Home Synthesis of Carbon Integration Networks Coupled with Hydrate Suppression and Dehydration Options
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Synthesis of Carbon Integration Networks Coupled with Hydrate Suppression and Dehydration Options

  • Rachid Klaimi , Sabla Y Alnouri EMAIL logo , Dhabia Al-Mohannadi , Joseph Zeaiter and Patrick Linke
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The excessive increase in carbon dioxide emissions through the past several decades has raised global climate change concerns. As such, environmental policy makers have been looking into the implementation of efficient strategies that would ultimately reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission levels, and meet strict emissions targets. As part of a national emission reduction strategy, the reduction of carbon-dioxide emissions from industrial activities has been proven to be very significant. This instigated the need for a systematic carbon integration approach that can yield cost-effective carbon integration networks, while meeting prescribed carbon dioxide emission reduction targets in industrial cities. A novel carbon integration methodology has been previously proposed as a carbon network source-sink mapping approach using a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Program (MINLP), and was found to be very effective to devise emission control strategies in industrial cities. This paper aims to further improve the design process of carbon integration networks, by coupling carbon integration networks with hydrate suppression/moisture removal options. This was found vital for the prevention of any potential hazards that are associated with the transportation of carbon dioxide in pipelines, such as hydrate formation and various corrosion effects, which may result from moisture retention. An extensive analysis of carbon capture, dehydration, inhibition, compression, and transmission options have all been incorporated into the network design process, in the course of determining cost-optimal solutions for carbon dioxide networks. The proposed approach has been illustrated using an industrial city case study.

References

[1] Olivier J, Janssens-Maenhout G, Muntean M, Peters J Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2016 Report. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[2] BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2017 [Available from: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html] Access date 15 June 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dong C, Dong X, Jiang Q, Dong K, Liu G. What is the probability of achieving the carbon dioxide emission targets of the Paris Agreement? Evidence from the top ten emitters. Sci Total Environ. 2018;622:1294–303.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.093Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Metz B, Davidson O, De Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Geneva (Switzerland): Working Group III, 2005. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Search in Google Scholar

[5] UNDP. Lebanon climate act: engaging the private sector in carbon mitigation. UNDP Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon;2016.Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission. EU climate action: european commission; 2016 [Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/eu_en. Access date 15 June 2018Search in Google Scholar

[7] Darby M. Six EU countries have already met their 2030 climate targets. Climate Home News; 2016. http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/07/22/six-eu-countries-have-already-met-their-2030-climate-targets/ Access date 14 June 2018Search in Google Scholar

[8] Energy RD. Policies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries—possibilities and limitations of ecological modernization in rentier states. Energy Policy. 2010;38(5):2395–403.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.031Search in Google Scholar

[9] World Data Atlas. Qatar-CO2 emissions per capita. Knoema, 2016. Available from https://knoema.com/atlas/Qatar/CO2-emissions-per-capita. https://knoema.com/atlas/Qatar/CO2-emissions-per-capita Access date 14 June 2018Search in Google Scholar

[10] Al-Mohannadi DM, Linke P. On the systematic carbon integration of industrial parks for climate footprint reduction. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:4053–64.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.094Search in Google Scholar

[11] Al-Mohannadi DM, Alnouri SY, Bishnu SK, Linke P. Multi-period carbon integration. J Clean Prod. 2016;136:150–58.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.027Search in Google Scholar

[12] Al-Mohannadi DM, Abdulaziz K, Alnouri SY, Linke P. On the synthesis of carbon constrained natural gas monetization networks. J Clean Prod. 2017;168:735–45.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.012Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zhang Y, Wang D, Yang J, Tian L, Wu L. Research on the hydrate formation in the process of GasPhase CO2 pipeline transportation. Int J Heat Technol. 2016;34(2):339–44.10.18280/ijht.340226Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bavoh CB, Lal B, Keong LK, Binti Jasamai M, Binti Idress M. Synergic kinetic inhibition effect of EMIM-Cl+ PVP on CO2 hydrate formation. Procedia Eng. 2016;148:1232–38.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.474Search in Google Scholar

[15] Carroll JJ. Problem is the result of industry’s move to use higher pressures. Pipeline Gas J. 2003;230(6):60–61.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Abbas Z, Mezher T, Abu-Zahra MR. CO2 purification. Part I: purification requirement review and the selection of impurities deep removal technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2013;16:324–34.10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.053Search in Google Scholar

[17] Aspelund A, Jordal K. Gas conditioning—the interface between CO2 capture and transport. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2007;1(3):343–54.10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00040-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] Said Z, Alshehhi AA, Mehmood A. Predictions of UAE’s renewable energy mix in 2030. Renew Energy. 2018;118:779–89.10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.075Search in Google Scholar

[19] Rečka L, Ščasný M. Brown coal and nuclear energy deployment: effects on fuel-mix, carbon targets, and external costs in the Czech Republic up to 2050. Fuel. 2018;216:494–502.10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.034Search in Google Scholar

[20] Furubayashi T, Nakata T. Cost and CO2 reduction of biomass co-firing using waste wood biomass in Tohoku region, Japan. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:1044–53.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.041Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ooi RE, Foo DC, Tan RR, Ng DK, Smith R. Carbon constrained energy planning (CCEP) for sustainable power generation sector with automated targeting model. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(29):9889–96.10.1021/ie4005018Search in Google Scholar

[22] Munir SM, Manan ZA, Alwi SRW. Holistic carbon planning for industrial parks: a waste-to-resources process integration approach. J Clean Prod. 2012;33:74–85.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.026Search in Google Scholar

[23] Atkins MJ, Morrison AS, Walmsley MR. Carbon emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector. Appl Energy. 2010;87(3):982–87.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Barteczko-Hibbert C, Bonis I, Binns M, Theodoropoulos C, Azapagic A. A multi-period mixed-integer linear optimisation of future electricity supply considering life cycle costs and environmental impacts. Appl Energy. 2014;133:317–34.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.066Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tan RR, Foo DC. Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Energy. 2007;32(8):1422–29.10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.018Search in Google Scholar

[26] Prah B, Yun R. Heat transfer and flow characteristics of CO2-hydrate mixture in pipeline. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:6813–23.10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1811Search in Google Scholar

[27] Prah B, Yun R. CO2 hydrate slurry transportation in carbon capture and storage. Appl Thermal Eng. 2018;128:653–61.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.053Search in Google Scholar

[28] Prakhova MU, Krasnov AN, Khoroshavina EA, Shalovnikov EA. Methods And Tools To Prevent Hydrate Formation In Gas Production. Elect Sci J Oil & Gas Business. 2016;1;101-118. DOI 10.17122/ogbus-2016-1-101-118.10.17122/ogbus-2016-1-101-118Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kemper J, Sutherland L, Watt J, Santos S. Evaluation and analysis of the performance of dehydration units for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia. 2014;63:7568–84.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.792Search in Google Scholar

[30] Benson SM, Bennaceur K, Cook P, Davison J, de Coninck H, Farhat K, et al. Chapter 13 - Carbon Capture and Storage. In Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2012;993-106810.1017/CBO9780511793677.019Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ussiri DA, Lal R. Carbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, Cham, Switzerland; 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-53845-7Search in Google Scholar

[32] Yang M, Song Y, Jiang L, Zhu N, Liu Y, Zhao Y, et al. CO2 hydrate formation and dissociation in cooled porous media: A potential technology for CO2 capture and storage. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(17):9739–46.10.1021/es401536wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Kelland MA, Reyes FT, Trovik KW. Tris (dialkylamino) cyclopropenium chlorides: tetrahydrofuran hydrate crystal growth inhibition and synergism with polyvinylcaprolactam as gas hydrate kinetic inhibitor. Chem Eng Sci. 2013;93:423–28.10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.033Search in Google Scholar

[34] Jr ED S, Koh C. Clathrate hydrates of natural gases. CRC press Boca Raton, Florida; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kelland MA. History of the development of low dosage hydrate inhibitors. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(3):825–47.10.1021/ef050427xSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Bavoh CB, Partoon B, Lal B, Gonfa G, Khor SF, Sharif AM. Inhibition effect of amino acids on carbon dioxide hydrate. Chem Eng Sci. 2017;171:331–39.10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.046Search in Google Scholar

[37] Roosta H, Dashti A, Mazloumi SH, Varaminian F. Inhibition properties of new amino acids for prevention of hydrate formation in carbon dioxide–water system: experimental and modeling investigations. J Mol Liq. 2016;215:656–63.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.039Search in Google Scholar

[38] Aman ZM, Koh CA. Interfacial phenomena in gas hydrate systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(6):1678–90.10.1039/C5CS00791GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Dos Santos IFS, Vieira NDB, De Nóbrega LGB, Barros RM, Tiago FGL. Assessment of potential biogas production from multiple organic wastes in Brazil: impact on energy generation, use, and emissions abatement. Res Cons Recy. 2018;131:54–63.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lim J, Choi W, Mok J, Clathrate-Based SY. CO2 Capture from Co2-rich natural gas and biogas. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2018;6(4):5627–35.10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00712Search in Google Scholar

[41] Di Profio P, Canale V, D’Alessandro N, Germani R, Di Crescenzo A, Fontana A. Separation of CO2 and CH4 from biogas by formation of clathrate hydrates: importance of the driving force and kinetic promoters. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2017;5(2):1990–97.10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02832Search in Google Scholar

[42] Zang X, Liang D. Phase equilibrium data for semiclathrate hydrate of synthesized binary CO2/CH4 gas mixture in tetra-n-butylammonium bromide aqueous solution. J Chem Eng Data. 2017;62(2):851–56.10.1021/acs.jced.6b00876Search in Google Scholar

[43] Buit L, Ahmad M, Mallon W, Hage F. CO2EuroPipe study of the occurrence of free water in dense phase CO2 transport. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:3056–62.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.217Search in Google Scholar

[44] Xiang Y, Wang Z, Yang X, Li Z, Ni W. The upper limit of moisture content for supercritical CO 2 pipeline transport. J Supercrit Fluids. 2012;67:14–21.10.1016/j.supflu.2012.03.006Search in Google Scholar

[45] De Visser E, Hendriks C, Barrio M, Molnvik MJ, Koeijer G, Liljemark S, et al. Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2008;2(4):478–84.10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[46] Olvera-Martínez ME, Mendoza-Flores J, Genesca J. CO 2 corrosion control in steel pipelines. Influence of turbulent flow on the performance of corrosion inhibitors. J Loss Prev Industries. 2015;35:19–28.10.1016/j.jlp.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar

[47] Chapel DG, Mariz CL, Ernest J, editors. Recovery of CO2 From flue gases: commercial trends. Canadian society of chemical engineers annual meeting; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Gadalla MA, Olujic Z, Jansens PJ, Jobson M, Reducing SR. CO2 emissions and energy consumption of heat-integrated distillation systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(17):6860–70.10.1021/es049795qSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] McCollum DL, Ogden JM. Techno-economic models for carbon dioxide compression, transport, and storage & correlations for estimating carbon dioxide density and viscosity. Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis, California;2006.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Karimi M, Hillestad M, Svendsen HF. Natural gas combined cycle power plant integrated to capture plant. Energy Fuels. 2012;26(3):1805–13.10.1021/ef201921sSearch in Google Scholar

[51] Porter RT, Fairweather M, Pourkashanian M, Woolley RM. The range and level of impurities in CO 2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2015;36:161–74.10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.016Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zevenhoven R, Kilpinen P. Control of pollutants in flue gases and fuel gases. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology Espoo; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Songolzadeh M, Soleimani M, Takht Ravanchi M, Songolzadeh R. Carbon dioxide separation from flue gases: a technological review emphasizing reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Sci World J. 2014;2014: Article ID 828131, 34.10.1155/2014/828131Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] ICIS. Caprolactam prices, markets & analysis 2014 [Available from: https://www.icis.com/chemicals/caprolactam/.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Rushing S Examining CO2 Sources for Algae. Biodiesel Magazine. 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Brinckerhoff P. Accelerating the uptake of CCS: industrial use of captured carbon dioxide. Edge Environment and KPMG, New York; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Dugstad A, Halseid M, editors. Internal corrosion in dense phase CO2 transport pipelines-state of the art and the need for further R&D. CORROSION 2012; 2012: NACE International.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Lindo Systems, What’sBest! 15.0 - excel add-in for linear, nonlinear, and integer modeling and optimization [Available from: www.lindo.com. Access date 14 June 2018Search in Google Scholar

[59] World Bank. State and trends of carbon pricing 2016. World Bank Publications, Washington DC;2016.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-24
Revised: 2018-06-06
Accepted: 2018-06-08
Published Online: 2018-06-22

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2018-0019/html
Scroll to top button