Instance-Optimal Goal-Oriented Adaptivity

References

[1] R. Becker, E. Estecahandy and D. Trujillo, Weighted marking for goal-oriented adaptive finite element methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), no. 6, 2451–2469. 10.1137/100794298Suche in Google Scholar

[2] A. Bespalov, A. Haberl and D. Praetorius, Adaptive FEM with coarse initial mesh guarantees optimal convergence rates for compactly perturbed elliptic problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 317 (2017), 318–340. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.014Suche in Google Scholar

[3] P. Binev, W. Dahmen and R. DeVore, Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates, Numer. Math. 97 (2004), no. 2, 219–268. 10.21236/ADA640658Suche in Google Scholar

[4] P. Binev, W. Dahmen, R. DeVore and P. Petrushev, Approximation classes for adaptive methods, Serdica Math. J. 28 (2002), no. 4, 391–416. Suche in Google Scholar

[5] C. Carstensen, M. Feischl, M. Page and D. Praetorius, Axioms of adaptivity, Comput. Math. Appl. 67 (2014), no. 6, 1195–1253. 10.1016/j.camwa.2013.12.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] J. M. Cascon, C. Kreuzer, R. H. Nochetto and K. G. Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008), no. 5, 2524–2550. 10.1137/07069047XSuche in Google Scholar

[7] L. Diening, C. Kreuzer and R. Stevenson, Instance optimality of the adaptive maximum strategy, Found. Comput. Math. 16 (2016), no. 1, 33–68. 10.1007/s10208-014-9236-6Suche in Google Scholar

[8] W. Dörfler, A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson’s equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996), no. 3, 1106–1124. 10.1137/0733054Suche in Google Scholar

[9] C. Erath, G. Gantner and D. Praetorius, Optimal convergence behavior of adaptive FEM driven by simple ( h - h / 2 ) -type error estimators, Comput. Math. Appl. 79 (2020), no. 3, 623–642. 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.07.014Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. Feischl, T. Führer and D. Praetorius, Adaptive FEM with optimal convergence rates for a certain class of nonsymmetric and possibly nonlinear problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014), no. 2, 601–625. 10.1137/120897225Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Feischl, G. Gantner, A. Haberl, D. Praetorius and T. Führer, Adaptive boundary element methods for optimal convergence of point errors, Numer. Math. 132 (2016), no. 3, 541–567. 10.1007/s00211-015-0727-4Suche in Google Scholar

[12] M. Feischl, D. Praetorius and K. G. van der Zee, An abstract analysis of optimal goal-oriented adaptivity, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54 (2016), no. 3, 1423–1448. 10.1137/15M1021982Suche in Google Scholar

[13] S. Ferraz-Leite, C. Ortner and D. Praetorius, Convergence of simple adaptive Galerkin schemes based on h - h / 2 error estimators, Numer. Math. 116 (2010), no. 2, 291–316. 10.1007/s00211-010-0292-9Suche in Google Scholar

[14] T. Führer, S. A. Funken and D. Praetorius, Adaptive isoparametric P2-FEM: Analysis and efficient Matlab implementation, in preparation. Suche in Google Scholar

[15] S. Funken, D. Praetorius and P. Wissgott, Efficient implementation of adaptive P1-FEM in Matlab, Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 11 (2011), no. 4, 460–490. 10.2478/cmam-2011-0026Suche in Google Scholar

[16] T. Gantumur, Convergence rates of adaptive methods, Besov spaces, and multilevel approximation, Found. Comput. Math. 17 (2017), no. 4, 917–956. 10.1007/s10208-016-9308-xSuche in Google Scholar

[17] F. D. Gaspoz and P. Morin, Approximation classes for adaptive higher order finite element approximation, Math. Comp. 83 (2014), no. 289, 2127–2160. 10.1090/S0025-5718-2013-02777-9Suche in Google Scholar

[18] M. Holst and S. Pollock, Convergence of goal-oriented adaptive finite element methods for nonsymmetric problems, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations 32 (2016), no. 2, 479–509. 10.1002/num.22002Suche in Google Scholar

[19] M. Holst, S. Pollock and Y. Zhu, Convergence of goal-oriented adaptive finite element methods for semilinear problems, Comput. Vis. Sci. 17 (2015), no. 1, 43–63. 10.1007/s00791-015-0243-1Suche in Google Scholar

[20] M. Karkulik, D. Pavlicek and D. Praetorius, On 2D newest vertex bisection: Optimality of mesh-closure and H 1 -stability of L 2 -projection, Constr. Approx. 38 (2013), no. 2, 213–234. 10.1007/s00365-013-9192-4Suche in Google Scholar

[21] C. Kreuzer and M. Schedensack, Instance optimal Crouzeix–Raviart adaptive finite element methods for the Poisson and Stokes problems, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 36 (2016), no. 2, 593–617. 10.1093/imanum/drv019Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. S. Mommer and R. Stevenson, A goal-oriented adaptive finite element method with convergence rates, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009), no. 2, 861–886. 10.1137/060675666Suche in Google Scholar

[23] P. Morin, R. H. Nochetto and K. G. Siebert, Data oscillation and convergence of adaptive FEM, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000), no. 2, 466–488. 10.1137/S0036142999360044Suche in Google Scholar

[24] P. Morin, K. G. Siebert and A. Veeser, A basic convergence result for conforming adaptive finite elements, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18 (2008), no. 5, 707–737. 10.1142/S0218202508002838Suche in Google Scholar

[25] L. R. Scott and S. Zhang, Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions, Math. Comp. 54 (1990), no. 190, 483–493. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-1011446-7Suche in Google Scholar

[26] K. G. Siebert, A convergence proof for adaptive finite elements without lower bound, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 31 (2011), no. 3, 947–970. 10.1093/imanum/drq001Suche in Google Scholar

[27] R. Stevenson, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method, Found. Comput. Math. 7 (2007), no. 2, 245–269. 10.1007/s10208-005-0183-0Suche in Google Scholar

[28] R. Stevenson, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection, Math. Comp. 77 (2008), no. 261, 227–241. 10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01959-XSuche in Google Scholar