Home The Effect of Module Geometry on Heat and Mass Transfer in Membrane Distillation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Effect of Module Geometry on Heat and Mass Transfer in Membrane Distillation

  • Hossein Ahadi , Javad Karimi-Sabet ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Mojtaba Shariaty-Niassar EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Some features of Direct Contact Membrane Distillation (DCMD), as one of the interesting membrane processes, has been studied in this effort. 3D computational fluid dynamic simulations were carried out to investigate some geometric parameter effects on flat sheet membrane module performance. It is obvious that using of baffles could noticeably improve the performance of the system. Hence, in present work, some baffle configurations were simulated and some parameters like temperature polarization, vapor flux and pressure drop through module length were investigated. The Simulation was performed based on neglecting viscous flow in membrane pores and dusty gas model was applied to predict vapor flux through membrane. Simulation results predicted that by using the new configuration we could have 40–60% vapor flux improvement (depend on inflow velocity) compared to a module without baffle. It was found that the average temperature polarization (TP), as a proper criteria, was higher for baffled one in all situations.

References

1. Kimura S, Nakao S-I. Transport phenomena in membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 1987;33:285–98.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80286-0Search in Google Scholar

2. Khayet M, Matsuura T. Membrane distillation principles and applications. UK: Elsevier, 2011.10.1016/B978-0-444-53126-1.10012-0Search in Google Scholar

3. Baker, RW. Membrane technology and applications. s.l.: Wiley, 2012.10.1002/9781118359686Search in Google Scholar

4. Jia M, Peinemann KV, Behling RD. Molecular sieving effect of the zeolite-filled silicone rubber membranes in gas permeation. J Membr Sci 1991;57:289–92.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80684-5Search in Google Scholar

5. El-Bourawia MS, Ding Z, Ma R, Khayet M. A framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process. J Membr Sci 2006;285:4–29.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.002Search in Google Scholar

6. Camacho LM, Dumée L, Zhang J, Li J-d, Duke M, Gomez J et al. Advances in membrane distillation for water desalination and purification applications. Water 2013;5:94–196.10.3390/w5010094Search in Google Scholar

7. Wang P, Chung TS. Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: membrane development, configuration design and application exploring. J Memb Sci 2015;474:39–56.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.016Search in Google Scholar

8. Khayet M. Membranes and theoretical modeling of membrane distillation: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2011;164:56–88.10.1016/j.cis.2010.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Tang N, Zhang H, Wang W. Computational fluid dynamics numerical simulation of vacuum membrane distillation for aqueous NaCl solution. Desalination 2011;274:120–9.10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.078Search in Google Scholar

10. Yu H, Yang X, Wang R, Fane AG. Numerical simulation of heat and mass transfer in direct membrane distillationin a hollow fiber module with laminar flow. J Membr Sci 2011;384:107–1610.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.011Search in Google Scholar

11. Al-Sharif S, Albeirutty M, Cipollina A, Micale G. Modelling flow and heat transfer in spacer-filled membrane distillation channels using open source CFD code. Desalination 2013;311:103–12.10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-8
Accepted: 2015-12-10
Published Online: 2016-1-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Note
  3. Editorial Special Issue: Selected Extended Papers from the 12th International Conference on Membrane Science and Technology (MST2015) Symposium on Modeling and Simulation
  4. Research Articles
  5. Molecular Perspective of Radionuclides Separation by Nanoporous Graphene Oxide Membrane
  6. Mathematical Modeling and Investigation on the Temperature and Pressure Dependency of Permeation and Membrane Separation Performance for Natural gas Treatment
  7. Mathematical Modeling of Natural Gas Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules by Application of Finite Element Method through Statistical Analysis
  8. Modelling Study of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Methan Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  9. Performance Investigation of Membrane Process in Natural Gas sweeting by Membrane Process: Modeling Study
  10. Gas Separation in Nanoporous Graphene from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  11. The Effect of Module Geometry on Heat and Mass Transfer in Membrane Distillation
  12. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) Process
  13. Multi-objective Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Asymmetric Polyetherimide Membrane for Prevaporation of Isopropanol
  14. Investigation of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Ethanol Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  15. Designing Better Membrane Modules Using CFD
  16. Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus® V8.6
  17. Numerical Simulation of Salt Water Passing Mechanism Through Nanoporous Single-Layer Graphene Membrane
  18. Facilitated Transport of Propylene Through Composite Polymer-Ionic Liquid Membranes. Mass Transfer Analysis
  19. CFD Simulation of Hydrogen Separation in Pd Hollow Fiber Membrane
  20. Numerical Study on Concentration Polarization for H2-N2 Separation through a Thin Pd Membrane by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2015-0060/pdf
Scroll to top button