Mediated characters: Multimodal viewpoint construction in comics

References

Baetens, Jan. 2007. Revealing traces: A new theory of graphic enunciation. In Robin Varnum & Christina T. Gibbons (eds.), The language of comics: Word and image, 145–155. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4). 577–609.10.1017/S0140525X99002149Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, John A. 2008. Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230582323Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin. 2003. To awaken a sleeping giant: Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 1–12. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Borkent, Mike. 2010. Illusions of simplicity: A cognitive approach to visual poetry. English Text Construction 3(2). 145–164.10.1075/bct.40.02borSearch in Google Scholar

Borkent, Mike. 2014. Visual improvisation: Cognition, materiality, and postlinguistic visual poetry. Visible Language 48(3). 4–27.Search in Google Scholar

Chow, Kenny K. N. & D. Fox Harrell. 2013. Elastic anchors for conceptual blends: A framework for analyzing animated computer interfaces. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 427–444. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Chute, Hillary. 2008. Comics as literature? Reading graphic narrative. Publications of the Modern Languages Association of America (PMLA) 123(2). 452–465.10.1632/pmla.2008.123.2.452Search in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2007. Frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 170–187. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clausner, Timothy C. & William Croft. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1). 1–31.10.1515/cogl.1999.001Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Neil. 2012. Comics, linguistics, and visual language: The past and future of a field. In Frank Bramlett (ed.), Linguistics and the study of comics, 92–118. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137004109_5Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Neil. 2013. The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. New York: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Neil. 2014. The architecture of visual narrative comprehension: The interaction of narrative structure and page layout in understanding comics. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 1–9.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00680Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, Neil & Stephen Maher. 2015. The notion of the motion: The neurocognition of motion lines in visual narratives. Brain Research 1601. 73–84.10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Amy. 2010. Shakespearean neuroplay: Reinvigorating the study of dramatic texts and performance through cognitive science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230113053Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2005. Blending and narrative viewpoint: Jonathan Raban’s travels through mental spaces. Language and Literature 14(2). 99–127.10.1177/0963947005051281Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794414Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727Search in Google Scholar

Eisner, Will. 2008. Expressive anatomy for comics and narrative. New York: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2009. Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication 8(2). 181–205.10.1177/1470357209102113Search in Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2013. Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors: Breaking out of conceptual prisons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2). 236–249.10.1075/bct.78.02elrSearch in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In The Linguistics Society of Korea (eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 2003. Double-decker definitions: The role of frames in meaning explanations. Sign Language Studies 3(3). 263–295.10.1353/sls.2003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2005. Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie. Journal of Pragmatics 37(1). 69–88.10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 462–482. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2013. Creative visual duality in comics balloons. In Tony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind, 253–273. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110295290.253Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. (eds.). 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Foulsham, Tom, Dean Wybrow & Neil Cohn. 2016. Reading without words: Eye movements in the comprehension of comic strips. Applied Cognitive Psychology 30. 566–579.10.1002/acp.3229Search in Google Scholar

Fukada, Chie. 2016. The dynamic interplay between words and pictures in picture storybooks: How visual and verbal information interact and affect the readers’ viewpoint and understanding. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-Iun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 217–236. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110365467-010Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Alison. 2012. Multimodal literature and experimentation. In Joe Bray, Alison Gibbons & Brian McHale (eds.), The Routledge handbook of experimental literature, 420–434. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805844Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. & Teenie Matlock. 2008. Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 161–176. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 2005. Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1595–1614.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Groensteen, Thierry. 2007. The system of comics. (Translated by Bart Beaty & Nick Nguyen). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, Christopher. 2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society 27(3). 335–350.10.1177/0957926516630896Search in Google Scholar

Hatfield, Charles. 2005. Alternative comics: An emerging literature. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. 2004. Print is flat, code is deep: The importance of media-specific analysis. Poetics Today 25(1). 67–90.10.1215/03335372-25-1-67Search in Google Scholar

Hickok, Gregory. 2014. The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. New York: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Hiraga, Masako. 2005. Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analysing texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230510708Search in Google Scholar

Holsanova, Jana, Nils Holmberg & Kenneth Holmqvist. 2009. Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23. 1215–1226.10.1002/acp.1525Search in Google Scholar

Horstkotte, Silke & Nancy Pedri. 2011. Focalization in graphic narrative. Narrative 19(3). 330–357.10.1353/nar.2011.0021Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1555–1577.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008Search in Google Scholar

Kendall, L.N., Quentin Raffaelli, Alan Kingstone & Rebecca M. Todd. 2016. Iconic faces are not real faces: Enhanced emotion detection and altered neural processing as faces become more iconic. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 1(1). 19. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0021-8 (accessed 10 January 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kukkonen, Karin. 2013. Space, time and causality in graphic narratives: An embodied approach. In Daniel Stein & Jan-Noël Thon (eds.), From comic strips to graphic novels: Contributions on the theory and history of graphic narrative, 49–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110282023.49Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1996. Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar, 91–123. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy 77(8). 453–486.10.4324/9781315161921-21Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguisics 12(2). 143–188.10.1515/cogl.12.2.143Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Stan & Jack Kirby. 1965. Captain America: Among Us, Wreckers Dwell. Tales of Suspense 64. New York: Marvel Comics.Search in Google Scholar

Lemire, Jeff. 2012. The underwater welder. Atlanta: Top Shelf Productions.Search in Google Scholar

Mar, Raymond A. & Keith Oatley. 2008. The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(3). 173–192.10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.xSearch in Google Scholar

McCloud, Scott. 1994. Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar

Meskin, Aaron. 2009. Comics as literature?. British Journal of Aesthetics 49(3). 219–239.10.1093/aesthj/ayp025Search in Google Scholar

Miodrag, Hannah. 2013. Comics and language: Reimagining critical discourse on the form. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.10.14325/mississippi/9781617038044.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2013. Balancing acts: Image schemas and force dynamics as experiential essence in pictures by Paul Klee and their gestural enactments. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.). Language and the creative mind, 325–346. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Chris. 2000. Popaganada: Superhero comics and propaganda in World War Two. In Anne Magnussen & Hans-Christian Christiansen (eds.), Comics & Culture: Analytical and Theoretical Approaches to Comics, 141–156. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, Shweta. 2012. Maybe what he means is he actually got the spot: Physical and cognitive viewpoint in a gesture study. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.009Search in Google Scholar

Newall, Michael. 2011. What is a picture? Depiction, realism, abstraction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230297531Search in Google Scholar

Potsch, Elisabeth & Robert F. Williams. 2012. Image schemas and conceptual metaphor in action comics. In Frank Bramlett (ed.), Linguistics and the Study of Comics, 13–36. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137004109_2Search in Google Scholar

Richie, L. David. 2008. X is a journey: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 23. 174–199.10.1080/10926480802223085Search in Google Scholar

Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2013. Multimodal construction grammar. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the Creative Mind, 255–274. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748631209Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 2013. Creativity across modalities in viewpoint construction. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the Creative Mind, 239–254. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve & Gilles Fauconnier. 1996. Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In Eve Sweetser & Gilles Fauconnier (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammars, 1–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception.’ In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 211–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Will, Elaine M. 2013. Look straight ahead. Saskatoon: Cuckoo’s Nest Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. 2009. Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(7). 1142–1150.10.1002/ejsp.661Search in Google Scholar