Startseite How politicians express different viewpoints in gesture and speech simultaneously
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

How politicians express different viewpoints in gesture and speech simultaneously

  • Douglas Guilbeault EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. August 2017

Abstract

Political speeches are a prime example of how discourse often requires speakers to convey multiple competing viewpoints, both their own and others’. Cognitive linguists have shown how, in speech, speakers express viewpoint through individual choices at the lexical and grammatical level. Recently, cognitive linguists have also shown that speakers express viewpoint using speech-accompanying gestures. To date, the study of viewpoint expression has focused on cases where speakers deliver the same viewpoint across modalities. By examining the persuasive uses of gesture in Obama’s A More Perfect Union speech, I show how speakers can communicate multiple different viewpoints across gesture and speech, simultaneously. There are moments when Obama expresses his opponents’ viewpoint in speech, while framing them in terms of his own viewpoint in gesture, and vice versa. I discuss how the deviation of viewpoints across modalities provides key insights into multimodal cognition, with respect to working memory, metaphor, and persuasion. Specifically, I argue that, as an implicit medium, gesture allows speakers to inject viewpoint into the uptake of speech, below the conscious radar of recipients, and I discuss how this rhetorical capacity is evolving as a result of communication technologies.

Funding statement: This work was supported by The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, (Grant/Award Number: ‘Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada PhD Scholarship’).

Appendix

References

Atkinson, M. 1984. Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Atkinson, M. 2005. Lend me your ears: All you need to know about making speeches and presentations. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailenson, J. N., A. C. Beall & J. Loomis. 2005. Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments. Human Communication Research 31(4). 511–537.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00881.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale & Boaz Keysar. 2007. Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn., 901–938. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50024-9Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth. 1979. The emergence of symbols. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergen, Ben. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Broaders, Sara & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2010. Truth is at hand: How gesture adds information during investigative interviews. Psychological Science 21. 623–628.10.1177/0956797610366082Suche in Google Scholar

Brookshire, Geoffrey & Daniel Casasanto. 2012. Motivation and motor control: Hemispheric specialization for approach motivation reverses with handedness. PLoS ONE 7(4). (accessed February 8, 2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0036036Suche in Google Scholar

Bullowa, M. (ed.). 1979. Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bulwer, J. 1644. Chirologia, or the natural language of the hand. London: Thomas Harper.10.1037/11828-001Suche in Google Scholar

Calbris, Geneviève. 2008. From left to right… Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cornelia Müller & Alan Cienki (eds.), Metaphor and gesture (Gesture Studies 3), 27–55. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.3.05calSuche in Google Scholar

Cappella, J. N. & S. Planalp. 1981. Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research 7. 117–132.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.xSuche in Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel. 2008. Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition 36(6). 1047–1056.10.3758/MC.36.6.1047Suche in Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel. 2009. The embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in left and right handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3). 351–367.10.1037/a0015854Suche in Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin. 2010. Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE 5(7). e11805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011805.Suche in Google Scholar

Caso, Letizia, Fridanna Maricchiolo & Marino Bonaiuto. 2006. The impact of deception and suspicion on different hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour 30(1). 1–19.10.1007/s10919-005-0001-zSuche in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. Analyzing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1Suche in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Anjan. 2010. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2(1). 79–116.10.1515/langcog.2010.004Suche in Google Scholar

Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, Susan Wagner, Zachary Mitchell & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2008. Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition 106. 1047–1058.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, Susan Wagner, Terina Kuang Yi Yip & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(4). 594–610.10.1080/01690965.2011.567074Suche in Google Scholar

Cooperrider, Kensy. 2014. Body-directed gestures: Pointing to the self and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 1–16. doihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.00310.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

Cornejo, Carlos, Franco Simonetti, Augstin Ibanez, Nerea Aldunate, Francisco Ceric, Vladimir Lopez & Rafael Nunez. 2009. Gesture and metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation. Brain and Cognition 70. 42–52.10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

Dael, Nele, Martijn Goudbeek & K. R. Scherer. 2013. Perceived gesture dynamics in nonverbal expression of emotion. Perception 42(6). 642–657.10.1068/p7364Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2008. Personal pronouns, blending, and narrative viewpoint. In A. Tyler, K. Yiyoung & M. Takada (eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language, 167–182. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The language of stories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, José Sanders & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.). 2012. Textual choices in discourse: A view from cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.40Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2014. Figurative language (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2016. Discourse viewpoint as network. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 13–41. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467-003Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467Suche in Google Scholar

David-Barrett, T. & R. I. M. Dunbar. 2013. Processing power limits social group size: Computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280(1765). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1765/2013115110.1098/rspb.2013.1151Suche in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2011. Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1). 236–250.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.022Suche in Google Scholar

Detz, Joan. 2002. How to write & give a speech: A practical guide for executives, PR people, the military, fund-raisers, politicians, educators, and anyone who has to make every word count. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Suche in Google Scholar

Dittrich, W. H., T. Troscianko, S. E. G. Lee & Dawn Morgan. 1996. Perception of emotion from dynamic point light displays represented in dance. Perception 25. 727–738.10.1068/p250727Suche in Google Scholar

Fabien, Mathy. 2012. What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memory. Cognition 122(3). 346–362.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 2003. Polarity and the scale principle. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Semantics: Critical concepts in linguistics. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Martin & Rolf A. Zwaan. 2008. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 825–850.10.1080/17470210701623605Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, R. & C. McDaniel. 1982. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218. 486–487.10.1126/science.7123249Suche in Google Scholar

Franklin, Amy. 2007. Blending in deception: Tracing output back to its source. In Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (Gesture Studies 1), 99–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.11fraSuche in Google Scholar

Fukada, Chie. 2016. The dynamic interplay between words and pictures in picture storybooks: How visual and verbal information interact and affect the readers’ viewpoint and understanding. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 217–236. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467-010Suche in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. 2005. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199271941.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gerofsky, Susan. 2010. Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students’ gestured graphs of functions. Gesture 10(2/3). 321–343.10.1075/bct.39.10gerSuche in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, Susan, San Kim & Melissa Singer. 1999. What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology 91. 720–730.10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.720Suche in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Susan M. Wagner. 2005. How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Science 9. 234–241.10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

Goodrich Smith, Whitney & Carla L. Hudson Kam. 2015. Children’s use of gesture in ambiguous pronoun interpretation. Journal of Child Language 42(3). 591–617. doi:http://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091500004510.1017/S0305000915000045Suche in Google Scholar

Goodrich, Whitney & Carla L. Hudson Kam. 2009. Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Development Science 12. 81–87.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00735.xSuche in Google Scholar

Gottfried, J. & E. Shearer. 2016. News across social media platforms 2016. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/Suche in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John (ed.). 1983. Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620836Suche in Google Scholar

Hostetter, Autumn & Martha Alibali. 2010. Language, gesture, action! A test of the gesture as simulated action framework. Journal of Memory and Language 63. 245–257.10.1037/e527312012-844Suche in Google Scholar

Hubbard, Amy, Stephen Wilson, Daniel Callan & Mirella Deprette. 2009. Giving speech a hand: Gesture modulates activity in auditory cortex during speech perception. Human Brain Mapping 30. 1028–1037.10.1002/hbm.20565Suche in Google Scholar

Ishino, Mika. 2007. Intersubjectivity in gestures: The speaker’s perspective toward the addressee. In Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (Gesture Studies 1), 243–250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.21ishSuche in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 2011. The grammar of polarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975288Suche in Google Scholar

Kelly, Spencer, Asli Özyürek & Eric Maris. 2010. Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science 21. 260–267.10.1177/0956797609357327Suche in Google Scholar

Kemp, Charles & Terry Regier. 2012. Kinship categories across languages reflect general communicative principles. Science 366. 1049–1054.10.1126/science.1218811Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1980. Gesture and speech: Two aspects of the same process of utterance. In M. R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110813098.207Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1982. The study of gesture: Some observations on its history. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 2. 45–62.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2014. The ‘poly-modalic’ nature of utterances and its relevance for inquiring into language origins. In Daniel Dor, Chris Knight & Jerome Lewis (eds.), The social origins of language, 67–76. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Kopp, S. & K. Bergmann. 2013. Automatic and strategic alignment of co-verbal gestures in dialogue. In I. Wachsmuth, J. De Ruiter, P. Jaecks & S. Kopp (eds.), Alignment in communication: Towards a new theory of communication (Advances in Interaction Studies 6), 57–87. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ais.6Suche in Google Scholar

Krieken, Kobie van, José Sanders & Hans Hoeken. 2016. Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 41–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467-007Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2008. The neuroscience of metaphoric gestures: Why they exist. In Cornelia Müller & Alan Cienki (eds.), Metaphor and gesture (Gesture Studies 3), 283–291. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.3.20lakSuche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2012. Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science 4. 1–13.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.xSuche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2002. Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics 13(2). 245–263.10.1515/cogl.2002.016Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectication. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1995. Viewing in cognition and grammar. In Philip W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 102), 153–212. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.102.06lanSuche in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott. 1990. Four functions of a locus: Re-examining the structure of space in ASL. Ciel Lucs (ed.), Research in sign language: Theoretical issues, 176–198. Washington: Gallaudet Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Suche in Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. 1966. Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mandler, Jean & Cánovas. Cristóbal 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 0. 1–23. doi:10.1017/langcog.2014.14Suche in Google Scholar

Mayer, Richard E. & Roxana Moreno. 2003. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1). 43–52.10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6Suche in Google Scholar

McClave, Evelyn, 2000. When you means I: Manual and nonmanual gestures and shifting participation frameworks. In Joy Kreeft Peyton, Peg Griffin, Walt Wolfram & Ralph Fasold (eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society, Essays in Honor of Roger W. Shuy, 247–259. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McDermott, Kathleen, Cynthia Wooldridge, Heather Rice, Jeffrey Berg & Karl Szpunar. 2016. Visual perspective in remembering and episodic future thought. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69(2). 243–253.10.4324/9781315222776-4Suche in Google Scholar

McManus, Chris. 2002. Right hand, left hand: The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1985. So you think gesture is nonverbal? Psychological Review 92(3). 350–371.10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David (ed.). 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 141–161. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010Suche in Google Scholar

Melinger, Alissa & Sotaro Kita. 2007. Conceptualization load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(4). 473–500.10.1080/01690960600696916Suche in Google Scholar

Merola, Giorgio. 2009. The effects of gesture viewpoint on the student’s memory of words and stories. Gesture-based human-computer interaction and simulation lecture notes in computer science 5085. 272–281.10.1007/978-3-540-92865-2_30Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, George. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97.10.1525/9780520318267-011Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture. Berlin: Weilder Buchverlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Narayan, Shweta. 2012. Maybe what it means is he actually got the spot: Physical and cognitive viewpoint in a gesture study. Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 113–139. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.009Suche in Google Scholar

Obama, Barak. 2008. A more perfect union. http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barackobamaperfectunion.htm For video see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU&t=1047s10.1080/00064246.2008.11413431Suche in Google Scholar

Özyürek, Asli, Sotaro Kita, Shanley Allen, Reyhan Furman & Amanda Brown. 2005. How does the linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insight from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture 5(1/2). 219–240.10.1075/gest.5.1-2.15ozySuche in Google Scholar

Özyürek, Asli, Roel Willems, Sortaro Kita & Peter Hagoort. 2007. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19. 605–616.10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.605Suche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey. 2009. Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture 9(3). 271–289.10.1075/gest.9.3.01parSuche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey. 2011. The relation between the encoding of motion event information and viewpoint in English-accompanying gestures. Gesture 11(1). 61–80.10.1075/gest.11.1.04parSuche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey. 2012. Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 97–122. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.008Suche in Google Scholar

Ping, Raedy & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2010. Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science 34(4). 602–619.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01102.xSuche in Google Scholar

Poggi, Isabella & Catherine Pelachaud. 2008. Persuasion and the expressivity of ecas. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, & G. Knoblich (eds.), Embodied communication in humans and machines, 391–424. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231751.003.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert & Yang Cho. 2006. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin 132(3). 416–442.10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416Suche in Google Scholar

Rauscher, Frances, Robert Krauss & Yihsiu Chen. 1996. Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science 7(4). 226–231.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.xSuche in Google Scholar

Reddy, Vasudevi. 2008. How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674033887Suche in Google Scholar

Rotstein, Gary. 2008. Another left-handed president? It’s looking that way. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. February 25. http://www.post-gazette.com/morning-file/2008/02/25/Another-left-handed-president-It-s-looking-that-way/stories/200802250187 (accessed March 1, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Sanders, José. 2012. Intertwined voices: Journalists’ modes of representing source information in journalistic subgenres. In Barbara Dancygier, José Sanders & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Textual choices in discourse: A view from cognitive linguistics, 87–111. Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.40.06sanSuche in Google Scholar

Sanders, José & Gisela Redeker. 1996. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar, 290–318. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2Suche in Google Scholar

Skipper, Jeremey, Susan Goldin-Meadow & Steven Nusbaum. 2009. Gestures orchestrate brain networks for language understanding. Current Biology 19(8). 661–667.10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.051Suche in Google Scholar

Stec, Kashmiri. 2012. Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in gesture and sign language. Gesture 12(3). 327–360.10.1075/gest.12.3.03steSuche in Google Scholar

Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2012. Multimodal construction grammar. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2008. Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2). 154–186.10.1080/08351810802028662Suche in Google Scholar

Street, Richard L., Jr. & Joseph N. Cappella. 1989. Social linguistic factors influencing adaptation in children’s speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(5). 497–519.10.1007/BF01067313Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1998. Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM), Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 2013. Creativity across modalities in viewpoint-construction. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 239–254. Stanford, US: CSLI publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Studies in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 357–366. New York & Hove: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve & Kashmiri Stec. 2016. Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 237–258. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467-011Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Grammar from the perspective of cognitive semantics. In Fernandez-Vest (ed.), Grammaticalisation areal et semantique cognitive: Le langues fenniques et sames, 17–25. Tallinn, Estonia: Foundation of the Estonian Language.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language, 169–196. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674726369Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691227788Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 1998. Figure. In A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari & M. Turner (eds.), Figurative language and thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012a. ‘Wait till you got started’: How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.015Suche in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012b. Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. In I. Buchstaller & I. Van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives 15, 173–202. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.15.11vanSuche in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2015. “More than one way at once”: Simultaneous viewpoints in text and image. In A. Benedek & K. Nyíri (eds.), Beyond words: Pictures, parables, paradoxes, 75–81. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Vanderbiesen, Jeroen. 2016. Mixed viewpoints and the quotative-reportive cline in German: Reported speech and reportive evidentiality. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 41–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110365467-004Suche in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, Nicole & Raymond Gibbs. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31. 721–731.10.1080/15326900701399962Suche in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo & Teenie Matlock. 2013. Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor and Symbol 28. 219–232.10.1080/10926488.2013.826529Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Choon Ying & Seana Coulson. 2007. Iconic gestures prime related concepts: An ERP study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(1). 57–63.10.3758/BF03194028Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Choon Ying & Seana Coulson. 2014. Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory. Acta Psychologica 153. 39–50.10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf. 2004. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation 44, 35–62. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-5
Revised: 2017-2-3
Accepted: 2017-3-24
Published Online: 2017-8-4
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2016-0086/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen