Startseite Repository of intra- and inter-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays: a European multicenter study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Repository of intra- and inter-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays: a European multicenter study

  • Marie-Agnès Dragon-Durey EMAIL logo , Nicola Bizzaro , Marie Senant , Hristina Andreeva , Dimitrios P. Bogdanos , Carolien Bonroy , Xavier Bossuyt , Catharina Eriksson , Nicole Fabien , Ingmar Heijnen , Manfred Herold , Lucile Musset , Liisa Kuhi , Marcos Lopez-Hoyos , Tímea Berki , Caroline Roozendaal , Ulrich Sack , Tatjana Sundic , Lorna Taylor , Andrea Tesija Kuna ORCID logo und Jan Damoiseaux
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. Juni 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

No reference data are available on repositories to measure precision of autoantibody assays. The scope of this study was to document inter- and intra-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays based on a real-world large international data set.

Methods

Members of the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) group collected the data of intra- and inter-run variability obtained with assays quantifying 15 different autoantibodies in voluntary participating laboratories from their country. We analyzed the impact on the assay performances of the type of immunoassay, the number of measurements used to calculate the coefficient of variation (CVs), the nature and the autoantibody level of the internal quality control (IQC).

Results

Data were obtained from 64 laboratories from 15 European countries between February and October 2021. We analyzed 686 and 1,331 values of intra- and inter-run CVs, respectively. Both CVs were significantly dependent on: the method of immunoassay, the level of IQC with higher imprecision observed when the antibody levels were lower than 2-fold the threshold for positivity, and the nature of the IQC with commercial IQCs having lower CVs than patients-derived IQCs. Our analyses also show that the type of autoantibody has low impact on the assay’ performances and that 15 measurements are sufficient to establish reliable intra- and inter-run variations.

Conclusions

This study provides for the first time an international repository yielding values of intra- and inter-run variation for quantitative autoantibody assays. These data could be useful for ISO 15189 accreditation requirements and will allow clinical diagnostic laboratories to assure quality of patient results.


Corresponding author: Marie-Agnès Dragon-Durey, MD, PhD for EASI France group, Laboratoire d’Immunologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Université de Paris Cité, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France, Phone: + 33 1 56 09 59 99, Fax: + 33 1 56 09 20 80, E-mail:

Funding source: Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Funding source: Università degli Studi di Firenze

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Funding source: University of Thessaly

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Funding source: KU Leuven

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Funding source: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Acknowledgments

Participating centers: We thank all physicians, biologists and scientists from the participating DBL for sharing their data: Marie Senant Private Biomedical Laboratory Cerballiance, Lisses, France; Laurence Guis-Cabanne Private Biomedical Laboratory Biomnis-Eurofins, Ivry, France; Georges Chyderiotis Laboratory Biomnis-Eurofins Lyon, France; Pascale Ghillani-Dalbin, Laboratory of Immunology, Hospital Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France; Chantal Dumestre-Perard, Laboratory of Immunology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Marie-Agnès Dragon-Durey, Laboratory of Immunology, Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; Nicole Fabien, Laboratory of Immunology, University Hospital of Lyon, France; Marie-Alexandra Alyanakian, Laboratory of Immunology, Hospital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France; Claudia Alpini, Servizio Analisi Chimico-Cliniche, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo,Pavia, Italy; Antonio Antico and Maria-Piera Panozzo, Lab Analisi ULSS 4, Santorso (VI), Italy; Gabriella Baldi, Laboratorio di Endocrinologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy; Teresa Carbone, UOC Patologia Clinica, ASM, Matera, Italy;Sergio Finazzi, Laboratorio Analisi, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy; Franco Franceschini, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Sperimentali, Università di Brescia and Reumatologia e Immunologia Clinica, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; Nicoletta Gallo, Azienda Ospedaliera Università di Padova, Dipartimento Strutturale Medicina di Laboratorio, UOC Medicina di Laboratorio, Padova, Italy; Emirena Garrafa and Duilio Brugnoni, Dipartimento di Diagnostica di Laboratorio, ASST, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; Maria Infantino e Mariangela Manfredi, Laboratorio Immunologia Allergologia, Dipartimento di Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio Azienda, Usl Toscana Centro, Firenze, Italy; Magda Marchese, Servizio di Patologia Clinica, Ospedale Santa Maria Delle Grazie-Asl Napoli two Nord, Napoli, Italy; Boaz Palterer and Paola Parronchi, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy; Giampaola Pesce, Laboratorio Diagnostico di Autoimmunologia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, and Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e specialità mediche (DIMI), Università di Genova, Genova, Italy; Amelia Rigon, Luisa Arcarese and Roberto Giacomelli, UOC di Immunologia Clinica e Reumatologia, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy; Maria-Cristina Sacchi, Laboratorio Analisi, Alessandria, Italy; Michela Tonegato, Sara Ghisellini and Michela Boni, Laboratorio Unico Provinciale Dipartimento Biotecnologie, Trasfusionale e di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Cona (FE), Italy; Maria-Teresa Trevisan, Laboratorio, Ospedale G. Fracastoro, Verona, Italy; Danilo Villalta, Allergologia e Immunologia clinica, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy; Dr Liaskos, Dr Patrikiou Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece; Hristina Andreeva, Section of Protein, Allergy and Immunology, Laboratory Medicine Department, Diagnostic Clinic, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Carina Strøm, Section of Protein, Allergy and Immunology, Laboratory Medicine Department, Diagnostic Clinic, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Sølvi Fagervik, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway; Christine Torsvik Steinsvåg, Department for Immunology and Transfusion medicine, Sørlandet sykehus HF, Kristiansand, Norway Livia Bajelan, Autoantibodies Diagnostics, Section for medical immunology, Department for immunology and transfusion medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway; Noemie Taer, Section for Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Kristine Thomassen Berget, Department for immunology and transfusion medicine, Sørlandet sykehus HF, Kristiansand, Norway; Carolien Bonroy, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Xavier Bossuyt, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Belgium and Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Sofie Schouwers, Department of Laboratory Medicine, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Laurence Lutteri, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Liège, Liège, Belgium; Martine Vercammen, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Saint-Jan Hospital Bruges-Ostend, Bruges, Belgium; Lieve Van Hoovels, Department of Laboratory Medicine, OLV Aalst, Belgium; Ana Kozmar, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Croatia; Lovorka Đerek, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia; Lora Dukić, Department of medical laboratory diagnostics, University Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia; Vedrana Drvar, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Croatia; Ines Šahinović, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Croatia; Tímea Berki, Department of Immunology and Biotechnology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary; Eszter Nagy, National Institute of Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities, Budapest and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Gábor Nagy and Péter Antal-Szalmás, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; Zsuzsanna Beleznay, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Liisa Kuhi, Central Laboratory, Diagnostic Clinic, East Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia; Maiga Mägi, Clinical Immunology Department, Laboratory, North Estonia Medical Centre (SA Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla), Tallinn, Estonia; Maarit Veski, Laboratory of Immunology, Central Laboratory, East Tallinn Central Hospital (AS Ida-Tallinna Keskhaigla), Tallinn, Estonia; Irina Golovljova, Laboratory, Tallinn Children´s Hospital (SA Tallinna Lastehaigla), Tallinn, Estonia; Irina Utenko, SYNLAB Eesti OÜ, Estonia; Thorsten Krieger, MVZ Rheumatologie und Autoimmunmedizin GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; Ulrich Sack, Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Immunology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Manfred Herold, Rheumatology Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Rille Pullerits, Department of Clinical immunology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Rui Da Silva Rodrigues, Department of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Charlotte Dahle, Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Linkoping, Sweden; Catharina Eriksson, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Hetty Bontkes, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Jan Damoiseaux, Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Renate van der Molen, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Henny Otten, Laboratory Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Caroline Roozendaal, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Marco Schreurs, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Vincent Aubert, Service of Immunology and Allergology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Luca Bernasconi, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland; Pascale Bruyère-Cerdan, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Ingmar Heijnen, Medical Immunology, Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Elisabeth Probst-Müller, Clinic of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Andrea Griesmacher, Central Institute of Clinical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria; Werner Klotz, Rheumatology Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Lorna Taylor, Department of Immunology, Black Country Pathology Services, West Midlands, United Kingdom.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: Marie-Agnes Dragon-Durey collected and analyzed the data with Marie Senant. All authors provided raw data for analyses by collecting data of the national EASI teams, participated in the design of the study, the drafting of the manuscript and provided approval of the final submitted version. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: M-A Dragon-Durey reports speaker fees from Werfen outside the submitted work. N Bizzaro declares lecture fees from Werfen/Inova and ThermoFisher outside the present work. U Sack reports COI not related to this work: lectures for Thermofisher. X Bossuyt reports COI not related to the work: scientific advisory committee Werfen and lecture fee Thermo Fisher. L Musset reports COI as scientific advisor Committee from Werfen and ThermoScientific not related to the present work. M Lopez-Hos reports COI as scientific advisor Committee from Werfen and ThermoScientific not related to the present work. J Damoiseaux reports consultancy fees from Werfen/Inova and ThermoFisher, and speaker fees from ThermoFisher outside the submitted work. M Senant, T Berki, C Bonroy, H Andreeva, D P Bogdanos, C Eriksson, N. Fabien, I Heijnen, M Herold, C Roozendaal, L Kuhi, T Sundic, L Taylor, A Tesija Kuna report no competing interests to declare for this manuscript.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Bizzaro, N, Bossuyt, X, Haapala, AM, Shoenfeld, Y, Sack, U. Accreditation in autoimmune diagnostic laboratories. A position paper of the european autoimmunity standardisation initiative (EASI). Autoimmun Rev 2016;16:81–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2016.09.021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Mulder, L, van der Molen, R, Koelman, C, van Leeuwen, E, Roos, A, Damoiseaux, J. Validation conform ISO-15189 of assays in the field of autoimmunity: joint efforts in The Netherlands. Autoimmun Rev 2018;17:513–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Ricos, C, Alvarez, V, Cava, F, Garcia-Lario, JV, Hernandez, A, Jimenez, CV, et al.. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365519950185229.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Vassault, A, Grafmeyer, D, de Graeve, J, Cohen, R, Beaudonnet, A, Bienvenu, J. [Quality specifications and allowable standards for validation of methods used in clinical biochemistry]. Ann Biol Clin Paris 1999;57:685–95.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Vis, JY, Huisman, A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2016;38:100–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12503.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Westgard, J. 2019. Available from: https://www.westgard.com.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988 (clia) proficiency testing regulations related to analytes and acceptable performance. Fed Regist 2019;84:1536–67.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Senant, M, Musset, L, Chyderiotis, G, Guis-Cabanne, L, Damoiseaux, J, Fabien, N, et al.. Precision of autoantibody assays in clinical diagnostic laboratories: what is the reality? Clin Biochem 2020;83:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.05.019.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Damoiseaux, J, Olschowka, N, Shoenfeld, Y. EASI - european autoimmunity standardisation initiative: facing the challenges of diagnostics in autoimmunity. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1620–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0826.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Sieghart, D, Platzer, A, Studenic, P, Alasti, F, Grundhuber, M, Swiniarski, S, et al.. Determination of autoantibody isotypes increases the sensitivity of serodiagnostics in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol 2018;9:876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00876.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Wang, M, Li, J, Huang, Y, Chen, T, Dong, S, Zhang, R, et al.. Analytical validation of the LiCA® high-sensitivity human thyroid stimulating hormone assay. Clin Biochem 2022;101:42–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.11.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Benard, C, Chauzeix, J, Blancher, A, Puissant-Lubrano, B. Analytical performances of SPAPLUS® turbidimeter for the quantification of albumin and IgG in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Biochem 2016;49:828–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.03.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. SH GTA 06. Guide technique d’accréditation: contrôle de qualité en biologie médicale. COFRAC; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Kinns, H, Pitkin, S, Housley, D, Freedman, DB. Internal quality control: best practice. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:1027–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201661.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. CLSI. Statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016, C24-A4.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Bogaert, L, Van den Bremt, S, Schouwers, S, Bossuyt, X, Van Hoovels, L. Harmonizing by reducing inter-run variability: performance evaluation of a quality assurance program for antinuclear antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:990–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0933.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Sepe, V, Eldridge, S, Loviselli, A, Cirillo, R, Bottazzo, GF. Definition of cut-off points for autoantibody assays in cohorts of healthy individuals. The sardinian school children-IDDM (SSI) & newborn-IDDM (SNI) study groups. Lancet 1996;347:693. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91247-7.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Sack, U, Bossuyt, X, Andreeva, H, Antal-Szalmás, P, Bizzaro, N, Bogdanos, D, et al.. Quality and best practice in medical laboratories: specific requests for autoimmunity testing. Auto - Immun Highlights 2020;11:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00134-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Bossuyt, X, Damoiseaux, J, Rasmussen, N, van Paassen, P, Hellmich, B, Baslund, B, et al.. Harmonization of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) testing by reporting test result-specific likelihood ratios: position paper. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:e35–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1178.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0411).


Received: 2022-04-26
Accepted: 2022-06-14
Published Online: 2022-06-24
Published in Print: 2022-08-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine: enjoying the present and assessing the future
  4. Rethinking internal quality control: the time is now
  5. Review
  6. Multi-omics analysis from archival neonatal dried blood spots: limitations and opportunities
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. ‘Penelope test’: a practical instrument for checking appropriateness of laboratory tests
  9. Interference by macroprolactin in assays for prolactin: will the In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation lead to a solution at last?
  10. EFLM Paper
  11. Efficiency, efficacy and subjective user satisfaction of alternative laboratory report formats. An investigation on behalf of the Working Group for Postanalytical Phase (WG-POST), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. Cross-reactivity in assays for prolactin and optimum screening policy for macroprolactinaemia
  14. Repository of intra- and inter-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays: a European multicenter study
  15. Stability of direct renin concentration and plasma renin activity in EDTA whole blood and plasma at ambient and refrigerated temperatures from 0 to 72 hours
  16. Comparison of four different immunoassays and a rapid isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for serum folate
  17. Analytical quality specifications in semen analysis according to the state of the current methodologies
  18. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  19. Short-term biological variation study of plasma hemophilia and thrombophilia parameters in a population of apparently healthy Caucasian adults
  20. First morning voided urinary gonadotropins in children: verification of method performance and establishment of reference intervals
  21. Derivation of sex and age-specific reference intervals for clinical chemistry analytes in healthy Ghanaian adults
  22. Cancer Diagnostics
  23. Serum free light chain analysis: persisting limitations with new kids on the block
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Age partitioned and continuous upper reference limits for Ortho VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I in a healthy paediatric cohort
  26. The predictive value of hemoglobin to creatinine ratio for contrast-induced nephropathy in percutaneous coronary interventions
  27. Infectious Diseases
  28. Health technology assessment to employ COVID-19 serological tests as companion diagnostics in the vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2
  29. Evaluation of a laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay
  30. Presepsin levels in neonatal cord blood are not influenced by maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection
  31. Letters to the Editors
  32. How to evaluate fixed clinical QC limits vs. risk-based SQC strategies
  33. Reply to Westgard et al.: ‘Keep your eyes wide … as the present now will later be past’*
  34. Platelet phagocytosis by monocytes
  35. Early detection of Candida parapsilosis in peripheral blood as a result of a peripheral blood smear performed after cytographic changes on the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 hematology
  36. Pseudo-erythroblastosis on Sysmex XN hematology analyzers: a clue to Candida sepsis. Case report and literature review
  37. Covert poisoning with difenacoum: diagnosis and follow-up difficulties
  38. Comparison of Sebia Capillarys 3-OCTA with the Tosoh Bioscience HLC®-723G8 method for A1C testing with focus on analytical interferences and variant detection
Heruntergeladen am 23.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-0411/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen