Startseite Integrated Palm Biomass Supply Chain toward Sustainable Management
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Integrated Palm Biomass Supply Chain toward Sustainable Management

  • B S How EMAIL logo und H L Lam
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Juli 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Sustainable biomass supply chain management (SBSCM) problem is a multi-objective optimisation (MOO) problem since the objectives of each sustainability dimension and (or) each components under a same sustainability dimension can be conflicting. It is unlikely to have a single solution that could simultaneously satisfy all objectives. Therefore, achieving optimum for one objective requires compromise of other objectives. Several approaches have been developed to solve MOO problems. The simplest way reported from the academicians is to transform MOO problem into single objective optimisation (SOO) problem by converting all objectives into a similar form of objectives. However, converting environmental impacts into economic form might produce sub-optimal solution as the optimal result is highly dependent on the magnitude of the penalty cost. This paper presents a systematic approach which integrates both economic and environmental concerns in the supply chain by using the concept of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Instead of merely focusing on carbon emission, this paper incorporates other environmental indicators as well, i. e., global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential (ODP), acidification potential (AP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP), nutrification potential (NP), aquatic toxicity potential (ATP), terrestrial toxicity potential (TTP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP), water footprint and land footprint. On top of that, this paper also proposes a graphical illustration method to present the sustainability performance of the results. Both economic sustainability and environmental sustainability are expressed in a vector form. With the aid of this graphical representation, the tendency of the process towards each sustainability dimension can be clearly seen. A case study in Johor state is used to demonstrate the proposed method and a palm biomass supply chain with high sustainability performance (λSCM= 0.8437) is synthesised in this paper.

Funding statement: The Ministry of Education (MOE), Malaysia, via LRGS Grant, (Grant / Award Number: ‘LRGS/2013/UKM/PT’).

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Education (MOE), Malaysia, via LRGS Grant (Program code: LRGS/2013/UKM/PT).

Reference

[1] Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel SA, Chidzero B, Fadika LM. Our common future: The World commission on environment and development. Oxord, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hong BH, How BS, Lam HL. Overview of sustainable biomass supply chain: From concept to modelling. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2016;18(7):2173–2194.10.1007/s10098-016-1155-6Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Narodoslawsky M, Niederl-Schmidinger A, Halasz L. Utilising renewable resources economically: New challenges and chances for process development. J Clean Prod. 2008;16(2):164–170.10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.023Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Rentizelas AA, Tatsiopoulos IP, Tolis A. An optimization model for multi-biomass tri-generation energy supply. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33(2):223–233.10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Bai Y, Hwang T, Kang S, Ouyang Y. Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion. Transportation Res Part B. 2011;45(1):162–175.10.1016/j.trb.2010.04.006Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Lam HL, Ng WPQ, Ng RTL, Ng EH, Abdul Aziz MK, Ng DKS. Green strategy for sustainable waste-to-energy supply chain. Energy. 2013;57:4–16.10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.032Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Čuček L, Martin M, Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z. Multi-period synthesis of optimally integrated biomass and bioenergy supply network. Comput Chem Eng. 2014;66:57–70.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.02.020Suche in Google Scholar

[8] How BS, Tan KY, Lam HL. Transportation decision tool for optimisation of integrated biomass flow with vehicle capacity constraints. J Clean Prod. 2016;136(Part B):197–223.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.142Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Čuček L, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z. A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod. 2012;34:9–20.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.036Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Andrić I, Jamali-Zghal N, Santarelli M, Lacarrière B, Le Corre O. Environmental performance assessment of retrofitting existing coal fired power plants to co-firing with biomass: Carbon footprint and emergy approach. J Clean Prod. 2015;103:13–27.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.019Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, Van Der Meer T. The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecological Econ. 2009;68(4):1052–1060.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.013Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Khoo HH. Review of bio-conversion pathways of lignocellulose-to-ethanol: Sustainability assessment based on land footprint projections. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;46:100–109.10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.027Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Heijungs R, Guinee JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo De Haes HA, Sleeswijk W. Environmental Life Cycle Assessmentment of Product Guide. Leiden, Netherland: Centre of Environmental Science, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Young DM, Cabezas H. Designing sustainable processes with simulation: The waste reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comput Chem Eng. 1999;23:1477–1491.10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00306-3Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Rangaiah GP. Advanced in Process Systems Engineering-Vol.1 Multi-Objective Optimization: Techniques and Applications in Chemical Engineering, 1st ed. Toh Tuck Link,Singapore: World Scientific, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Dantus MM, High KA. Evaluation of waste minimization alternatives under uncertainty: A multiobjective optimization approach. Comput Chem Eng. 1999;23(10):1493–1508.10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00307-5Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Mayrotas G. Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming problems. Appl Math Comput. 2009;213(2):455–465.10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Esmaili M, Amjady N, Shayanfar HA. Multi-objective congestion management by modified augmented ε-constraint method. Appl Energy. 2011;83(3):755–766.10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.014Suche in Google Scholar

[19] EPA. Designing for Environment: A Multi-objective Optimization Framework Under Uncertainty. 2003 [Online] Available at: cfpub.epa.gov. Accessed 10 May 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Saaty TL. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. J Math Psychol. 1977;15:234–281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Saaty RW. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Math Modelling. 1987;9(3–5):161–176.10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Lingo. LINGO 14.0. 2015 [Online] Available at: lingo.software.informer.com/14.0/. Accessed 12 February 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Čuček L, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z. Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains. Energy. 2012;44(1):135–145.10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.040Suche in Google Scholar

[24] MPOC. Malaysia Palm Oil Industry. 2014 [Online] Available at www.mpoc.org.my.aspx. Accessed 10 January 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Ng WPQ, Lam HL, Ng FY, Kamal M, Lim JHE. Waste-to-wealth: Green potential from palm biomass in Malaysia. J Clean Prod. 2012;34:57–65.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Zaimes GG, Khanna V. Life cycle sustainability aspects of microalgal biofuels. In: Klemeš JJ, editor(s). Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability. Waltham, U.S.: Elsevier, 2015:255–276.10.1016/B978-0-12-799968-5.00008-7Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-5-6
Accepted: 2017-7-7
Published Online: 2017-7-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2017-0024/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen