Home Salivary cortisol and cortisone in diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome – a comparison of six different analytical methods
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Salivary cortisol and cortisone in diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome – a comparison of six different analytical methods

  • Nils Bäcklund ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Göran Brattsand , Staffan Lundstedt , Elisabeth Aardal , Inga Bartuseviciene , Katarina Berinder , Charlotte Höybye , Pia Burman , Britt Edén Engström , Anders Isaksson , Anders Blomgren , Oskar Ragnarsson , Ulrika Rüetschi , Jeanette Wahlberg , Tommy Olsson and Per Dahlqvist
Published/Copyright: April 4, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Salivary cortisol and cortisone at late night and after dexamethasone suppression test (DST) are increasingly used for screening of Cushing’s syndrome (CS). We aimed to establish reference intervals for salivary cortisol and cortisone with three liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) techniques and for salivary cortisol with three immunoassays (IAs), and evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for CS.

Methods

Salivary samples at 08:00 h, 23:00 h and 08:00 h after a 1-mg DST were collected from a reference population (n=155) and patients with CS (n=22). Sample aliquots were analyzed by three LC-MS/MS and three IA methods. After establishing reference intervals, the upper reference limit (URL) for each method was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity for CS. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparing ROC curves.

Results

URLs for salivary cortisol at 23:00 h were similar for the LC-MS/MS methods (3.4–3.9 nmol/L), but varied between IAs: Roche (5.8 nmol/L), Salimetrics (4.3 nmol/L), Cisbio (21.6 nmol/L). Corresponding URLs after DST were 0.7–1.0, and 2.4, 4.0 and 5.4 nmol/L, respectively. Salivary cortisone URLs were 13.5–16.6 nmol/L at 23:00 h and 3.0–3.5 nmol/L at 08:00 h after DST. All methods had ROC AUCs ≥0.96.

Conclusions

We present robust reference intervals for salivary cortisol and cortisone at 08:00 h, 23:00 h and 08:00 h after DST for several clinically used methods. The similarities between LC-MS/MS methods allows for direct comparison of absolute values. Diagnostic accuracy for CS was high for all salivary cortisol and cortisone LC-MS/MS methods and salivary cortisol IAs evaluated.


Corresponding author: Nils Bäcklund, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden, Phone: +46706041730, Fax: +4690137633, E-mail:

Funding source: Västerbotten Läns Landsting

Funding source: Private donation to Umeå University for research on pituitary disease

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Katarina Iselid, Umeå University Hospital, for expert recruitment of reference individuals and sample management, and Anders Lundquist and Marie Eriksson, Umeå University, for statistical advice.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Västerbotten County Council and by a donation to Umeå University for research on pituitary disease.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee at Umeå University (Dnr 2015/08-31).

References

1. Fleseriu, M, Auchus, R, Bancos, I, Ben-Shlomo, A, Bertherat, J, Biermasz, NR, et al.. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:847–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00235-7.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bäcklund, N, Brattsand, G, Israelsson, M, Ragnarsson, O, Burman, P, Edén Engström, B, et al.. Reference intervals of salivary cortisol and cortisone and their diagnostic accuracy in Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2020;182:569–82. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-19-0872.Search in Google Scholar

3. Ueland, GÅ, Methlie, P, Kellmann, R, Bjørgaas, M, Åsvold, BO, Thorstensen, K, et al.. Simultaneous assay of cortisol and dexamethasone improved diagnostic accuracy of the dexamethasone suppression test. Eur J Endocrinol 2017;176:705–13. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-17-0078.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ng, CM, Lam, TK, Au Yeung, YC, Choi, CH, Iu, YP, Shek, CC, et al.. Clinical utility of late-night and post-overnight dexamethasone suppression salivary cortisone for the investigation of Cushing’s syndrome. Hong Kong Med J 2017;23:570–8. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj176240.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Manetti, L, Rossi, G, Grasso, L, Raffaelli, V, Scattina, I, Del Sarto, S, et al.. Usefulness of salivary cortisol in the diagnosis of hypercortisolism: comparison with serum and urinary cortisol. Eur J Endocrinol 2013;168:315–21. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-12-0685.Search in Google Scholar

6. Garde, AH, Hansen, ÅM, Nikolajsen, TB. An inter-laboratory comparison for determination of cortisol in saliva. Accred Qual Assur 2003;8:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-002-0548-x.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dodd, AJ, Ducroq, DH, Neale, SM, Wise, MP, Mitchem, KL, Armston, A, et al.. The effect of serum matrix and gender on cortisol measurement by commonly used immunoassays. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:379–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563213514567.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Taylor, AE, Keevil, B, Huhtaniemi, IT. Mass spectrometry and immunoassay: how to measure steroid hormones today and tomorrow. Eur J Endocrinol 2015;173:D1–12. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-15-0338.Search in Google Scholar

9. Raff, H, Homar, PJ, Burns, EA. Comparison of two methods for measuring salivary cortisol. Clin Chem 2002;48:207–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.1.207.Search in Google Scholar

10. Smith, RE, Maguire, JA, Stein-Oakley, AN, Sasano, H, Takahashi, K, Fukushima, K, et al.. Localization of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II in human epithelial tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:3244–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.81.9.3244.Search in Google Scholar

11. Bocchi, B, Fagart, J, Cluzeaud, F, Fay, M, Rafestin-Oblin, ME, Farman, N. Glucocorticoid metabolism by 11-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 modulates human mineralocorticoid receptor transactivation activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003;84:239–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00036-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Perogamvros, I, Owen, LJ, Newell-Price, J, Ray, DW, Trainer, PJ, Keevil, BG. Simultaneous measurement of cortisol and cortisone in human saliva using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: application in basal and stimulated conditions. J Chromatogr, B: Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2009;877:3771–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Antonelli, G, Ceccato, F, Artusi, C, Marinova, M, Plebani, M. Salivary cortisol and cortisone by LC-MS/MS: validation, reference intervals and diagnostic accuracy in Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Chim Acta 2015;451:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.10.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ray, JA, Kushnir, MM, Rockwood, AL, Meikle, AW. Analysis of cortisol, cortisone and dexamethasone in human serum using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and assessment of cortisol: cortisone ratios in patients with impaired kidney function. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:1221–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.03.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Raff, H. Cushing’s syndrome: diagnosis and surveillance using salivary cortisol. Pituitary 2012;15:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0333-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Ueland, GÅ, Kellmann, R, Jørstad Davidsen, M, Viste, K, Husebye, ES, Almås, B, et al.. Bedtime salivary cortisol as a screening test for Cushing syndrome in children. J Endocr Soc 2021;5:bvab033. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Imamovic, M, Bäcklund, N, Lundstedt, S, Brattsand, G, Aardal, E, Olsson, T, et al.. Confounding effects of liquorice, hydrocortisone, and blood contamination on salivary cortisol but not cortisone. Endocr Connect 2022;12:e220324. https://doi.org/10.1530/ec-22-0324.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Debono, M, Harrison, RF, Whitaker, MJ, Eckland, D, Arlt, W, Keevil, BG, et al.. Salivary cortisone reflects cortisol exposure under physiological conditions and after hydrocortisone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1469–77. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3694.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Perogamvros, I, Keevil, BG, Ray, DW, Trainer, PJ. Salivary cortisone is a potential biomarker for serum free cortisol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:4951–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1215.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kotłowska, A, Puzyn, T, Sworczak, K, Stepnowski, P, Szefer, P. Metabolomic biomarkers in urine of Cushing’s syndrome patients. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020294.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Brossaud, J, Ducint, D, Corcuff, JB. Urinary glucocorticoid metabolites: biomarkers to classify adrenal incidentalomas? Clin Endocrinol 2016;84:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12717.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. El-Farhan, N, Rees, DA, Evans, C. Measuring cortisol in serum, urine and saliva: are our assays good enough? Ann Clin Biochem 2017;54:308–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563216687335.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Gomez-Gomez, A, Miranda, J, Feixas, G, Arranz Betegon, A, Crispi, F, Gratacós, E, et al.. Determination of the steroid profile in alternative matrices by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2020;197:105520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105520.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Casals, G, Hanzu, FA. Cortisol measurements in Cushing’s Syndrome: immunoassay or mass spectrometry? Ann Lab Med 2020;40:285–96. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.4.285.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Baid, SK, Sinaii, N, Wade, M, Rubino, D, Nieman, LK. Radioimmunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry measurement of bedtime salivary cortisol levels: a comparison of assays to establish hypercortisolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:3102–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-2861.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Beko, G, Varga, I, Glaz, E, Sereg, M, Feldman, K, Toth, M, et al.. Cutoff values of midnight salivary cortisol for the diagnosis of overt hypercortisolism are highly influenced by methods. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:364–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.11.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Inder, WJ, Dimeski, G, Russell, A. Measurement of salivary cortisol in 2012: laboratory techniques and clinical indications. Clin Endocrinol 2012;77:645–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04508.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Turpeinen, U, Hämäläinen, E. Determination of cortisol in serum, saliva and urine. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2013;27:795–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2013.10.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Petersenn, S. Biochemical diagnosis of Cushing’s disease: screening and confirmatory testing. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2021;35:101519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2021.101519.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Israelsson, M, Brattsand, R, Brattsand, G. 20α- and 20β-dihydrocortisone may interfere in LC-MS/MS determination of cortisol in saliva and urine. Ann Clin Biochem 2018;55:341–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563217724178.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Horowitz, GL, Altaie, S, Boyd, JC, Ceriotti, F, Garg, U, Horn, P, et al.. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline–third edition. C28-A3c ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

32. Dixon, WJ. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics 1953;9:74–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001634.Search in Google Scholar

33. Sun, X, Xu, W. Fast implementation of DeLong’s algorithm for comparing the areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2014;21:1389–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2014.2337313.Search in Google Scholar

34. DeLong, ER, DeLong, DM, Clarke-Pearson, DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595.Search in Google Scholar

35. Erickson, D, Singh, RJ, Sathananthan, A, Vella, A, Bryant, SC. Late-night salivary cortisol for diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay. Clin Endocrinol 2012;76:467–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04239.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Ceccato, F, Marcelli, G, Martino, M, Concettoni, C, Brugia, M, Trementino, L, et al.. The diagnostic accuracy of increased late night salivary cortisol for Cushing’s syndrome: a real-life prospective study. J Endocrinol Invest 2019;42:327–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0921-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Sturmer, LR, Dodd, D, Chao, CS, Shi, RZ. Clinical utility of an ultrasensitive late night salivary cortisol assay by tandem mass spectrometry. Steroids 2018;129:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2017.11.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Ceccato, F, Boscaro, M. Cushing’s syndrome: screening and diagnosis. High Blood Pres Cardiovasc Prev 2016;23:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-016-0153-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Roberts, RF, Roberts, WL. Performance characteristics of five automated serum cortisol immunoassays. Clin Biochem 2004;37:489–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.01.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Brixey-McCann, R, Tennant, S, Geen, J, Armston, A, Barth, J, Keevil, B, et al.. Effect of cortisol assay bias on the overnight dexamethasone suppression test: implications for the investigation of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocr Abstr 2015;38:P22. https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.38.p22.Search in Google Scholar

41. Laudat, MH, Cerdas, S, Fournier, C, Guiban, D, Guilhaume, B, Luton, JP. Salivary cortisol measurement: a practical approach to assess pituitary-adrenal function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;66:343–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-66-2-343.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Berndt, V, Dahlqvist, P, de Verdier, J, Ryberg, H, Ragnarsson, O. The diagnostic value of salivary cortisol and salivary cortisone in patients with suspected hypercortisolism. Front Endocrinol 2022;13:1028804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1028804.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Deutschbein, T, Broecker-Preuss, M, Flitsch, J, Jaeger, A, Althoff, R, Walz, MK, et al.. Salivary cortisol as a diagnostic tool for Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal insufficiency: improved screening by an automatic immunoassay. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:613–8. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-11-0945.Search in Google Scholar

44. Raff, H, Singh, RJ. Measurement of late-night salivary cortisol and cortisone by LC-MS/MS to assess preanalytical sample contamination with topical hydrocortisone. Clin Chem 2012;58:947–8. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.182717.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Debono, M, Elder, C, Lewis, J, Fearnside, J, Caunt, S, Dixon, S, et al.. Home waking salivary cortisone to screen for adrenal insufficiency. NEJM Evid 2022;2(2):EVIDoa2200182. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200182.Search in Google Scholar

46. Kannankeril, J, Carroll, T, Findling, JW, Javorsky, B, Gunsolus, IL, Phillips, J, et al.. Prospective evaluation of late-night salivary cortisol and cortisone by EIA and LC-MS/MS in suspected Cushing syndrome. J Endocr Soc 2020;4:bvaa107. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Galm, BP, Qiao, N, Klibanski, A, Biller, BMK, Tritos, NA. Accuracy of Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:dgaa105. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Mészáros, K, Karvaly, G, Márta, Z, Magda, B, Tőke, J, Szücs, N, et al.. Diagnostic performance of a newly developed salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement using an LC-MS/MS method with simple and rapid sample preparation. J Endocrinol Invest 2018;41:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0743-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Garde, AH, Hansen, AM. Long-term stability of salivary cortisol. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005;65:433–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510510025773.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Meyer, EJ, Nenke, MA, Rankin, W, Lewis, JG, Torpy, DJ. Corticosteroid-binding globulin: a review of basic and clinical advances. Horm Metab Res 2016;48:359–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108071.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0141).


Received: 2023-02-07
Accepted: 2023-03-21
Published Online: 2023-04-04
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Laboratory Medicine: from just testing to saving lives
  4. Reviews
  5. Serum biomarkers of remodeling in severe asthma with fixed airway obstruction and the potential role of KL-6
  6. Safety monitoring of drug-induced muscle injury and rhabdomyolysis: a biomarker-guided approach for clinical practice and drug trials
  7. Mini Review
  8. Concise review on the combined use of immunocapture, mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography for clinical applications
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Recommendation for the design of stability studies on clinical specimens
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Assessment of WHO 07/202 reference material and human serum pools for commutability and for the potential to reduce variability among soluble transferrin receptor assays
  13. veRification: an R Shiny application for laboratory method verification and validation
  14. Impact of storage temperature and time before analysis on electrolytes (Na+, K+, Ca2+), lactate, glucose, blood gases (pH, pO2, pCO2), tHb, O2Hb, COHb and MetHb results
  15. The stability of blood gases and CO-oximetry under slushed ice and room temperature conditions
  16. Elevated levels of renal function tests conferred increased risks of developing various pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes: insights from a population-based cohort study
  17. Poor comparability of plasma renin activity measurement in determining patient samples: the status quo and recommendations for harmonization
  18. Salivary cortisol and cortisone in diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome – a comparison of six different analytical methods
  19. Improved diagnostics of purine and pyrimidine metabolism disorders using LC-MS/MS and its clinical application
  20. Analytical evaluation of a GAD65 antibodies chemiluminescence immunoassay for CSF in neurological syndromes
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. Evaluation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations by cross-platform assessment of accuracy-based EQA data against SI-traceable reference value
  23. Highly sensitive tandem mass spectrometric measurement of serum estradiol without derivatization and pediatric reference intervals in children and adolescents
  24. Cancer Diagnostics
  25. Practical delta check limits for tumour markers in different clinical settings
  26. Comparison between free β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and total hCG assays in adults with testicular cancer
  27. Hematology and Coagulation
  28. Value of monocyte distribution width for predicting severe cholecystitis: a retrospective cohort study
  29. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Medica EasyCell assistant
  30. Validation of non-invasive point of care blood content analysis using the TensorTip™ MTX device: a method comparison study
  31. Infectious Diseases
  32. Kinetics and ability of binding antibody and surrogate virus neutralization tests to predict neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant following BNT162b2 booster administration
  33. Letters to the Editor
  34. The first case of VEXAS syndrome in Austria
  35. Acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies detection: is it time for a change?
  36. Performance of the 2009 CKDEPI, 2021 CKDEPI, and EKFC equations among high-risk patients in Denmark
  37. Biotin interference in immunoassays: water under the bridge?
  38. The new synthetic benzimidazole opioid etonitazepipne: an emerging fatal harm and a challenge for laboratory medicine
  39. Unexplained increase of serum carcinoembryonic antigen: don’t forget the thyroid!
  40. Falsely elevated cortisol serum levels in preterm infants due to use of immunoassay
  41. Misdiagnosis of Hb Bart’s disease: prenatal screening and diagnosis of thalassemia in special population
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0141/html
Scroll to top button