A comprehensive dynamic model for high-pressure tubular low-density polyethylene (LDPE) reactors. [PhD Thesis]. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University; 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Agrawal, N, Rangaiah, GP, Ray, AK, Gupta, SK. Multi-objective optimization of the operation of an industrial low-density polyethylene tubular reactor using genetic algorithm and its jumping gene adaptations. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006;45:3182–99. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050977i.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Erdeghem, PMMV, Logist, F, Heughebaert, M, Dittrich, C, Impe, JFV. Conceptual modelling and optimization of jacketed tubular reactors for the production of LDPE. In: Vande, Wouwer A, Smets, I, Kothare, M, Tade, M, Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on dynamics and control of process systems (DYCOPS 2010). Leuven, Belgium: IFAC, Elsevier Ltd; 2010:419–24 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Gujarathi, AM, Babu, BV. Multi-objective optimization of low density polyethylene (LDPE) tubular reactor using strategies of differential evolution. In: Handbook of optimization, Zelinka, I, Snášel, V, Abraham, A. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013:615–39 pp.10.1007/978-3-642-30504-7_25Suche in Google Scholar

12. Wolpert, DH, Macready, WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1997;1:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Abdelghany, RY, Kamel, S, Sultan, HM, Khorasy, A, Elsayed, SK, Ahmed, M. Development of an improved Bonobo optimizer and its application for solar cell parameter estimation. Sustainability 2021;13:3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073863.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Asteasuain, M, Tonelli, SM, Brandolin, A, Bandoni, JA. Dynamic simulation and optimisation of tubular polymerisation reactors in gPROMS. Comput Chem Eng 2001;25:509–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-1354(01)00631-7.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Brandolin, A, Lacunza, MH, Ugrin, PE, Capiati, NJ. High pressure polymerization of ethylene. An improved mathematical model for industrial tubular reactors. Polym React Eng 1996;4:193–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543414.1996.10744475.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Cioffi, M, Hoffmann, AC, Janssen, LPBM. Reducing the gel effect in free radical polymerization. Chem Eng Sci 2001;56:911–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(00)00305-5.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Azmi, A, Sata, SA, Rohman, FS, Aziz, N. Melt flow index of low-density polyethylene determination based on molecular weight and branching properties. J Phys Conf 2019;1349:012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1349/1/012094.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Muhammad, D, Ahmad, Z, Aziz, N. Modeling and nonlinearity studies of low density polyethylene (LDPE) tubular reactor. Mater Today Proc 2018;5:21612–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.07.010.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Bokis, CP, Ramanathan, S, Franjione, J, Buchelli, A, Call, ML, Brown, AL. Physical properties, reactor modeling, and polymerization kinetics in the low-density polyethylene tubular reactor process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002;41:1017–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010308e.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Stoiljkovic, D, Jovanović, S. Compression, supramolecular organization and free radical polymerization of ethylene gas. Polyolefins J 2019;6:23–41.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Bekri, NL, Idris, I, Som, AM, Murat, MN, Rohman, FS, Ilyas, RA, et al.. Study of input parameter changes toward low density polyethylene’s product properties. Mater Today Proc 2023;74:425–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.140.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Das, AK, Nikum, AK, Krishnan, SV, Pratihar, DK. Multi-objective Bonobo optimizer (MOBO): an intelligent heuristic for multi-criteria optimization. Knowl Inf Syst 2020;62:4407–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-020-01503-x.Suche in Google Scholar

23. ICIS. Chemicals, polyethylene prices, news and analysis; 2018. https://www.icis.com/chemicals-and-the-economy/2018/05/us-ethylene-prices-near-all-time-lows-as-over-capacity-arrives/ [Accessed 14th March 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

24. Zhang, S, Li, S, Harley, RG, Habetler, TG. Performance evaluation and comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for the analytical design of switched reluctance machines. CES Trans Electr Mach Syst 2017;1:58–65. https://doi.org/10.23919/tems.2017.7911109.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Wang, H, Jin, Y, Yao, X. Diversity assessment in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern 2017;47:323–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2016.2550502.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Rohman, FS, Muhammad, D, Zahan, KA, Murat, MN. Operation and design optimisation of industrial low-density polyethylene tubular reactor for multiple objectives using an evolutionary algorithm-based strategy. Process Integr Optim Sustainability 2023;7:655–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-023-00308-z.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Duchateau, J, Castañeda-Zúñiga, D, Neuteboom, P, Toloza, C, Tacx, J, Reynolds, A, et al.., Chapter 7.9: SABIC high-pressure process for LDPE: CTR™ technology. In: Meyers, RA, editor. Handbook of petrochemicals production processes, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Professional: Access Engineering; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Dhib, R, Al-Nidawy, N. Modelling of free radical polymerisation of ethylene using difunctional initiators. Chem Eng Sci 2002;57:2735–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00156-2.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Rohman, FS, Zahan, KA, Muhammad, D, Murat, MN. Pareto optimisation of low density polyethylene (LDPE) in tubular reactor using a hybrid strategy. Chem Eng Technol 2022;45:2292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200295.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-06
Accepted: 2024-06-24
Published Online: 2024-07-30

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2024-0023/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen