Home External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China

  • Xueliang Wang EMAIL logo , Fen Liu , Lingli Jiang , Yun Bao , Yanqun Xiao and Hualiang Wang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 7, 2016

Abstract

Background:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection and genotyping is now being used for cervical screening by a growing number of laboratories in Shanghai, but they may have various levels of proficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of clinical laboratories for HPV DNA detection and genotyping by an external quality assessment (EQA) program.

Methods:

The EQA panels were clinically validated by the Cobas 4800 HPV test, and then distributed to the participating laboratories in May 2015 (round 1) and September 2015 (round 2). Each panel consisted of one negative sample and nine positive cell or clinical samples of HPV16 and HPV18 types at different concentrations. In total, 40 laboratories submitted 18 qualitative and 22 genotyping data sets in round 1 and 44 laboratories submitted 18 qualitative and 26 genotyping data sets in round 2. In both rounds, all laboratories used commercial assays.

Results:

The negative samples were detected correctly in both rounds by all participating laboratories. There were no false-positive results in the qualitative data sets and only two false-positive results in the genotyping data sets in each of round 1 and round 2. The false-negative rates were 8.0% for round 1 and 2.7% for round 2. For the qualitative data sets, almost all of the laboratories (100% for round 1 and 97.8% for round 2) obtained a score of acceptable or better. For the genotyping results, acceptable or better scores were obtained in 81.8% (round 1) and 100% (round 2).

Conclusions:

Our results indicate that the majority of laboratories in Shanghai have reliable diagnostic ability for HPV detection and genotyping. Moreover, this study emphasizes the importance of EQA for monitoring the performance of clinical laboratories.

  1. Author contributions: All authors accept responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approve its submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was funded by a grant from the Joint Research Project for Important Diseases by Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (No. 2013ZYJB0010).

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kroupis C, Vourlidis N. Human papilloma virus (HPV) molecular diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1783–9.10.1515/cclm.2011.685Search in Google Scholar

2. Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Zhao P, Li G, Wu L, et al. Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009. Chin J Cancer Res 2013;25:10–21.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhao FH, Hu SY, Zhang SW, Chen WQ, Qiao YL. Cervical cancer mortality in 2004–2005 and changes during last 30 years in China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010;44:408–12.Search in Google Scholar

4. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:518–27.10.1056/NEJMoa021641Search in Google Scholar

5. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12–9.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar

6. Wu EQ, Liu B, Cui JF, Chen W, Wang JB, Lu L, et al. Prevalence of type-specific human papillomavirus and pap results in Chinese women: a multi-center, population-based cross-sectional study. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:795–803.10.1007/s10552-013-0162-8Search in Google Scholar

7. Heideman DA, Hesselink AT, Berkhof J, van Kemenade F, Melchers WJ, Daalmeijer NF, et al. Clinical validation of the cobas 4800 HPV test for cervical screening purposes. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:3983–5.10.1128/JCM.05552-11Search in Google Scholar

8. Hesselink AT, Heideman DA, Berkhof J, Topal F, Pol RP, Meijer CJ, et al. Comparison of the clinical performance of PapilloCheck human papillomavirus detection with that of the GP5+/6+-PCR-enzyme immunoassay in population-based cervical screening. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:797–801.10.1128/JCM.01743-09Search in Google Scholar

9. Hesselink AT, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Berkhof J, van Kemenade FJ, van der Salm ML, et al. Clinical validation of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay according to the guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for cervical screening. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:2409–10.10.1128/JCM.00633-13Search in Google Scholar

10. Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Boeke AJ, Bulk S, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet 2007;370:1764–72.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0Search in Google Scholar

11. Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr., Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:880–90.10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7Search in Google Scholar

12. Dijkstra MG, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, Meijer CJ. Cervical cancer screening: on the way to a shift from cytology to full molecular screening. Ann Oncol 2014;25:927–35.10.1093/annonc/mdt538Search in Google Scholar

13. Qiao YL, Sellors JW, Eder PS, Bao YP, Lim JM, Zhao FH, et al. A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:929–36.10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70210-9Search in Google Scholar

14. Meijer CJ, Berkhof J, Castle PE, Hesselink AT, Franco EL, Ronco G, et al. Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older. Int J Cancer 2009;124:516–20.10.1002/ijc.24010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Stoler MH, Castle PE, Solomon D, Schiffman M. The expanded use of HPV testing in gynecologic practice per ASCCP-guided management requires the use of well-validated assays. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;127:335–7.10.1309/RNF3C01JKADQCLKPSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Eklund C, Forslund O, Wallin KL, Dillner J. Global improvement in genotyping of human papillomavirus DNA: the 2011 HPV LabNet International Proficiency Study. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52: 449–59.10.1128/JCM.02453-13Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Eklund C, Forslund O, Wallin KL, Zhou T, Dillner J. The 2010 global proficiency study of human papillomavirus genotyping in vaccinology. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:2289–98.10.1128/JCM.00840-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Eklund C, Zhou T, Dillner J. Global proficiency study of human papillomavirus genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:4147–55.10.1128/JCM.00918-10Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Zhang R, Huang J, Wang P, Sun Y, Zhang K, Xie J, et al. Proficiency test for human papillomavirus genotyping in china. Intervirology 2013;56:295–301.10.1159/000351620Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Meissner JD. Nucleotide sequences and further characterization of human papillomavirus DNA present in the CaSki, SiHa and HeLa cervical carcinoma cell lines. J Gen Virol 1999;80:1725–33.10.1099/0022-1317-80-7-1725Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Rao A, Young S, Erlich H, Boyle S, Krevolin M, Sun R, et al. Development and characterization of the cobas human papillomavirus test. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:1478–84.10.1128/JCM.03386-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Fagan EJ, Moore C, Jenkins C, Rossouw A, Cubie HA, James VL. External quality assessment for molecular detection of human papillomaviruses. J Clin Virol 2010;48:251–4.10.1016/j.jcv.2010.05.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Cubie HA, Moore C, Waller M, Moss S. The development of a quality assurance programme for HPV testing within the UK NHS cervical screening LBC/HPV studies. J Clin Virol 2005;33: 287–92.10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission. Conformity assessment: general requirements for proficiency testing. ISO/IEC 17043. 2010.Search in Google Scholar

25. Wilkinson DE, Baylis SA, Padley D, Heath AB, Ferguson M, Pagliusi SR, et al. Establishment of the 1st World Health Organization international standards for human papillomavirus type 16 DNA and type 18 DNA. Int J Cancer 2010;126:2969–83.10.1002/ijc.25039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Stocher M, Berg J. Internal control DNA for PCR assays introduced into lambda phage particles exhibits nuclease resistance. Clin Chem 2004;50:2163–6.10.1373/clinchem.2004.035519Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0293) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2016-4-11
Accepted: 2016-10-5
Published Online: 2016-11-7
Published in Print: 2017-2-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Commutable samples with assigned target concentrations may help us harmonise general chemistry results
  4. Reviews
  5. Performance of point-of-care HbA1c test devices: implications for use in clinical practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Cardiac troponins and mortality in type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Analytical performance of 17 general chemistry analytes across countries and across manufacturers in the INPUtS project of EQA organizers in Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom and Spain
  13. Commutability of proficiency testing material containing tobramycin: a study within the framework of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 project
  14. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts
  15. Extending laboratory automation to the wards: effect of an innovative pneumatic tube system on diagnostic samples and transport time
  16. Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study
  17. An integrated proteomic and peptidomic assessment of the normal human urinome
  18. An alternative inhibition method for determining cross-reactive allergens
  19. Validation of a new assay for α-synuclein detection in cerebrospinal fluid
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Intra-individual variation of plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), betaine and choline over 1 year
  22. Cancer Diagnostics
  23. Predictive performance of TPA testing for recurrent disease during follow-up after curative intent surgery for colorectal carcinoma
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) in severe aortic valve stenosis: association with outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
  26. Association between apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and premature coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
  27. Urinary orosomucoid: a novel, early biomarker of sepsis with promising diagnostic performance
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. CT or MRI
  30. Reply to: CT or MRI in the diagnosis of right lower quadrant abdominal pain?
  31. Quantification of daratumumab in the serum protein electrophoresis
  32. Response to: Interference of daratumumab on the serum protein electrophoresis
  33. Glycated albumin: correlation to HbA1c and preliminary reference interval evaluation
  34. Using “big data” to describe the effect of seasonal variation in thyroid-stimulating hormone
  35. IgE multiple myeloma: a new case report
  36. Therapeutic decision-making process in the intensive care unit: role of biological point-of-care testing
  37. How can we evaluate differences between serial measurements on the same sample? A new approach based on within-subject biological variation
Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0293/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button