References

Albright, Adam. 2009. Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar. Analogy in grammar 185–213.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90(2). 119–161.10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-XSuche in Google Scholar

Alegre, Maria & Peter Gordon. 1999. Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology. Brain and Language 68(1). 347–354.10.1006/brln.1999.2066Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, R Harald. 2007. Storage and computation in the mental lexicon. The mental lexicon: Core perspectives 81–104.10.1163/9780080548692_006Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, R Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, R Harald, Ton Dijkstra & Robert Schreuder. 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37(1). 94–117.10.1006/jmla.1997.2509Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Suche in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath. 2008. The Leipzig Glossing Rules. Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. Revised version of February.Suche in Google Scholar

Blevins, James P. 2001. Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2). 211–222.10.1111/1467-968X.00080Suche in Google Scholar

Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 531–573.10.1017/S0022226706004191Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1926. A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2(3). 153–164.10.2307/408741Suche in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 1999. Lexical storage and regular processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(6). 1016–1016.10.1017/S0140525X99242227Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, R. Harald Baayen, et al. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Boume, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and cognitive processes 10(5). 425–455.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form, vol. 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tsl.9Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L & Dan I Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58(2). 265–289.10.1353/lan.1982.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Carreiras, Manuel, Andrea Mechelli & Cathy J Price. 2006. Effect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud. Human brain mapping 27(12). 963–972.10.1002/hbm.20236Suche in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H & Simon Kirby. 2003. Language evolution: Consensus and controversies. Trends in cognitive sciences 7(7). 300–307.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00136-0Suche in Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in laboratory phonology 1. 283–333.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017Suche in Google Scholar

Colé, Pascale, Juan Segui & Marcus Taft. 1997. Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 37(3). 312–330.10.1006/jmla.1997.2523Suche in Google Scholar

Cuskley, Christine F, Martina Pugliese, Claudio Castellano, Francesca Colaiori, Vittorio Loreto & Francesca Tria. 2014. Internal and external dynamics in language: evidence from verb regularity in a historical corpus of English. PloS one 9(8). e102882.10.1371/journal.pone.0102882Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2008. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 58(4). 931–951.10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005Suche in Google Scholar

Dawdy-Hesterberg, Lisa Garnand & Janet Breckenridge Pierrehumbert. 2014. Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns. Language, cognition and neuroscience 29(10). 1268–1282.10.1080/23273798.2014.899377Suche in Google Scholar

Dominguez, Alberto, Maira Alija, Javier Rodriguez-Ferreiro & Fernando Cuetos. 2010. The contribution of prefixes to morphological processing of Spanish words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22(4). 569–595.10.1080/09541440903007792Suche in Google Scholar

Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Sachiko Kinoshita, Manuel Carreiras & Dennis Norris. 2011. Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same–different task. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4-6). 509–529.10.1080/01690965.2010.499215Suche in Google Scholar

Flom, Peter L & David L Cassell. 2007. Stopping stepwise: Why stepwise and similar selection methods are bad, and what you should use. In NorthEast SAS Users Group Inc 20th Annual Conference: 11-14th November 2007; Baltimore, Maryland, NorthEast SAS Users Group.Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, John, Jangman Hong et al. 2009. {Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects package}. Journal of Statistical Software 32(1). 1–24.10.18637/jss.v032.i01Suche in Google Scholar

Frisch, Stefan A, Janet B Pierrehumbert & Michael B Broe. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(1). 179–228.10.1023/B:NALA.0000005557.78535.3cSuche in Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew & Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevelhierarchical models, vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Gonnerman, Laura M., Mark S. Seidenberg & Elaine S. Andersen. 2007. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(2). 323–345.10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323Suche in Google Scholar

Grainger, Jonathan. 1990. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of memory and language 29(2). 228–244.10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-ASuche in Google Scholar

Grainger, Jonathan, Pascale Colé & Juan Segui. 1991. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 30(3). 370–384.10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-ISuche in Google Scholar

Hahn, Ulrike & Ramin Charles Nakisa. 2000. German inflection: single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology 41(4). 313–360.10.1006/cogp.2000.0737Suche in Google Scholar

Halácsy, Péter, András Kornai & Csaba Oravecz. 2007. HunPos: an open source trigram tagger. In Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the acl on interactive poster and demonstration sessions, 209–212. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1557769.1557830Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, John. 2006. The phonology of being understood: Further arguments against sonority. Lingua 116(10). 1483–1494.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.009Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer B & R Harald Baayen. 2005. Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. Trends in cognitive sciences 9(7). 342–348.10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002Suche in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce & Colin Wilson. 2008. A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic inquiry 39(3). 379–440.10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.379Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T Florian. 2008. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of memory and language 59(4). 434–446.10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007Suche in Google Scholar

Janda, Laura A, Tore Nesset & R Harald Baayen. 2010. Capturing correlational structure in Russian paradigms: A case study in logistic mixed-effects modeling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1). 29–48.10.1515/cllt.2010.002Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of phonetics 34(4). 485–499.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

Kidd, Evan & Minna Kirjavainen. 2011. Investigating the contribution of procedural and declarative memory to the acquisition of past tense morphology: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4-6). 794–829.10.1080/01690965.2010.493735Suche in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon, Monica Tamariz, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith. 2015. Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition 141. 87–102.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016Suche in Google Scholar

Krott, Andrea, R Harald Baayen & Robert Schreuder. 2001. Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics 39(1; ISSU 371). 51–94.10.1515/ling.2001.008Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2011. Principles of linguistic change, cognitive and cultural factors, vol. 3. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781444327496Suche in Google Scholar

Lindsay, Shane, Leanne M. Sedin & M. Gareth Gaskell. 2012. Acquiring novel words and their past tenses: Evidence from lexical effects on phonetic categorisation. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1). 210–225.10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.005Suche in Google Scholar

Lukács, Ágnes, Péter Rebrus & Miklós Törkenczy. 2010. Defective verbal paradigms in Hungarian–description and experimental study. In Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 163, 85.10.5871/bacad/9780197264607.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Milin, Petar, Dušica Filipović Djurđević & Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín. 2009. The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 50–64.10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.007Suche in Google Scholar

Milnor, John. 1985. On the concept of attractor. In Hunt, Brian R., Judy A. Kennedy, Tien-Yien Li, & Helena E. Nusse (eds.), The theory of chaotic attractors, 243–264. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-21830-4_15Suche in Google Scholar

Mirković, Jelena, Mark S Seidenberg & Marc F Joanisse. 2011. Rules versus statistics: Insights from a highly inflected language. Cognitive science 35(4). 638–681.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01174.xSuche in Google Scholar

Myers, James & Yingshing Li. 2009. Lexical frequency effects in Taiwan Southern Min syllable contraction. Journal of Phonetics 37(2). 212–230.10.1016/j.wocn.2009.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Shinichi & Holger Schielzeth. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2). 133–142.10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.xSuche in Google Scholar

Németh, Géza & Csaba Zainkó. 2002. Multilingual statistical text analysis, Zipf’s law and Hungarian speech generation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 49(3-4). 385–405.10.1556/ALing.49.2002.3-4.8Suche in Google Scholar

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1990. Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 34(4). 393–418.10.1016/0022-2496(90)90020-ASuche in Google Scholar

Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17(2). 237–274.10.1017/S0952675700003900Suche in Google Scholar

Paul, Hermann. 1880/1995. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte [Principles of the history of language], vol. 6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110929461Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2012. The dynamic lexicon. In Abigail Cohn, Cécile Fougeron & Marie Huffman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 173–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2016. Phonological representation: beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Reviews.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050Suche in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org.Suche in Google Scholar

Rácz, Péter, Viktória Papp & Jennifer B. Hay. 2016. Chapter 25. Frequency and corpora. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139814720.024Suche in Google Scholar

Rácz, Péter, Janet B Pierrehumbert, Jennifer B Hay & Viktória Papp. 2015. Morphological emergence. In The handbook of language emergence, 123–146. Wiley Online Library.10.1002/9781118346136.ch5Suche in Google Scholar

Rácz, Péter & Péter Rebrus. 2012. Variation in the possessive allomorphy of Hungarian. In Current issues in morphological theory:(ir) regularity, analogy and frequency. selected papers from the 14th international morphology meeting, budapest, 13 16 may 2010, vol. 322, 51. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, NL.10.1075/cilt.322.03racSuche in Google Scholar

Rebrus, Péter. 2000. Morfofonológiai jelenségek [Morphophonological phenomena]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: Morfológia [Structural Hungarian Grammar: Morphology], vol. 3, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Suche in Google Scholar

Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2011. Paradigmatic variation in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian. papers from the 2009 debrecen conference, vol. 12, 135–161.10.1075/atoh.12.06rebSuche in Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel distributed processing (volume 2): Psychological and biological models, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sela, Rebecca J & J. S. Simonoff. 2011. Reemtree: Regression trees with random effects. R package version 0.90 3. 741–749.Suche in Google Scholar

Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-1906-8Suche in Google Scholar

Soskuthy, Marton. 2013. Analogy in the emergence of intrusive-r in English. English Language & Linguistics 17(1). 55–84.10.1017/S1360674312000329Suche in Google Scholar

Stemberger, Joseph Paul & Brian MacWhinney. 1986. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition 14(1). 17–26.10.3758/BF03209225Suche in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A & R Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language variation and change 24(2). 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Suche in Google Scholar

Trón, Viktor, Péter Halácsy, Péter Rebrus, András Rung, Péter Vajda & Eszter Simon. 2006. Morphdb.hu: Hungarian lexical database and morphological grammar. In Proceedings of 5th international conference on language resources and evaluation (lrec’06), Genova, Italy.Suche in Google Scholar

Trón, Viktor, András Kornai, György Gyepesi, László Németh, Péter Halácsy & Dániel Varga. 2005. Hunmorph: Open source word analysis. In Proceedings of the workshop on software, 77–85. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1626315.1626321Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, William S Y. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 3. 9–25.10.2307/411748Suche in Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.org.10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3Suche in Google Scholar

Zipf, George Kingsley. 1935. The psycho-biology of language. Houghton, Mifflin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar