Startseite Synthesis of Carbon Integration Networks Coupled with Hydrate Suppression and Dehydration Options
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Synthesis of Carbon Integration Networks Coupled with Hydrate Suppression and Dehydration Options

  • Rachid Klaimi , Sabla Y Alnouri EMAIL logo , Dhabia Al-Mohannadi , Joseph Zeaiter und Patrick Linke
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Juni 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The excessive increase in carbon dioxide emissions through the past several decades has raised global climate change concerns. As such, environmental policy makers have been looking into the implementation of efficient strategies that would ultimately reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels, and meet strict emissions targets. As part of a national emission reduction strategy, the reduction of carbon-dioxide emissions from industrial activities has been proven to be very significant. This instigated the need for a systematic carbon integration approach that can yield cost-effective carbon integration networks, while meeting prescribed carbon dioxide emission reduction targets in industrial cities. A novel carbon integration methodology has been previously proposed as a carbon network source-sink mapping approach using a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Program (MINLP), and was found to be very effective to devise emission control strategies in industrial cities. This paper aims to further improve the design process of carbon integration networks, by coupling carbon integration networks with hydrate suppression/moisture removal options. This was found vital for the prevention of any potential hazards that are associated with the transportation of carbon dioxide in pipelines, such as hydrate formation and various corrosion effects, which may result from moisture retention. An extensive analysis of carbon capture, dehydration, inhibition, compression, and transmission options have all been incorporated into the network design process, in the course of determining cost-optimal solutions for carbon dioxide networks. The proposed approach has been illustrated using an industrial city case study.

References

[1] Olivier J, Janssens-Maenhout G, Muntean M, Peters J Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2016 Report. 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2017 [Available from: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html] Access date 15 June 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Dong C, Dong X, Jiang Q, Dong K, Liu G. What is the probability of achieving the carbon dioxide emission targets of the Paris Agreement? Evidence from the top ten emitters. Sci Total Environ. 2018;622:1294–303.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.093Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Metz B, Davidson O, De Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Geneva (Switzerland): Working Group III, 2005. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] UNDP. Lebanon climate act: engaging the private sector in carbon mitigation. UNDP Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon;2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission. EU climate action: european commission; 2016 [Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/eu_en. Access date 15 June 2018Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Darby M. Six EU countries have already met their 2030 climate targets. Climate Home News; 2016. http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/07/22/six-eu-countries-have-already-met-their-2030-climate-targets/ Access date 14 June 2018Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Energy RD. Policies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries—possibilities and limitations of ecological modernization in rentier states. Energy Policy. 2010;38(5):2395–403.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.031Suche in Google Scholar

[9] World Data Atlas. Qatar-CO2 emissions per capita. Knoema, 2016. Available from https://knoema.com/atlas/Qatar/CO2-emissions-per-capita. https://knoema.com/atlas/Qatar/CO2-emissions-per-capita Access date 14 June 2018Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Al-Mohannadi DM, Linke P. On the systematic carbon integration of industrial parks for climate footprint reduction. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:4053–64.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.094Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Al-Mohannadi DM, Alnouri SY, Bishnu SK, Linke P. Multi-period carbon integration. J Clean Prod. 2016;136:150–58.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.027Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Al-Mohannadi DM, Abdulaziz K, Alnouri SY, Linke P. On the synthesis of carbon constrained natural gas monetization networks. J Clean Prod. 2017;168:735–45.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.012Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Y, Wang D, Yang J, Tian L, Wu L. Research on the hydrate formation in the process of GasPhase CO2 pipeline transportation. Int J Heat Technol. 2016;34(2):339–44.10.18280/ijht.340226Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Bavoh CB, Lal B, Keong LK, Binti Jasamai M, Binti Idress M. Synergic kinetic inhibition effect of EMIM-Cl+ PVP on CO2 hydrate formation. Procedia Eng. 2016;148:1232–38.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.474Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Carroll JJ. Problem is the result of industry’s move to use higher pressures. Pipeline Gas J. 2003;230(6):60–61.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Abbas Z, Mezher T, Abu-Zahra MR. CO2 purification. Part I: purification requirement review and the selection of impurities deep removal technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2013;16:324–34.10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.053Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Aspelund A, Jordal K. Gas conditioning—the interface between CO2 capture and transport. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2007;1(3):343–54.10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00040-0Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Said Z, Alshehhi AA, Mehmood A. Predictions of UAE’s renewable energy mix in 2030. Renew Energy. 2018;118:779–89.10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.075Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Rečka L, Ščasný M. Brown coal and nuclear energy deployment: effects on fuel-mix, carbon targets, and external costs in the Czech Republic up to 2050. Fuel. 2018;216:494–502.10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.034Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Furubayashi T, Nakata T. Cost and CO2 reduction of biomass co-firing using waste wood biomass in Tohoku region, Japan. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:1044–53.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.041Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Ooi RE, Foo DC, Tan RR, Ng DK, Smith R. Carbon constrained energy planning (CCEP) for sustainable power generation sector with automated targeting model. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(29):9889–96.10.1021/ie4005018Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Munir SM, Manan ZA, Alwi SRW. Holistic carbon planning for industrial parks: a waste-to-resources process integration approach. J Clean Prod. 2012;33:74–85.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.026Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Atkins MJ, Morrison AS, Walmsley MR. Carbon emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector. Appl Energy. 2010;87(3):982–87.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Barteczko-Hibbert C, Bonis I, Binns M, Theodoropoulos C, Azapagic A. A multi-period mixed-integer linear optimisation of future electricity supply considering life cycle costs and environmental impacts. Appl Energy. 2014;133:317–34.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.066Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Tan RR, Foo DC. Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Energy. 2007;32(8):1422–29.10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.018Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Prah B, Yun R. Heat transfer and flow characteristics of CO2-hydrate mixture in pipeline. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:6813–23.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1811Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Prah B, Yun R. CO2 hydrate slurry transportation in carbon capture and storage. Appl Thermal Eng. 2018;128:653–61.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.053Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Prakhova MU, Krasnov AN, Khoroshavina EA, Shalovnikov EA. Methods And Tools To Prevent Hydrate Formation In Gas Production. Elect Sci J Oil & Gas Business. 2016;1;101-118. DOI 10.17122/ogbus-2016-1-101-118.10.17122/ogbus-2016-1-101-118Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Kemper J, Sutherland L, Watt J, Santos S. Evaluation and analysis of the performance of dehydration units for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia. 2014;63:7568–84.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.792Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Benson SM, Bennaceur K, Cook P, Davison J, de Coninck H, Farhat K, et al. Chapter 13 - Carbon Capture and Storage. In Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2012;993-106810.1017/CBO9780511793677.019Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Ussiri DA, Lal R. Carbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, Cham, Switzerland; 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-53845-7Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Yang M, Song Y, Jiang L, Zhu N, Liu Y, Zhao Y, et al. CO2 hydrate formation and dissociation in cooled porous media: A potential technology for CO2 capture and storage. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(17):9739–46.10.1021/es401536wSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Kelland MA, Reyes FT, Trovik KW. Tris (dialkylamino) cyclopropenium chlorides: tetrahydrofuran hydrate crystal growth inhibition and synergism with polyvinylcaprolactam as gas hydrate kinetic inhibitor. Chem Eng Sci. 2013;93:423–28.10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.033Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Jr ED S, Koh C. Clathrate hydrates of natural gases. CRC press Boca Raton, Florida; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Kelland MA. History of the development of low dosage hydrate inhibitors. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(3):825–47.10.1021/ef050427xSuche in Google Scholar

[36] Bavoh CB, Partoon B, Lal B, Gonfa G, Khor SF, Sharif AM. Inhibition effect of amino acids on carbon dioxide hydrate. Chem Eng Sci. 2017;171:331–39.10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.046Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Roosta H, Dashti A, Mazloumi SH, Varaminian F. Inhibition properties of new amino acids for prevention of hydrate formation in carbon dioxide–water system: experimental and modeling investigations. J Mol Liq. 2016;215:656–63.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.039Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Aman ZM, Koh CA. Interfacial phenomena in gas hydrate systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(6):1678–90.10.1039/C5CS00791GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Dos Santos IFS, Vieira NDB, De Nóbrega LGB, Barros RM, Tiago FGL. Assessment of potential biogas production from multiple organic wastes in Brazil: impact on energy generation, use, and emissions abatement. Res Cons Recy. 2018;131:54–63.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.012Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Lim J, Choi W, Mok J, Clathrate-Based SY. CO2 Capture from Co2-rich natural gas and biogas. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2018;6(4):5627–35.10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00712Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Di Profio P, Canale V, D’Alessandro N, Germani R, Di Crescenzo A, Fontana A. Separation of CO2 and CH4 from biogas by formation of clathrate hydrates: importance of the driving force and kinetic promoters. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2017;5(2):1990–97.10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02832Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Zang X, Liang D. Phase equilibrium data for semiclathrate hydrate of synthesized binary CO2/CH4 gas mixture in tetra-n-butylammonium bromide aqueous solution. J Chem Eng Data. 2017;62(2):851–56.10.1021/acs.jced.6b00876Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Buit L, Ahmad M, Mallon W, Hage F. CO2EuroPipe study of the occurrence of free water in dense phase CO2 transport. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:3056–62.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.217Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Xiang Y, Wang Z, Yang X, Li Z, Ni W. The upper limit of moisture content for supercritical CO 2 pipeline transport. J Supercrit Fluids. 2012;67:14–21.10.1016/j.supflu.2012.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

[45] De Visser E, Hendriks C, Barrio M, Molnvik MJ, Koeijer G, Liljemark S, et al. Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2008;2(4):478–84.10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Olvera-Martínez ME, Mendoza-Flores J, Genesca J. CO 2 corrosion control in steel pipelines. Influence of turbulent flow on the performance of corrosion inhibitors. J Loss Prev Industries. 2015;35:19–28.10.1016/j.jlp.2015.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Chapel DG, Mariz CL, Ernest J, editors. Recovery of CO2 From flue gases: commercial trends. Canadian society of chemical engineers annual meeting; 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Gadalla MA, Olujic Z, Jansens PJ, Jobson M, Reducing SR. CO2 emissions and energy consumption of heat-integrated distillation systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(17):6860–70.10.1021/es049795qSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] McCollum DL, Ogden JM. Techno-economic models for carbon dioxide compression, transport, and storage & correlations for estimating carbon dioxide density and viscosity. Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis, California;2006.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Karimi M, Hillestad M, Svendsen HF. Natural gas combined cycle power plant integrated to capture plant. Energy Fuels. 2012;26(3):1805–13.10.1021/ef201921sSuche in Google Scholar

[51] Porter RT, Fairweather M, Pourkashanian M, Woolley RM. The range and level of impurities in CO 2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2015;36:161–74.10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.016Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Zevenhoven R, Kilpinen P. Control of pollutants in flue gases and fuel gases. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology Espoo; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Songolzadeh M, Soleimani M, Takht Ravanchi M, Songolzadeh R. Carbon dioxide separation from flue gases: a technological review emphasizing reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Sci World J. 2014;2014: Article ID 828131, 34.10.1155/2014/828131Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] ICIS. Caprolactam prices, markets & analysis 2014 [Available from: https://www.icis.com/chemicals/caprolactam/.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Rushing S Examining CO2 Sources for Algae. Biodiesel Magazine. 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Brinckerhoff P. Accelerating the uptake of CCS: industrial use of captured carbon dioxide. Edge Environment and KPMG, New York; 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Dugstad A, Halseid M, editors. Internal corrosion in dense phase CO2 transport pipelines-state of the art and the need for further R&D. CORROSION 2012; 2012: NACE International.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Lindo Systems, What’sBest! 15.0 - excel add-in for linear, nonlinear, and integer modeling and optimization [Available from: www.lindo.com. Access date 14 June 2018Suche in Google Scholar

[59] World Bank. State and trends of carbon pricing 2016. World Bank Publications, Washington DC;2016.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-24
Revised: 2018-06-06
Accepted: 2018-06-08
Published Online: 2018-06-22

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 20.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2018-0019/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen