Home Medicine BCL2L12: a multiply spliced gene with independent prognostic significance in breast cancer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

BCL2L12: a multiply spliced gene with independent prognostic significance in breast cancer

  • Athina Kladi-Skandali , Diamantis C. Sideris and Andreas Scorilas ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 16, 2018

Abstract

Background

Alternative splicing is a key process in carcinogenesis and, from a clinical aspect, holds great promises, as alternatively spliced variants have emerged as an untapped source of diagnostic and prognostic markers. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of three recently recognized splice variants of the apoptosis-related gene, BCL2L12, in breast cancer (BC).

Methods

Total RNA was extracted from breast samples (150 BC and 80 tumor-adjacent normal tissues) and, following cDNA synthesis, a variant-specific qPCR was performed for the expressional quantification of BCL2L12 v.1, v.2 and v.4 transcript variants. Extensive statistical analysis, including bootstrap resampling and internal validation, was conducted in order to evaluate the associations of v.1, v.2 and v.4 expression with patients’ clinopathological and survival data.

Results

All examined BCL2L12 variants were significantly upregulated in BC specimens compared to their non-cancerous counterpart (v.1, p<0.001; v.2, p=0.009; v.4, p=0.004). Increased BCL2L12 v.4 mRNA expression was associated with markers of unfavorable prognosis namely, advanced tumor grade (p=0.002), ER- (p=0.015)/PR- (p<0.001) negativity, Ki-67-positivity (p=0.007) and high NPI (Nottingham prognostic index) score (p=0.033). Moreover, v.4 was significantly overexpressed in women with triple negative BC (TNBC) and HER2-positive tumors compared to those harboring luminal tumors (p<0.001). Survival analysis disclosed that BCL2L12 v.2 overexpression, as a continuous variable ([HR]=0.45, 95% CI=0.17–0.82, p=0.010), is a strong and independent marker of favorable prognosis for BC patients. Interestingly, v.2 retains its prognostic value in patients with Grade II/III ([HR]=0.21, 95% CI=0.05–0.57, p=0.006) or HER2-positive/TNBC tumors ([HR]=0.25, 95% CI=0.05–0.74, p=0.042).

Conclusions

BCL2L12 v.1, v.2, v.4 are aberrantly expressed in BC. Their expressional analysis by cost-effective molecular methods could provide a novel molecular tool for BC management.


Corresponding author: Dr. Andreas Scorilas, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 15701 Panepistimiopolis, Athens, Greece, Phone: +30-210-727-4306, Fax: +30-210-727-4158

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. A. Ardavanis (First Department of Oncology, “St. Savvas” Anticancer Hospital, Athens, Greece) for kindly providing breast tissue samples along with detailed patient characteristics, tumor clinical and histopathological features and for his thorough revision of our manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Rivenbark AG, O’Connor SM, Coleman WB. Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine. Am J Pathol 2013;183:1113–24.10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Siddiqa A, Long LM, Li L, Marciniak RA, Kazhdan I. Expression of HER-2 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells modulates anti-apoptotic proteins Survivin and Bcl-2 via the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways. BMC Cancer 2008;8:129.10.1186/1471-2407-8-129Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Cittelly DM, Das PM, Salvo VA, Fonseca JP, Burow ME, Jones FE. Oncogenic HER2{Delta}16 suppresses miR-15a/16 and deregulates BCL-2 to promote endocrine resistance of breast tumors. Carcinogenesis 2010;31:2049–57.10.1093/carcin/bgq192Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Schiff R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Arpino G, Rimawi M, et al. Advanced concepts in estrogen receptor biology and breast cancer endocrine resistance: implicated role of growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005;56(Suppl 1):10–20.10.1007/s00280-005-0108-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Dawson SJ, Makretsov N, Blows FM, Driver KE, Provenzano E, Le Quesne J, et al. BCL2 in breast cancer: a favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received. Br J Cancer 2010;103:668–75.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605736Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Callagy GM, Webber MJ, Pharoah PD, Caldas C. Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2008;8:153.10.1186/1471-2407-8-153Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Hwang KT, Woo JW, Shin HC, Kim HS, Ahn SK, Moon HG, et al. Prognostic influence of BCL2 expression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2012;131:E1109–19.10.1002/ijc.27539Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Callagy GM, Pharoah PD, Pinder SE, Hsu FD, Nielsen TO, Ragaz J, et al. Bcl-2 is a prognostic marker in breast cancer independently of the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2468–75.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2719Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Cronin M, Sangli C, Liu ML, Pho M, Dutta D, Nguyen A, et al. Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX genomic diagnostic test for recurrence prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Chem 2007;53:1084–91.10.1373/clinchem.2006.076497Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Adamopoulos PG, Kontos CK, Tsiakanikas P, Scorilas A. Identification of novel alternative splice variants of the BCL2L12 gene in human cancer cells using next-generation sequencing methodology. Cancer Lett 2016;373:119–29.10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Stegh AH, Kim H, Bachoo RM, Forloney KL, Zhang J, Schulze H, et al. Bcl2L12 inhibits post-mitochondrial apoptosis signaling in glioblastoma. Genes Dev 2007;21:98–111.10.1101/gad.1480007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Stegh AH, Chin L, Louis DN, DePinho RA. What drives intense apoptosis resistance and propensity for necrosis in glioblastoma? A role for Bcl2L12 as a multifunctional cell death regulator. Cell Cycle 2008;7:2833–9.10.4161/cc.7.18.6759Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Stegh AH, Kesari S, Mahoney JE, Jenq HT, Forloney KL, Protopopov A, et al. Bcl2L12-mediated inhibition of effector caspase-3 and caspase-7 via distinct mechanisms in glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:10703–8.10.1073/pnas.0712034105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Stegh AH, Brennan C, Mahoney JA, Forloney KL, Jenq HT, Luciano JP, et al. Glioma oncoprotein Bcl2L12 inhibits the p53 tumor suppressor. Genes Dev 2010;24:2194–204.10.1101/gad.1924710Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Yang MC, Loh JK, Li YY, Huang WS, Chou CH, Cheng JT, et al. Bcl2L12 with a BH3-like domain in regulating apoptosis and TMZ-induced autophagy: a prospective combination of ABT-737 and TMZ for treating glioma. Int J Oncol 2015;46: 1304–16.10.3892/ijo.2015.2838Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mathioudaki K, Scorilas A, Papadokostopoulou A, Xynopoulos D, Arnogianaki N, Agnanti N, et al. Expression analysis of BCL2L12, a new member of apoptosis-related genes, in colon cancer. Biol Chem 2004;385:779–83.10.1515/BC.2004.101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Foutadakis S, Avgeris M, Tokas T, Stravodimos K, Scorilas A. Increased BCL2L12 expression predicts the short-term relapse of patients with TaT1 bladder cancer following transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Urol Oncol 2014;32:39 e29–36.10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Geomela PA, Kontos CK, Yiotakis I, Scorilas A. Quantitative expression analysis of the apoptosis-related gene, BCL2L12, in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2013;42:154–61.10.1111/j.1600-0714.2012.01190.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Thomadaki H, Floros KV, Pavlovic S, Tosic N, Gourgiotis D, Colovic M, et al. Overexpression of the novel member of the BCL2 gene family, BCL2L12, is associated with the disease outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Biochem 2012;45:1362–7.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Papageorgiou SG, Kontos CK, Pappa V, Thomadaki H, Kontsioti F, Dervenoulas J, et al. The novel member of the BCL2 gene family, BCL2L12, is substantially elevated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, supporting its value as a significant biomarker. Oncologist 2011;16:1280–91.10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0349Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Florou D, Papadopoulos IN, Scorilas A. Molecular analysis and prognostic impact of the novel apoptotic gene BCL2L12 in gastric cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010;391:214–8.10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Avgeris M, Stamati L, Kontos CK, Piatopoulou D, Marmarinos A, Xagorari M, et al. BCL2L12 improves risk stratification and prediction of BFM-chemotherapy response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:2104–18.10.1515/cclm-2018-0507Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, Statistics Subcommittee of NCIEWGoCD. Reporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;100:229–35.10.1007/s10549-006-9242-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ, Panel members. Strategies for subtypes – dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1736–47.10.1093/annonc/mdr304Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2206–23.10.1093/annonc/mdt303Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Kontos CK, Scorilas A. Molecular cloning of novel alternatively spliced variants of BCL2L12, a new member of the BCL2 gene family, and their expression analysis in cancer cells. Gene 2012;505:153–66.10.1016/j.gene.2012.04.084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. de Kok JB, Roelofs RW, Giesendorf BA, Pennings JL, Waas ET, Feuth T, et al. Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes. Lab Invest 2005;85:154–9.10.1038/labinvest.3700208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7252–9.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0713Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Brinkman BM. Splice variants as cancer biomarkers. Clin Biochem 2004;37:584–94.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Tzovaras A, Kladi-Skandali A, Michaelidou K, Zografos GC, Missitzis I, Ardavanis A, et al. BCL2L12: a promising molecular prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. Clin Biochem 2014;47:257–62.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.09.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Thomadaki H, Talieri M, Scorilas A. Prognostic value of the apoptosis related genes BCL2 and BCL2L12 in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2007;247:48–55.10.1016/j.canlet.2006.03.016Search in Google Scholar

32. Williams MM, Cook RS. Bcl-2 family proteins in breast development and cancer: could Mcl-1 targeting overcome therapeutic resistance? Oncotarget 2015;6:3519–30.10.18632/oncotarget.2792Search in Google Scholar

33. Gunthert U, Hofmann M, Rudy W, Reber S, Zoller M, Haussmann I, et al. A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells. Cell 1991;65:13–24.10.1016/0092-8674(91)90403-LSearch in Google Scholar

34. Yamaguchi F, Saya H, Bruner JM, Morrison RS. Differential expression of two fibroblast growth factor-receptor genes is associated with malignant progression in human astrocytomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:484–8.10.1073/pnas.91.2.484Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Eom YH, Kim HS, Lee A, Song BJ, Chae BJ. BCL2 as a subtype-specific prognostic marker for breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 2016;19:252–60.10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.252Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Honma N, Horii R, Ito Y, Saji S, Younes M, Iwase T, et al. Differences in clinical importance of Bcl-2 in breast cancer according to hormone receptors status or adjuvant endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 2015;15:698.10.1186/s12885-015-1686-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Escorcio-Dourado CS, Martins LM, Simplicio-Revoredo CM, Sampaio FA, Tavares CB, da Silva-Sampaio JP, et al. Bcl-2 antigen expression in luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Med Oncol 2017;34:161.10.1007/s12032-017-1022-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Chen LY, Tsang JY, Ni YB, Chan SK, Chan KF, Zhang S, et al. Bcl2 and Ki67 refine prognostication in luminal breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;149:631–43.10.1007/s10549-015-3288-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Hwang KT, Kim K, Chang JH, Oh S, Kim YA, Lee JY, et al. BCL2 regulation according to molecular subtype of breast cancer by analysis of the cancer genome atlas database. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:658–69.10.4143/crt.2017.134Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Nadler Y, Camp RL, Giltnane JM, Moeder C, Rimm DL, Kluger HM, et al. Expression patterns and prognostic value of Bag-1 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R35.10.1186/bcr1998Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Trere D, Montanaro L, Ceccarelli C, Barbieri S, Cavrini G, Santini D, et al. Prognostic relevance of a novel semiquantitative classification of Bcl2 immunohistochemical expression in human infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1004–14.10.1093/annonc/mdm074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Malamou-Mitsi V, Gogas H, Dafni U, Bourli A, Fillipidis T, Sotiropoulou M, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of p53 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1504–11.10.1093/annonc/mdl147Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Martinez-Arribas F, Alvarez T, Del Val G, Martin-Garabato E, Nunez-Villar MJ, Lucas R, et al. Bcl-2 expression in breast cancer: a comparative study at the mRNA and protein level. Anticancer Res 2007;27:219–22.Search in Google Scholar

44. Eguchi H, Suga K, Saji H, Toi M, Nakachi K, Hayashi SI. Different expression patterns of Bcl-2 family genes in breast cancer by estrogen receptor status with special reference to pro-apoptotic Bak gene. Cell Death Differ 2000;7:439–46.10.1038/sj.cdd.4400675Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Pandya V, Glubrecht D, Vos L, Hanson J, Damaraju S, Mackey J, et al. The pro-apoptotic paradox: the BH3-only protein Bcl-2 interacting killer (Bik) is prognostic for unfavorable outcomes in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2016;7:33272–85.10.18632/oncotarget.8924Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Ichim G, Lopez J, Ahmed SU, Muthalagu N, Giampazolias E, Delgado ME, et al. Limited mitochondrial permeabilization causes DNA damage and genomic instability in the absence of cell death. Mol Cell 2015;57:860–72.10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0272).


Received: 2018-03-14
Accepted: 2018-09-06
Published Online: 2018-10-16
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Obituary
  3. Jillian Russyll (AKA Jill) Tate
  4. Editorial
  5. The long way to standardization of practices: HbA1c as archetypal example
  6. Reviews
  7. Secretory tumors of the pituitary gland: a clinical biochemistry perspective
  8. Thalassemia in the laboratory: pearls, pitfalls, and promises
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Diagnostic biomarkers of muscle injury and exertional rhabdomyolysis
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Patient’s knowledge and awareness about the effect of the over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and dietary supplements on laboratory test results: a survey in 18 European countries
  13. National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017
  14. Urinary albumin strip assay as a screening test to replace quantitative technology in certain conditions
  15. Cerebrospinal fluid free kappa light chains and kappa index perform equal to oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  16. Different immunoreactivity of monomers and dimers makes automated free light chains assays not equivalent
  17. The utility of saliva testing in the estimation of uremic toxin levels in serum
  18. Determination of cannabinoids in oral fluid and urine of “light cannabis” consumers: a pilot study
  19. Moving from the second to the third generation Roche PTH assays: what are the consequences for clinical practice?
  20. Baseline hepcidin measurement in the differential diagnosis of anaemia for elderly patients and its correlation with the increment of transferrin saturation following an oral iron absorption test
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. A multicenter study for the evaluation of the reference interval for TSH in Italy (ELAS TSH Italian Study)
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. Urinary measurement of circulating tumor DNA for treatment monitoring and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients
  25. BCL2L12: a multiply spliced gene with independent prognostic significance in breast cancer
  26. Diabetes
  27. The global impact of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Education and Management Division: engaging stakeholders and assessing HbA1c quality in a multicentre study across China
  28. The frequency of testing for glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, is linked to the probability of achieving target levels in patients with suboptimally controlled diabetes mellitus
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Response to article by Caponi et al. about serum free light chains
  31. Response to Letter to the Editor about immunochemical measurement of urine free light chains
  32. Estimated GFR-specific 99th percentiles for high-sensitive cardiac troponin T based on the adjusted analytical change limit (adjACL) in hospitalized patients
  33. Perioperative heart-type fatty acid binding protein concentration cutoffs for the identification of severe acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  34. A peculiar reaction curve with dual spikes in absorbance during a total bilirubin assay in spite of accurate results induced by high M-protein concentration
  35. Extremely low high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol due to an unusual non-inherited cause: a case report
  36. A single-center performance evaluation of the fully automated iFlash anti-Müllerian hormone immunoassay
  37. Genetic polymorphisms and variants in the LDL receptor associated with familial hypercholesterolemia: cascade screening and identification of the variants 666C>A, 862G>A, 901G>A, and 919G>A of a Brazilian family
  38. Undetected paraganglioma by functional imaging techniques: case report
  39. A particular case of AML patient with the polymorphism G105G (rs11554137) and the missense mutation R132C in IDH1 gene
  40. Atypical “hairy cell-like” presentation of leukemic mantle cell lymphoma
  41. Evaluation of a rapid centrifugation step (4500 g for 2 min) in coagulation assays to monitor direct oral anticoagulants
Downloaded on 17.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0272/html
Scroll to top button