Home Medicine The association between activated protein C ratio and Factor V Leiden are gender-dependent
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The association between activated protein C ratio and Factor V Leiden are gender-dependent

  • Rasmus Søgaard Hansen ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Mads Nybo
Published/Copyright: March 23, 2019

Abstract

Background

The most common cause of activated protein C (aPC) resistance is a missense substitution (Arg506Gln), known as Factor V Leiden (FVL). Due to its low cost, many laboratories use the aPC ratio as a primary test with a unisex cut-off. However, the association between the aPC ratio and FVL including any relation to gender has been sparsely investigated.

Methods

Results of the aPC ratio and FVL analyses from 1081 patients referred to the Thrombophilia Clinic at Odense University Hospital were compared.

Results

In 153 FVL positive patients, the mean aPC ratio was 2.1 ± 0.3, which differed from 2.7 ± 0.4 in FVL negative individuals (p < 0.01). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC), with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93, indicated the optimal aPC cut-off at 2.3–2.4, with sensitivity 89%–94%, specificity 71%–84%, positive predictive value 35%–48% and negative predictive value 98%–99%. In FVL positive females, the mean aPC ratio was 2.0 ± 0.3, which differed from males (2.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.05). In FVL negative females, the mean aPC ratio was 2.6 ± 0.4, also different from males (2.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.01). Of note, 35% of FVL negative females had an aPC ratio ≤2.4 against 18% in males (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the aPC ratio is lower in females than in males. Due to a high negative predictive value the aPC ratio can be used as a first line test for FVL, but those found positive must be confirmed with a DNA test.


Corresponding author: Rasmus Søgaard Hansen, MD, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense, Denmark, Phone: +45 2886 2288

Acknowledgments

All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

  6. Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

1. Castoldi E, Rosing J. APC resistance: biological basis and acquired influences. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:445–53.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03711.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Simone B, De Stefano V, Leoncini E, Zacho J, Martinelli I, Emmerich J, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with single and combined effects of Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin 20210A and Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T: a meta-analysis involving over 11,000 cases and 21,000 controls. Eur J Epidemiol 2013;28:621–47.10.1007/s10654-013-9825-8Search in Google Scholar

3. Zöller B, Svensson PJ, He X, Dahlbäck B. Identification of the same factor V gene mutation in 47 out of 50 thrombosis-prone families with inherited resistance to activated protein C. J Clin Invest 1994;94:2521–4.10.1172/JCI117623Search in Google Scholar

4. Bertina RM, Koeleman BP, Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Dirven RJ, de Ronde H, et al. Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C. Nature 1994;369:64–7.10.1038/369064a0Search in Google Scholar

5. Van Cott EM, Khor B, Zehnder JL. Factor V Leiden. Am J Hematol 2016;91:46–9.10.1002/ajh.24222Search in Google Scholar

6. Ridker PM, Miletich JP, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Ethnic distribution of factor V Leiden in 4047 men and women. Implications for venous thromboembolism screening. J Am Med Assoc 1997;277:1305–7.10.1001/jama.277.16.1305Search in Google Scholar

7. Thygesen LC, Ersboll AK. Danish population-based registers for public health and health-related welfare research: introduction to the supplement. Scand J Public Health 2011;39:8–10.10.1177/1403494811409654Search in Google Scholar

8. Larsen TB, Lassen JF, Brandslund I, Byriel L, Petersen GB, Nørgaard-Pedersen B. The Arg506Gln mutation (FV Leiden) among a cohort of 4188 unselected Danish newborns. Thromb Res 1998;89:211–5.10.1016/S0049-3848(98)00010-3Search in Google Scholar

9. Herskovits AZ, Morgan EA, Lemire SJ, Lindeman NI, Dorfman DM. An improved algorithm for activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden screening. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:379–86.10.1309/AJCPO6VUP3MZEYWUSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Zehnder JL, Benson RC. Sensitivity and specificity of the APC resistance assay in detection of individuals with factor V Leiden. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:107–11.10.1093/ajcp/106.1.107Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Sweeney JD, Blair AJ, King TC. Comparison of an activated partial thromboplastin time with a Russell viper venom time test in screening for factor V (Leiden) (FVR506Q). Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:74–7.10.1093/ajcp/108.1.74Search in Google Scholar

12. Strobl FJ, Hoffman S, Huber S, Williams EC, Voelkerding KV. Activated protein C resistance assay performance: improvement by sample dilution with factor V-deficient plasma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:430–3.Search in Google Scholar

13. Steinberg DM, Fine J, Chappell R. Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs. Biostatistics 2009;10:94–105.10.1093/biostatistics/kxn018Search in Google Scholar

14. Parikh P, Mathai A, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:45–50.10.4103/0301-4738.37595Search in Google Scholar

15. Kristoffersen AH, Petersen PH, Rørass T, Sandberg S. Estimates of within-subject biological variation of protein C, antithrombin, protein S free, protein S activity, and activated protein C resistance in pregnant women. Clin Chem 2017;63:898–907.10.1373/clinchem.2016.265900Search in Google Scholar

16. Rühl H, Schröder L, Müller J, Sukhitashvili S, Welz J, Kuhn WC, et al. Impact of hormone-associated resistance to activated protein C on the thrombotic potential of oral contraceptives: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 2014;9:e105007.10.1371/journal.pone.0105007Search in Google Scholar

17. Rühl H, Schröder L, Müller J, Fimmers R, Sukhitashvili S, Welz J, et al. Tamoxifen induces resistance to activated protein C. Thromb Res 2014;133:886–91.10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.004Search in Google Scholar

18. Johnson KC, Aragaki AK, Jackson R, Reiner A, Sandset PM,Rosing J, et al. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor, activated protein C resistance, and risk of coronary heart disease due to combined estrogen plus progestin therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016;36:418–24.10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306905Search in Google Scholar

19. Connors JM. Thrombophilia testing and venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1177–87.10.1056/NEJMra1700365Search in Google Scholar

20. Gouault-Heilmann M, Leroy-Matheron C. Factor V Leiden-dependent APC resistance: improved sensitivity and specificity of the APC resistance test by plasma dilution in factor V-depleted plasma. Thromb Res 1996;82:281–3.10.1016/0049-3848(96)00075-8Search in Google Scholar

21. Aboud MR, Ma DD. A comparison between two activated protein C resistance methods as routine diagnostic tests for factor V Leiden mutation. Br J Haematol 1997;97:798–803.10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.1432958.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kadauke S, Khor B, Van Cott EM. Activated protein C resistance testing for factor V Leiden. Am J Hematol 2014;89:1147–50.10.1002/ajh.23867Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-12-28
Accepted: 2019-02-22
Published Online: 2019-03-23
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. CCLM Award for the Most Cited Paper
  4. Folate and vitamin B12 assays after recalibration to the WHO International Standard 03/178: making the interpretation as simple as possible, but not simpler
  5. Reviews
  6. Blood contamination in salivary diagnostics: current methods and their limitations
  7. Central adrenal insufficiency: open issues regarding diagnosis and glucocorticoid treatment
  8. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  9. Measuring the chronology of the translational process of molecular genetic discoveries
  10. Development and interlaboratory evaluation of a NIST Reference Material RM 8366 for EGFR and MET gene copy number measurements
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Post-translational modification-derived products are associated with frailty status in elderly subjects
  13. Urine chloride self-measurement to monitor sodium chloride intake in patients with chronic kidney disease
  14. Estimated urinary osmolality based on combined urinalysis parameters: a critical evaluation
  15. Measurement of S100B protein: evaluation of a new prototype on a bioMérieux Vidas® 3 analyzer
  16. Measuring thyroglobulin in patients with thyroglobulin autoantibodies: evaluation of the clinical impact of BRAHMS Kryptor® Tg-minirecovery test in a large series of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma
  17. Human chorionic gonadotropin suspected heterophile interference investigations in immunoassays: a recommended approach
  18. Certified reference material against PR3 ANCA IgG autoantibodies. From development to certification
  19. Diagnostic accuracy of a fully automated multiplex celiac disease antibody panel for serum and plasma
  20. Fasting serum bile acids concentration is associated with insulin resistance independently of diabetes status
  21. Hematology and Coagulation
  22. The association between activated protein C ratio and Factor V Leiden are gender-dependent
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Determination of sigma score based on biological variation for haemostasis assays: fit-for-purpose for daily practice?
  25. Calcitonin measurement in pediatrics: reference ranges are gender-dependent, validation in medullary thyroid cancer and thyroid diseases
  26. Cancer Diagnostics
  27. Uncovering the clinical impact of kallikrein-related peptidase 5 (KLK5) mRNA expression in the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. Performance of a novel high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients – evidence for sex-specific differences
  30. Infectious Diseases
  31. Rapid susceptibility testing of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella by glucose metabolization monitoring
  32. Letters to the Editor
  33. Vitamin B12 and folate levels in a healthy population: establishing reference intervals
  34. Reference values of a new serum folate assay traceable to the WHO International Standard
  35. Serum protein electrophoresis and complement deficiencies: a veteran but very versatile test in clinical laboratories
  36. Introduction of a novel ELISA assay for serum AMH determination
  37. Bone alkaline phosphatase on the IDS-iSYS automated analyser; cross-reactivity with intestinal ALP
  38. Evaluation of the MULTISURE HIV Rapid Test in a Korean population with low human immunodeficiency virus prevalence
  39. Vancomycin immunoassay: does the Advia Centaur XPT underestimate the exposure of patients? A method comparison study
  40. Hb Hunan and Hb Hengyang: Two unexpected discoveries during HbA1c measurements
  41. Analytical performance of a CE-marked immunoassay to quantify phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chains
  42. Implementation of an automated method for direct quantification of urinary ammonium
  43. Congress Abstracts
  44. Proceedings of ACBI 2018 41ST Annual Conference Association of Clinical Biochemists in Ireland
Downloaded on 26.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-1382/html
Scroll to top button