Home Uncertainty in measurement and total error: different roads to the same quality destination?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Uncertainty in measurement and total error: different roads to the same quality destination?

  • Ian Farrance EMAIL logo , Tony Badrick and Robert Frenkel
Published/Copyright: June 27, 2018

Abstract

The debate comparing the benefits of measurement uncertainty (uncertainty in measurement, MU) with total error (TE) for the assessment of laboratory performance continues. The summary recently provided in this journal by members of the Task and Finish Group on Total Error (TFG-TE) of the EFLM put the arguments into clear perspective. Even though there is generally strong support for TE in many laboratories, some of the arguments proposed for its on-going support require further comment. In a recent opinion which focused directly on the TFG-TE summary, several potentially confusing statements regarding ISO15189 and the Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) were again promulgated to promote TE methods for assessing uncertainty in laboratory measurement. In this opinion, we present an alternative view of the key issues and outline our views with regard to the relationship between ISO15189, uncertainty in measurement and the GUM.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Guarantor: IF.

  3. Research funding: None declared.

  4. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  5. Honorarium: None declared.

  6. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Oosterhuis WP, Bayat H, Armbruster D, Coskun A, Freeman KP, Kallner A, et al. The use of error and uncertainty methods in the medical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:209–19.10.1515/cclm-2017-0341Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Westgard JO. Error methods are more practical, but uncertainty methods may still be preferred. Clin Chem 2018;64:636–8.10.1373/clinchem.2017.284406Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. International Organization for Standardization. Third edition, ISO 15189:2012, Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. http://www.iso.org/iso/cataloguedetail?csnumber=56115. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bureau International des Pois et Mesures. JCGM 100:2008, Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

5. Farrance I, Badrick T, Sikaris KA. Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1309–11.10.1515/cclm-2016-0314Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). JCGM 200:2012. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

7. Westgard S. Quality requirements and standards – quality goals at the crossroads: growing, going or gone? http://www.westgard.com/gone-goals-gone.htm. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

8. Westgard JO, Westgard S. Making Quality Great Again! I’m with Quality! Some dismay, but less disagreement on MU vs. TE. https://www.westgard.com/make-quality-great-again.htm. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

9. International Organization for Standardization. Draft international standard ISO 15189.2:2002. Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence.Search in Google Scholar

10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2003, Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Organization for Standardization. Second edition, ISO 15189:2007, Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence.Search in Google Scholar

12. Magnusson B, Naykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. Nordtest technical report TR537, edition 1.2, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

13. European co-operation for accreditation. EA guidelines on the expression of uncertainty in quantitative testing. EA-4/16, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

14. European federation of national associations of measurement, testing and analytical laboratories. Guide to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for quantitative test results. Eurolab technical report 1/2006.Search in Google Scholar

15. White GH, Farrance I. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing – a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev 2004;25:S1–S24.Search in Google Scholar

16. Magnusson B, Naykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M, Sahlin E. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. Nordtest technical report TR537, edition 4, 2017. http://www.nordtest.info/index.php/technical-reports/item/handbook-for-calculation-of-measurement-uncertainty-in-environmental-laboratories-nt-tr-537-edition-4.html. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

17. Frenkel RB, Farrance I. A statistical procedure for the assessment of bias in analytical methods using conditional probabilities. Accred Qual Assur 2017;22:265–73.10.1007/s00769-017-1274-8Search in Google Scholar

18. Koerbin G, Sikaris KA, Jones GR, Ryan J, Reed M, Tate J, et al. Evidence-based approach to harmonized reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:99–107.10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Westgard JO, Westgard S. Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53:32–50.10.1177/0004563215597248Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Padoan A, Antonelli G, Aita A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assurance schemes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1696–701.10.1515/cclm-2016-0896Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM). Database of higher-order reference materials and measurement methods. https://www.bipm.org/jctlm. Accessed: May 2018.Search in Google Scholar

22. Farrance I, Frenkel R. Uncertainty of measurement: a review of the rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:49–75.Search in Google Scholar

23. Theodorsson E. Uncertainty in measurement and total error, tools for coping with diagnostic uncertainty. Clin Lab Med 2017;37:15–34.10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Expression of Measurement Uncertainty in Laboratory Medicine; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP29-A, CLSI, Wayne, PA, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

25. Farrance I, Frenkel R. Uncertainty in measurement: a review of Monte Carlo simulation using Microsoft Excel for the calculation of uncertainties through functional relationships, including uncertainties in empirically derived constants. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:37–61.Search in Google Scholar

26. Frenkel RB, Farrance I. Uncertainty in measurement: procedures for determining uncertainty with application to clinical laboratory calculations. Adv Clin Chem 2018;85:149–211.10.1016/bs.acc.2018.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Farrance I, Badrick T, Frenkel R. Uncertainty in measurement: a review of the procedures for determining uncertainty in measurement and its use in deriving the biological variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Pract Lab Med 2018 in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.PLABM.2018.e00097.10.1016/j.PLABM.2018.e00097Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2018-04-22
Accepted: 2018-06-07
Published Online: 2018-06-27
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Observing an analyzer’s operational life cycle: a useful management tool for clinical laboratories
  4. Reviews
  5. Personalized laboratory medicine: a patient-centered future approach
  6. Circular RNAs: a new class of biomarkers as a rising interest in laboratory medicine
  7. Mini Review
  8. Impact of interactions between drugs and laboratory test results on diagnostic test interpretation – a systematic review
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Uncertainty in measurement and total error: different roads to the same quality destination?
  11. Guidelines and Recommendations
  12. Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Evidence for the positive impact of ISO 9001 and ISO 15189 quality systems on laboratory performance – evaluation of immunohaematology external quality assessment results during 19 years in Austria
  15. Effects of high-dose, intravenous lipid emulsion on laboratory tests in humans: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical crossover trial
  16. Commutability of the certified reference materials for the standardization of β-amyloid 1-42 assay in human cerebrospinal fluid: lessons for tau and β-amyloid 1-40 measurements
  17. Failure rate prediction of equipment: can Weibull distribution be applied to automated hematology analyzers?
  18. Evaluation of serum alkaline phosphatase measurement through the 4-year trueness verification program in China
  19. Increased serum concentrations of soluble ST2 predict mortality after burn injury
  20. The clinical significance of borderline results of the Elia CTD Screen assay
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. Reference intervals for 33 biochemical analytes in healthy Indian population: C-RIDL IFCC initiative
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. BCL2L12 improves risk stratification and prediction of BFM-chemotherapy response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. The correlation between glucose fluctuation from self-monitored blood glucose and the major adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome during a 6-month follow-up by WeChat application
  27. Diabetes
  28. Impact of blood cell counts and volumes on glucose concentration in uncentrifuged serum and lithium-heparin blood tubes
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Standard process-oriented workflow introduces pre-analytical error when used in large study sample batches
  31. Comparison of three staining methods in the automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60
  32. Detection of Plasmodium falciparum using automated digital cell morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60
  33. Serum ischemia-modified albumin concentration may reflect long-term hypoxia in chronic respiratory disease: a pilot study
  34. Wet absorptive microsampling at home for HbA1c monitoring in diabetic children
  35. Serum endocan levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a potential role in the evaluation of susceptibility to exacerbation
  36. Analytical and clinical validation of the new Roche Elecsys Vitamin D Total II assay
  37. Analytical validation of two second generation thyroglobulin immunoassays (Roche and Thermo Fisher)
  38. Omission of preservatives during 24-h of urine collection for the analysis of fractionated metanephrines enhance patient convenience
  39. Transient monoclonal gammopathy in a 2-year-old child with combined viral and bacterial infection
  40. Nephelometric assay of urine free light chains: an alternative and early clinical test for Bence-Jones protein quantification
  41. Congress Abstracts
  42. Congress of Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry 7th Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC)
  43. 50th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
  44. Revolution drives Evolution – from measuring to understanding: Annual meeting of Swiss Society of Clinical Chemistry (SSCC) in Bern, November 15-16 2018
Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0421/html
Scroll to top button