Home Layouts and tips for a typical final-year chemical engineering graduation project
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Layouts and tips for a typical final-year chemical engineering graduation project

  • Anees A. Khadom EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 19, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A fundamental step in the education and scientific research processes is the final-year project for undergraduate students. In chemical engineering departments, the final year project has unique properties since it deals with the design and production of specific materials or chemicals. It represents a whole plant design. In the present work, a layout and tips are proposed for a typical final-year chemical engineering graduation project. Six chapters are suggested. Each chapter is given a main theme and subtitles in order to facilitate the writing process of the project. Chapter one represents an introduction to the importance of the material that was produced, material properties, production process, etc. In chapter two, material and energy balance calculations are addressed. Chapter three handled the equipment design. Cost and environmental assessments are discussed in Chapter four. The results of chapters two and three are compared with software outcomes, which can be collected in chapter five. Finally, the main results, conclusion, and recommendations for future work are proposed to be in Chapter six. Furthermore, tips and advice are addressed to assist students in the writing of a typical graduation project.


Corresponding author: Anees A. Khadom, Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Diyala, Baquba City 32001, Daiyla governorate, Iraq, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the support of the College of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering at University of Diyala.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The author state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Maniyappan, A. Effectiveness of structured teaching programme on recent advances in robotic rehabilitation among final year BSc nursing students in South India, India. Asian J Nurs Educ Res 2020;10:79–83. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-2996.2020.00018.x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Morales-Botello, ML, Moreno Martínez, C. Semi-guided learning tool as framework for STEM students learning: a case study for final year projects. Educ Inf Technol 2023;28:1535–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11231-0‏.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Cobos, M, Roger, S, Lopez, JJ, Gonzalez, A. Final year projects in electrical and information engineering: tips for students and supervisors. In: 2009 EAEEIE annual conference. New York, USA: IEEE; 2009:1–5 pp.10.1109/EAEEIE.2009.5335487Search in Google Scholar

4. Kuh, GD. Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Assoc Am Coll Univ‏ 2008;14:28–9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Brereton, OP, Lees, S, Bedson, R, Boldyreff, C, Drummond, S, Layzell, P, Young, R. Student collaboration across universities: a case study in software engineering. In: Thirteenth conference on software engineering education and training. New York, USA: IEEE; 2000:76–86 pp.10.1109/CSEE.2000.827025Search in Google Scholar

6. Morad, AH. The reality of university education in Iraq: problems and solutions through adoption of credit hours system. Eng Technol J 2019;37:487–91. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.37.4c.18.Search in Google Scholar

7. Himmelblau, DM, Riggs, JB. Basic principles and calculations in chemical engineering. ‏Michigan, USA: FT press; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ricaurte, M, Viloria, A. Project-based learning as a strategy for multi-level training applied to undergraduate engineering students. ‏Educ Chem Eng 2020;33:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sinnott, R, Richardson, JF, Coulson, JM. Chemical engineering: an introduction to chemical engineering design. New York, USA: Elsevier; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Sambudi, NS, Ramli, RM. Integrated project as innovative assessment to enhance learning experience in thermodynamics class. ASEAN J Sci Eng Educ 2021;1:167–76. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v1i3.40896‏.Search in Google Scholar

11. McCabe, WL, Smith, JC, Harriott, P. Unit operations of chemical engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993, vol 5:154 p.Search in Google Scholar

12. Khan, F, Amyotte, P, Adedigba, S. Process safety concerns in process system digitalization. ‏Educ Chem Eng 2021;34:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

13. Prett, DM, García, CE. Fundamental process control: butterworths series in chemical engineering. ‏Stoneham, Massachusetts, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sinnott, RAY. Chemical engineering design. ‏New York, USA: Elsevier; 2014, vol 6.Search in Google Scholar

15. Peters, MS, Timmerhaus, KD, West, RE. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003, vol 4.‏Search in Google Scholar

16. Haydary, J. Chemical process design and simulation: aspen Plus and aspen Hysys applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.10.1002/9781119311478Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-07
Accepted: 2024-07-02
Published Online: 2024-07-19

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2024-0046/html
Scroll to top button