Home An immuno-DOT diagnostic assay for autoimmune nodopathy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An immuno-DOT diagnostic assay for autoimmune nodopathy

  • Alexandre Jentzer ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Guillaume Taieb , Jérémie El Bechir , Thierry Vincent and Jérôme Joël Devaux EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 12, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a life-threatening peripheral neuropathy mediated by four autoantibodies targeting axoglial cell adhesion molecules at the nodes of Ranvier: Neurofascin-155 (Nfasc155), PanNeurofascin (PanNfasc), Contactin-1 (CNTN1), and Contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1). Antibody detection is a strong biomarker for AN diagnosis and treatment monitoring. The aim of this study was to develop an immuno-dot assay (immuno-DOT) compatible with routine implementation in medical laboratories.

Methods

This new approach was compared to standard techniques: indirect immunofluorescence assay, cell-based assay, and ELISA. Sensitivities (Se) and specificities (Sp) were calculated on a cohort composed of 58 patients diagnosed with AN, 50 seronegative patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 20 healthy controls, 30 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, 20 with monoclonal gammopathy and 20 with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. The patients were diagnosed with AN based on compatible electro-clinical arguments and at least two positive standard techniques.

Results

Immuno-DOT sensitivities and specificities were Se=91 %, Sp=97 % for anti-Nfasc155; Se=80 %, Sp=94 % for anti-PanNfasc; Se=93 %, Sp=98 % for anti-CNTN1; and Se=87 %, Sp=94 % for anti-CASPR1. Immuno-DOT allowed the diagnosis within 3 h and the accurate follow-up of the immune reactivity and isotype, and dot intensity correlated with antibody titers following treatments. A longitudinal study indicated that immuno-DOT yielded reliable results even after six months of storage at −20 °C.

Conclusions

The diagnostic performance of immuno-DOT was satisfactory and compatible with routine implementation in medical laboratories.


Corresponding authors: Alexandre Jentzer, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France; Department of Immunology, Saint Eloi University Hospital Center, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France; and Laboratoire d’Immunologie, CHU Montpellier, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France, E-mail: ; and Jérôme Devaux, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France, E-mail:

Funding source: Agence Nationale pour la Recherche

Award Identifier / Grant number: NECCIN

Award Identifier / Grant number: grant#23593

  1. Research ethics: All the subjects provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Montpellier University Hospital (IRB-MTP-2020-01-20200339). All animal experiments were in line with the European community’s guiding principles on the care and use of animals (2010/63/EU) and were approved by the local Ethical Committee and by the “ministére de l’éducation nationale de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche” (APAFIS#3847-2016012610089856v5).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: Alexandre Jentzer Jérôme Joël Devaux contributed to conception, design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Dr. Devaux received a research grant from CSL Behring. The other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

  5. Research funding: This work was supported by the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (NECCIN; GT and JJD), from the Association Française contre les Myopathies (grant#23593; GT and JJD) and ArgenX.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Einheber, S, Zanazzi, G, Ching, W, Scherer, S, Milner, TA, Peles, E, et al.. The axonal membrane protein Caspr, a homologue of neurexin IV, is a component of the septate-like paranodal junctions that assemble during myelination. J Cell Biol 1997;139:1495–506. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.139.6.1495.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Van den Bergh, PYK, van Doorn, PA, Hadden, RDM, Avau, B, Vankrunkelsven, P, Allen, JA, et al.. European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force-second revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2021;26:242–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12455.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Querol, L, Nogales-Gadea, G, Rojas-Garcia, R, Diaz-Manera, J, Pardo, J, Ortega-Moreno, A, et al.. Neurofascin IgG4 antibodies in CIDP associate with disabling tremor and poor response to IVIg. Neurology 2014;82:879–86. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000205.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Devaux, JJ, Miura, Y, Fukami, Y, Inoue, T, Manso, C, Belghazi, M, et al.. Neurofascin-155 IgG4 in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology 2016;86:800–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002418.Search in Google Scholar

5. Manso, C, Querol, L, Lleixà, C, Poncelet, M, Mekaouche, M, Vallat, J-M, et al.. Anti-Neurofascin-155 IgG4 antibodies prevent paranodal complex formation in vivo. J Clin Invest 2019;129:2222–36. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci124694.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Delmont, E, Manso, C, Querol, L, Cortese, A, Berardinelli, A, Lozza, A, et al.. Autoantibodies to nodal isoforms of neurofascin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain 2017;140:1851–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx124.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Stengel, H, Vural, A, Brunder, A-M, Heinius, A, Appeltshauser, L, Fiebig, B, et al.. Anti-pan-neurofascin IgG3 as a marker of fulminant autoimmune neuropathy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2019;6:e603. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxi.0000000000000603.Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang, L, Pan, J, Meng, H, Yang, Z, Zeng, L, Liu, J. Anti-NF155/NF186 IgG4 antibody positive autoimmune nodopathy. Brain Sci 2022;12:1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111587.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Querol, L, Nogales-Gadea, G, Rojas-Garcia, R, Martinez-Hernandez, E, Diaz-Manera, J, Suárez-Calvet, X, et al.. Antibodies to contactin-1 in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol 2013;73:370–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23794.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Manso, C, Querol, L, Mekaouche, M, Illa, I, Devaux, JJ. Contactin-1 IgG4 antibodies cause paranode dismantling and conduction defects. Brain 2016;139:1700–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Doppler, K, Appeltshauser, L, Villmann, C, Martin, C, Peles, E, Krämer, HH, et al.. Auto-antibodies to contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr) in two patients with painful inflammatory neuropathy. Brain 2016;139:2617–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww189.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Pascual-Goñi, E, Fehmi, J, Lleixà, C, Martín-Aguilar, L, Devaux, J, Höftberger, R, et al.. Antibodies to the Caspr1/contactin-1 complex in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Brain 2021;144:1183–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kouton, L, Boucraut, J, Devaux, J, Rajabally, YA, Adams, D, Antoine, JC, et al.. Electrophysiological features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy associated with IgG4 antibodies targeting neurofascin 155 or contactin 1 glycoproteins. Clin Neurophysiol 2020;131:921–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.01.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Appeltshauser, L, Junghof, H, Messinger, J, Linke, J, Haarmann, A, Ayzenberg, I, et al.. Anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies induce subclass-related complement activation and nodo-paranodal damage. Brain 2023;146:1932–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac418.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Delmont, E, Brodovitch, A, Kouton, L, Allou, T, Beltran, S, Brisset, M, et al.. Antibodies against the node of Ranvier: a real-life evaluation of incidence, clinical features and response to treatment based on a prospective analysis of 1500 sera. J Neurol 2020;267:3664–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10041-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Le Quintrec, M, Teisseyre, M, Bec, N, Delmont, E, Szwarc, I, Perrochia, H, et al.. Contactin-1 is a novel target antigen in membranous nephropathy associated with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Kidney Int 2021;100:1240–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.08.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Cortese, A, Lombardi, R, Briani, C, Callegari, I, Benedetti, L, Manganelli, F, et al.. Antibodies to neurofascin, contactin-1, and contactin-associated protein 1 in CIDP: clinical relevance of IgG isotype. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2020;7:e639. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxi.0000000000000639.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Hassouni, YE, Bourhia, M, Bari, A, Ullah, R, Mahmood, HM, Ali, SS, et al.. Evaluation of the performance of immunoblot and immunodot techniques used to identify autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune diseases. Open Chem 2021;19:237–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0101.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0510).


Received: 2023-11-10
Accepted: 2024-05-30
Published Online: 2024-06-12
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. CD34+ progenitor cells meet metrology
  4. Reviews
  5. Venous blood collection systems using evacuated tubes: a systematic review focusing on safety, efficacy and economic implications of integrated vs. combined systems
  6. The correlation between serum angiopoietin-2 levels and acute kidney injury (AKI): a meta-analysis
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Advancing value-based laboratory medicine
  9. Clostebol and sport: about controversies involving contamination vs. doping offence
  10. Direct-to-consumer testing as consumer initiated testing: compromises to the testing process and opportunities for quality improvement
  11. Perspectives
  12. An improved implementation of metrological traceability concepts is needed to benefit from standardization of laboratory results
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Comparative analysis of BCR::ABL1 p210 mRNA transcript quantification and ratio to ABL1 control gene converted to the International Scale by chip digital PCR and droplet digital PCR for monitoring patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. IVDCheckR – simplifying documentation for laboratory developed tests according to IVDR requirements by introducing a new digital tool
  17. Analytical performance specifications for trace elements in biological fluids derived from six countries federated external quality assessment schemes over 10 years
  18. The effects of drone transportation on routine laboratory, immunohematology, flow cytometry and molecular analyses
  19. Accurate non-ceruloplasmin bound copper: a new biomarker for the assessment and monitoring of Wilson disease patients using HPLC coupled to ICP-MS/MS
  20. Construction of platelet count-optical method reflex test rules using Micro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%, “PLT clumps?” flag, and “PLT abnormal histogram” flag on the Mindray BC-6800plus hematology analyzer in clinical practice
  21. Evaluation of serum NFL, T-tau, p-tau181, p-tau217, Aβ40 and Aβ42 for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
  22. An immuno-DOT diagnostic assay for autoimmune nodopathy
  23. Evaluation of biochemical algorithms to screen dysbetalipoproteinemia in ε2ε2 and rare APOE variants carriers
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. Allowable total error in CD34 cell analysis by flow cytometry based on state of the art using Spanish EQAS data
  26. Clinical utility of personalized reference intervals for CEA in the early detection of oncologic disease
  27. Agreement of lymphocyte subsets detection permits reference intervals transference between flow cytometry systems: direct validation using established reference intervals
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. Atypical cells in urine sediment: a novel biomarker for early detection of bladder cancer
  30. External quality assessment-based tumor marker harmonization simulation; insights in achievable harmonization for CA 15-3 and CEA
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a high-sensitivity troponin I point-of-care assay in the Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule Out Study (MACROS-2)
  33. Analytical verification of the Atellica VTLi point of care high sensitivity troponin I assay
  34. Infectious Diseases
  35. Synovial fluid D-lactate – a pathogen-specific biomarker for septic arthritis: a prospective multicenter study
  36. Targeted MRM-analysis of plasma proteins in frozen whole blood samples from patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) for reporting the performance of laboratory biomarkers: not ready for prime time
  39. Urgent need to adopt age-specific TSH upper reference limit for the elderly – a position statement of the Belgian thyroid club
  40. Sigma metric is more correlated with analytical imprecision than bias
  41. Utility and limitations of monitoring kidney transplants using capillary sampling
  42. Simple flow cytometry method using a myeloma panel that easily reveals clonal proliferation of mature B-cells
  43. Is sweat conductivity still a relevant screening test for cystic fibrosis? Participation over 10 years
  44. Hb D-Iran interference on HbA1c measurement
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-0510/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button