Corrigendum to: Line Brandt. 2016. The rhetorics of fictive interaction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation
Corrigendum to: Line Brandt. 2016. The rhetorics of fictive interaction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation. Cognitive Semiotics. Volume 9, Issue 2, pages 149–182. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2016-0006)
This article is an autonomous and extended version of the chapter “‘Say hello to this ad’ – The persuasive rhetoric of fictive interaction in marketing”, whose co-author was Esther Pascual, and which was published in Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (eds.), The Conversation Frame. Forms and functions of fictive interaction. John Benjamins, 2016, pp. 303–322, DOI: 10.1075/hcp.55.15bra. Work on that original book chapter was fully funded by a Vidi grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (276.70.019), awarded to Esther Pascual. Examples followed by * have either been used by Esther Pascual in previous publications or stem from her fictive interaction database.
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Corrigendum to: Line Brandt. 2016. The rhetorics of fictive interaction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation
- Introduction
- Ecological meaning, linguistic meaning, and interactivity
- Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses
- Contrasting attention to mutual knowledge in English and Mopan Mayan conversation: Schooling, orality, and cultural cosmology
- Upright posture and the meaning of meronymy: A synthesis of metaphoric and analytic accounts
- Temporality of sense-making in narrative interactions
- Meaning making from life to language: The Semiotic Hierarchy and phenomenology
- Retraction of: The rhetorics of fictiveinteraction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation
Articles in the same Issue
- Corrigendum to: Line Brandt. 2016. The rhetorics of fictive interaction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation
- Introduction
- Ecological meaning, linguistic meaning, and interactivity
- Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses
- Contrasting attention to mutual knowledge in English and Mopan Mayan conversation: Schooling, orality, and cultural cosmology
- Upright posture and the meaning of meronymy: A synthesis of metaphoric and analytic accounts
- Temporality of sense-making in narrative interactions
- Meaning making from life to language: The Semiotic Hierarchy and phenomenology
- Retraction of: The rhetorics of fictiveinteraction in advertising: The case for imagined direct speech in argumentation