“It is natural for you to be afraid…”: On the discourse of web-based communication with patients
-
Davide Mazzi
Davide Mazzi is research fellow in English language and translation at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). His research activity has essentially focused on the following areas: discourse analysis, corpus linguistics and argumentation studies. His recent publications include
The “other’s” gaze: The discursive construction of journalists’ professional identity across Italy and the US (Boca Raton: BrownWalker Press, 2012) and “‘Our reading would lead to… ’: Corpus perspectives on pragmatic argumentation in US Supreme Court judgments”,Journal of Argumentation in Context (2014).
Abstract
Over the last twenty years, medical discourse has attracted a great deal of scholarly research. Language in healthcare settings has been more generally analysed through genres – whether in terms of expert-to-expert or expert-to-lay communication – whereas more specific aspects include the study of discourse strategies behind the expression of empathy, problems of media representation of healthcare issues, and the role played by cultural variables in healthcare contexts. While substantial research exists on medical discourse and the transmission of medical knowledge, a number of works still tend to focus on accuracy and comprehensiveness of content rather than on the linguistic analysis of communication strategies. In light of that, the aim of this work is to substantiate the findings in the literature published so far by bringing a genuinely discourse-based perspective to bear on them. To achieve this goal, a corpus investigation was carried out of web-based resources employed by a leading nationwide organisation to communicate to the public about cancer. The study focuses on the discourse functions of frequently occurring phraseology, in the attempt to address the following questions: (a) Are there any recurrent discourse patterns that tend to be reiterated across the sections of informative healthcare materials? (b) How are patients’ needs addressed through the language of such materials? (c) More generally, how can findings be interpreted with a view to both their relevance to the context under analysis and their possible application in the language-learning classroom?
About the author
Davide Mazzi is research fellow in English language and translation at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). His research activity has essentially focused on the following areas: discourse analysis, corpus linguistics and argumentation studies. His recent publications include The “other’s” gaze: The discursive construction of journalists’ professional identity across Italy and the US (Boca Raton: BrownWalker Press, 2012) and “‘Our reading would lead to… ’: Corpus perspectives on pragmatic argumentation in US Supreme Court judgments”, Journal of Argumentation in Context (2014).
References
Adolphs, Svenja, Brian Brown, Ronald Carter, Paul Crawford & Opinder Sahota. 2004. Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1). 9–28.10.1558/japl.1.1.9.55871Search in Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2006. AntConc 3.2.1. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/ (accessed 27 May 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.10.5040/9781350933996Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtine, Mikhail M. 1984 [1952]. Les genres du discours. In Mikhail M. Bakhtine, Esthétique de la création verbale, 265–308. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.23Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Viviana Cortes. 2004. If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405.10.1093/applin/25.3.371Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Bigi, Sarah. 2014. Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations. In Sara Rubinelli & Franciska Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Argumentation and health, 51–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/bct.64.05bigSearch in Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2013. Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2). 229–253.10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03breSearch in Google Scholar
Bres, Jacques & Sylvie Mellet. 2009. Une approche dialogique des faits grammaticaux. Langue française 163(3). 3–20.10.3917/lf.163.0003Search in Google Scholar
Bres, Jacques & Alexandra Nowakowska. 2005. Dis-moi avec qui tu dialogues, je te dirai qui tu es…De la pertinence de la notion de dialogisme pour l’analyse du discours. Marges Linguistiques 9. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00438508 (accessed 19 July 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Cline, Rebecca J.W. & Katherine N. Haynes. 2001. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: The state of the art. Health Education Research 16(6). 671–692.10.1093/her/16.6.671Search in Google Scholar
Clarke, Angus, Srikant Sarangi & Kate Verrier-Jones. 2011. Voicing the lifeworld: Parental accounts of responsibility in genetic consultations for polycystic kidney disease. Social Science & Medicine 72. 1743–1751.10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.040Search in Google Scholar
Coughlan, Diarmuid, Brian Turner & Antonio Trujillo. 2013. Motivation for a health-literate health care system – Does socioeconomic status play a substantial role? Implications for the Irish policy maker. Journal of Health Communication 18. 158–171.10.1080/10810730.2013.825674Search in Google Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2004. Giving science a bad name: Politically and commercially motivated fallacies in BSE Inquiry. Argumentation 18. 123–143.10.1007/s10503-004-2070-2Search in Google Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2009. Emerging infectious diseases: Coping with uncertainty. Argumentation 23. 171–188.10.1007/s10503-008-9116-9Search in Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 2001. Quelques raisons de distinguer “locuteurs” et “énonciateurs”. Polyphonie linguistique et littéraire 3. https://ojs.ruc.dk/index.php/poly/article/view/2410/726 (accessed 3 June 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2010. Closed-class keywords and corpus-driven discourse analysis. In Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds.), Keyness in text, 59–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.41.05groSearch in Google Scholar
Gülich, Elisabeth. 2003. Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies 5(2). 235–263.10.1177/1461445603005002005Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, Kevin, Miriam A. Locher & Louise Mullany. 2013. “Can I be at risk of getting AIDS?” A linguistic analysis of two Internet advice columns on sexual health. Linguistics Online 59(2–3). 111–132.10.13092/lo.59.1145Search in Google Scholar
Hojat, Mohammadreza, Joseph S. Gonnella, Thomas J. Nasca, Salvatore Mangione, J. Jon Veloksi & Michael Magee. 2002. The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Academic Medicine 77(10). 58–60.10.1097/00001888-200210001-00019Search in Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis. 1998. Verbs observed: A corpus-driven pedagogic grammar. Applied Linguistics 19(1). 45–72.10.1093/applin/19.1.45Search in Google Scholar
Lingard, Lorelei, Kim Garwood, Catherine F. Schryer & Marlee M. Spafford. 2003. A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science & Medicine 56. 603–616.10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00057-6Search in Google Scholar
Lingard, Lorelei & Richard J. Haber. 1999. Teaching and learning communication in medicine: A rhetorical approach. Academic Medicine 74(5). 507–510.10.1097/00001888-199905000-00015Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. 2014. The commodification of patient opinion: The digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health and Illness 36(6). 856–869.10.1111/1467-9566.12109Search in Google Scholar
MacFarlane, Anne & Cecily C. Kelleher. 2002. Concepts of illness causation and attitudes to health care among older people in the Republic of Ireland. Social Science & Medicine 54. 1389–1400.10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00121-6Search in Google Scholar
Mazzi, Davide. 2015. Semantic sequences and the pragmatics of medical research-article writing. In Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci & Michele Sala (eds.), Insights into medical communication, 353–368. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Murray, Michael & Carol McMillan. 1993. Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control, and women’s cancer screening behavior. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 32(1). 87–100.10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01032.xSearch in Google Scholar
NicGabhainn, Saoirse, Cecily Kelleher, A.M. Naughton, F. Carter, M. Flanagan and M.J. McGrath. 1999. Socio-demographic variations in perspectives on cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors. Health Education Research 14(5). 619–628.10.1093/her/14.5.619Search in Google Scholar
Pecorari, Diane. 2009. Formulaic language in biology: A topic-specific investigation. In Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari & Susan Hunston (eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse, 91–105. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina. 2012. Enhancing empathic skills in clinical practice: A linguistic approach. Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 5(2). 114–131.10.1504/IJWOE.2012.049516Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik & Sidney Greenbaum. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar
Rubinelli, Sara & Peter J. Schulz. 2006. “Let me tell you why!” When argumentation in doctor-patient interaction makes a difference. Argumentation 20. 353–375.10.1007/s10503-006-9014-ySearch in Google Scholar
Schryer, Catherine F., Lorelei Lingard, Marlee M. Spafford & Kim Garwood. 2003. Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In Charles Bazerman & David Russell (eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/ (accessed 28 May 2015).10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.02Search in Google Scholar
Schryer, Catherine F. & Philippa Spoel. 2005. Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 19(3). 249–278.10.1177/1050651905275625Search in Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001 [1995]. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9(1). 75–106.10.4324/9780203594070-6Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar
Swales, John. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar
Tognini Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.6Search in Google Scholar
Wizowski, Lindsay, Theresa Harper & Tracy Hutchings. 2014. Writing health information for patients and families. Hamilton, ON: Hamilton Health Sciences.Search in Google Scholar
Woodward-Kron, Robyn, Melanie Connor, Peter J. Schulz & Kristine Elliott. 2014. Educating the patient for healthcare communication in the age of the World Wide Web: A qualitative study. Academic Medicine 89(2). 318–325.10.1097/ACM.0000000000000101Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Teaching medical discourse in higher education: An introduction
- Handing over and letting go: using online continuing medical education in teaching and assessing medical English language and communication skills to undergraduates
- Thinking creatively: Introducing new didactic methods into a course in English for Laboratory Technicians
- Language functions and medical communication: The human body as text
- iPads in medical language courses at the University of Helsinki
- On the importance of a genre-based approach in the teaching of English for Medical Purposes
- Medical ethics and the learner-centred approach: Developing materials on organ transplant and euthanasia in an English as a foreign language classroom in higher education
- Learning terminology in order to become an active agent in the development of Basque biomedical registers
- Euphemism as a core feature of patientese: A comparative study between English and French
- Metaphors in the mirror: The influence of teaching metaphors in a medical education programme
- Putting the plain into pain language in English for Medical Purposes: Learner inquiry into patients’ online descriptive accounts
- “It is natural for you to be afraid…”: On the discourse of web-based communication with patients
- International medical graduates and the discursive patterns of patient-centred communication
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Teaching medical discourse in higher education: An introduction
- Handing over and letting go: using online continuing medical education in teaching and assessing medical English language and communication skills to undergraduates
- Thinking creatively: Introducing new didactic methods into a course in English for Laboratory Technicians
- Language functions and medical communication: The human body as text
- iPads in medical language courses at the University of Helsinki
- On the importance of a genre-based approach in the teaching of English for Medical Purposes
- Medical ethics and the learner-centred approach: Developing materials on organ transplant and euthanasia in an English as a foreign language classroom in higher education
- Learning terminology in order to become an active agent in the development of Basque biomedical registers
- Euphemism as a core feature of patientese: A comparative study between English and French
- Metaphors in the mirror: The influence of teaching metaphors in a medical education programme
- Putting the plain into pain language in English for Medical Purposes: Learner inquiry into patients’ online descriptive accounts
- “It is natural for you to be afraid…”: On the discourse of web-based communication with patients
- International medical graduates and the discursive patterns of patient-centred communication
