Startseite Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin method using the OC-SENSOR PLEDIA
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin method using the OC-SENSOR PLEDIA

  • Shane O’Driscoll ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Carolyn Piggott ORCID logo und Sally C. Benton ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. März 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends faecal calprotectin (f-cal) to help differentiate inflammatory bowel diseases from irritable bowel syndrome. Faecal samples for calprotectin have historically been collected at home by patients into screw-top pots and sent to laboratories where calprotectin is extracted and analysed. Faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) samples are collected at home into specific collection devices containing stabilising buffer. We evaluated the OC-FCa method for f-cal, developed by Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd. (Japan) that uses the same collection device and analyser as f-Hb.

Methods

OC-FCa was assessed for limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), within and between-run imprecision, linearity, prozone, recovery and carryover. A method comparison against the BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo (BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Switzerland) was performed using patient samples and EQA.

Results

The LOB was 3 µg calprotectin/g faeces (µg/g), LOD 8 μg/g and LOQ 20 μg/g. Within and between-run imprecision was <5%; linearity was good (R2 > 0.99); prozone was appropriately detected; recovery was 99.6%; no observed carryover. OC-FCa showed a strong positive bias compared with BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo (Z=−5.3587, p < 0.001). When categorised using our local pathway, which interprets calprotectin concentrations and need for further investigation, Cohen’s Kappa demonstrates substantial agreement at <50 μg/g (κ=0.80) and >150 μg/g (κ=0.63) and fair agreement (κ=0.22) in the borderline category 50–150 μg/g.

Conclusions

The OC-FCa method performed well in the evaluation. With the lack of standardisation for f-cal a clinical study is required to evaluate the positive bias and establish suitable cut-off levels.


Corresponding author: Shane O’Driscoll, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan and Mast Diagnostics Division, Bootle, Merseyside, UK for supplying the analysers and consumables, and UK NEQAS for providing materials for assessment.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contribution: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Faecal calprotectin diagnostic tests for inflammatory diseases of the bowel. DG 11. London: NICE; 2013. [Online]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg11 [Accessed 16 August 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

2. BÜHLMANN Laboratories, Switzerland. BÜHLMANN Instruction for use CALEX® Cap, 2020. Available from: https://buhlmannlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/B-CALEX-C50-C200-C500-IFU-FDA-VA2-2020-04-29.pdf [Accessed 09 Mar 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

3. Eiken Chemical, Co., Ltd. OC-auto sampling bottle 3, 2020. [Online]. Available from: https://www.eiken.co.jp/en/products/fit/sampling_bottles/ [Accessed 16 Dec 2021].Suche in Google Scholar

4. Armbruster, DA, Pry, T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:S49–52.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods, 3rd ed. EP05-A3 Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Broughton, PMG, Buttolph, MA, Gowenlock, AH, Neill, DW, Skentelbery, RG. Recommended scheme for the evaluation of instruments for automatic analysis in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. J Clin Pathol 1969;22:278–84, https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.22.3.278.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Turvill, J, Rook, L, Rawle, M, Rook, L, Rawle, M, Robins, G, Smale, S, Kant, P, et al.. Validation of a care pathway for the use of faecal calprotectin in monitoring patients with Crohn’s disease. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017;8:183–8, https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2016-100780.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74, https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Oyaert, M, Boel, A, Jacobs, J, Van den Bremt, S, De Sloovere, M, Vanpoucke, H, et al.. Analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of six different faecal calprotectin assays in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1564–73, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Whitehead, SJ, French, J, Brookes, MJ, Ford, C, Gama, R. Between-assay variability of faecal calprotectin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Ann Clin Biochem 2013;50:53–61, https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2012.011272.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Haisma, S-M, van Rheenen, PF, Wagenmakers, L, Muller Kobold, A. Calprotectin instability may lead to undertreatment in children with IBD. Arch Dis Child 2020;105:996–8, https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316584.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. O’Driscoll, S, Piggott, C, Bruce, H, Benton, SC. An evaluation of ten external quality assurance scheme (EQAS) materials for the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:307–13, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0210.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Maclean, W, Singh, R, Mackenzie, P, White, D, Benton, S, Stebbing, J, et al.. The two-week rule colorectal cancer pathway: an update on recent practice, the unsustainable burden on diagnostics and the role of faecal immunochemical testing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020;102:308–11. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0019.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Hiraoka, S, Takashima, S, Inokuchi, T, Nakarai, A, Takahara, M, Harada, K, et al.. The novel latex agglutination turbidimetric immunoassay system for simultaneous measurements of calprotectin and hemoglobin in feces. Intest Res 2019;17:202–9, https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00086.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-11-04
Accepted: 2022-02-27
Published Online: 2022-03-14
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Statistics in diagnostic medicine
  4. Interferences in immunoassays: review and practical algorithm
  5. EFLM Paper
  6. The value proposition of integrative diagnostics for (early) detection of cancer. On behalf of the EFLM interdisciplinary Task and Finish Group “CNAPS/CTC for early detection of cancer”
  7. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  8. Benchmarking medical laboratory performance: survey validation and results for Europe, Middle East, and Africa
  9. Pre-analytical stability of serum biomarkers for neurological disease: neurofilament-light, glial fibrillary acidic protein and contactin-1
  10. Filling in the GAPS: validation of anion gap (AGAP) measurement uncertainty estimates for use in clinical decision making
  11. Implementation and challenges of portable blood gas measurements in air medical transport
  12. Calculation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate using the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation and whole blood creatinine values measured with Radiometer ABL 827 FLEX
  13. Dubiously increased FT4 and FT3 levels in clinically euthyroid patients: clinical finding or analytical pitfall?
  14. Two co-inherited hemoglobin variants revealed by capillary electrophoresis during quantification of glycated hemoglobin
  15. Determination of individual bile acids in acute respiratory distress syndrome reveals a specific pattern of primary and secondary bile acids and a shift to the acidic pathway as an adaptive response to the critical condition
  16. Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin method using the OC-SENSOR PLEDIA
  17. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  18. Reference intervals for Sysmex XN hematological parameters as assessed in the Dutch Lifelines cohort
  19. Cardiovascular Diseases
  20. High incidence of discrepancies in new Siemens assay – a comparison of cardiac troponin I assays
  21. Infectious Diseases
  22. Effect of BNT162b2 booster dose on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike trimeric IgG antibodies in seronegative individuals
  23. The role of neutralizing antibodies by sVNT after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers
  24. Continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children using residual blood samples from routine clinical chemistry
  25. Prognostic significance of soluble CD25 in patients with sepsis: a prospective observational study
  26. Letters to the Editors
  27. Diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasensitive S-PLEX SARS-CoV-2 N electrochemiluminescence immunoassay
  28. Life-threatening autoimmune hemolytic anemia following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: don’t be too prudent with the red gold
  29. CSF-interleukin 6 for early diagnosis of ventriculitis in a broad intensive care setting
  30. Clearance of macro-TSH from the circulation is slower than TSH
  31. Biological variation and reference change value as decision criteria in clinical use of tumor biomarkers. Are they really useful?
  32. Testing for anti-Müllerian hormone: analytical performances and usability of a point-of-care assay
  33. Diagnostic performance characteristics of the Quanta Flash Rheumatoid Factor assay in a consecutive Dutch patient cohort
  34. Trimester-specific reference values for the anticardiolipin antibody by chemiluminescence immunoassay in healthy pregnancy
  35. Congress Abstracts
  36. 4th National Point of Care Testing Symposium
Heruntergeladen am 10.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-0126/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen