Home Medicine A survey on measurement and reporting of total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone in clinical laboratories in Europe
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A survey on measurement and reporting of total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone in clinical laboratories in Europe

  • Nick Narinx ORCID logo , Jennifer Afrakoma Nyamaah ORCID logo , Karel David ORCID logo , Vera Sommers ORCID logo , Joeri Walravens ORCID logo , Tom Fiers ORCID logo , Bruno Lapauw ORCID logo , Brigitte Decallonne ORCID logo , Frank Claessens ORCID logo , Katleen Van Uytfanghe ORCID logo , Jaak Billen ORCID logo , Pieter Vermeersch ORCID logo , Dirk Vanderschueren ORCID logo and Leen Antonio ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 12, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

To compare clinical laboratory workflows for the assessment of androgens in men, focusing on total testosterone (T), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free T, in clinical laboratories throughout Europe.

Methods

An internet-based survey that included questions related to pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases of androgen measurements was distributed between December 2022 and December 2023 by clinical laboratory/chemistry and endocrine societies. A total of 124 unique records from clinical laboratories in 27 European countries were analyzed.

Results

Pre-analytical requirements for total T are subject to improvement as less than half of clinical laboratories recommended adequate morning sampling time and/or sampling in a fasting state. Total T was predominantly quantified using enzyme-linked immunoassay (IA) on automated platforms, with only one in four centers using mass spectrometry (MS), while SHBG was exclusively measured by IA. Additionally, free T was used by a majority of clinical laboratories, mainly reported as approximation by calculation of free T (cFT) using the Vermeulen formula. Generally, age-stratification was the preferred means of reporting reference ranges for total T, SHBG and cFT. However, considerate variability was observed in reported lower and upper limits, leading to the necessity of interpreting test results against assay-specific reference ranges, thereby hindering comparability of results between clinical laboratories.

Conclusions

Our survey highlights significant inter-laboratory variability for the assessment of androgen status in men, implying non-commutability of clinical test results between different centers. In addition, we observed poor adherence to pre-analytical recommendations. These findings advocate for continued harmonization efforts of measurement procedures for SHBG and total/free T.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Leen Antonio, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven Herestraat 49 – Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11P9024N

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1800923N

Award Identifier / Grant number: T004321N

Acknowledgments

We thank all collaborating societies for their support and their kind help in the dissemination of this survey study. Furthermore, we thank all participating clinical laboratories for supplying survey data. We wish to convey a special thank you to Prof. Dr. Jean-Marc Kaufman and Prof. Dr. Frederick C. Wu (members of the BEED-ED Advisory Board) for their continuous support and to Dr. Giovanni Corona, Dr. Sjoerd A.A. van den Berg and Dr. Gido Snaterse for their help in disseminating the survey. Collaboration for this publication is based upon work from COST Action CA20119 Andronet, supported by COST (European Cooperation in science and technology, see http://www.cost.eu).

  1. Research ethics: This survey study, with internal reference number S66446, was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Ethics Committee Research UZ/KU Leuven. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that this research was conducted independently, without any sponsorship or financial support from manufacturers or commercial firms. This study represents the authors’ unbiased and objective academic work. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

  6. Research funding: This work was funded by research grants from Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, T004321N, 1800923N, 11P9024N).

  7. Data availability: Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

References

1. Bhasin, S, Brito, JP, Cunningham, GR, Hayes, FJ, Hodis, HN, Matsumoto, AM, et al.. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103:1715–44. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00229.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Corona, G, Goulis, DG, Huhtaniemi, I, Zitzmann, M, Toppari, J, Forti, G, et al.. European Academy of Andrology (EAA) guidelines on investigation, treatment and monitoring of functional hypogonadism in males: endorsing organization: European Society of Endocrinology. Andrology 2020;8:970–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12770.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Yeap, BB, Grossmann, M, McLachlan, RI, Handelsman, DJ, Wittert, GA, Conway, AJ, et al.. Endocrine Society of Australia position statement on male hypogonadism (part 1): assessment and indications for testosterone therapy. Med J Aust 2016;205:173–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00393.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Salonia, A, Bettocchi, C, Boeri, L, Capogrosso, P, Carvalho, J, Cilesiz, NC, et al.. European association of Urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol 2021;80:333–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Mulhall, JP, Trost, LW, Brannigan, RE, Kurtz, EG, Redmon, JB, Chiles, KA, et al.. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA guideline. J Urol 2018;200:423–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lunenfeld, B, Saad, F, Hoesl, CE. ISA, ISSAM and EAU recommendations for the investigation, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in males: scientific background and rationale. Aging Male 2005;8:59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13685530500163416.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Dunn, JF, Nisula, BC, Rodbard, D. Transport of steroid hormones: binding of 21 endogenous steroids to both testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin in human plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981;53:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-53-1-58.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Jasuja, R, Pencina, KM, Spencer, DJ, Peng, L, Privat, F, Dhillo, W, et al.. Reference intervals for free testosterone in adult men measured using a standardized equilibrium dialysis procedure. Andrology 2023;11:125–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13310.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Mendel, CM. The free hormone hypothesis: a physiologically based mathematical model. Endocr Rev 1989;10:232–74. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-10-3-232.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Antonio, L, Wu, FC, O’Neill, TW, Pye, SR, Ahern, TB, Laurent, MR, et al.. Low free testosterone is associated with hypogonadal signs and symptoms in men with normal total testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:2647–57. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Narinx, N, David, K, Walravens, J, Vermeersch, P, Claessens, F, Fiers, T, et al.. Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology. Cell Mol Life Sci 2022;79:543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04562-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Keevil, BG, Adaway, J. Assessment of free testosterone concentration. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2019;190:207–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.04.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Fiers, T, Wu, F, Moghetti, P, Vanderschueren, D, Lapauw, B, Kaufman, JM. Reassessing free-testosterone calculation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry direct equilibrium dialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103:2167–74. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02360.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Livingston, M, Downie, P, Hackett, G, Marrington, R, Heald, A, Ramachandran, S. An audit of the measurement and reporting of male testosterone levels in UK clinical biochemistry laboratories. Int J Clin Pract 2020;74:e13607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13607.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Le, M, Flores, D, May, D, Gourley, E, Nangia, AK. Current practices of measuring and reference range reporting of free and total testosterone in the United States. J Urol 2016;195:1556–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.0. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wickham, H, François, R, Henry, L, Müller, K, Vaughan, D. Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4; 2023. Available from: https://dplyr.tidyverse.org.Search in Google Scholar

18. Wickham, H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016:260 p.Search in Google Scholar

19. Vermeulen, A, Verdonck, L, Kaufman, JM. A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:3666–72. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Ross, HA, Meuleman, EJ, Sweep, FC. A simple method for estimating equilibrium constants for serum testosterone binding resulting in an optimal free testosterone index for use in elderly men. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:613–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2005.106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Sartorius, G, Ly, LP, Sikaris, K, McLachlan, R, Handelsman, DJ. Predictive accuracy and sources of variability in calculated free testosterone estimates. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:137–43. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2008.008171.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Wilke, TJ, Utley, DJ. Total testosterone, free-androgen index, calculated free testosterone, and free testosterone by analog RIA compared in hirsute women and in otherwise-normal women with altered binding of sex-hormone-binding globulin. Clin Chem 1987;33:1372–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/33.8.1372.Search in Google Scholar

23. Brambilla, DJ, Matsumoto, AM, Araujo, AB, McKinlay, JB. The effect of diurnal variation on clinical measurement of serum testosterone and other sex hormone levels in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:907–13. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1902.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Diver, MJ, Imtiaz, KE, Ahmad, AM, Vora, JP, Fraser, WD. Diurnal rhythms of serum total, free and bioavailable testosterone and of SHBG in middle-aged men compared with those in young men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;58:710–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01772.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Van de Velde, F, Reyns, T, Toye, K, Fiers, T, Kaufman, JM, T’Sjoen, G, et al.. The effects of age and obesity on postprandial dynamics of serum testosterone levels in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020;92:214–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Sartorius, G, Spasevska, S, Idan, A, Turner, L, Forbes, E, Zamojska, A, et al.. Serum testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol concentrations in older men self-reporting very good health: the healthy man study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;77:755–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04432.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Miller, WG, Tate, JR, Barth, JH, Jones, GR. Harmonization: the sample, the measurement, and the report. Ann Lab Med 2014;34:187–97. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.187.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Vesper, HW, Thienpont, LM. Traceability in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2009;55:1067–75. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Thienpont, LM, Van Uytfanghe, K, Blincko, S, Ramsay, CS, Xie, H, Doss, RC, et al.. State-of-the-art of serum testosterone measurement by isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2008;54:1290–7. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.105841.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Vesper, HW, Bhasin, S, Wang, C, Tai, SS, Dodge, LA, Singh, RJ, et al.. Interlaboratory comparison study of serum total testosterone [corrected] measurements performed by mass spectrometry methods. Steroids 2009;74:498–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2009.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Taieb, J, Mathian, B, Millot, F, Patricot, MC, Mathieu, E, Queyrel, N, et al.. Testosterone measured by 10 immunoassays and by isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in sera from 116 men, women, and children. Clin Chem 2003;49:1381–95. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.8.1381.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Wang, C, Catlin, DH, Demers, LM, Starcevic, B, Swerdloff, RS. Measurement of total serum testosterone in adult men: comparison of current laboratory methods versus liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:534–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Huhtaniemi, IT, Tajar, A, Lee, DM, O’Neill, TW, Finn, JD, Bartfai, G, et al.. Comparison of serum testosterone and estradiol measurements in 3174 European men using platform immunoassay and mass spectrometry; relevance for the diagnostics in aging men. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:983–91. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-11-1051.Search in Google Scholar

34. Martinez-Escribano, A, Maroto-Garcia, J, Ruiz-Galdon, M, Barrios-Rodriguez, R, Alvarez-Millan, JJ, Cabezas-Sanchez, P, et al.. Measurement of serum testosterone in nondiabetic young obese men: comparison of direct immunoassay to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Biomolecules 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121697.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Lynch, KL. Clsi C62-A: a new standard for clinical mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2016;62:24–9. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.238626.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Wu, FC, Tajar, A, Pye, SR, Silman, AJ, Finn, JD, O’Neill, TW, et al.. Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis disruptions in older men are differentially linked to age and modifiable risk factors: the European Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:2737–45. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1972.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. RMarriott, RJ, Murray, K, Adams, RJ, Antonio, L, Ballantyne, CM, Bauer, DC, et al.. Factors associated with circulating sex hormones in men : individual participant data meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 2023;176:1221–34. https://doi.org/10.7326/m23-0342.Search in Google Scholar

38. Handelsman, DJ, Sikaris, K, Ly, LP. Estimating age-specific trends in circulating testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in males and females across the lifespan. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53:377–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215610589.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Travison, TG, Vesper, HW, Orwoll, E, Wu, F, Kaufman, JM, Wang, Y, et al.. Harmonized reference ranges for circulating testosterone levels in men of four cohort studies in the United States and Europe. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:1161–73. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2935.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Adaway, J, Keevil, B, Miller, A, Monaghan, PJ, Merrett, N, Owen, L. Ramifications of variability in sex hormone-binding globulin measurement by different immunoassays on the calculation of free testosterone. Ann Clin Biochem 2020;57:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563219888549.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Yeap, BB, Marriott, RJ, Antonio, L, Bhasin, S, Dobs, AS, Dwivedi, G, et al.. Sociodemographic, lifestyle and medical influences on serum testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in men from UK Biobank. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2021;94:290–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14342.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Banica, T, Verroken, C, Reyns, T, Mahmoud, A, T’Sjoen, G, Fiers, T, et al.. Early decline of androgen levels in healthy adult men: an effect of aging per Se? A prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;106:1074–83. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa915.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Narinx, N, Marriott, RJ, Murray, K, Bhasin, S, Dobs, AS, Flicker, L. Factors associated with variations in calculated free testosterone in men: individual participant data meta-analyses on 20,631 participants. Andrology 2024;12:51–148.Search in Google Scholar

44. Narinx, N, Marriott, RJ, Murray, K, Adams, RJ, Ballantyne, CM, Bauer, DC, et al.. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and medical factors associated with calculated free testosterone concentrations in men: individual participant data meta-analyses. Eur J Endocrinol 2024;191:523–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Nyamaah, JA, Narinx, N, Antonio, L, Vanderschueren, D. Use of calculated free testosterone in men: advantages and limitations. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2024;31:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000891.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Rosner, W, Auchus, RJ, Azziz, R, Sluss, PM, Raff, H. Position statement: utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: an Endocrine Society position statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:405–13. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1864.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Goldman, AL, Bhasin, S, Wu, FCW, Krishna, M, Matsumoto, AM, Jasuja, R. A reappraisal of testosterone’s binding in circulation: physiological and clinical implications. Endocr Rev 2017;38:302–24. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2017-00025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Keevil, BG, Adaway, J, Fiers, T, Moghetti, P, Kaufman, JM. The free androgen index is inaccurate in women when the SHBG concentration is low. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018;88:706–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13561.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Ho, CK, Stoddart, M, Walton, M, Anderson, RA, Beckett, GJ. Calculated free testosterone in men: comparison of four equations and with free androgen index. Ann Clin Biochem 2006;43:389–97. https://doi.org/10.1258/000456306778520115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1237).


Received: 2024-10-23
Accepted: 2025-03-02
Published Online: 2025-03-12
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Setting analytical performance specification by simulation (Milan model 1b)
  4. Reviews
  5. Unveiling the power of R: a comprehensive perspective for laboratory medicine data analysis
  6. Clostebol detection after transdermal and transmucosal contact. A systematic review
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. A value-based score for clinical laboratories: promoting the work of the new EFLM committee
  9. Digital metrology in laboratory medicine: a call for bringing order to chaos to facilitate precision diagnostics
  10. Perspectives
  11. Supporting prioritization efforts of higher-order reference providers using evidence from the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine database
  12. Clinical vs. statistical significance: considerations for clinical laboratories
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Reliable detection of sex chromosome abnormalities by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction
  15. Targeted proteomics of serum IGF-I, -II, IGFBP-2, -3, -4, -5, -6 and ALS
  16. Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures and Materials
  17. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) candidate reference measurement procedure for urine albumin
  18. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  19. Patient risk management in laboratory medicine: an international survey to assess the severity of harm associated with erroneous reported results
  20. Exploring the extent of post-analytical errors, with a focus on transcription errors – an intervention within the VIPVIZA study
  21. A survey on measurement and reporting of total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone in clinical laboratories in Europe
  22. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a 2020–2023 experience in a Chinese province
  23. Impact of delayed centrifugation on the stability of 32 biochemical analytes in blood samples collected in serum gel tubes and stored at room temperature
  24. Concordance between the updated Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid immunoassays and amyloid positron emission tomography for Alzheimer’s disease assessment: findings from the Apollo study
  25. Novel protocol for metabolomics data normalization and biomarker discovery in human tears
  26. Use of the BIOGROUP® French laboratories database to conduct CKD observational studies: a pilot EPI-CKD1 study
  27. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  28. Consensus instability equations for routine coagulation tests
  29. Hematology and Coagulation
  30. Flow-cytometric lymphocyte subsets enumeration: comparison of single/dual-platform method in clinical laboratory with dual-platform extended PanLeucogating method in reference laboratory
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Novel Mindray high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay for single sample and 0/2-hour rule out of myocardial infarction: MERITnI study
  33. Infectious Diseases
  34. Cell population data for early detection of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Lab Error Finder: A call for collaboration
  37. Cascading referencing of terms and definitions
  38. Strengthening international cooperation and confidence in the field of laboratory medicine by ISO standardization
  39. Determining the minimum blood volume required for laboratory testing in newborns
  40. Performance evaluation of large language models with chain-of-thought reasoning ability in clinical laboratory case interpretation
  41. Vancomycin assay interference: low-level IgM paraprotein disrupts Siemens Atellica® CH VANC assay
  42. Dr. Morley Donald Hollenberg. An extraordinary scientist, teacher and mentor
Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-1237/html
Scroll to top button