Home A design for external quality assessment for the analysis of thiopurine drugs: pitfalls and opportunities
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A design for external quality assessment for the analysis of thiopurine drugs: pitfalls and opportunities

  • Karen Robijns EMAIL logo , Matthijs van Luin , Rob T.P. Jansen , Cees Neef and Daan J. Touw
Published/Copyright: August 15, 2018

Abstract

Background

For the analysis of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR), no external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) is currently available and no quality control samples can be made because of the absence of pure substances. An experimental design is tested to compare laboratory analytical results.

Methods

In this EQAS, participating laboratories were asked to select patient samples from their routine analysis and exchange these with a coupled laboratory. Because of large differences in results between laboratories, all standard operating procedures were reviewed, revealing that the origin of these differences could be in the method of hydrolysis and the preparation of calibrators. To investigate the contribution of the calibrators to these differences, one participating laboratory was asked to prepare a batch of calibrators to be shipped to the participating laboratories for analysis.

Results

Results for 6-TGN differed more between laboratories, compared with results for 6-MMPR. For 6-TGN and 6-MMPR 43% and 24% of the results, respectively, were out of the 80%–120% range. When correcting the results from the exchange of the patient samples with the results of the calibrators, the mean absolute difference for 6-TGN improved from 24.8% to 16.3% (p<0.001), while the results for 6-MMPR worsened from 17.3% to 20.0% (p=0.020).

Conclusions

This first EQAS for thiopurine drugs shows that there is a difference between laboratories in the analysis of 6-TGN, and to a lesser extent in the analysis of 6-MMPR. This difference for 6-TGN can partially be explained by the use of in-house-prepared calibrators that differ among the participants.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Moreau AC, Paul S, Del Tedesco E, Rinaudo-Gaujous M, Boukhadra N, Genin C, et al. Association between 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels and clinical remission in inflammatory disease: a meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:464–71.10.1097/01.MIB.0000439068.71126.00Search in Google Scholar

2. Dubinsky MC, Lamothe S, Yang HY, Targan SR, Sinnett D, Théorêt Y, et al. Pharmacogenomics and metabolite measurement for 6-mercaptopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2000;118:705–13.10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70140-5Search in Google Scholar

3. Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO/IEC 15189:2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jansen RT, Cobbaert CM, Weykamp C, Thelen M. The quest for equivalence of test results: the pilgrimage of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 program for metrological traceability. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1673–84.10.1515/cclm-2017-0796Search in Google Scholar

5. Conformity assessment – general requirements for proficiency testing. ISO/IEC 17043:2010.Search in Google Scholar

6. de Graaf P, Vos RM, de Boer NH, Sinjewel A, Jharap B, Mulder CJ, et al. Limited stability of thiopurine metabolites in blood samples: relevant in research and clinical practice. J Chromatogr B 2010;878:1437–42.10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.03.004Search in Google Scholar

7. Dervieux T, Boulieu R. Simultaneous determination of 6-thioguanine and methyl 6-mercaptopurine nucleotides of azathioprine in red blood cells by HPLC. Clin Chem 1998;44:551–5.10.1093/clinchem/44.3.551Search in Google Scholar

8. Shipkova M, Armstrong VA, Wieland E, Oellerich M. Differences in nucleotide hydrolysis contribute to the differences between erythrocyte 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations determined by two widely used methods. Clin Chem 2003;49:260–8.10.1373/49.2.260Search in Google Scholar

9. Lennard L. Assay of 6-thioinosinic acid and 6-thioguanine nucleotides, active metabolites of 6-mercaptopurine, in human red blood cells. J Chromatogr 1987;423:169–78.10.1016/0378-4347(87)80340-7Search in Google Scholar

10. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 Rev. 1.Search in Google Scholar

11. Aarnoutse RE, Verweij-van Wissen CP, van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer EW, Wuis EW, Koopmans PP, Hekser YA, et al. International interlaboratory quality control program for measurement of antiretroviral drugs in plasma. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:884–6.10.1128/AAC.46.3.884-886.2002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Droste JA, Aarnoutse RE, Koopmans PP, Hekster YA, Burger DM. Evaluation of antiretroviral drug measurements by an interlaboratory quality control program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;32:287–91.10.1097/00126334-200303010-00007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Burger D, Teulen M, Eerland J, Harteveld A, Aarnoutse R, Touw D. The International interlaboratory quality control program for measurement of antiretroviral drugs in plasma: a global proficiency testing program. Ther Drug Monit 2011;33:239–43.10.1097/FTD.0b013e31820fa528Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-02-01
Accepted: 2018-07-11
Published Online: 2018-08-15
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Blowin’ in the wind
  4. Standardization and harmonization of autoimmune diagnostics
  5. On the complexity of hemostasis and the need for harmonization of test practice
  6. Harmonization of laboratory hematology: a long and winding journey
  7. Section 1: Current Harmonization Activities at Global Level
  8. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?
  9. Harmonization of External Quality Assessment Schemes and their role – clinical chemistry and beyond
  10. An overview of EFLM harmonization activities in Europe
  11. Metrological traceability and harmonization of medical tests: a quantum leap forward is needed to keep pace with globalization and stringent IVD-regulations in the 21st century!
  12. Assessment of bone turnover in osteoporosis: harmonization of the total testing process
  13. Recent initiatives in harmonization of hemostasis practice
  14. EASI – European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative: facing the challenges of diagnostics in autoimmunity
  15. Harmonization of microbiology processes and standards: work in progress
  16. Harmonization initiatives in the generation, reporting and application of biological variation data
  17. Harmonization of accreditation to ISO15189
  18. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation
  19. Section 2: Pre-Pre and Pre-Analytical Phase
  20. Laboratory testing in the emergency department: an Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC) consensus report
  21. The EFLM strategy for harmonization of the preanalytical phase
  22. Section 3: The Analytical Phase
  23. The roadmap for harmonization: status of the International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results
  24. The quest for equivalence of test results: the pilgrimage of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 program for metrological traceability
  25. Current state and recommendations for harmonization of serum/plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone mass spectrometry methods
  26. International normalized ratio (INR) testing in Europe: between-laboratory comparability of test results obtained by Quick and Owren reagents
  27. Detecting molecular forms of antithrombin by LC-MRM-MS: defining the measurands
  28. A design for external quality assessment for the analysis of thiopurine drugs: pitfalls and opportunities
  29. Harmonization of PCR-based detection of intestinal pathogens: experiences from the Dutch external quality assessment scheme on molecular diagnosis of protozoa in stool samples
  30. Harmonization of urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) results: a study based on an external quality assessment program in Polish laboratories
  31. Standardization of autoimmune testing – is it feasible?
  32. Diagnostic laboratory tests for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: unmet needs towards harmonization
  33. Clinically relevant discrepancies between different rheumatoid factor assays
  34. An international survey on anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) testing in daily clinical practice
  35. Predictive autoimmunity using autoantibodies: screening for anti-nuclear antibodies
  36. Harmonization in autoimmune thyroid disease diagnostics
  37. International consensus on antinuclear antibody patterns: definition of the AC-29 pattern associated with antibodies to DNA topoisomerase I
  38. Reference standards for the detection of anti-mitochondrial and anti-rods/rings autoantibodies
  39. International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: defining negative results and reporting unidentified patterns
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0116/pdf
Scroll to top button