Startseite Urinary measurement of circulating tumor DNA for treatment monitoring and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Urinary measurement of circulating tumor DNA for treatment monitoring and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients

  • Tao Song , Fei Mao , Li Shi , Xuemei Xu , Zirong Wu , Juan Zhou und Meifang Xiao EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juli 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background

Solid tumor tissue testing is the gold standard for molecular-based assays for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This poses challenges during treatment monitoring. Total DNA derived from urine specimens offers clear advantages to track the disease dynamics. Our study aims to evaluate the sensitivity for total DNA recovered from urine and its clinical relevance to mCRC.

Methods

KRAS mutations in urine specimens were examined in 150 mCRC patients. Baseline concordance was established to determined clinical relevance. The total DNA quantities were also prospectively examined in serial samplings during treatment.

Results

Analysis of the genetic mutations showed good agreement for baseline samples. Matched tumor and urine specimens’ molecular profiles were observed to have 90% concordance. Comparing with healthy volunteers, we established a cutoff of 8.15 ng that demonstrated elevated total DNA levels was associated with mCRC patients (sensitivity: 90.7%; specificity: 82.0%). For patients treated with chemotherapy or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, DNA quantity mirrored early treatment response. Survival analysis showed that patients with sustained elevated quantities of KRAS mutations had poorer outcome.

Conclusions

Total urine DNA offers a viable complement for mutation profiling in mCRC patients, given the good agreement with matched tumor samples. Our study also established that this is specific based on the results from healthy individuals. Serial monitoring of total DNA levels allowed early prediction to treatment response and was effective to identify high risk patients. This is potentially useful to complement current disease management.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by a research grant provided by Xiangyang No. 1 People’s Hospital.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Lee JJ, Chu E. An update on treatment advances for the first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer J 2007; 13:276–81.10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181570062Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Kirchner T, Boeck S, Jung A. Clinical relevance of EGFR-and KRAS-status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR. Cancer Treat Rev 2009;35:262–71.10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.11.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Morgan SR, Whiteley J, Donald E, Smith J, Eisenberg MT, Kallam E, et al. Comparison of KRAS mutation assessment in tumor DNA and circulating free DNA in plasma and serum samples. Clin Med Insights Pathol 2012;5:15–22.10.4137/CPath.S8798Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Math M, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366:883–92.10.1056/NEJMoa1113205Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Haber DA, Velculescu VE. Blood-based analyses of cancer: circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Cancer Discov 2014;4:650–61.10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-1014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Paterlini-Brechot P, Benali NL. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detection: clinical impact and future directions. Cancer Lett 2007;253:180–204.10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:426–37.10.1038/nrc3066Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Ratain MJ, Siu LL. Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 2013;501:355–64.10.1038/nature12627Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Chen KZ, Lou F, Yang F, Zhang JB, Ye H, Chen W, et al. Circulating tumor DNA detection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients by targeted sequencing. Sci Rep 2016;6:31985.10.1038/srep31985Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Ma F, Zhu W, Guan Y, Yang L, Xia X, Chen S, et al. ctDNA dynamics: a novel indicator to track resistance in metastatic breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 therapy. Oncotarget 2016;7:66020–31.10.18632/oncotarget.11791Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Siravegna G, Marsoni S, Siena S, Bardelli A. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14:531–48.10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Yu J, Zhu T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Qian Z, Xu H, et al. A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:7296–304.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0861Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Thierry AR, El Messaoudi S, Gahan PB, Anker P, Stroun M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016;35:347–76.10.1007/s10555-016-9629-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med 2008;14:985–90.10.1038/nm.1789Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Peeters M, Price T, Van Laethem J-L. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: where are we today? Oncologist 2009;14:29–39.10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0167Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Karlovich C, Goldman JW, Sun JM, Mann E, Sequist LV, Konopa K, et al. Assessment of EGFR mutation status in matched plasma and tumor tissue of NSCLC patients from a phase I study of rociletinib (CO-1686). Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:2386–95.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1260Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Thress KS, Brant R, Carr TH, Dearden S, Jenkins S, Brown H, et al. EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA from NSCLC patient plasma: a cross-platform comparison of leading technologies to support the clinical development of AZD9291. Lung Cancer 2015;90:509–15.10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Joung JG, Bae JS, Kim SC, Jung H, Park WY, Song SY. Genomic characterization and comparison of multi-regional and pooled tumor biopsy specimens. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152574.10.1371/journal.pone.0152574Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Tan C, Du X. KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:5171–80.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Yeo T, Tan SJ, Lim CL, Lau DP, Chua YW, Krisna SS, et al. Microfluidic enrichment for the single cell analysis of circulating tumor cells. Sci Rep 2016;6:22076.10.1038/srep22076Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0675).


Received: 2017-07-29
Accepted: 2018-06-22
Published Online: 2018-07-17
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Obituary
  3. Jillian Russyll (AKA Jill) Tate
  4. Editorial
  5. The long way to standardization of practices: HbA1c as archetypal example
  6. Reviews
  7. Secretory tumors of the pituitary gland: a clinical biochemistry perspective
  8. Thalassemia in the laboratory: pearls, pitfalls, and promises
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Diagnostic biomarkers of muscle injury and exertional rhabdomyolysis
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Patient’s knowledge and awareness about the effect of the over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and dietary supplements on laboratory test results: a survey in 18 European countries
  13. National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017
  14. Urinary albumin strip assay as a screening test to replace quantitative technology in certain conditions
  15. Cerebrospinal fluid free kappa light chains and kappa index perform equal to oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  16. Different immunoreactivity of monomers and dimers makes automated free light chains assays not equivalent
  17. The utility of saliva testing in the estimation of uremic toxin levels in serum
  18. Determination of cannabinoids in oral fluid and urine of “light cannabis” consumers: a pilot study
  19. Moving from the second to the third generation Roche PTH assays: what are the consequences for clinical practice?
  20. Baseline hepcidin measurement in the differential diagnosis of anaemia for elderly patients and its correlation with the increment of transferrin saturation following an oral iron absorption test
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. A multicenter study for the evaluation of the reference interval for TSH in Italy (ELAS TSH Italian Study)
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. Urinary measurement of circulating tumor DNA for treatment monitoring and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients
  25. BCL2L12: a multiply spliced gene with independent prognostic significance in breast cancer
  26. Diabetes
  27. The global impact of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Education and Management Division: engaging stakeholders and assessing HbA1c quality in a multicentre study across China
  28. The frequency of testing for glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, is linked to the probability of achieving target levels in patients with suboptimally controlled diabetes mellitus
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Response to article by Caponi et al. about serum free light chains
  31. Response to Letter to the Editor about immunochemical measurement of urine free light chains
  32. Estimated GFR-specific 99th percentiles for high-sensitive cardiac troponin T based on the adjusted analytical change limit (adjACL) in hospitalized patients
  33. Perioperative heart-type fatty acid binding protein concentration cutoffs for the identification of severe acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  34. A peculiar reaction curve with dual spikes in absorbance during a total bilirubin assay in spite of accurate results induced by high M-protein concentration
  35. Extremely low high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol due to an unusual non-inherited cause: a case report
  36. A single-center performance evaluation of the fully automated iFlash anti-Müllerian hormone immunoassay
  37. Genetic polymorphisms and variants in the LDL receptor associated with familial hypercholesterolemia: cascade screening and identification of the variants 666C>A, 862G>A, 901G>A, and 919G>A of a Brazilian family
  38. Undetected paraganglioma by functional imaging techniques: case report
  39. A particular case of AML patient with the polymorphism G105G (rs11554137) and the missense mutation R132C in IDH1 gene
  40. Atypical “hairy cell-like” presentation of leukemic mantle cell lymphoma
  41. Evaluation of a rapid centrifugation step (4500 g for 2 min) in coagulation assays to monitor direct oral anticoagulants
Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-0675/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen