Startseite Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept

  • Graham Ross Dallas Jones EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Mai 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The uncertainty of a measurement result is a fundamental concept in metrology indicating the range within the “true” value of a measurement should lie. Although not commonly reported with results, the calculation of measurement uncertainty (MU) has become common in routine clinical laboratories. Interpretation of numerical pathology results is made by comparison with data from other measurements. As MU is aimed at assisting with result interpretation, it should be related to the specific comparison being made. There are three basic type of comparators: a previous result from the same patient, a population reference interval, or a clinical decision point. For each comparison, the “true” value is that which would have been obtained from the instrument used to make the comparator measurements if it was measured without uncertainty. The MU is the range of likely deviations from this true value due to the method used to produce the result under interpretation. For patient monitoring, if the two measurements were made on the same analyzer, the uncertainty is the imprecision of the assay over the relevant time frame. In comparing with a manufacturer-specific reference interval, the MU is deviation from the manufacturer’s master calibrator. For clinical decision points produced with the assays traceable to international references, the MU is related to deviation from that reference standard. For optimal use of MU in the clinical laboratory, it may be necessary to consider the use of the test result and the concept of a single MU for each result may need to be revised.

  1. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 2008;100.Suche in Google Scholar

2. ISO 15189:2012 Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

3. White GH, Farrance I. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing – a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev 2004;25(Suppl ii):S1–24.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Requirements for the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty. National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Committee (NPAAC), 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). JCGM 2008;200.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Fraser CG. Reference change values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:807–12.10.1515/cclm.2011.733Suche in Google Scholar

7. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020–35.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, and the ADQI workgroup. Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004;8:R204–12.10.1186/cc2872Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Jones GR. Validating common reference intervals in routine laboratories. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:119–21.10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Jones GR, Jackson C. The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) – its history and operation. Clin Chim Acta 2016;453:86–94.10.1016/j.cca.2015.11.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Sec. 2. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl 1):S8–16.10.2337/dc15-S005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. eGFR based on serum creatinine or cystatin C (KDIGO). KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1–150.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-4-14
Accepted: 2016-4-15
Published Online: 2016-5-13
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Laboratory analytical quality – the process continues
  4. Measurement uncertainty – a revised understanding of its calculation and use
  5. Review
  6. Substrate-zymography: a still worthwhile method for gelatinases analysis in biological samples
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry
  9. The problem with total error models in establishing performance specifications and a simple remedy
  10. Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept
  11. Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. Using the hazard ratio to evaluate allowable total error in predictive measurands
  14. Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program
  15. Analytical interference by monoclonal immunoglobulins on the direct bilirubin AU Beckman Coulter assay: the benefit of unsuspected diagnosis from spurious results
  16. Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China
  17. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the new Fujirebio Lumipulse®G non-competitive assay for 25(OH)-vitamin D and three immunoassays for 25(OH)D in healthy subjects, osteoporotic patients, third trimester pregnant women, healthy African subjects, hemodialyzed and intensive care patients
  18. Patient-performed extraction of faecal calprotectin
  19. Comparison of the clinical utility of the Elia CTD Screen to indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Sex-related differences in the association of ghrelin levels with obesity in adolescents
  22. Gestation specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in pregnancy
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
  25. Dopamine concentration in blood platelets is elevated in patients with head and neck paragangliomas
  26. Letters to the Editor
  27. Cancer dynamics and the success of cancer screening programs
  28. Mother’s instinct – a rare case of multiple test interferences due to heterophile antibodies
  29. Sigma metric or defects per million opportunities (DPMO): the performance of clinical laboratories should be evaluated by the Sigma metrics at decimal level with DPMOs
  30. A national survey of preanalytical handling of oral glucose tolerance tests in pregnancy
  31. Updating pregnancy diabetes guidelines: is (y)our laboratory ready?
  32. Low serum bilirubin values are associated with pulmonary embolism in a case-control study
  33. Effect of Hb H on HbA1c measurements as measured by IFCC reference method and affinity HPLC
  34. Adipocytes in venipunctures cause falsely elevated S-100B serum values
  35. Earlier detection of sepsis by Candida parapsilosis using three-dimensional cytographic anomalies on the Mindray BC-6800 hematological analyzer
  36. Theranos phenomenon – part 4: Theranos at an International Conference
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0311/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen