Home Dialogic co-creation in English language teaching and learning: a personal experience
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dialogic co-creation in English language teaching and learning: a personal experience

  • Henry Finch ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 5, 2023

Abstract

This report will discuss the development and implementation of a dialogic co-creation model for English language teaching in the Language Resource Centre at the Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany. The focus of this report will be on the impact of content co-creation and its impact on learner and teacher autonomy in English language learning and teaching. This collaborative, dialogic model draws primarily on principles of dialogism and exploratory talk (ET) and exemplifies a novel, learner-centered method for curriculum development and teaching in Higher Education. This learner-centered perspective advances an in-depth understanding of the relationship between language learner and teacher, content and language integrated learning (CLIL), language for specific purposes (LSP), their respective content boundaries, the role of content expert and the inhibition threshold. Three examples of teaching English to university professors and professional staff using this model will be discussed. The author proposes that such a model could be adapted and scaled into larger student groups, too.


Corresponding author: Henry Finch, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, E-mail:

References

Baker, Michael. 1994. A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 5(2). 199–254.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 2010. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Douglas. 2010. Why talk is important. English Teaching: Practice and Critique 9(2). 7–10.Search in Google Scholar

Belcher, Diane D. 2004. Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24. 165–186.10.1017/S026719050400008XSearch in Google Scholar

Breen, Michael P. & Andrew Littlejohn. 2000. Classroom decision-making: Negotiation and process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holec, Henri. 1979. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Cooperation.Search in Google Scholar

Kalish, Michael L., Thomas L. Griffiths & Lewandowsky. Stephan. 2007. Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(2). 288–294. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194066.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2). 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141.Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 1995. Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System 23(2). 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(95)00006-6.Search in Google Scholar

Little, David, Leni Dam & Lienhard Legenhausen. 2017. Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Channel View Publications.10.21832/9781783098606Search in Google Scholar

Moate, Josephine. 2010. The integrated nature of CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal 1(3). 30–37.Search in Google Scholar

Pica, Teresa. 1994. Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second‐language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language and learning 44(3). 493–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x.Search in Google Scholar

Rapoport, Amnon. 1967. Dynamic programming models for multistage decision-making tasks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4(1). 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(67)90041-7.Search in Google Scholar

Sennett, Richard. 1998. The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Sudhoff, Julian. 2010. CLIL and intercultural communicative competence: Foundations and approaches towards a fusion. International CLIL Research Journal 1(3). 30–37.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 1997. Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses [Canarian Journal of English Studies] 34. 115–132.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-26
Accepted: 2023-03-16
Published Online: 2023-06-05
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. The fascinating world of language teaching and learning varieties
  4. Research Articles
  5. Aspiring multilinguals or contented bilinguals? University students negotiating their multilingual and professional identities
  6. The (im)possibility of breaking the cycle of rippling circularities affecting Australian language education programs: a Queensland example
  7. Lernen mit LMOOCs im universitären Deutschunterricht: Entscheidungshilfen für Deutschlehrende
  8. Enhance sustainability and environmental protection awareness: agency in Chinese informal video learning
  9. Gamification and learning Spanish as a modern language: student perceptions in the university context
  10. Seeing innovation from different prisms: university students’ and instructors’ perspectives on flipping the Spanish language classroom
  11. Investigating syntactic complexity and language-related error patterns in EFL students’ writing: corpus-based and epistemic network analyses
  12. Using Google Docs for guided Academic Writing assessments: students’ perspectives
  13. Digital storytelling as practice-based participatory pedagogy for English for specific purposes
  14. Is individual competition in translator training compatible with collaborative learning? The case of the MTIE Translation Award
  15. Tackling the elephant in the language classroom: introducing machine translation literacy in a Swiss language centre
  16. Institutionalised autonomisation of language learning in a French language centre
  17. The story of becoming an autonomous learner: a case study of a student’s learning management
  18. The effect of collaborative activities on tertiary-level EFL students’ learner autonomy in the Turkish context
  19. Learner autonomy and English achievement in Chinese EFL undergraduates: the mediating role of ambiguity tolerance and foreign language classroom anxiety
  20. Activity Reports
  21. Lehre am Sprachenzentrum der UZH und der ETH Zürich: Positionspapier
  22. Communication course for future engineers – effective data presentation and its interpretation during LSP courses
  23. Dialogic co-creation in English language teaching and learning: a personal experience
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2023-2010/html
Scroll to top button